POLİS TEŞKİLATININ “İŞKOLİK” ÇALIŞANLARI

Yıl 2010, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1, 56 - 63, 01.01.2010

Murat Günbeyi Tarkan Gündoğdu

Öz

İşkolikler, vaktinin çoğunu iş yerinde veya iş ile ilgili konularda harcayan, iş’e bağımlı kişiler olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Günümüze kadar işkolikliğin hem bireye hem de organizasyona zarar verdiği yönünde yüzlerce akademik çalışma yapılmıştır. İşkoliklik, hiyerarşik yapılanması olan Emniyet Teşkilatı’nda da önemli bir problemdir. İşkolik çalışanlar Türk Polis Teşkilatı’nın verimliliğini düşürdüğü gibi, diğer çalışanların da verimsiz olmasına neden olmaktadırlar. Bu çalışmada işkolikliğin polis teşkilatındaki yansımaları, bunun nedenleri, polis ailelerine, kendilerine ve Emniyet Teşkilatı’na verdiği zararlar ve birtakım çözüm önerileri tartışılmaktadır. Ayrıca, Emniyet Teşkilatı’ndaki işkolikliğin diğer kamu ve özel kurumlardakinden farklı olarak istekdışı oluştuğu ve bunun nedenleri incelenmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

İşkoliklik, Polis, Verimlilik, Aile, Performans

WORKAHOLIC EMPLOYEES OF THE TURKISH NATIONAL POLICE

Öz

Workaholics spend their time mostly with their job-related activities and they are addicted to working. In the literature, there are currently many academic studies about why workaholism and presenteeism are harmful. Workaholism is also a significant problem in the Turkish National Police Organization which has a hierarchical structure. Presenteeism/workaholism is destructive not only for officers but also organization itself. Throughout the study presenteeism/workaholism, its reasons, its negative effects on individuals and organization and some solutions were discussed. Also, it was emphasized that presenteeism/workaholism is differently applied in the Turkish National Police than in other public and private organizations

Anahtar Kelimeler

Presenteeism , Workaholism , Police , Performance , Productivity

Kaynakça

• BITTNER, E. (1970). The functions of the police in modern society. Washington, D.C.:U.S. Government Printing Office.
• BONEBRIGHT, C.A., CLAY, D.L., ANKENMANN, R.D. (2000). The relationship of workaholism with work–life conflict, life satisfaction, and purpose in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, 469–477.ss.
• BURKE, R.J. (1999). It’s not how hard you work but how you work hard: Evaluating workaholism components. International Journal of Stress Management, 6, 225 - 239.ss
• BURKE, R.J. (2000).Workaholism in organizations: psychological and physical well- being consequences. Stress Medicine, 16, 11–16.ss
• BURKE, R.J. (2001). Editorial: Workaholism in organizations. International Journal of Stress Management, 8, 65–68.ss
• CARROLL, J. J., ROBINSON, B. E. (2000). Parentification and depression among adult children of workaholics and adult children of alcoholics. The Family Journal, 8, 360–367.ss
• HAYMON, S. (1993). The relationship of work addiction and depression, anxiety, and anger in college males. DoctoralDissertation, Florida State University, Tallahasse, FL, 1992. Dissertation Abstracts International, 53, 5401-B.
• HEMP, P. (2004). Presenteeism: at work-but out of ıt. Harward Business Review
• GOTTMAN, J., SILVER, N. (1999). The seven principles for making marriage work. New York: Random House.
• ISHIYAMA, F. I., KITAYAMA, A. (1994). Overwork and career-centered self- validation among the Japanese: psychosocial issues and counselling implications. International Journal for the Advancement of Counseling, 17, 167–182. ss
• KOMPIER, M., COOPER, C. (1999). Preventing stress, improving productivity: European case studies in the workplace.London: Routledge
• MACHLOWITZ, M. (1980). Workaholics: living with them, working with them. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
• PEIPERL, M., JONES, B. (2001). Workaholics and overworkers: productivity or
• pathology? Group and Organization Management, 26, 369–393.ss.
• PIETROPINTO, A. (1986). The workaholic spouse. Medical Aspects of Human Sexuality, 20, 89–96.ss.
• PORTER, G. (1996). Organizational impact of workaholism: suggestions for researching the negative outcomes of excessive work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1, 70–84.ss.
• ROBINSON, B. E. (1998). Chained to the desk: a guidebook for workaholics, their
• partners and children, and the clinicians who treat them. New York: New York University Press.
• ROBINSON, B. E., CHASE, N. (2000). High-performing families: causes, consequences, and clinical solutions. Washington, DC: American Counseling Association.
• SAMUEL, R.J., WILSON, L.M. (2007). Is presenteeism hurting your workforce? Employee Benefit Plan Review
• SEYBOLD, K.C., SALOMONE, P.R. (1994). Understanding workaholism: a view of causes and counseling approaches. Journal of Counseling and Development, 73, 4–9.ss.
• SHERIDAN, A. (2004). Chronic presenteeism: the multiple dimensions to men’s absence from part-time work. Gender, Work and Organization, (11), pp. 207- 225.ss.
• SPARKS, K., COOPER, C., FRIED, Y., SHIROM, A. (1997). The effects of hours of work on health: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Occupational and OrganizationalPsychology, 70, 391–408.ss.
• SPENCE, J.T., ROBBINS, A.S. (1992). Workaholism: definition, measurement, and preliminary results. Journal of Personality Assessment, 58, 160–178.ss.
• TOPCHIK, G. (2005). Ghosts in the office. Associations Now
• VAN DER HULST, M., GEURTS, S. (2001). Associations between overtime and psychological health in high and low reward jobs. Work and Stress, 15, 227–240.