YENİ KAMU YÖNETİMİ YAKLAŞIMI İLE YATIRIM DESTEK AJANSLARI: TÜRKİYE YATIRIM DESTEK VE TANITIM AJANSI

Abstract

Bu çalışma neo-liberal yatırım politikalarının bir sonucu olan yatırım destek faaliyetlerini tanımlamakla birlikte Yeni Kamu Yönetimi (YKY) paradigması ile yükselen işletme tipi ajansları incelemektedir. Yazar, yatırım destek ajanslarının operasyonel modelini değerlendirerek ardından Hood'un (1991) YKY değişkenlerine göre Türkiye yatırım destek ajansını analiz etmektedir. Yazar, politik etkiler ile çalışmayı sonuçlandırmaktadır. 

Keywords

• Yeni Kamu Yönetimi,Neoliberal Politikalar,Ajanslaşma

INVESTMENT PROMOTION AGENCIES IN THE NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT PARADIGM: THE INVESTMENT SUPPORT AND PROMOTION AGENCY OF TURKE

Abstract

The article describes investment promotion activities as a result of neoliberal development policies and analyzes concomitant administrative reforms, namely the rise of business like agencies that are part of the New Public Management (NPM) paradigm. The author assesses the operational model of investment promotion agencies and then moves on to analyze Turkey’s investment and promotion agency according to Hood’s (1991) NPM variables. The author concludes with policy implications. 

Keywords

• New Public Management,Neoliberal Policies,Agencies

References

1. Aucoin, P. (1990). Administrative reform in public management: paradigms, principles, paradoxes and pendulums. Governance 3(2), 115-137.
2. Baç Muftuler, M. (2005). Turkey's political reforms and the impact of the European Union. South European Society and Politics 10(1), 17-31.
3. Barzelay, M. (2001). The New Public Management: Improving Research and Policy Dialogue. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA : University of California Press.
4. Blili, S & Sermet, F. (2007). Being in the World: Swiss Made and Global Management. Geneva: Swiss Academic Associated Publishers.
5. Borensztein, E., De Gregorio, J. & Lee, J.W. (1998). How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth?. Journal of International Economics 45(1),115-135.
6. Boston, J., Martin, J., Pallot, J. and Walsh, P. (1996) Public Management: The New Zealand Model. Auckland: Oxford University Press.
7. Campbell, C. &Wilson, G.K. (1995). The End of Whitehall: Death of a Paradigm? Oxford: Blackwell.
8. Cevikbas, R. (2012). New Public Management Approach and Turkey Applications. Journal of Economics and Management Research. 1(2),9-32.

9. Christensen, T. & Lægreid, P. (2007). Transcending New Public Management: The Transformation of Public Sector Reforms. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Company.
10. De Vries, J. (2010). Is New Public Management Really Dead? OECD Journal on Budgeting, 2010 (1), 1-5.
11. Eryilmaz, B. (2004). Kamu Yönetiminde Değişim. In U. Ömürgönülselen & M. K. Öktem (Eds) 2. Kamu Yönetimi Reformu Forumu KAYFOR 2 (pp.50-64). Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi, İİBF Kamu Yönetimi Bölümü,Yayınlayanları.
12. Eshuis, J., Braun, E. & Klijn, E.H. (2013). Place Marketing as Governance Strategy: An Assessment of Obstacles in Place Marketing and Their Effects on Attracting Target Groups. Public Administration Review. 73(3), 507-516.
13. Harding ,T. & Javorcik, B.S. (2011). Roll Out the Red Carpet and They Will Come: Investment Promotion and FDI Inflows. The Economic Journal, 121(557), 1445- 1476.
14. Heper, M. (1992). The Strong State as a Problem for the Consolidation of Democracy Turkey and Germany Compared. Comparative Political Studies, 25(2): 169-194.
15. Heper, M., & Keyman, E. F. (1998). Double‐faced state: political patronage and the consolidation of democracy in Turkey. Middle Eastern Studies, 34(4), 259-277.
16. Homburg, V., Pollitt C., v.Thiel S. (2007). Introduction. In C. Pollitt, V. Homburg , S.Van Thiel (Eds) Public Management in Europe, Adaptation and Alternatives (pp.1-9) . NewYork, NY: Palgrave Macmillian,.
17. Hood,C. (1996). Exploring Variations in Public Management Reform of the 1980s. In H.A. Bekke, J.L. Perry and T.A. Toonen (Eds.), Civil Service Systems in Comparative Perspective (268-287). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
18. Hood, C. (2007). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration 69(1), 3-19.
19. Investment Support and Promotion Agency. (2014). WAIPA headquarters relocating to Istanbul [Press release]. Retrieved from
20. James, O. (2004). Executive agencies and joined-up government in the UK. In C. Pollitt & C.Talbot (Eds.) Unbundled Government: A Critical Analysis of the Global Trend to Agencies, Quangos and Contractualisation (75-93). London: Routledge.
21. Keskin, N.E. (2006).Türkiye’de Kamu Yönetimi Disiplininin ‘Köken’ Sorunu. Amme İdaresi Dergisi 39 (2): 1 - 28
22. Kettl, D. (1996). Introduction. In D.F. Kettl & H.B. Milward (Eds.) The State of Public Management (pp. 1-12). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
23. Kumar, N. & Marg, D. K.K. (2000). Foreign direct investment and technology capabilities in the developing countries: A review. International Journal of Public Administration, 23(5-8): 1253-1268.
24. Loewendahl, H. (2001). A framework for FDI promotion. Transnational Corporations 10(1), 1-42.
25. Loewendahl, H. & Ertugal-Loewendahl, E. (2000). Turkey's Performance in Attracting Foreign Direct Investment: Implications of EU Enlargement. Centre for European Policy Studies.
26. Morisset, J. (2003). Does a country need a promotion agency to attract foreign direct investment? A small analytical model applied to 58 countries. FIAS Policy Research Working Paper 3028. World Bank.
27. Morisset, J., & Andrews-Johnson, K. (2004). The effectiveness of promotion agencies at attracting foreign direct investment (Vol. 16). World Bank Publications OECD (1996) Economic Surveys: Turkey, OECD,Paris
28. Osborne, D. (1993). Reinventing government. Public Productivity & Management Review 16(4), 349-356.
29. O'Toole, L. J. Jr. (1997). Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration. Public Administration Review 57 (1), 45-52.
30. Önis, Z. (2004). Turgut Özal and his economic legacy: Turkish neo-liberalism in critical perspective. Middle Eastern studies, 40(4), 113-134.
31. Özel, M. (2007). Küreselleşme Sürecinde Türk Kamu Yönetimi ve Yeniden Yapılanma. In M.Özel ve V.Eren (Eds.) Devletin Dönüşümü ve Yeni
32. Dönem Kamu Yönetimi (pp. 231–275). Konya: Çizgi Kitabevi.
33. Phelps, N.A., Power, M. & Wanjiru, R. (2008). Communities of Investment Promotion Practice in the Spread of Global Neoliberalism. In: K. England and K. Ward (Eds.) Neoliberalization: States, Networks, Peoples (83-106). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
34. Pollitt, C., Talbot, C. (2004). Unbundled Government: A Critical Analysis of the Global Trend
35. to Agencies Quangos and Contractualisation. New York, NY: Routledge.
36. Pollitt, C., Talbot, C., Caulfield, J. & Smullen, A. (2005). Agencies: How Governments do Things Through Semi-Autonomous Organizations. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan
37. Pollitt, C., Van Thiel, S. & Homburg,V.M.F. (2007). New public management in Europe. Management Online Review, 1-6.
38. Riddle, L., Brinkerhoff, J.M. & Nielsen, T.M. (2008). Partnering to beckon them home: public‐sector innovation for diaspora foreign investment promotion. Public Administration and Development 28(1), 54-66.
39. Sayar, Y. (2014, April 21). Yatırım cekme milli takimi. Dünya. Retrieved from
40. Seidman, H. & Gilmour, R. (1986). Politics, Position, and Power. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
41. Sezen, S. (2011). International versus domestic explanations of administrative reforms: the case of Turkey. International Review of Administrative Sciences 77(2), 322-346.
42. Shaw, I. (1997). Evaluation in Health and Social Care Exploring Lost Dimensions. Evaluation 3(4), 469-480.
43. Simon, H.A. (1947). Administrative Behavior. New York, NY: Free Press.
44. Sözen, S. (2012). Recent Administrative Reforms in Turkey: A Preliminary Assessment. International Journal of Business and Social Science 3(9), 168-173.
45. Sozen, S. & Shaw, I. (2002). The international applicability of “new” public management: lessons from Turkey. International Journal of Public Sector Management 15(6), 475-486.
46. Talbot, C. (2004). Executive agencies: have they improved management in government? Public Money and Management 24(2), 104-112.
47. Taylor, F.W. (1911). The Principles of Scientific Management. New York, NY : 202.
48. The World Bank.(2013). Foreign direct investment [Data] . Retrieved from
49. Wells, .L.T & Wint, A.G. (2000). Marketing a country: Promotion as a Tool for Attracting Foreign Direct Investment. Rev.Ed. FIAS Occasional Paper series: 13.
50. Yesilkagit, K. & Van Thiel, S. (2008). Political influence and bureaucratic autonomy. Public Organization Review 8(2), 137-153.
51. Zanatta, M., Camillo, E., Consoni, F. & Varrichio, P. (2008). Investment Promotion Agencies and the world competition for foreign direct investment: A survey of international frameworks. OECD Global Forum on International Investment.