ENVIRONMENTAL KUZNETS CURVE FOR CARBON EMISSIONS IN BOSNIA & HERZEGOVINA

Abstract

The relationship between environmental quality and economic growth has been empirically modeled through emissions–income relationship so far, and the outcome of most of these studies has been formulated by the so called environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis. According to the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis, the relationship between per-capita GDP and per capita pollutant emissions has a U shape, an inverted-U shape, a N shape and an inverted-N shape. This implies that, economic growth may be profitable for environmental quality. The purpose of this study is to test whether the EKC hypothesis is valid for Bosnia and Herzegovina. Firstly, EKC relationship for CO2 emissions for Bosnia & Herzegovina, over a time period of 1992–2009, has been tested and tried to determine  relationship between CO2 emissions–income. As a result of the analysis EKC hypothesis is rejected and inverted N shaped relationship was found between CO2 emissions–income.

Keywords

• EKC Hypothesis,CO2 Emissions

BOSNA VE HERSEK'DE KARBON EMİSYONLARI İÇİN ÇEVRESEL KUZNETS EĞRİ

Abstract

The relationship between environmental quality and economic growth has been empirically modeled through emissions–income relationship so far, and the outcome of most of these studies has been formulated by the so called environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis. According to the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis, the relationship between per-capita GDP and per capita pollutant emissions has a U shape, an inverted-U shape, a N shape and an inverted-N shape. This implies that, economic growth may be profitable for environmental quality. The purpose of this study is to test whether the EKC hypothesis is valid for Bosnia and Herzegovina. Firstly, EKC relationship for CO2 emissions for Bosnia & Herzegovina, over a time period of 1992–2009, has been tested and tried to determine  relationship between CO2 emissions–income. As a result of the analysis EKC hypothesis is rejected and inverted N shaped relationship was found between CO2 emissions–income.

Keywords

• EKC Hipotezi,CO2 Emisyonları

References

1. Fodha, M., Zaghdoud, O., (2010). Economic growth and pollutant emissions in Tunisia: An empirical analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve. Energy Policy, 38,1150-1156.
2. Grossman, G.M., Krueger, A.B., (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110 (2), 353-377.
3. Huang, W.M., Lee, G.W.M. & Wu, C.C., (2008). GHG emissions, GDP growth and the Kyoto Protocol: A revisit of Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis. Energy Policy, 36, 239-247.
4. Kijima, M., Nishibe K. & Ohyama A., (2010). Economic modeling for the enviromental Kuznets curve: A survey. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 34, 1187-1201.
5. Komen, M.H., Gerking, S. & Folmer, H., (1997). Income and environmental R&D: empirical evidence from oecd countries. Environment and Development Economics, 2 (4), 505-515.
6. Kuznets, S., (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review, 45 (1), 1–28.
7. Ng, Y.-K., Wang, J., (1993). Relative income, aspiration, environmental quality, individual and political myopia: why may the rat-race for material growth be welfare-reducing?. Mathematical Social Sciences, 26 (1), 3-23.
8. Roca, J., (2003). Do individual preferences explain the environmental Kuznets curve?. Ecological Economics, 45 (1), 3-10.

9. Selden, T., Song, D., (1994). Environmental quality and development: is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emis sions?. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27, 147–162.
10. Tisdell C., (2001). Globalisation and sustainability: environmental Kuznets curve and the WTO. Ecologial Economics, 39, 185-196.