PİYASA ETKİNLİĞİ HİPOTEZİ: İMKB İÇİN AMPİRİK BİR ANALİZ

Abstract

The increasing of profit seeking in the stock markets of developing countries has attracted the attention of researhers for the market efficiency. The aim of this study is to test the weak form of market efficiency for the national stock market. In accordance with this purpose, ISE 100 index is analysed for the 1 November 1987 and 30 November 2012 period within the random walk model framework. We employed a unit root test with structural breaks provided by Lanne et al. (2002) and Saikkonen and Lutkepohl (2002). The results indicate the nonstationary of ISE 100 index. Thus, it is seen that the Turkish stock market is efficient

Keywords

• Efficient market hypothesis, Unit Root Tests, Weak Form Efficiency, Structural Break

PİYASA ETKİNLİĞİ HİPOTEZİ: İMKB İÇİN AMPİRİK BİR ANALİZ

Abstract

Gelişmekte olan ülkelerdeki hisse senedi piyasalarında artan kâr arayışları, araştırmacıların piyasaların etkinliğine olan ilgisini artırmıştır. Bu çalışmanın amacı da ulusal hisse senedi piyasasının zayıf formda etkinliğini test etmektir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda rassal yürüyüş modeli çerçevesinde İMKB 100 endeksi 1 Kasım 1987 ile 30 Kasım 2012 dönemi için Lanne vd. (2002) ile Saikkonen ve Lutkepohl (2002) tarafından geliştirilen yapısal kırılmalı birim kök testi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Çalışma sonucunda İMKB 100 endeksinin durağan olmadığı bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır. Böylece Türk hisse senedi piyasasının etkin olduğu görülmektedir

Keywords

• Etkin Piyasa Hipotezi, Birim Kök Testi, Zayıf Formda Etkinlik, Yapısal Kırılma

References

1. AL-JAFARİ, M. K. (2011). “Testing The Weak-Form Efficiency Of Bahrain Securities Market”, International
2. Research Journal Of Finance And Economics, 72 :14-25. AMSLER, C. ve LEE, J. (1995). “An LM Test For A Unit Root İn The Presence Of A Structural Change”.
3. Econometric Theory 11:359–68. ASSAF, A. (2008). “Nonstationarity in Real Exchange Rates Using Unit Root Tests with a Level Shift at Unknown
4. Time”, International Review of Economics and Finance, 17:269-278. BACHELİER, L. (1900). TheIorie de la Speculation, (Paris: Gauthier-Villars, 1900).
5. BALABAN, E. (1995). “Informational Efficiency Of The Istanbul Securities Exchange And Some Rationale For
6. Public Regulation”, The Central Bank Of The Republic Of Turkey, Discussion Paper, No: 9502.
7. BALL, R. (2009). “The Global Financial Crisis And The Efficient Market Hypothesis What Have We Learned?”,
8. Journal Of Applied Corporate Finance, 21(4): 8–16. BİLDİK, R. (2000). “Hisse Senedi Piyasalarında Dönemsellikler Ve İmkb Üzerine Ampirik Bir Çalışma”, İMKB

9. Yayınları, Mart Mat. Sanatlar Ltd. Şti., İstanbul. CHOUDHRY, T. (1994). “Stochastic Trends And Stock Prices: An International Inquiry”. Applied Financial Economics, 4:383-390.
10. DİMSON, E. ve MUSSAVİAN, M. (1998). “A Brief History Of Market Efficiency”, European Financial Management, 4(1):1-14.
11. DUMAN A, Özdemir S., ABİDİN Z. ve ATAN, M. (2009). “Hisse Senedi Piyasasında Zayıf Formda Etkinlik:
12. İMKB Üzerine Ampirik Bir Çalışma”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(2):33-48
13. FAMA, E. ve FRENCH, K. (1988). “Permanent And Temporary Components Of Stock Prices”, Journal Of Political Economy, 96:246–273.
14. FAMA, E (1970). “Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Works”, The Journal of Finance, 25(2):383-417.
15. GRİEB, Ta ve REYES, M. (1999). “Random Walk Tests For Latin American Equity İndexes And İndividual Firms”,
16. Journal Of Financial Research, 22:371–383. HAQUE, A, L., HUNG C. ve NİSA, F. (2011). “Testing The Weak Form Efficiency Of Pakistani Stock Market
17. (2000–2010)”, International Journal Of Economics And Financial Issues, Vol. 1, No. 4, 153-162.
18. HARVEY, D., EYBOURNE, S. ve P. NEWBOLD, (2001). “Innovational Outlier Unit Root Tests with An
19. Endogenously Determined Breaks in Level”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 63: 559-575. KARAN, M. B. (2004). Yatırım Analizi ve Portfoy Yönetimi, Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi
20. KÖSE, A. (1993). “Etkin Pazar Kuramı Ve İmkb’de Etkin Pazar Kuramının Zayıf Şeklini Test Etmeye Yönelik Bir
21. Çalışma-Filtre Kuralı Testi”, İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(2) LANNE, M., LÜTKEPOHL, H. ve SAİKKONEN, P. (2002). “Comparison of Unit Root Tests for Time Series with
22. Level Shifts”, Journal of Time Series Analysis, 23(6):667- 685. LANNE, M., LÜTKEPOHL, H. ve SAİKKONEN, P. (2003). “Test Procedures for Unit Roots in Time Series with
23. Level Shifts at Unknown Time”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 65(1):91-115. LEE,J., STRAZİCİCH, M.C. (2001). “Testing the Null of Stationarity in the Presence of a Structural Break”, Applied
24. Economics Letters, 8: 377–382 LEE, J. ve STRAZİCİCH, M. C. (2003). “Minimum LM Unit Root Test with Two Structural Breaks”, Review of
25. Economics and Statistics, 63:1082-1089.
26. LİU, C., SONG, S. ve ROMİLLEY, P. (1997). “Are Chinese Stock Markets Efficient? A Cointegration and Causality
27. Analysis", Applied Economic Letters, 4: 511–515. LUMSDAİNE, R. L. ve PAPELL, D. H. (1997). “Multiple Trend Breaks and the Unit Root Hypothesis”, Review of
28. Economics and Statistics, 79(2): 212-218. MALKİEL, B. G., (2003). “The Efficient Market Hypothesis And İts Critics”, The Journal Of Economic Perspectives, 17(1): 59-82.
29. MONTAÑÉS, A. ve OLLOQUİ, I., (1999). “Misspecification of the breaking date in segmented trend Variables:
30. Effect on the Unit Root Tests”, Economics Letters, 65, 301-307.9 NARAYAN, P. ve PRASAD, A. (2007). “Mean Reversion İn Stock Prices: New Evidence From Panel Unit Root
31. Tests For Seventeen European Countries”, Economics Bulletin, 3(34): 1-6. NARAYAN, P. ve SMYTH, R. (2004). “Is South Korea’s Stock Market Efficient?”, Applied Economics Letters, 11:707–710.
32. OKUR, M. ve ÇAĞIL, G. (2004). “İMKB’nin Zayıf Formda Etkinliğinin Test Edilmesi”,Geleneksel Finans
33. Sempozyumu ,http://Bsy.Marmara.Edu.Tr/Tr/Sempozyum_Bildirileripdf ÖZDEMİR, Z. A. (2008). “Efficient Market Hypothesis: Evidence From a Small Open Economy”, Applied Economics, 40:633-641.
34. PERRON, P. (1989). “The Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock, and the Unit Root Hypothesis”, Econometrica, 57:1361- 140
35. PERRON, P. (1990). “Testing for a Unit Root in a Time Series with a Changing Mean,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 153-162.
36. PERRON, P. ve VOGELSANG, T.J., (1992). “Testing for a unit root in a time series with a changing mean: corrections and extensions”, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 10:467–470.
37. PERRON, P. ve YABU, T. (2005). “Testing for Shifts in Trend with an Integrated or Sta-tionary Noise Component,”
38. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Economics, Boston University. POTERBA, J. ve SUMMERS, L. (1988). “Mean Reversion İn Stock Prices: Evidence And İmplications”, Journal Of
39. Financial Economics, 22: 27–59. SAİKKONEN, P. ve LUTKEPOHL, H. (2001). “Testing For Unit Roots In Time Series With Level Shifts”,
40. Allgemeines Statistisches Archiv, 85:1–25. SAİKKONEN, P. ve LÜTKEPOHL, H. (2002). “Testing for a Unit Root in a Time Series with a Level Shift at
41. Unknown Time”, Econometric Theory, 18 (2): 313-348. SHİVELY, P. (2003). “The Nonlinear Dynamics Of Stock Prices”, The Quarterly Review Of Economics and Finance, 43: 505–517.
42. TANG, T. C. (2006). “A new approach to examining the sustainability of external imbalances: the case of Japan”,
43. Applied Economics Letters, 13: 287–292 VAİDYANATHAN, R., ve Gali, K. K. (1994). “Efficiency Of The Indian Capital Market”, Indian Journal Of
44. Finance And Research , 5(2):35-38. ZHANG, D., WU, T. C., CHANG, T. ve LEE, C.H. (2012). “Revisiting The Efficient Market Hypothesis for African
45. Countries: Panel SURKSS Test Wıth A Fourier Function”, South African Journal Of Economics , 80(3):287-300. ZİVOT, E., ve ANDREWS, D.W. K. (1992). “Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit- root hypothesis”, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 10: 252−270.