BibTex RIS Cite

TOWARDS LOCAL AND PROTECTIVE TURKISH DISASTER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Year 2007, Issue: 19, - , 20.06.2015

Abstract

The earthquakes have created destructive consequences in every aspect of community life in Turkey for thousands years. Centralized and bureaucratic institutional structure and policies ignoring mitigation phase and mainly focusing on the response and recovery phases of disaster management has been ineffective. The symmetry-shattering effect of the 1999 Marmara and Düzce earthquakes awakened the Turkish public administration. The reforms after the earthquakes significantly improved the response capacity of the system. However, the responsible managers still need to improve the mitigation capacity of the system to diminish the catastrophic effects of disasters to local communities before they occur

References

  • Afet İsleri Genel Müdürlüğü (1998). Kanunlar ve Yönetmelikler.
  • Ankara: Bayındırlık ve İskan Bakanlığı Akdağ, S. Emre, (2002), “Mali Yapı ve Denetim Boyutlarıyla Afet Yönetimi”. http://www.sayistay.gov.tr/yayin/yayinicerik/aras20afetyonetimi.pdf (002005).
  • Axelroad, R. and D. M. Cohen (1999). Harnessing Complexity. New York: Free Press.
  • Balamir, M. (1999). “Reproducing the Fatalist Society: An Evaluation of the Disasters and Development Laws and Regulations in Turkey.” In Emine M.
  • Komut, ed. Urban Settlements and Natural Disasters: Proceedings of UIA Region II Workshop. Ankara, Turkey: Chamber of Architects of Turkey. pp. 96- Balamir, M. (2001a). “Disaster Policies and Social Organization”. Paper presented at the 5th Conference of ESA. “Disaster and Social Crisis Research
  • Network sessions: Deconstructing Disaster Management: Beyond the Command and Control Model”, Chaired by Maureen Fordham, Helsinki, August 28-September 1. Balamir, M. (2001b). “Recent Changes in Turkish Disaster Policy: A Strategic
  • Reorientation”. In P. R. Kleindorfer and M. R. Sertel (eds.), Mitigation and Financing Seismic Risks, Kluwer, pp. 207-234. Barzelay, M. (1992). Breaking Through Bureaucracy: A New Way for
  • Managing in Government. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Comfort, L. K. (1999). Shared Risk: Complex Systems in Seismic Response. Amsterdam: Pergamon.
  • Çorbacıoğlu, S. and N. Kapucu (2005). “A Critical Evaluation of Turkish
  • Disaster Management System”. TODAİE, Turkish Public Administration Annual, Vol. 29-31
  • DPT (Devlet Planlama Teskilatı) (2000). Doğal Afetler Özel İhtisas
  • Komisyonu Raporu (Yayımlanmadı). Erdik, Mustafa (2000), “Report on 1999 Kocaeli and Düzce
  • Earthquakes”www.koeri.bound.edu.tr/depremmuh/Kocaelireport.pdf (002 002). Ergünay, Oktay (1999). “A Perspective of Disaster Management in Turkey:
  • Issues and Prospects”. In Emine M. Komut, ed. Urban Settlements Natural Disasters: Proceedings of UIA Region II Workshop. Turkey: Chamber of Architects of Turkey. pp. 1-10 and Ankara, Gülkan, Polat (2001). “595 sayılı Yapı Denetimi Hakkındaki Kanun
  • Hükmündeki Kararnamenin İptali ve Ardından Gelen 4708 Sayılı
  • Denetimi Kanunu Hakkında Bir Deneme” (Yayımlanmadı) Yapı İstanbul Greater Municipality (2003). Earthquake Master Plan for İstanbul.
  • Prepared by Boğaziçi University, İstanbul Technical University, Middle East Technical University, and Yildiz University. İstanbul: July 7th. JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency) (2004). Türkiye'de Doğal
  • Afetler Konulu Ülke Strateji Raporu. Ankara. Keleş, Ruşen (2004). “Turkish Government Structure from a Disaster
  • Management Perspective”. UNDP. Mileti, D. S. 1999. Disasters by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United Centrals. Washington D.C: Joseph Henry Press.
  • Marion, R. (1999). The Edge of Organization. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
  • Morgan, G. (1997). Images of Organization. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
  • National Earthquake Council Report, (2002), “Deprem Zararlarını Azaltma Ulusal Stratejisi.” (002003)
  • Osborne, D. and T. Gabler (1992). Reinventing Government. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
  • Pfeffer, J. (1992). Managing with Power: Politics and Influence in
  • Organizations. MA: Harvard Business School Press. Platt, R. H. (1999). Disaster and Democracy: The Politics of Extreme Natural
  • Events. Washington, D. C.: Island Press. Possekel, Anja K. (1999). Living with the Unexpected: Linking Disaster
  • Recovery to Sustainable Development. Springer: New York, Heidelberg, Berlin. Sağlık Bakanlığı (2004). Afetlerde Sağlık Organizasyonu Projesi. Ankara: Sağlık Bakanlığı.
  • Schenider. S. K. (1995). Flirting with Disaster: Public Management in Crisis
  • Situations. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe. Scott, W. R. (1992). Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems.
  • Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. TBMM (Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi) (1997). Doğal Afetlerde Can Ve Mal
  • Kaybının En Aza İndirilmesi İçin Alınması Gereken Belirlenmesine İlişkin Meclis Araştırması. Ankara. Tedbirleri TBMM (Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi) (1999). Deprem Araştırma Raporu
  • (Report No: 10/66, 67, 68, 69, 70). Ankara. Turner B. A. and N. F. Pidgeon (1997). Man-made Disasters. 2nd Edition,
  • Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

TOWARDS LOCAL AND PROTECTIVE TURKISH DISASTER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Year 2007, Issue: 19, - , 20.06.2015

Abstract

Depremler binlerce yıldır Türk insanının hayatının her alanında yıkıcı sonuçlar doğurmaktadır. Merkezi, bürokratik kurumsal yapı ve önleyici tedbirleri ihmal edip, kurtarma ve rehabilite aşamalarına ağırlık veren politikalar bugüne kadar etkisiz kalmıştır. Standard kalıpları yıkan 1999 Marmara ve Düzce depremleri Türkiye'nin Kamu Yönetimi sistemi ve anlayışı üzerinde uyandırıcı etki yapmıştır. Depremlerden sonra yapılan reformlar afet yönetiminin kurtarma kapasitesini kayda değer biçimde artırmıştır. Ancak, afet yönetiminden sorumlu karar vericilerin, zarar önleyici çalışmalara ağırlık verip, afet sistemi içerisindeki kurumların kapasitesini artırarak, depremlerin yerel halk üzerindeki felakete varan etkilerini azaltmaları gerekmektedir

References

  • Afet İsleri Genel Müdürlüğü (1998). Kanunlar ve Yönetmelikler.
  • Ankara: Bayındırlık ve İskan Bakanlığı Akdağ, S. Emre, (2002), “Mali Yapı ve Denetim Boyutlarıyla Afet Yönetimi”. http://www.sayistay.gov.tr/yayin/yayinicerik/aras20afetyonetimi.pdf (002005).
  • Axelroad, R. and D. M. Cohen (1999). Harnessing Complexity. New York: Free Press.
  • Balamir, M. (1999). “Reproducing the Fatalist Society: An Evaluation of the Disasters and Development Laws and Regulations in Turkey.” In Emine M.
  • Komut, ed. Urban Settlements and Natural Disasters: Proceedings of UIA Region II Workshop. Ankara, Turkey: Chamber of Architects of Turkey. pp. 96- Balamir, M. (2001a). “Disaster Policies and Social Organization”. Paper presented at the 5th Conference of ESA. “Disaster and Social Crisis Research
  • Network sessions: Deconstructing Disaster Management: Beyond the Command and Control Model”, Chaired by Maureen Fordham, Helsinki, August 28-September 1. Balamir, M. (2001b). “Recent Changes in Turkish Disaster Policy: A Strategic
  • Reorientation”. In P. R. Kleindorfer and M. R. Sertel (eds.), Mitigation and Financing Seismic Risks, Kluwer, pp. 207-234. Barzelay, M. (1992). Breaking Through Bureaucracy: A New Way for
  • Managing in Government. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Comfort, L. K. (1999). Shared Risk: Complex Systems in Seismic Response. Amsterdam: Pergamon.
  • Çorbacıoğlu, S. and N. Kapucu (2005). “A Critical Evaluation of Turkish
  • Disaster Management System”. TODAİE, Turkish Public Administration Annual, Vol. 29-31
  • DPT (Devlet Planlama Teskilatı) (2000). Doğal Afetler Özel İhtisas
  • Komisyonu Raporu (Yayımlanmadı). Erdik, Mustafa (2000), “Report on 1999 Kocaeli and Düzce
  • Earthquakes”www.koeri.bound.edu.tr/depremmuh/Kocaelireport.pdf (002 002). Ergünay, Oktay (1999). “A Perspective of Disaster Management in Turkey:
  • Issues and Prospects”. In Emine M. Komut, ed. Urban Settlements Natural Disasters: Proceedings of UIA Region II Workshop. Turkey: Chamber of Architects of Turkey. pp. 1-10 and Ankara, Gülkan, Polat (2001). “595 sayılı Yapı Denetimi Hakkındaki Kanun
  • Hükmündeki Kararnamenin İptali ve Ardından Gelen 4708 Sayılı
  • Denetimi Kanunu Hakkında Bir Deneme” (Yayımlanmadı) Yapı İstanbul Greater Municipality (2003). Earthquake Master Plan for İstanbul.
  • Prepared by Boğaziçi University, İstanbul Technical University, Middle East Technical University, and Yildiz University. İstanbul: July 7th. JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency) (2004). Türkiye'de Doğal
  • Afetler Konulu Ülke Strateji Raporu. Ankara. Keleş, Ruşen (2004). “Turkish Government Structure from a Disaster
  • Management Perspective”. UNDP. Mileti, D. S. 1999. Disasters by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United Centrals. Washington D.C: Joseph Henry Press.
  • Marion, R. (1999). The Edge of Organization. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
  • Morgan, G. (1997). Images of Organization. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
  • National Earthquake Council Report, (2002), “Deprem Zararlarını Azaltma Ulusal Stratejisi.” (002003)
  • Osborne, D. and T. Gabler (1992). Reinventing Government. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
  • Pfeffer, J. (1992). Managing with Power: Politics and Influence in
  • Organizations. MA: Harvard Business School Press. Platt, R. H. (1999). Disaster and Democracy: The Politics of Extreme Natural
  • Events. Washington, D. C.: Island Press. Possekel, Anja K. (1999). Living with the Unexpected: Linking Disaster
  • Recovery to Sustainable Development. Springer: New York, Heidelberg, Berlin. Sağlık Bakanlığı (2004). Afetlerde Sağlık Organizasyonu Projesi. Ankara: Sağlık Bakanlığı.
  • Schenider. S. K. (1995). Flirting with Disaster: Public Management in Crisis
  • Situations. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe. Scott, W. R. (1992). Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems.
  • Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. TBMM (Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi) (1997). Doğal Afetlerde Can Ve Mal
  • Kaybının En Aza İndirilmesi İçin Alınması Gereken Belirlenmesine İlişkin Meclis Araştırması. Ankara. Tedbirleri TBMM (Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi) (1999). Deprem Araştırma Raporu
  • (Report No: 10/66, 67, 68, 69, 70). Ankara. Turner B. A. and N. F. Pidgeon (1997). Man-made Disasters. 2nd Edition,
  • Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
There are 33 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Süleyman Çelik This is me

Publication Date June 20, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2007 Issue: 19

Cite

APA Çelik, S. (2015). TOWARDS LOCAL AND PROTECTIVE TURKISH DISASTER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi(19).
AMA Çelik S. TOWARDS LOCAL AND PROTECTIVE TURKISH DISASTER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. June 2015;(19).
Chicago Çelik, Süleyman. “TOWARDS LOCAL AND PROTECTIVE TURKISH DISASTER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM”. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, no. 19 (June 2015).
EndNote Çelik S (June 1, 2015) TOWARDS LOCAL AND PROTECTIVE TURKISH DISASTER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 19
IEEE S. Çelik, “TOWARDS LOCAL AND PROTECTIVE TURKISH DISASTER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM”, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, no. 19, June 2015.
ISNAD Çelik, Süleyman. “TOWARDS LOCAL AND PROTECTIVE TURKISH DISASTER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM”. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 19 (June 2015).
JAMA Çelik S. TOWARDS LOCAL AND PROTECTIVE TURKISH DISASTER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2015.
MLA Çelik, Süleyman. “TOWARDS LOCAL AND PROTECTIVE TURKISH DISASTER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM”. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, no. 19, 2015.
Vancouver Çelik S. TOWARDS LOCAL AND PROTECTIVE TURKISH DISASTER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2015(19).

Dergimiz EBSCOhost, ULAKBİM/Sosyal Bilimler Veri Tabanında, SOBİAD ve Türk Eğitim İndeksi'nde yer alan uluslararası hakemli bir dergidir.