BibTex RIS Cite

2001 KRİZİ SONRASINDA TÜRKİYE'DE KENTSEL ALANLARDA KADINLARIN İŞGÜCÜNE KATILIMININ BELİRLEYİCİLERİ

Year 2008, Issue: 22, - , 20.06.2015

Abstract

This study attempts to explore the determinants of the female labour force participation in the urban Turkey. It adopts an approach which emphasises women’s sociodemografic characteristics and their family backrounds. The evidence comes from a Household Budget Survey conducted by the Turkish Statistical Institution for the year 2003. Factors underlying female labor force participation are discussed on the basis of 2 logistic regression models: one for the whole data set and the another for the subset of married women. The findings of the models indicate the importance of marital status, age, education, economical status and the number and age of children as determinants of participation. Odds of participation increases for the unmarried status and decreases with age group. It is much more likely for single women and for younger women to participate in the labour force. University and higher graduates are more willing to participate compared to less educated women. When the income level of household gets worse willingness to participate increases. Willingness to participate is positively affected by the number and also age of children. Therefore, contrary to a common hypothesis in the literature, the role of women as mothers in the household does not affect the participation negatively

References

  • ABRAMO, Lais and VALENZULA, M. Elena (2005). “Women’s Labour
  • Force Participation Rates in Latin America”, International Labour Review, Vol. 144, No.4, pp.369-391. ALBRECHT, James W.-EDIN, P.- UROMAN, Susan B. (2000). “A Cross
  • Country Comparison of Attitudes Towards Mothers Working and their Actual Labor Market Experience” LABOUR, 14 (4), pp.591-608. BECKER, Gary (1965). “A Theory of Allocation of Time”, Economic Journal, 75, pp.493-517.
  • BLAU, Francine D. and WINKLER, Anne E.(1998). The Economics of
  • Women, Men and Work. Third Edition, Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall. BLAU, Francine D. and FERBER, Marianne A. (1986). The Economics of
  • Women, Men and Work. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, 1986
  • BROWNING, Martin (1992). “Children and Household Economic
  • Behavior”, Journal of Economic Literature, Volume:30, Number:3, pp.1434-75.
  • CLEVELAND, G. –GUNDERSON, M. – HYATT, D. (1996). “Child Care
  • Costs and the Employment Decisions of Women: Canadian Evidence”, Canadian Journal of Economics, XXIX, pp.132-151. COHEN, P.N. and BIANCHI, S.M. (1999). “Marriage, Children and Women’s Employment: What Do We Know?” Monthly Labor Review,
  • Bureau of Labor Statistics, Volume:122, No.12, pp.22-31. GLICK, P., and SAHN, D. (2005). “Intertemporal Female Labor Force
  • Behavior in a Developing Country: What Can Learn From a Limited Panel?” Labor Economics, 12, pp.23-45. GÜRSEL, S. ve ULUSOY, V.(1999). “Türkiye’de İşsizlik ve İstihdam, Yapı ve Kredi Yayınları”, Cogito/Ekonomi-87, İstanbul.
  • HAYGHE, Howard V. (1997). ”Development in Women’s Labor Force
  • Participation”, Monthly Labor Review, 120(9), pp.41-46. HECKMAN, James J. (1993). “What Has Been Learned About Labor
  • Supply in the Past Twenty Years”, American Economic Review, 2, pp.116- HUMPHREY, Janet (1988). Women’s Employment in Restructuring
  • America: The Changing Experience of Women in Three Recessions in Jilll Rubery (ed.): Women and Recession. London, Routledge. JAUMOTTE, Florence (2003). “Labour Force Participation of
  • Women: Empirical Evidence on The Role of Policy and Other Determinants in OECD Countries”, OECD Economic Studies, No.37, OECD, Paris, p.55. JUHN, Chinhui and MURPHY, Kevin M. (1997). “Wage Inequality and Family Labor Supply” Journal of Labor Economics, 15(1), pp.72-97.
  • KASNAKOĞLU, Z., ve DAYIOĞLU, M. (19.04.1996). “Türkiye’de
  • Kadının Eğitimi ve İşgücüne Katılımı”, Education and the Labor Market in Turkey: Proceeding of a Seminar Held in Ankara, (Ed. T. Bulutay), DİE, Ankara:.15-22. KING, J.E. (1990). Labour Economics. London: MacMilliain Pub.
  • KILLINGSWORTH, Mark R. (1983). Labor Supply. Cambridge:Cambridge University Pres.
  • KILLINGSWORTH, Mark R. and HECKMAN, James J. (1986). “Female
  • Labor Supply: A Survey”, In Handbook of Labor Economics, Volume: 1, edited by O. Ashenfelter and R. Layerd, New York: Elsevier Science Publisher, pp.130-204. LEE, Kye Woo and CHO, Kisuk (2005). “Female Labour Force
  • Participation During Economic Crises in Argentina and Republic of Korea, International Labour Review, Volume:144, Number:4, pp.423-450. LEHRER, Evelyn L. and NERLOVE, Marc (1984). “A Life-Cycle Analysis of Family Income Distribution”, Economic Inquiry, Volume:22, Number:3, pp.360-74.
  • LUNDBERG, S. (1988). “Labor Supply of Husbands and Wives: A
  • Simultaneous Equations Approaches” The Review of Economics and Statistics, Volume:70, Number:2, pp.224-235. MINCER, J. (1985). “Intercountry Comparisons of Labor Force Trends and of Related Development, An Overwiew”, Journal of Labor Economics, 3(11), Part 2: Trends in Women’s Work, Education and Family Building, pp.1
  • NAKAMURA, A. and NAKAMURA, M. (1994). “Predicting Female Labor
  • Supply: Effects of Children and Recent Work Experience,” The Journal of Human Resources, Volume:29, Number:2, Special Issue: Women’s Work, Wages and Well Being, pp.304-327. ÖZAR, Şemsa ve GÜNLÜK-ŞENESEN, Gülay (1998). “Determinants of female (non-) participation in the urban labour force in Turkey”, METU
  • Studies in Development, Volume:25, Number:2, pp.329-359. ÖZER, Mustafa ve BİÇERLİ, M. Kemal (2003). “Türkiye’de Kadın
  • İşgücünün Panel Veri Analizi”, Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3,1. RIBOUD, Michelle (1985). “An Analysis of Women’s Labor Force
  • Participation in France: Cross Section Estimates and Time Series Evidence”, Journal of Labor Economics, Volume:3, Number:1, pp.177-200. SMITH, James P. and WARD, Michael P. (1985). “Time Series Growth in the Female Labor Force” Journal of Labor Economics, Volume:3, Number:1, pp.59-90.
  • SORRENTINO, C. (1983). “International Comparisons of Labor Force
  • Participation 1960-81”, Monthly Labor Review, Volume:106, Number:2, pp.23-26.
  • TRIEST, R.K. (1990). “The Effect of Income Taxation on Labour Supply in the United States”, The Journal of Human Resources, Volume: 25, Issue 3,
  • Special Issue on Taxation and Labour Supply in Industrial Countries, pp.491-516. TAŞTI E. (1996), İşgücü Arz Fonksiyonları ve Evli Kadınların İşgücüne
  • Katılma Oranını Değerlendirmek için Sınırlı Bağımlı Değişken Teknikleri Üzerine Uygulama, DİE, Yayımlanmamış Uzmanlık Tezi, Ankara. TÜİK, (2003),Hanehalkı Bütçe Anketi Veri Seti.
  • TÜİK, Hanehalkı İşgücü Anketi Sonuçları (1988-2005).
  • TÜSİAD, (2002). Türkiye’de İşgücü Piyasası ve İşsizlik, TÜSİAD Araştırma
  • Raporu, Yayın No: TÜSİAD-T/2002/12-354:48.

2001 KRİZİ SONRASINDA TÜRKİYE'DE KENTSEL ALANLARDA KADINLARIN İŞGÜCÜNE KATILIMININ BELİRLEYİCİLERİ

Year 2008, Issue: 22, - , 20.06.2015

Abstract

Bu çalışmada Türkiye’de kentsel alanlarda kadının işgücüne katılımını etkileyen faktörler ülkemizde yaşanan 2001 finansal krizi sonrasında, 2003 yılı için incelenmiştir. Çalışmada kadınların sosyo-demografik özellikleri ve aile yapılarını dikkate alan bir yaklaşım benimsenmiştir. Kullanılan veriler Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu tarafından hazırlanan 2003 yılı Hanehalkı Bütçe Anketinden elde edilen fert düzeyinde verilerdir. Kadınların işgücüne katılma kararlarını etkileyen faktörlere, tüm kadınlar ve evli kadınlar olmak üzere 2 ayrı lojistik regresyon modeliyle bakılmıştır. Bu modellerden elde edilen bulgular eğitim düzeyinin, ekonomik durumun, çocuk sayısının ve çocuğun yaşının kadınların işgücüne katılmalarında önemli etkenler olduğu yönündedir. Tahmin sonuçları bekar olmanın kadınların işgücüne katılma ihtimalini arttıracağını evli olmanın ise azaltacağını göstermektedir.. Eğitim seviyesi yükseldikçe kadın işgücüne katılım konusunda daha istekli hale gelmektedir. Ailenin ekonomik durumu iyileştiğinde diğer bir deyişle ailenin kullanılabilir yıllık geliri arttığında ve oturulan konutun mülkiyetine sahip olunduğunda, kadın katılım konusunda istekli davranmayacaktır. Hanedeki çocuk sayısının, hatta 7-18, 0-6 yaş aralığında yer alan çocukların varlığının bile kadının işgücü piyasasına katılım ihtimalini arttırdığı tespit edilmiştir. Dolayısıyla, kadınların hane içindeki anne rolleri onların işgücüne katılmalarını olumsuz yönde etkilememektedir

References

  • ABRAMO, Lais and VALENZULA, M. Elena (2005). “Women’s Labour
  • Force Participation Rates in Latin America”, International Labour Review, Vol. 144, No.4, pp.369-391. ALBRECHT, James W.-EDIN, P.- UROMAN, Susan B. (2000). “A Cross
  • Country Comparison of Attitudes Towards Mothers Working and their Actual Labor Market Experience” LABOUR, 14 (4), pp.591-608. BECKER, Gary (1965). “A Theory of Allocation of Time”, Economic Journal, 75, pp.493-517.
  • BLAU, Francine D. and WINKLER, Anne E.(1998). The Economics of
  • Women, Men and Work. Third Edition, Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall. BLAU, Francine D. and FERBER, Marianne A. (1986). The Economics of
  • Women, Men and Work. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, 1986
  • BROWNING, Martin (1992). “Children and Household Economic
  • Behavior”, Journal of Economic Literature, Volume:30, Number:3, pp.1434-75.
  • CLEVELAND, G. –GUNDERSON, M. – HYATT, D. (1996). “Child Care
  • Costs and the Employment Decisions of Women: Canadian Evidence”, Canadian Journal of Economics, XXIX, pp.132-151. COHEN, P.N. and BIANCHI, S.M. (1999). “Marriage, Children and Women’s Employment: What Do We Know?” Monthly Labor Review,
  • Bureau of Labor Statistics, Volume:122, No.12, pp.22-31. GLICK, P., and SAHN, D. (2005). “Intertemporal Female Labor Force
  • Behavior in a Developing Country: What Can Learn From a Limited Panel?” Labor Economics, 12, pp.23-45. GÜRSEL, S. ve ULUSOY, V.(1999). “Türkiye’de İşsizlik ve İstihdam, Yapı ve Kredi Yayınları”, Cogito/Ekonomi-87, İstanbul.
  • HAYGHE, Howard V. (1997). ”Development in Women’s Labor Force
  • Participation”, Monthly Labor Review, 120(9), pp.41-46. HECKMAN, James J. (1993). “What Has Been Learned About Labor
  • Supply in the Past Twenty Years”, American Economic Review, 2, pp.116- HUMPHREY, Janet (1988). Women’s Employment in Restructuring
  • America: The Changing Experience of Women in Three Recessions in Jilll Rubery (ed.): Women and Recession. London, Routledge. JAUMOTTE, Florence (2003). “Labour Force Participation of
  • Women: Empirical Evidence on The Role of Policy and Other Determinants in OECD Countries”, OECD Economic Studies, No.37, OECD, Paris, p.55. JUHN, Chinhui and MURPHY, Kevin M. (1997). “Wage Inequality and Family Labor Supply” Journal of Labor Economics, 15(1), pp.72-97.
  • KASNAKOĞLU, Z., ve DAYIOĞLU, M. (19.04.1996). “Türkiye’de
  • Kadının Eğitimi ve İşgücüne Katılımı”, Education and the Labor Market in Turkey: Proceeding of a Seminar Held in Ankara, (Ed. T. Bulutay), DİE, Ankara:.15-22. KING, J.E. (1990). Labour Economics. London: MacMilliain Pub.
  • KILLINGSWORTH, Mark R. (1983). Labor Supply. Cambridge:Cambridge University Pres.
  • KILLINGSWORTH, Mark R. and HECKMAN, James J. (1986). “Female
  • Labor Supply: A Survey”, In Handbook of Labor Economics, Volume: 1, edited by O. Ashenfelter and R. Layerd, New York: Elsevier Science Publisher, pp.130-204. LEE, Kye Woo and CHO, Kisuk (2005). “Female Labour Force
  • Participation During Economic Crises in Argentina and Republic of Korea, International Labour Review, Volume:144, Number:4, pp.423-450. LEHRER, Evelyn L. and NERLOVE, Marc (1984). “A Life-Cycle Analysis of Family Income Distribution”, Economic Inquiry, Volume:22, Number:3, pp.360-74.
  • LUNDBERG, S. (1988). “Labor Supply of Husbands and Wives: A
  • Simultaneous Equations Approaches” The Review of Economics and Statistics, Volume:70, Number:2, pp.224-235. MINCER, J. (1985). “Intercountry Comparisons of Labor Force Trends and of Related Development, An Overwiew”, Journal of Labor Economics, 3(11), Part 2: Trends in Women’s Work, Education and Family Building, pp.1
  • NAKAMURA, A. and NAKAMURA, M. (1994). “Predicting Female Labor
  • Supply: Effects of Children and Recent Work Experience,” The Journal of Human Resources, Volume:29, Number:2, Special Issue: Women’s Work, Wages and Well Being, pp.304-327. ÖZAR, Şemsa ve GÜNLÜK-ŞENESEN, Gülay (1998). “Determinants of female (non-) participation in the urban labour force in Turkey”, METU
  • Studies in Development, Volume:25, Number:2, pp.329-359. ÖZER, Mustafa ve BİÇERLİ, M. Kemal (2003). “Türkiye’de Kadın
  • İşgücünün Panel Veri Analizi”, Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3,1. RIBOUD, Michelle (1985). “An Analysis of Women’s Labor Force
  • Participation in France: Cross Section Estimates and Time Series Evidence”, Journal of Labor Economics, Volume:3, Number:1, pp.177-200. SMITH, James P. and WARD, Michael P. (1985). “Time Series Growth in the Female Labor Force” Journal of Labor Economics, Volume:3, Number:1, pp.59-90.
  • SORRENTINO, C. (1983). “International Comparisons of Labor Force
  • Participation 1960-81”, Monthly Labor Review, Volume:106, Number:2, pp.23-26.
  • TRIEST, R.K. (1990). “The Effect of Income Taxation on Labour Supply in the United States”, The Journal of Human Resources, Volume: 25, Issue 3,
  • Special Issue on Taxation and Labour Supply in Industrial Countries, pp.491-516. TAŞTI E. (1996), İşgücü Arz Fonksiyonları ve Evli Kadınların İşgücüne
  • Katılma Oranını Değerlendirmek için Sınırlı Bağımlı Değişken Teknikleri Üzerine Uygulama, DİE, Yayımlanmamış Uzmanlık Tezi, Ankara. TÜİK, (2003),Hanehalkı Bütçe Anketi Veri Seti.
  • TÜİK, Hanehalkı İşgücü Anketi Sonuçları (1988-2005).
  • TÜSİAD, (2002). Türkiye’de İşgücü Piyasası ve İşsizlik, TÜSİAD Araştırma
  • Raporu, Yayın No: TÜSİAD-T/2002/12-354:48.
There are 38 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Günsel Doğrul This is me

Publication Date June 20, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2008 Issue: 22

Cite

APA Doğrul, G. (2015). 2001 KRİZİ SONRASINDA TÜRKİYE’DE KENTSEL ALANLARDA KADINLARIN İŞGÜCÜNE KATILIMININ BELİRLEYİCİLERİ. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi(22).
AMA Doğrul G. 2001 KRİZİ SONRASINDA TÜRKİYE’DE KENTSEL ALANLARDA KADINLARIN İŞGÜCÜNE KATILIMININ BELİRLEYİCİLERİ. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. June 2015;(22).
Chicago Doğrul, Günsel. “2001 KRİZİ SONRASINDA TÜRKİYE’DE KENTSEL ALANLARDA KADINLARIN İŞGÜCÜNE KATILIMININ BELİRLEYİCİLERİ”. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, no. 22 (June 2015).
EndNote Doğrul G (June 1, 2015) 2001 KRİZİ SONRASINDA TÜRKİYE’DE KENTSEL ALANLARDA KADINLARIN İŞGÜCÜNE KATILIMININ BELİRLEYİCİLERİ. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 22
IEEE G. Doğrul, “2001 KRİZİ SONRASINDA TÜRKİYE’DE KENTSEL ALANLARDA KADINLARIN İŞGÜCÜNE KATILIMININ BELİRLEYİCİLERİ”, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, no. 22, June 2015.
ISNAD Doğrul, Günsel. “2001 KRİZİ SONRASINDA TÜRKİYE’DE KENTSEL ALANLARDA KADINLARIN İŞGÜCÜNE KATILIMININ BELİRLEYİCİLERİ”. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 22 (June 2015).
JAMA Doğrul G. 2001 KRİZİ SONRASINDA TÜRKİYE’DE KENTSEL ALANLARDA KADINLARIN İŞGÜCÜNE KATILIMININ BELİRLEYİCİLERİ. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2015.
MLA Doğrul, Günsel. “2001 KRİZİ SONRASINDA TÜRKİYE’DE KENTSEL ALANLARDA KADINLARIN İŞGÜCÜNE KATILIMININ BELİRLEYİCİLERİ”. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, no. 22, 2015.
Vancouver Doğrul G. 2001 KRİZİ SONRASINDA TÜRKİYE’DE KENTSEL ALANLARDA KADINLARIN İŞGÜCÜNE KATILIMININ BELİRLEYİCİLERİ. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2015(22).

Dergimiz EBSCOhost, ULAKBİM/Sosyal Bilimler Veri Tabanında, SOBİAD ve Türk Eğitim İndeksi'nde yer alan uluslararası hakemli bir dergidir.