Bir Beton Fabrikasının Çatısına Kurulan Güneş Enerjisi Sisteminin Performans Analizi

Year 2026, Volume: 14 Issue: 2 , 617 - 628 , 19.04.2026

Gökhan Yıldız , Ali Etem Gürel , Muhammed Maraşlı

https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.1729682

https://izlik.org/JA68UE52XH

Abstract

Günümüzde artan enerji maliyetleri ve çevresel kaygılar, sanayi tesislerini sürdürülebilir enerji kaynaklarına yönlendirmektedir. Bu bağlamda, fabrikaların çatılarına kurulan Güneş Enerjisi Santralleri (GES), çevre dostu ve ekonomik bir enerji üretim çözümü sunmaktadır. Çatı GES sistemleri, fabrikaların mevcut çatı alanlarını değerlendirmesine olanak tanırken, elektrik ihtiyacının önemli bir kısmını karşılayarak enerji faturalarında ciddi tasarruf sağlar. Ayrıca karbon salımını azaltarak çevresel sürdürülebilirliğe katkı sunar. Bununla birlikte, sistem kurulumunda çatı yapısının uygunluğu, ilk yatırım maliyeti ve bürokratik süreçler gibi bazı zorluklar da bulunmaktadır. Tüm bu etkenler göz önünde bulundurulduğunda, çatı GES uygulamaları; uzun vadeli ekonomik faydaları, enerji arz güvenliği ve çevresel kazanımları nedeniyle fabrikalar için stratejik bir yatırım haline gelmiştir. Bu çalışmada Türkiye’de Düzce ilinde yer alan bir beton fabrikasının çatısına kurulan GES’in fabrikanın enerji tasarrufu performansı ve çevresel etkilerinin incelenmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Elde edilen sonuçlar, güneş radyasyonunun Düzce yoğun olduğu aylarda GES’ten kullanılan elektriğin şebekeden kullanılan elektriğe göre daha fazladır. Ancak, 8 ay için fabrikada ihtiyaç duyulan enerjinin ortalama %46,02’sı çatıya kurulan GES’ten karşılanmıştır. Ekonomik açıdan, kurulan GES’in kendini amorti etme süresi yaklaşık olarak hesaplanmıştır. Çevresel açıdan, GES kurulumu ile eskiye göre 1100 ton CO2 salınımı azalmıştır. Bu değer, fabrikanın GES kurulmadan önceki haline göre %76 daha az CO2 salınımı anlamına gelmektedir. Sonuç olarak, fabrikanın çatısına yerleştirilen GES’in ekonomik ve çevresel yönlerden oldukça katkı sağladığı görülmektedir.

Keywords

Beton fabrikası , Enerji , Güneş enerjisi santrali , Çevre.

Performance Analysis of a PV Power Plant Installed on the Roof

https://izlik.org/JA68UE52XH

Abstract

Today, increasing energy costs and environmental concerns direct industrial facilities to sustainable energy sources. In this context, PV Power Plants (PVPP) installed on the roofs of factories offer an environmentally friendly and economical energy production solution. Rooftop solar power plants allow factories to utilize their existing rooftop areas, while meeting a significant portion of their electricity needs and providing significant savings on energy bills. It also contributes to environmental sustainability by reducing carbon emissions. However, there are some difficulties in system installation, such as the suitability of the roof structure, initial investment cost and bureaucratic processes. Considering all these factors, rooftop solar power plant applications have become a strategic investment for factories due to their long-term economic benefits, energy supply security and environmental gains. This study aims to investigate the energy saving performance and environmental impacts of a PVPP installed on the roof of a factory in Düzce, Türkiye. The results show that in the months when solar radiation is intense in Düzce, the electricity used from PVPPs is higher than the electricity used from the grid. However, an average of 46.02% of the energy needed in the factory for 8 months was provided by the PVPP installed on the roof. From an economic perspective, the payback period of the installed solar power plant system is calculated as approximately 3 years. From an environmental perspective, with the installation of the PVPP, CO2 emissions have decreased by 1,100 tons compared to the past. This value means that the factory emits 76% less CO2 compared to the factory before the installation of the PVPP. As a result, it is seen that the PVPP placed on the roof of the factory contributes significantly to economic and environmental aspects.

Keywords

Factory , Energy , Solar power plant , Environment

Ethical Statement

This study does not involve human or animal participants. All procedures followed scientific and ethical principles, and all referenced studies are appropriately cited.

Supporting Institution

This research received no external funding.

Thanks

The authors do not wish to acknowledge any individual or institution.

References

• Algarni, S., Tirth, V., Alqahtani, T., Alshehery, S., & Kshirsagar, P. (2023). Contribution of renewable energy sources to the environmental impacts and economic benefits for sustainable development. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 56(2), Article 103098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2023.103098
• Ang, T. Z., Salem, M., Kamarol, M., Das, H. S., Nazari, M. A., & Prabaharan, N. (2022). A comprehensive study of renewable energy sources: Classifications, challenges and suggestions. Energy Strategy Reviews, 43, Article 100939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.100939
• Ayadi, O., Shadid, R., Bani-Abdullah, A., Alrbai, M., Abu-Mualla, M., & Balah, N. (2022). Experimental comparison between Monocrystalline, Polycrystalline, and Thin-film solar systems under sunny climatic conditions. Energy Reports, 8, 218-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.06.121
• Ballif, C., Haug, F. J., Boccard, M., Verlinden, P. J., & Hahn, G. (2022). Status and perspectives of crystalline silicon photovoltaics in research and industry. Nature Reviews Materials, 7(8), 597-616. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-022-00423-2
• Bati, A. S. R., Zhong, Y. L., Burn, P. L., Nazeeruddin, M. K., Shaw, P. E., & Batmunkh, M. (2023). Next-generation applications for integrated perovskite solar cells. Communications Materials, 4(1), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43246-022-00325-4
• Berto, R., Stival, C. A., & Rosato, P. (2018). Enhancing the environmental performance of industrial settlements: An economic evaluation of extensive green roof competitiveness. Building and Environment, 127, 58-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.10.032
• Cabral, D., Kosmadakis, G., & Mathioulakis, E. (2024). Parametric comparison of a CPVT performance evaluation under standard testing procedures-ISO 9806: 2017 and IEC 62108: 2016-for an automated and manual 2-axis tracking solar system stand. Energy Reports, 11, 1242-1255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.12.069
• El Hammoumi, A., Chtita, S., Motahhir, S., & El Ghzizal, A. (2022). Solar PV energy: From material to use, and the most commonly used techniques to maximize the power output of PV systems: A focus on solar trackers and floating solar panels. Energy Reports, 8, 11992-12010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.09.054
• Ellabban, O., Abu-Rub, H., & Blaabjerg, F. (2014). Renewable energy resources: Current status, future prospects and their enabling technology. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39, 748-764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.113
• Erat, S., Telli, A., Ozkendir, O. M., & Demir, B. (2021). Turkey’s energy transition from fossil-based to renewable up to 2030: milestones, challenges and opportunities. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 23(2), 401-412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-020-01949-1
• Erdogdu, E. (2025). The carbon border adjustment mechanism: Opportunities and challenges for non‐EU countries. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, 14(1), Article e70000. https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.70000
• Fratean, A., & Dobra, P. (2018). Control strategies for decreasing energy costs and increasing self-consumption in nearly zero-energy buildings. Sustainable Cities and Society, 39, 459-475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.03.019
• Gholami, H. (2024). A holistic multi-criteria assessment of solar energy utilization on urban surfaces. Energies, 17(21), Article 5328. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17215328
• Holechek, J. L., Geli, H. M. E., Sawalhah, M. N., & Valdez, R. (2022). A global assessment: can renewable energy replace fossil fuels by 2050? Sustainability, 14(8), Article 4792. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084792
• Kabir, E., Kumar, P., Kumar, S., Adelodun, A. A., & Kim, K. H. (2018). Solar energy: Potential and future prospects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, 894-900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.094
• Kannan, N., & Vakeesan, D. (2016). Solar energy for future world: -A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 62, 1092-1105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.022
• Kolamroudi, M. K., Ilkan, M., Egelioglu, F., & Safaei, B. (2022). Maximization of the output power of low concentrating photovoltaic systems by the application of reflecting mirrors. Renewable Energy, 189, 822-835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.031
• Martínez-Calahorro, A. J., Jiménez-Castillo, G., Rus-Casas, C., Gómez-Vidal, P., & Muñoz-Rodríguez, F. J. (2020). Photovoltaic self-consumption in industrial cooling and refrigeration. Electronics, 9(12), Article 2204. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9122204
• Mekhilef, S., Saidur, R., & Safari, A. (2011). A review on solar energy use in industries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(4), 1777-1790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.12.018
• Olabi, A. G., & Abdelkareem, M. A. (2022). Renewable energy and climate change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 158, Article 112111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112111
• Oni, A. M., Mohsin, A. S. M., Rahman, M. M., & Bhuian, M. B. H. (2024). A comprehensive evaluation of solar cell technologies, associated loss mechanisms, and efficiency enhancement strategies for photovoltaic cells. Energy Reports, 11, 3345-3366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2024.03.007
• Panwar, N. L., Kaushik, S. C., & Kothari, S. (2011). Role of renewable energy sources in environmental protection: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(3), 1513-1524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.037
• Parida, B., Iniyan, S., & Goic, R. (2011). A review of solar photovoltaic technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(3), 1625-1636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.032
• Pedrero, J., Hernández, P., & Martínez, Á. (2021). Economic evaluation of PV installations for self-consumption in industrial parks. Energies, 14(3), Article 728. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14030728
• Pfenninger, S., Hawkes, A., & Keirstead, J. (2014). Energy systems modeling for twenty-first century energy challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 33, 74-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.02.003
• Razykov, T. M., Ferekides, C. S., Morel, D., Stefanakos, E., Ullal, H. S., & Upadhyaya, H. M. (2011). Solar photovoltaic electricity: Current status and future prospects. Solar Energy, 85(8), 1580-1608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2010.12.002
• Reddy, V. J., Hariram, N. P., Ghazali, M. F., & Kumarasamy, S. (2024). Pathway to sustainability: An overview of renewable energy integration in building systems. Sustainability, 16(2), Article 638. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020638
• Reich, N. H., Mueller, B., Armbruster, A., Van Sark, W. G. J. H. M., Kiefer, K., & Reise, C. (2012). Performance ratio revisited: is PR> 90% realistic? Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 20(6), 717-726. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.1219
• Shahsavari, A., & Akbari, M. (2018). Potential of solar energy in developing countries for reducing energy-related emissions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 90, 275-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.065
• Shezan, S. A., Julai, S., Kibria, M. A., Ullah, K. R., Saidur, R., Chong, W. T., & Akikur, R. K. (2016). Performance analysis of an off-grid wind-PV (photovoltaic)-diesel-battery hybrid energy system feasible for remote areas. Journal of Cleaner Production, 125, 121-132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.014
• Singh, G. K. (2013). Solar power generation by PV (photovoltaic) technology: A review. Energy, 53, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.02.057
• Singh, B. P., Goyal, S. K., & Kumar, P. (2021). Solar PV cell materials and technologies: Analyzing the recent developments. Materials Today: Proceedings, 43, 2843-2849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.003
• Şirin, C., Goggins, J., & Hajdukiewicz, M. (2023). A review on building-integrated photovoltaic/thermal systems for green buildings. Applied Thermal Engineering, 229, Article 120607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.120607
• Türkiye Elektrik İletim A.Ş. (TEİAŞ). (n.d.). 2023 yılı TEİAŞ Türkiye elektrik üretim iletim istatistikleri. Retrieved April 25, 2025, from https://www.teias.gov.tr/turkiye-elektrik-uretim-iletim-istatistikleri
• Verduci, R., Romano, V., Brunetti, G., Yaghoobi Nia, N., Di Carlo, A., D'Angelo, G., & Ciminelli, C. (2022). Solar energy in space applications: Review and technology perspectives. Advanced Energy Materials, 12(29), Article 2200125. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202200125
• Vlaović, Ž. D., Stepanov, B. L., Anđelković, A. S., Rajs, V. M., Čepić, Z. M., & Tomić, M. A. (2023). Mapping energy sustainability using the kohonen self-organizing maps-case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 412, Article 137351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137351