Research Article

Comparison of Dynamic Characteristics of Prestressed and Reinforced Concrete Beams

Volume: 7 Number: 1 January 31, 2019
EN TR

Comparison of Dynamic Characteristics of Prestressed and Reinforced Concrete Beams

Abstract

To determine the dynamic characteristics of bridges built with prestressed and reinforced concrete beams, the dynamic properties of such beams should be known. Prestressing force is applied to the prestressed concrete (PSC) beam, unlike reinforced concrete (RC) beam. In this study, it is aimed to compare the dynamic properties of PSC and RC beams with the same material, section properties and effective span length. Dynamic properties such as the mode shapes and periods of the PSC and RC beam were determined by means of the formulation found in the literature and a computer program that uses the finite element method. For this study I-beam with 0.90m height and 15m effective span length was selected as an example. The selected beam was considered separately as PSC and RC. In the PSC beam, eight low-relaxation Grade270 prestressing strand with 15mm (0.6 in.) diameter were used, unlike reinforced concrete beams. Three dimensional finite element models (FEM) of PSC and RC beam were constituted using SAP2000 software. At the end of the study, mode shapes and periods of PSC and RC beams obtained from analytical prediction by formulation and numerical by FEM were compared with each other.

Keywords

Prestressed beam,Reinforced beam,Natural frequency,Mode shapes,Prestressing force

References

  1. [1] S. Ates, B. Atmaca, E. Yildiri, and N. A. Demiroz, “Effects of soil-structure interaction on construction stage analysis of highway bridges.” Computers and Concrete, vol. 12, no. 2, pp.169-186, 2013.
  2. [2] F. Ubertini, A. L. Materazzi, A. D’Alessandro and S. Laflamme, “Natural frequencies identification of a reinforced concrete beam using carbon nanotube cement-based sensors” Engineering Structures, no. 60, pp. 265-275, 2014.
  3. [3] F. Magalhes, A. Cunha and E. Caetano, “Vibration based structural health monitoring of an arch bridge: from automated oma to damage detection.” Mech Syst Signal Process, no. 28, pp. 212–28, 2012.
  4. [4] F.S. Tse, I. E. Morse and R.T. Hinkle Mechanical vibrations: theory and applications, 2rd ed., Boston, USA: Allyn and Bacon series in mechanical engineering and applied mechanics, 1978.
  5. [5] M. Saiidi, B. Douglas and S. Feng, “Prestress force effect on vibration frequency of concrete bridges”, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 120, no. 7, pp. 2233–2241, 1994.
  6. [6] T. H. T. Chan and T. H. Yung, “A theoretical study of force identification using prestressed concrete bridges” Engineering Structures, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 1529–1537, 2000.
  7. [7] N. F. Grace and B. Ross, “Dynamic characteristic of post-tensioned girders with web openings,” J. Structural Engineering, vol. 122, no. 6, pp. 643-650, 1996.
  8. [8] A. Miyamoto, K. Tei, H. Nakamura, and J.W. Bull, “Behavior of prestressed beam strengthened with external tendons”, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 126, no. 9, pp. 1033–1044, 2000.
  9. [9] Timoshenko, S., Young, D.H., Weaver, W.J.R., Vibration Problems in Engineering, New York, USA: Wiley, 1974.
  10. [10] G. Deak, “Prestress force effect on vibration frequency of concrete bridges discussion”, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 122, no. 4, pp. 458–459, 1996.
APA
Atmaca, B. (2019). Comparison of Dynamic Characteristics of Prestressed and Reinforced Concrete Beams. Duzce University Journal of Science and Technology, 7(1), 37-44. https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.421496
AMA
1.Atmaca B. Comparison of Dynamic Characteristics of Prestressed and Reinforced Concrete Beams. DUBİTED. 2019;7(1):37-44. doi:10.29130/dubited.421496
Chicago
Atmaca, Barbaros. 2019. “Comparison of Dynamic Characteristics of Prestressed and Reinforced Concrete Beams”. Duzce University Journal of Science and Technology 7 (1): 37-44. https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.421496.
EndNote
Atmaca B (January 1, 2019) Comparison of Dynamic Characteristics of Prestressed and Reinforced Concrete Beams. Duzce University Journal of Science and Technology 7 1 37–44.
IEEE
[1]B. Atmaca, “Comparison of Dynamic Characteristics of Prestressed and Reinforced Concrete Beams”, DUBİTED, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 37–44, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.29130/dubited.421496.
ISNAD
Atmaca, Barbaros. “Comparison of Dynamic Characteristics of Prestressed and Reinforced Concrete Beams”. Duzce University Journal of Science and Technology 7/1 (January 1, 2019): 37-44. https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.421496.
JAMA
1.Atmaca B. Comparison of Dynamic Characteristics of Prestressed and Reinforced Concrete Beams. DUBİTED. 2019;7:37–44.
MLA
Atmaca, Barbaros. “Comparison of Dynamic Characteristics of Prestressed and Reinforced Concrete Beams”. Duzce University Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 7, no. 1, Jan. 2019, pp. 37-44, doi:10.29130/dubited.421496.
Vancouver
1.Barbaros Atmaca. Comparison of Dynamic Characteristics of Prestressed and Reinforced Concrete Beams. DUBİTED. 2019 Jan. 1;7(1):37-44. doi:10.29130/dubited.421496