Abstract
Ağır
ve havaleli yüklerin taşınması süreçlerini de kapsayan proje lojistiği son
derece hassas operasyonlardan oluşan lojistik bir faaliyettir. Kriterlerin ve
karar noktalarının çok sayıda olması treyler seçimini son derece
zorlaştırmaktadır. Seçime ilişkin süreçler etki eden faktörlerin ve
değişkenlerin çok sayıda olması treyler seçimine ilişkin süreçlerde çok
kriterli karar alma metodolojilerinin uygulanmasını iyi bir seçenek haline
getirebilmektedir. Bu çalışmada çok kriterli karar alma yöntemlerinden birisi
olan analitik hiyerarşi prosesi kullanılmıştır. Bu çalışma proje lojistiği ve
ağır taşımacılık faaliyetlerinde kullanılacak treylerlerin seçimi ile ilgili
olarak karar vericilerin hangi kriterlere daha fazla önem verdiklerinin yanı
sıra, karar alternatifleri arasından yapacakları tercihlerin daha optimal ve rasyonel
bir tercih olabileceğini sayısal bir perspektife tanımlamaya çalışmaktadır.
References
- Referans1 Görçün, Ö.F, “Simulation and Planning Project Logistics Operations: A Case Study of Transportation Operation of Autoclave from Petkim Port to Gördes Building Site” 4th International Conference on Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering, Valenciennes, France, 2018, ss. 28-32.
- Referans2 Ecer, F. Küçük, O, “Tedarikçi Seçiminde Analitik Hiyerarşi Yöntemi ve Bir Uygulama,” Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, c. 11, s.1, ss. 355-369, 2010.
- Referans3 Özyörük, B. Özcan, E, “Analitik Hiyerarşi Sürecinin Tedarikçi Seçiminde Uygulanması: Otomotiv Sektöründen Bir Örnek,” Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, c.13, s.1, ss.133-144, 2008.
- Referans4 Ghasem, A. Ehsan, A, “Prioritizing of Marketing Mix Elements Effects on Patients’ Tendency to the Hospital Using Analytic Hierarchy Process,” International Journal of Healthcare Management, c.10, s.1, ss. 34-41, 2017.
- Referans5 Kamaruzzaman, S. N. Lou, E. C. W. Wong, P. F. Wood, R.; Che-Ani, A. I, “Developing Weighting System for Refurbishment Building Assessment Scheme in Malaysia Through Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Approach,” Energy Policy, c.112, ss.280-290, 2018.
- Referans6 Ammarapala, V. Chinda, T. Pongsayaporn, P. Ratanachot, W. Punthutaecha, K. Janmonta K, “Cross-Border Shipment Route Selection Utilizing Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method,” Songklanakar in Journal of Science & Technology, c.40, s.1, ss. 31-37, 2018.
- Referans7 Starkowski, D, “Choosing a Semi-Trailer – a Systematic Analysis,” Technical Transactions, c.1, ss.71-85, 2018.
- Referans8 Öcalır, E, Using Decision Support Systems for Transport Planning Efficiency. Hershey, USA: IGI Global Publications, ss. 205-206.
- Referans9 Saaty, T.L., “Axiomatic Foundation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process,” Management Science, c.32, ss.841–855, 1986.
- Referans10 Saaty, T.L, “Decision-Making with The AHP: Why is the Principal Eigenvector Necessary,” European Journal of Operational Research, 145, 85–91, 2003.
- Referans11 Saaty, T. L, Fundamentals of Decision-Making and Priority Theory with the AHP. Pittsburg, PA, USA: RWS Publications, 1994, ss.201-217.
- Referans12 Wang, G. Huang S. H. Dismukes J. P, “Product-Driven Supply Chain Selection Using Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methodology,” International Journal of Production Economics, c.91 s.1, ss.1-15, 2004.
Abstract
The
project logistics that include transportation of heavy and bulky cargoes is a
logistics activity that consists of extremely sensitive operations. Trailer
selection can be extremely difficult because of there are too many factors,
criteria, and decision alternatives in the selection processes. Therefore,
utilization of the multi-criteria decision-making methods can be a good option
in order to solve these kinds of problems. In this study, the Analytic
Hierarchy Process (AHP) which is one of the methods of multi-criteria
decision-making was used. It tried to examine which criteria are more important
compared to others, according to project logistics companies in a trailer
selection process. In addition to that, selection criteria and alternatives
relating the decisions were also evaluated in the framework of quantitative
basis.
References
- Referans1 Görçün, Ö.F, “Simulation and Planning Project Logistics Operations: A Case Study of Transportation Operation of Autoclave from Petkim Port to Gördes Building Site” 4th International Conference on Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering, Valenciennes, France, 2018, ss. 28-32.
- Referans2 Ecer, F. Küçük, O, “Tedarikçi Seçiminde Analitik Hiyerarşi Yöntemi ve Bir Uygulama,” Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, c. 11, s.1, ss. 355-369, 2010.
- Referans3 Özyörük, B. Özcan, E, “Analitik Hiyerarşi Sürecinin Tedarikçi Seçiminde Uygulanması: Otomotiv Sektöründen Bir Örnek,” Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, c.13, s.1, ss.133-144, 2008.
- Referans4 Ghasem, A. Ehsan, A, “Prioritizing of Marketing Mix Elements Effects on Patients’ Tendency to the Hospital Using Analytic Hierarchy Process,” International Journal of Healthcare Management, c.10, s.1, ss. 34-41, 2017.
- Referans5 Kamaruzzaman, S. N. Lou, E. C. W. Wong, P. F. Wood, R.; Che-Ani, A. I, “Developing Weighting System for Refurbishment Building Assessment Scheme in Malaysia Through Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Approach,” Energy Policy, c.112, ss.280-290, 2018.
- Referans6 Ammarapala, V. Chinda, T. Pongsayaporn, P. Ratanachot, W. Punthutaecha, K. Janmonta K, “Cross-Border Shipment Route Selection Utilizing Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method,” Songklanakar in Journal of Science & Technology, c.40, s.1, ss. 31-37, 2018.
- Referans7 Starkowski, D, “Choosing a Semi-Trailer – a Systematic Analysis,” Technical Transactions, c.1, ss.71-85, 2018.
- Referans8 Öcalır, E, Using Decision Support Systems for Transport Planning Efficiency. Hershey, USA: IGI Global Publications, ss. 205-206.
- Referans9 Saaty, T.L., “Axiomatic Foundation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process,” Management Science, c.32, ss.841–855, 1986.
- Referans10 Saaty, T.L, “Decision-Making with The AHP: Why is the Principal Eigenvector Necessary,” European Journal of Operational Research, 145, 85–91, 2003.
- Referans11 Saaty, T. L, Fundamentals of Decision-Making and Priority Theory with the AHP. Pittsburg, PA, USA: RWS Publications, 1994, ss.201-217.
- Referans12 Wang, G. Huang S. H. Dismukes J. P, “Product-Driven Supply Chain Selection Using Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methodology,” International Journal of Production Economics, c.91 s.1, ss.1-15, 2004.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Engineering |
| Journal Section | Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | January 31, 2019 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2019 |