Evaluation of Indoor Plant Preferences in Hotels within the Scope of Planting Design Principles and Determination of Maintanence Possibilities: The Case of Antalya

Year 2021, , 957 - 970, 25.04.2021

Ceren Selim

https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.872113

Cited By: 2

Abstract

In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the plant species preferences in the interiors of five-star hotels in Antalya in terms of plant design criteria and to determine the maintenance practices. In this context, indoor plants preferences, functions, maintenance practices were evaluated in terms of plant design elements and principles in twenty five-star hotels which were located in Turkey's most important tourism district of Antalya province coastal zone. According to the findings, economic concerns and maintenance difficulties have shown that low-maintenance and economical plants are generally chosen in the selection of indoor plants preferred in hotels. In addition, it has been understood that while plants find a place in planting designs due to their aesthetic features and their emphasis functions, the functions of improving air quality, contributing positively to human psychology, increasing work efficiency, restricting, directing functions were ignored.

Keywords

Indoor plants, ornamental plants, hotels, planting design, landscape maintanence

Otellerde İç Mekân Bitki Tercihlerinin Bitkisel Tasarım İlkeleri Kapsamında Değerlendirilmesi ve Bakım Olanaklarının Belirlenmesi: Antalya Örneği

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, Antalya ilinde yer alan beş yıldızlı otellerin iç mekânlarında kullanılan bitki türü tercihlerinin, bitkisel tasarım kriterleri açısından değerlendirilmesi ve bakım uygulamalarının belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu kapsamda Türkiye’nin en önemli turizm destinasyonlarının başında gelen Antalya İlinde bulunan yirmi otelde yer alan iç mekan bitkileri, yerinde yapılan gözlemler ve sorumlu departmanlarla yapılan görüşmeler ile işlevleri, bakım uygulamaları, bitkisel tasarım öğeleri ve ilkeleri açısından değerlendirilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, ekonomik kaygılar ve bakım zorluklarından dolayı tercih edilen iç mekan bitkisi seçiminde genellikle az bakım isteyen ve ekonomik bitkilerin seçildiğini göstermiştir. Ayrıca bitkilerin estetik özelikleri ve vurgu yapma işlevleri nedeniyle bitkisel tasarımlarda yer bulurken, hava kalitesini iyileştirme, insan psikolojisine olumlu katkı sağlama, iş verimini artırma, sınırlama ve yönlendirme işlevlerinin nispeten ön plana çıkmadığı belirlenmiştir.

Keywords

iç mekan bitkileri, süs bitkileri, otel, bitkisel tasarım, peyzaj bakımı

References

• [1] C. Brod, Technostress: The Human Cost of The Computer Revolution, Reading, USA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1984.
• [2] M. S. Lee, J. Lee, B. J. Park and Y. Miyazaki, “Interaction with indoor plants may reduce psychological and physiological stress by suppressing autonomic nervous system activity in young adults: A randomized crossover study,” Journal of physiological anthropology, vol. 34, no. 21, pp. 1–6, 2015.
• [3] G. H. Manaker, Interior Plantscapes: Installation, Maintenance, and Management, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1996.
• [4] T. Bringslimark, T. Hartig and G.G. Patil, “The psychological benefits of indoor plants: A critical review of the experimental literature,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 422–433, 2009.
• [5] C. Selim, İ. Akgün ve R. Olgun, “Ofislerde kullanılan iç mekân bitki tercihlerinin, bakım olanaklarının ve hava kalitesi üzerine etkilerinin değerlendirilmesi: Akdeniz Üniversitesi örneği,” Türk Tarım-Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, c. 8, s. 3, ss. 702–715, 2020.
• [6] Ö.L. Çorbacı, D. Duran Gökalp ve P. Göker, “İç mekânda bitkilerle tasarımda ışığın önemi,” Eğitim Odağında Artvin Sempozyumu, Artvin, Türkiye, 2012, ss. 211-222.
• [7] H. Çelem, M. Arslan, İç Mekân Bitkileri, Ankara, Türkiye: Tagey Yayıncılık, 1995.
• [8] I. Sezen, B. Aytatlı, R. Ağrılı ve E. Patan, “İç mekân tasarımında bitki kullanımının birey ve mekân üzerine etkileri,” ATA Planlama ve Tasarım Dergisi, c. 1, s.1, ss. 25-34, 2017.
• [9] L. Deng, Q. Deng, “The basic roles of indoor plants in human health and comfort,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 25, pp. 36087–36101, 2018.
• [10] G. P. Bot, “Developments in indoor sustainable plant production with emphasis on energy saving,” Comput. Electron. Agric. vol 30, pp. 151–165, 2001.
• [11] J. Messinger, G. Renger, “Photosynthetic water splitting,” in Primary Processes of Photosynthesis, Part 2: Principles and Apparatus, Cambridge, UK: RSC Publishing, 2008, pp. 291–351.
• [12] X. Yan, H. Wang, Z. Hou, S. Wang, D. Zhang, Q. Xu and T. Tokola, “Spatial analysis of the ecological effects of negative air ions in urban vegetated areas: A case study in Maiji, China,” Urban For Urban Green, vol. 14, pp. 636–645, 2015.
• [13] A. R. Khan, A. Younis, A. Riaz and M. M. Abbas, “Effect of interior plantscaping on indoor academic environment,” Journal of Agriculture Research, vol. 43, pp. 235–242, 2005.
• [14] F. Korte, G. Kvesitadze, D. Ugrekhelidze, M. Gordeziani, G. Khatisashvili, O. Buadze and G. Zaalishvili, “Organic toxicants and plants,” Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., vol. 47, no.1, pp. 1–26, 2000.
• [15] B. Guieysse, C. Hort, V. Platel, R. Munoz, M. Ondarts and S. Revah, “Biological treatment of indoor air for VOC removal: potential and challenges,” Biotechnology Advances, vol. 26, pp. 398–410, 2008.
• [16] B. C. Wolverton, A. Johnson and K. Bounds. (1989, September 15). Interior landscape plants for indoor air pollution abatement [Online]. Available: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19930073077/downloads/19930073077.pdf.
• [17] G. A. Beattie, J. R. Seibel, “Uptake and localization of gaseous phenol and p-cresol in plant leaves,” Chemosphere, vol. 68, pp. 528–536, 2007.
• [18] R. L. Orwel, R. L. Wood, J. Tarran, F. Torpy and M. D. Burchett, “Removal of benzene by the indoor plant/substrate microcosm and implications for air quality,” Water Air Soil Pollut., vol. 157, pp. 193–207, 2004.
• [19] Y. J. Liu, Y. J. Mu, Y. G. Zhu, H. Ding and N. C. Arens, “Which ornamental plant species effectively remove benzene from indoor air?,” Atmos. Environ., vol. 41, pp. 650–654, 2007.
• [20] H. Şevik, M. Çetin ve K. Işınkaralar, “Bazı iç mekân süs bitkilerinin kapalı mekânlarda karbondioksit miktarına etkisi,” Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, c. 4, ss. 493–500, 2016.
• [21] L. Pastore, R. Corrao and P. K. Heiselberg, “The effects of vegetation on indoor thermal comfort: The application of a multi-scale simulation methodology on residential neighborhood renovation case study,” Interdisciplinary Energy and Buildings, vol. 146, pp. 1–11, 2017.
• [22] K. Dijkstra, M. E. Pieterse and A. Pruyn, “Stress reducing effects of indoor plants in the built healthcare environment: The mediating role of perceived attractiveness,” Preventive Medicine, vol. 47, pp. 279–283, 2008.
• [23] T. Fjeld, B. Veiersted, L. Sandvik, G. Riise and F. Levy, “The effect of indoor foliage plants on health and discomfort symptoms among office workers,” Indoor Built Environ., vol. 7, pp. 204–209, 1998.
• [24] K. T. Han, “Influence of limitedly visible leafy indoor plants on the psychology, behavior and health of students at a junior high school in Taiwan,” Environ. Behav., vol. 41, pp. 658–692, 2009.
• [25] Z. Xu, L. Wang and H. Hou, “Formaldehyde removal by potted plant–soil systems,” J. Hazard Mater., vol. 192, pp. 314–318, 2011.
• [26] C. A. Shoemaker, P. D. Relf and V. I. Lohr, “Social science methodologies for studying individuals’ responses in human issues in horticulture research,” HortTechnology, vol. 10, pp. 87–93, 2010.
• [27] R.K. Ranaas, K. Horgen Evensen, D. Rich, G. Sjøstrøm, G. Patil, “Benefits of indoor plants on attention capacity in an office setting,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 31, pp. 99–105, 2011.
• [28] T. Fjeld, “The effect of interior planting on health and discomfort among workers and school children,” HortTechnology, vol. 10, pp. 46–52, 2000.
• [29] V. I. Lohr, C. H. Pearson-Mims, “Physical discomfort may be reduced in the presence of interior plants,” HortTechnology, vol. 10, pp. 53–58, 2000.
• [30] S. Shibata, N. Suzuki, “Effects of indoor foliage plants on subjects’ recovery from mental fatigue,” Journal of Psychology, vol. 3, pp. 385–396, 2001.
• [31] S. Shibata, N. Suzuki, “Effects of the foliage plant on task performance and mood,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 22, pp. 265–272, 2002.
• [32] E. Kim, R. H. Mattson, “Stress recovery effects of viewing red-flowering geraniums,” Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture, vol. 13, pp. 4–12, 2002.
• [33] M. Liu, E. Kim and R. H. Mattson, “Physiological and emotional influences of cut flower arrangement and lavender fragrance on university students,” Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture, vol. 14, pp. 18–27, 2003.
• [34] S. Shibata, N. Suzuki, “Effects of an indoor plant on creative task performance and mood,” Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, vol. 45, pp. 373–381, 2004.
• [35] S. H. Park, R. H. Mattson and E. Kim, “Pain tolerance effects of ornamental plants in a simulated hospital patient room,” Acta Horticulturae, vol. 639, pp. 241–247, 2004.
• [36] S. H. Park, R. H. Mattson, “Therapeutic influences of plants in hospital rooms on surgical recovery,” HortScience, vol. 44, pp. 1–4, 2009.
• [37] S. H. Park, R. H. Mattson, “Effects of flowering and foliage plants in hospital rooms on patients recovering from abdominal surgery,” HortTechnology, vol. 18, pp. 563–568, 2008.
• [38] A. Esentürk, Ö. Yerli, “Peyzaj tasarımında yeni bir bitki yetiştirme sanatı: Kokedama,” Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, c. 7, ss. 1858–1866, 2019.
• [39] Z. Dilaver. (2019, 24 Nisan). İç mekân bitkileri ve tasarımı [Online]. Available: https://acikders.ankara.edu.tr/course/view.php?id=5473,%202019.
• [40] A. Ulus, “Bazı iç mekân bitkilerinin kullanım tekniği üzerine çalışmalar,” İstanbul Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 56, s. 2, ss. 146–161, 2006.
• [41] N. Oral, İç Mekân Süs Bitkileri Özelikleri, Üretimi ve Bakımı, Yalova, Türkiye: Tarımsal Araştırmaları Destekleme ve Geliştirme Vakfı, 1987.