Computational Approaches in 21st Century Architectural Design: Defining Digital Representation Methods

Year 2022, , 1201 - 1217, 31.07.2022

Emre Kuruçay , İlker Karadağ

https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.900770

Cited By: 3

Abstract

The studies on design and design methods increased towards the end of the twentieth century in industrialized societies, however, the act of design started to be carried out with different auxiliary tools. The digital and algorithmic structure behind the computer has begun to provide the designer with different possibilities outside of the traditional drawing environment. After this period, the queries and discussions on the content of the design, its components, the intellectual process of the designer, and similar issues gradually increased. Within this scope, new theories and methods have emerged. In today's design, especially with digital technologies, transformations in theory and practice in the design process have brought new methods with them. Architects and designers have now become design tool developers rather than using use of the design tool. Based on this, the assistive tools that determine the current architectural design style is aimed to be explored in this paper. The study contributes to the field by (i) exploring these tools and their latent features, (ii) assessing the pros and cons of these tools, and (iii) last, implementing these design tools on the case studies. 

Keywords

Computational design, Design process, Digital technologies, Form, Representation

21. Yüzyıl Mimari Tasarımında Hesaplamalı Yaklaşımlar: Sayısal Temsil Yöntemlerinin Tanımlanması

Abstract

Yirminci yüzyılın sonlarına doğru sanayileşmiş toplumlarda tasarım ve tasarım yöntemleri ile ilgili çalışmalardaki artış, yardımcı araçlarla tasarım yapma yönündeki eğilimi artırmıştır. Dijital ve matematiksel yapısı sayesinde bilgisayar ortamının tasarımcıya geleneksel yöntemlere göre çeşitli kolaylıklar sunmasının yanında ilham verici farklı olanaklar da ortaya koyabilmesi, bu eğilimi daha cazip hale getirmiştir. Bununla birlikte tasarımcının düşünsel süreci, tasarım ve tasarımın bileşenleri konularındaki sorgulamalar giderek artmış, bu kapsamda yeni teoriler ve yaklaşımlar ortaya çıkmıştır. Günümüz tasarlaması tasarım süreçleri bağlamında, özellikle dijital teknolojilerle birlikte, teori ve pratikteki dönüşümler, beraberinde yeni yöntemler ve açılımlar getirmiştir. Mimarlar ve tasarımcılar, tasarım araçlarını kullanmaktan ziyade tasarım aracı geliştirmek konusunda kendilerini geliştirmektedir. Bundan yola çıkarak makalede, mevcut mimari tasarım stilini belirleyen yardımcı araçların incelenmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Çalışma, (i) bu araçları ve bunların tam olarak netleşmemiş ya da fark edilmemiş özelliklerini keşfederek, (ii) araçların olumlu ya da olumsuz yanlarının değerlendirilmesi ve (iii) son olarak bu tasarım araçlarının vaka çalışmalarında uygulanarak alana katkıda bulunması amacıyla bir ön çalışma olmayı hedeflemektedir.

Keywords

Biçim, Dijital teknolojiler, Hesaplamalı tasarım, Tasarım süreci, Temsil

References

• [1] M. Asimow, Introduction to design, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1962.
• [2]M. Gür and Şen E., “Transformation of bio-pattern to poly-pattern as a basic design studio experience,” Uluslararası Hakemli Tasarım ve Mimarlık Dergisi, vol.16, pp. 23-51, 2019.
• [3]A. Newell and H. A. Simon, Human problem solving, Brattleboro: Echo Point Books & Media, LLC, 2019.
• [4]Ö. Akin, Psychology of architectural design, London: Pion, 1989.
• [5]R. D. Coyne, M. A. Rosenman, and A. D. Radford, Knowledge-based design systems, Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley, 1990.
• [6]B. Lawson, How designers think, 4rd ed, Architectural Press, 2006.
• [7]A. Menges and S. Ahlquist, “Computational design thinking,” Computational design thinking, Chichester, United Kingdom: Wiley, a John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Publication, pp. 10-30, 2011.
• [8]R. Oxman, “Theory and design in the first digital age,” Design Studies, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 229–265, 2006.
• [9]C. Bovill, “The Fractal Dimension,” Fractal geometry in architecture and design, Birkhauser, pp. 23-46, 1996.
• [10]O. Z. Güzelci, S. Alaçam, A. K. Şen Bayram, and I. Lacroix, “Measuring the Entropy of Sinan’s Muqarnas Patterns,” Nexus Network Journal, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 85–105, 2020.
• [11]M. J. Ostwald and J. Vaughan, “Measuring Architecture,” The Fractal Dimension of Architecture, vol. 1, pp. 67-85, 2016.
• [12]E. Kuruçay, “Sinan mimarisinde görsel karmaşıklığın hesaplamalı analizi,” Master thesis, Department of Architecture, Bursa Uludağ University Institute of Science and Technology, Bursa, Turkey, 2020.
• [13]M. Aksoy, “Varolan tasarım dilleri ve yeni tasarım dilleri bağlamında biçim gramerleri analizi,” PHD thesis, Istanbul Technical University Department of Architecture of Science and Technology, İstanbul, Turkey, 2001.
• [14]J. Rollo, “Triangle and T-square: the windows of Frank Lloyd Wright,” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, vol. 22, no.1, pp. 75–92, 1995. [15]G. Stiny, “Introduction to Shape and Shape Grammar,” Environment and Planning B, vol. 8, pp. 343–351, 1980.
• [16]J. Wojtowicz and W. Fawcett, Architecture: formal approach, London: Academy editions, 1986.
• [17]T. Knight and G. Stiny, “Classical and non-classical computation,” Architectural Research Quarterly, vol. 5, no. 4, 2001.
• [18]H. Koning and J. Eizenberg, “The Language of the Prairie: Frank Lloyd Wright's Prairie Houses,” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 295–323, 1981.
• [19]J. P. Duarte, “Towards the Mass Customization of Housing: The Grammar of Siza's Houses at Malagueira,” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 347–380, 2005.
• [20]P. Prusinkiewicz and A. Lindenmayer, “The Algorithmic Beauty of Plants,” The Virtual Laboratory, 1990.
• [21]Anonymous. (2021, February 26). L-systems [Online]. Available: http://www.michael-hansmeyer.com/l-systems
• [22] (2021, February 27). www.mh-portfolio.com.
• [23]J. Frazer, An evolutionary architecture, London: Architectural Association, 1995. [24]J. H. Holland, Adaption in natural and artificial systems an introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence. Cambridge, Mass. u.a: MIT Press, 1994.
• [25] M. Hensel, Techniques and technologies in morphogenetic design. Chichester: Wiley-Acad., 2006.
• [26]J. von Neumann, “The General and Logical Theory of Automata,” Collected Works, edited by A. H. Taub, pp. 1-41, 1963.
• [27] K. Terzidis, “The Intricacy of the Otherness,” Algorithmic architecture, London: Routledge, pp. 15-37, 2016.
• [28]https://www.arkitektuel.com/nakagin-kapsul-kulesi/.
• [29]B. Kolarevic, “Performance based design,” Architecture in the digital age: design and manufacturing, 1rd ed, New York: Taylor & Francis, pp. 372-389, 2003.
• [30]İ. Karadağ and N. Serteser, “Estimation of airflow characteristics of indoor environments in the early design stage,” A/Z : ITU Journal of Faculty of Architecture, vol. 16, pp. 1–9, 2001.