Güneş Enerjisi Santrallerinin Türkiye ve Avrupa’daki Geri Ödeme Sürelerinin Karşılaştırması

Year 2023, Volume: 11 Issue: 5, 2419 - 2444, 29.12.2023

Mohannad Gyam , İlhan Ceylan , Ali Etem Gürel , Gökhan Yıldız

https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.1389956

Abstract

Dünya’da enerjinin önemi her geçen gün artmaktadır. Ülkelerin büyük bir bölümü ihtiyaç duydukları enerji gereksinimini fosil yakıtlar tarafından karşılanmaktadır. Fosil yakıtların tükenecek olması, artan fiyatı ve çevreye vermiş olduğu zararlardan dolayı araştırmacılar alternatif enerji kaynaklarına yönelmişlerdir. Yenilenebilir enerji kaynaklarına son yıllarda alternatif enerji olarak talep büyük oranda artmıştır. Güneş enerjisi, yenilenebilir enerji kaynakları arasında en popüler ve tüm dünyada yaygın olarak kullanılan enerji kaynaklarından birisidir. Bu sebeple, Türkiye ve Avrupa ülkelerinde güneş enerjisi kullanımı artırılmaya çalışılmaktadır. Türkiye güneş ışınım miktarı yüksek olmasına rağmen beklenen seviyelere ulaşamamıştır. Bu çalışmada, Türkiye ile Avrupa ülkeleri arasındaki şebekeye bağlı 1 MW’lık bir güneş enerjisi santralinin geri ödeme süreleri karşılaştırılmıştır. Karşılaştırılan ülkeler, kendilerine özgü solar radyasyon değerlerinde %22,6 verimliliğe sahip bir monokristal güneş panellerinin kullanıldığı varsayılmıştır. Ayrıca, Rusya-Ukrayna savaşının enerji fiyatlarına etkisi nedeniyle güneş enerjisi santralinin geri ödeme süresi iki senaryo üzerinden değerlendirilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre, birinci senaryoda en yüksek geri ödeme süresi 2,75 yıl ile Karaman’da, ardından 3,17 yıl ile Türkiye gelmektedir. İspanya, Fransa ve Almanya’daki geri ödeme süreleri sırasıyla 3,6, 5,6 ve 5,7 yıl olarak hesaplanmıştır. İkinci senaryoda ise (Rusya-Ukrayna savaşı sonrası), en yüksek geri ödeme süreleri 2,22 yıl ile Almanya ve 3,27 yıl ile Fransa olarak belirlenmiştir. İspanya, Karaman ve Türkiye’de geri ödeme süreleri sırasıyla 2,41, 2,75 ve 3,17 yıl olarak tespit edilmiştir.

Keywords

Güneş enerjisi, Fotovoltaik, Geri ödeme süresi, Güneş enerjisi potansiyeli

Comparison of Payback Periods of Solar Power Plant in Türkiye and Europe

Abstract

The importance of energy in the world is increasing day by day. Most of the countries’ energy needs are met by fossil fuels. Due to the depletion of fossil fuels, their increasing prices and the damage they cause to the environment, researchers have turned to alternative energy sources. The demand for renewable energy sources as alternative energy has increased significantly in recent years. Solar energy is one of the most popular and widely used energy sources among renewable energy sources all over the world. For this reason, efforts are being made to increase the use of solar energy in Türkiye and European countries. Although the amount of solar radiation in Türkiye is high, it has not reached the expected levels. In this study, the payback periods (PBP) of a 1 MW solar power plant (SPP) connected to the grid between Türkiye and European countries were compared. It is assumed that the compared countries use monocrystalline solar panels with an efficiency of 22.6% at their specific solar radiation values. Additionally, due to the impact of the Russia-Ukraine war on energy prices, the PBP of the SPP was determined based on two scenarios. According to the results, in the first scenario, the highest PBP is in Karaman with 2.75 years, followed by Türkiye with 3.17 years. PBPs in Spain, France and Germany are calculated as 3.6, 5.6 and 5.7 years, respectively. In second scenario (after the Russia-Ukraine war), the highest PBPs were determined as Germany with 2.22 years and France with 3.27 years. PBPs in Spain, Karaman and Türkiye were determined as 2.41, 2.75 and 3.17 years,
respectively.

Keywords

Solar energy, Photovoltaic, Payback period, Solar energy potential

References

• [1] A. Ustaoglu, H. Torlaklı, A. Ergün, E. Erdoğmuş and M. E. Akay, "Advanced exergy analysis of an integrated solid waste fueled cogeneration system based on organic Rankine Cycle for different working fluids", Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 270, pp. 116294, 2022.
• [2] A. H. A. Al-Waeli, H. A. Kazem, M. T. Chaicha and K. Sopian, "Photovoltaic/thermal (PV/T) Systems: Principles, design, and applications", Springer Nature, Switzerland, pp. 1-3, 2019.
• [3] A. Ergün and H. Eyinç, "Performance assessment of novel photovoltaic thermal system using nanoparticle in phase change material", International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1490-1505, 2019.
• [4] REN21, “Renewables 2020 Global Status Report", Paris, 2020.
• [5] TÜRKİYE PETROLLERİ A.O., "Petrol ve Doğal Gaz Sektör Raporu", Ankara, 2020.
• [6] Duvar Gazete, “665 Milyar Doları Nasıl Yaktık?", https://www.gazeteduvar.com.tr/665- milyar-dolari-nasil-yaktik-makale-1535547, 2022.
• [7] EUROPEAN COMMISSION, “Energy prices and costs in Europe", Brussels, 2019.
• [8] International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), “Renewable capacity statistics 2021", Abu Dhabi, 2021.
• [9] A. H. Smets, K. Jäger, O. Isabella, R. A. Swaaij and M. Zeman, "Solar energy the physics and engineering of photovoltaic conversion, technologies and systems", UIT Berlin, Germany, pp. 726- 729, 2015.
• [10] Internet: Clean Technica, “Solar Power Energy Payback Time Is Now Super Short - CleanTechnica", https://cleantechnica.com/2018/03/25/solar-power-energy-payback-time-now-super- short/, 2022.
• [11] Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems and PSE Projects GmbH, “Photovoltaics Report", Freiburg, 2021.
• [12] W. Kessler, “Comparing energy payback and simple payback period for solar photovoltaic systems", E3S Web of Conferences., vol. 22, pp.80, 2017.
• [13] F. Lüle, T. Koyuncu and A. Kaya, “Payback periods of three identical solar photovoltaic power plants", Engineering Sciences, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 200–206, 2019.
• [14] T. Taner and A. S. Dalkilic, “A feasibility study of solar energy-techno economic analysis from Aksaray city, Turkey", Journal of Thermal Engineering, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 1–1, 2017.
• [15] R. Büyükzeren, H. B. Altintaş, K. Martin, and A. Kahraman, "Binalardaki fotovoltaik uygulamasının teknik, çevresel ve ekonomik incelenmesi: meram tıp fakültesi hastanesi örneği", EMO Bilimsel Dergi, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 9–14, 2015.
• [16] T. Tsvetomira, "Solar Payback Times in Europe on the Slide - Otovo", https://renewablesnow.com/news/solar-payback-times-in-europe-on-the-slide-otovo-644921/, 2022.
• [17] Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems and ISE, "Photovoltaics Report", Freiburg, 2022. 2442
• [18] Wild-Scholten, D. and Schottler, M., "Solar as an environmental product. Thin-film modules. Production processes and their environmental assessment", Netherlands, 2009
• [19] Enerji İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü, "GEPA", https://gepa.enerji.Gov.tr/MyCalculator/Default. Aspx, 2022.
• [20] T.C. Enerji ve Tabii Kaynaklar Bakanlığı, "Güneş - T.C. Enerji ve Tabii Kaynaklar Bakanlığı", https://enerji.gov.tr/bilgi-merkezi-enerji-gunes 2022.
• [21] Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S), "Sunshine duration and clouds", https://climate.copernicus.eu/ESOTC/2019/sunshine-duration-and-clouds, 2022.
• [22] Global Solar Atlas, "Solar resours map", https://globalsolaratlas.info/download/europe-and- central-asia, 2022.
• [23] Deutscher Wetterdienst DWD, "Global radiation (Mean 30-year monthly and annual sums)", https://www.dwd.de/EN/ourservices/solarenergy/maps_globalradiation_mvs.html#buehneTop, 2022.
• [24] RU-GELD.DE, "Sunshine in Germany: the number of sunny days, hours of sunshine quantity in Germany by year, season, month, and also by federated state", https://ru- geld.de/en/country/weather-and-climate/sunshine.html, 2022.
• [25] F. G: Montoya, M. J. Aguilera and F. Manzano-Agugliaro, "Renewable energy production in Spain: A review", Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 33, pp. 509–531, 2014.
• [26] J. Polo, "Solar global horizontal and direct normal irradiation maps in Spain derived from geostationary satellites", Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, vol. 130, no. 131, pp. 81–88, 2015.
• [27] Current Results, "Average sunshine a year in Europe", https://www.Currentresults.com/Weath er/Spain/annual-days-of-sunshine.php (2022).
• [28] R. R. Urs, Z. Ali, M. Marzband, K. Saleem, B. Mohammadi-Ivatloo and A. Anvari- Moghaddam, "A technical assessment on photovoltaic power generation under varying weather profile – Northumbria university pilot", 2020 IEEE 29th International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE), pp. 811–815, 2020.
• [29] A. Kalyanpur, M. Mercadier and P. Blanc, "Gisement solaire en France : caractérisation de la ressource énergétique, profil de répartition et volatilité", Environnement & Technique, vol. 331, pp. 54–59, 2017.
• [30] Y. B. Hinssen and W. H. Knap, "Comparison of pyranometric and pyrheliometric methods for the determination of sunshine duration", Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 835–846, 2007.
• [31] M. Pierro, D. Moser, R. Perez and C. Cornaro, "The value of PV power forecast and the paradox of the “single pricing” scheme: The Italian case study", Energies, vol. 13, no. 15, pp. 3945 2020.
• [32] Çevresel Etki Değerlendirmesi İzin ve Denetım Genel Müdürlüğü, "Çevresel göstergeler", https://webdosya.csb.gov.tr/db/ced/icerikler/cevresel_gostergeler_-2021tr-rev-20220622105837.pdf, 2022. 2443
• [33] ACS Enerji ve Teknoloji Ltd Sti, "LEXRON-72M Data Sheet", https://www.acsenerji.com/, 2022.
• [34] EPİAŞ Şeffaflık Platformu, "Piyasa takas fiyatı ", https://seffaflik.epias.com.tr/transparenc y/piyasalar/gop/ptf.xhtml (2022).
• [35] M. Yalılı, "Lisanslı fotovoltaik güneş enerji santrali yatırımının finansal analizi: Van ili örneği", Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, vol.10, no. 3, pp. 1055–1074, 2021.
• [36] W eather Spark, "Karaman iklimi, aylık hava durumu, ortalama sıcaklığı (Türkiye)", https://tr.weatherspark.com/y/97718/Karaman-Türkiye-Ortalama-Hava-Durumu-Yıl-Boyunca, 2022.
• [37] U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), "Energy sector in Germany", https://www .eia.gov/international/analysis/country/DEU.
• [38] Statistisches Bundesamt, "Gross electricity production in Germany", https://www.destatis.de/EN/Themes/Economic-SectorsEnterprises/Energy/Production/Tables/gr oss- electricity-production.html (2022).
• [39] NORD POOL, "DAY-AHEAD PRICES", https://www.nordpoolgroup.com/en/Market- data1/Dayahead/Area-Prices/de-lu/monthly/?view=table, 2022.
• [40] U. S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), "Energy sector in France", https://www.eia.gov/international/analysis/country/FRA, 2022.
• [41] U. S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), "Energy sector in Spain", https://www.eia.gov/international/analysis/country/ESP, 2022.
• [42] International Energy Agency (IEA), "Spain natural gas security policy", https://www.iea.org/articles/spain-natural-gas-security-policy, 2022.
• [43] The nominated electricity market operator (NEMO), "Monthly report on the development of the electricity market", https://www.omie.es/en/publications?page=0, 2022.