Identification of Some Seed Coat Traits in Advanced Generations of Cultured Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) and Wild Chickpea (C. reticulatum) Hybrids

Year 2023, , 147 - 160, 10.06.2023

Leyla Turan , Behiye Bicer

https://doi.org/10.55007/dufed.1282743

Abstract

This study was conducted in the Dicle University Faculty of Agriculture research area during the 2021-2022 growing season to determine the seed coat properties of advanced generation hybrid lines derived from Gökçe x wild chickpea genotypes. In the study, chickpea populations in F7-8 generations obtained from Gökçe × Cicer reticulatum hybrids (Gökçe × Cudi_152 (85 lines) Gökçe × Egil_073 (82 lines), Gökçe × Sirna _060 (84 lines) and Gökçe × Savur _063 (34 lines) were used. Experiment were in augmented design with 2 replications, and plots consist of 0,5 m length, one row and row spacing 50 cm. In the study, the seed coat color, seed shape, seed coat surface and color and shape formation on the seed coat were defined. In the hybrid lines in the F7 F8 generations, the color of the seed coat changed from black to light cream, and the colors were predominantly brown and its tones. In all populations, the seed shapes of the lines were pea-like. Different colorations were determined on the surface of the seed coat and in the embryo, and these were defined as lace shape, leopard pattern, bone-like seed coat surfaces.

Keywords

Chickpea, Cicer arietinum, Cicer reticulatum, Seed shape, Seed shell surface, Seed color

Kültür Nohut (Cicer arietinum) ve Yabani Nohut (C. reticulatum) Melezlerinin İleri Jenerasyonlarında Bazı Tohum Kabuk Özelliklerinin Tanımlanması

Abstract

Bu çalışma Gökçe kültür nohutu ile bazı yabani nohut genotiplerinden elde edilen ileri jenerasyon melez hatların tohum kabuk özelliklerinin tanımlanması amacıyla 2021-2022 yetiştirme sezonunda Dicle Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Tarla Bitkileri araştırma alanında yürütülmüştür. Çalışmada Gökçe × Cicer reticulatum melezinden elde edilen F7-8 jenerasyonlarındaki (Gökçe × Cudi_152 (85 hat), Gökçe × Egil_073 (82 hat), Gökçe × Sirna _060 (84 hat) ve Gökçe × Savur_063 (34 hat)) popülasyonlar kullanılmıştır. Deneme Augmented desende 2 tekrarlamalı olarak, sıra uzunluğu 0,5 m ve sıra arası mesafe 50 cm olan parsellerden oluşmuştur. Çalışmada tohum kabuğu rengi, tohum şekli, tohum kabuk yüzeyi ve tohum kabuğu üzerinde renk ve şekil oluşumları özellikleri tanımlanmıştır. F7-F8 kuşaklarındaki melez hatlarda tohum kabuk rengi siyahtan açık kreme kadar değişmiş kahverengi ve tonları ağırlıklı renkler olmuştur. Hatlara ait tohum şekilleri tüm popülasyonlarda yüksek oranda bezelyemsi tiptedir. Tohum kabuğunun yüzeyinde ve embriyoda değişik renklenmeler belirlenmiş bunlar dantel şekli, leopar desen, kemik görünümlü tohum kabuk yüzeyleri olarak tanımlanmıştır.

Keywords

Nohut, Cicer arietinum, Cicer reticulatum, Tohum şekli, Tohum kabuk yüzeyi, Tohum rengi

References

• P. Smýkal, C. J. Coyne, M. J. Ambrose, N. Maxted, H. Schaefer, M. W. Blair, J. Berger, S. L. Greene, M. N. Nelson, N. Besharat, T. Vymyslický, C. Toker, R. K.Saxena, M. Roorkiwal, M. K. Pandey, J. Hu, Y. H. Li, L. X. Wang, Y. Guo, L. J. Qiu, R. J. Redden and R. K. Varshney, “Legume crops phylogeny and genetic diversity for science and breeding”. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, vol.34, no. 1-3, pp. 43-104, 2015.
• Anonymous, (2023). Faostat. Accessed: March 16, 2023. [Online]. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
• D. Zohary, and M. Hopf, “Domestication of plants in the Old World: The origin and spread of cultivated plants in West Asia, Europe and the Nil eValley” (No. Ed. 3). Oxford university press, 2000.
• G. Ladizinsky and A. Adler. “Genetic relationships among the annual species of Cicer L.” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, vol. 48, no. 4, pp.197-203, 1976.
• C. Toker, J. Berger, A. Kahraman, A. Aydogan, C. Can, B. Bukun, R. V. Penmetsa, E. J. von Wettberg and D. R. Cook.“ Cicer reticulatum Ladizinsky, progenitor of the cultivated chickpea (C. arietinum L.)”. Legume Perspect, vol. 5,pp. 26–27, 2014.
• L. J. G. Van der Maesen. “Origin, history and taxonomy of chickpea”, In The chickpea, pp.11-34, 1987.
• Y. Anbessa, T. Warkentin, R. Bueckert and A.Vandenberg. “Short internode, double podding and early flowering effects on maturity and other agronomic characters in chickpea”. Field Crops Research, vol. 102, pp. 43-50, 2007.
• F. K. Kupicha. “The delimitation of tribeViceae (Leguminosae) and the relationship of CicerL.”Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, vol. 4, pp. 131–162, 1977.
• G. Ladizinsky. “A new Cicer from Tukey. Notes from the Royal Botanical Garden Edinburgh” vol. 34, pp. 201-202, 1975.
• L. D. Robertson, B. Ocampo and K. B. Sıngh. “Morphological variation in wild annual Cicer species in comparison to the cultigen.” Euphytica, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 309- 319, 1997.
• S. Abbo, R. P. Van-Oss, A. Gopher, Y. Saranga, I. Ofner and Z. Peleng. “Plant domestication versus crop evolution: a conceptual framework for cereals and grain legumes.” Trends in Plant Science, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 351-360, 2014.
• S. Abbo, S. Lev‐Yadun, and N. Galwey, “Vernalization response of wild chickpea. New Phytologist”, vol. 154, no.3, pp. 695-701, 2002.
• S. Samineni, S. Kamatam, M. Thudı, R. K. Varshneyand P. M. Gaur. “Vernalization response in chickpea is controlled by a major 32 QTL”, Euphytica, vol. 207, no. 2, pp. 453-461, 2016.
• J. Berger, S. Abboand N. C. Turner.“Ecogeography of annual wild species”, CropScience, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 1076–1090, 2003.
• F. Shan, H. C. Clarke, J. A Plummer, G. Yan and K. H. M. Siddique, “Geographical patterns of genetic variation in the world collections of wild annual Cicer characterized by amplified fragment length polymorphisms” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, vol. 110, pp. 381–391, 2005.
• C. Toker, J. Berger, T. Eker, D. Sari, H. Sari, R. S. Gokturk, A. Kahraman, B. Aydın and E. Von Wettberg, “Cicer turcicum: A New Cicer species and its potential to improve chickpea”. Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 12, pp. 587, 2021.
• J. I. Cubero, “Morphology of chickpea.” In: MC. Saxena, KB. Singh (eds) The Chickpea. CAB. International, Wallingford, Oxon, OX10 8DE, UK, 1987, pp. 35–66.
• C. Serrano, B. Carbas, A. Castanho, A. Soares, M. C. V. Pattoand C. Brites. “Characterisation of nutritional quality traits of a chickpea (Cicer arietinum) germplasm collection exploited in chickpea breeding in Europe”. Crop and Pasture Science, vol. 68, no. 11, pp. 1031-1040, 2017.
• J. A. Wood, N. E. Egan, C. F. Keir, J. C. Miller, G. C. Pengilley and K. B. Hobson. “Characterisation of seed marking types in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): Tiger stripe and other blemishes”. Legume Science, vol. 2, no. 2, e29, 2020.
• B. T. Biçer ve A. E. Anlarsal, “Diyarbakır Yöresi Nohut (Cicer arietinum L.) Köy Popülasyonlarının Tarımsal, Morfolojik ve Fenolojik Özellikler için Değerlendirilmesi” Harran Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.9, no. 3, pp. 1-8, 2005.
• H. S. Meena, J. Kumar and S. S. Yadav. “Inheritance of seed coat color in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)” Indian J. Genet, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 151 -152, 2004.
• S. Hossain, J. Panozzo, C. Pittock, and R. Ford. “Quantitative trait loci analysis of seed coat color components for selective breeding in chickpea(Cicer arietinum L.)” Canadian journal of plant science, vol. 91, no.1, pp. 49-55,2011.
• E. J. Knights, J. A. Wood, and S. Harden.“A gene influencing seed shape of desi type chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)” Plant breeding, vol. 130, no. 2, pp. 278-280, 2011.
• J. Giland and J. I. Cubero. “Inheritance of seed coat thickness in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and its evolutionary implications”. Plant Breeding, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 257-260, 1993.
• D. C. More and R. D. Cruz, “Genetic studies in Bengal gram (Cicer arietinum, L.) V: D-70-10 · White flowered White grained-II.” J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ., vol. 1, pp. 11-14, 1976.
• S. Kim, M. Han and A. L. Rayburn. “Genome size and seed mass analyses in Cicer arietinum (Chickpea) and wild Cicerspecies”. Hort Science, vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 1751-1756, 2015.