Research Article

Comparison of Performances of Two Different Antipodal Vivaldi Antennas in Microwave Breast Cancer Detection Systems

Volume: 16 Number: 4 December 30, 2025
EN TR

Comparison of Performances of Two Different Antipodal Vivaldi Antennas in Microwave Breast Cancer Detection Systems

Abstract

In this study, two different antipodal Vivaldi antennas were designed using CST MWS simulation program. The proposed antipodal Vivaldi antennas were designed using 1.6 mm thick FR4 material. The dielectric constant of this material is 4.4 and the loss tangent value is 0.002. The impedance of the feed port is 50 Ω and the copper thickness is 0.035 µm. The compact size of the first antenna is 30 mm x 36 mm, its gain is 5.04 dB and its directivity is 6.48 dB. The size of the second antenna is 38 mm x 33.5 mm, its gain is 7.68 dB and its directivity is 8.77 dB. In the simulation environment, two phantoms were created by placing spherical tumors with two different diameters, each inside a separate heterogeneous breast phantom. Then, the designed antennas in the simulation environment were tested for tumor detection performance on the phantom using the radar-based microwave breast cancer imaging technique (RMWI). After the signal processing stages, tumor images were obtained. In microwave imaging methods, the performance of two different antennas on tumor detection was observed in terms of gain and directivity. In the breast cancer detection study using RMWI technique, the importance of antenna properties such as gain and directivity was emphasized.

Keywords

References

  1. [1] American Cancer Society. Key Statistics for Breast Cancer. American Cancer Society, Atlanta, USA. 2023, https://www.breastcancer.org/facts-statistics
  2. [2] World Health Organization. Breast Cancer. World Health Organization, Global Breast Cancer Initiative. 2023, https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/breast-cancer
  3. [3] B. J. Pomerantz, "Imaging and Interventional Radiology for Cancer." Surgical Oncology for the General Surgeon, An Issue of Surgical Clinics, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 499-506, 2020.
  4. [4] Z. He, Z. Chen, M. Tan, S. Elingarami, Y. Liu, T. Li, Y. Deng, N. He, S. Li, J. Fu and W. Li, "A review on methods for diagnosis of breast cancer cells and tissues." Cell proliferation, 53(7), e12822, 2020.
  5. [5] K. Lalitha and J. Manjula, "Non-invasive microwave head imaging to detect tumors and to estimate their size and location." Physics in Medicine 13: 100047, 2022.
  6. [6] A. Naghibi, A. R. Attari, "Near-field radar-based microwave imaging for breast cancer detection: A study on resolution and image quality." IEEE Transactions on antennas and propagation 69.3: 1670-1680, 2020.
  7. [7] E. C. Fear, X. Li, S.C. Hagness and M. A. Stuchly, "Confocal microwave imaging for breast cancer detection: Localization of tumors in three dimensions." IEEE Transactions on biomedical engineering, 49(8), 812-822, 2002.
  8. [8] D. Guliato, R. M. Rangayyan, J. D. Carvalho and S. A. Santiago. Polygonal modeling of contours of breast tumors with the preservation of spicules. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 55(1), 14-20, 2007.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Biomedical Imaging , Engineering Electromagnetics

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 30, 2025

Submission Date

April 21, 2025

Acceptance Date

September 22, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 16 Number: 4

IEEE
[1]Ş. Yıldız and M. B. Kurt, “Comparison of Performances of Two Different Antipodal Vivaldi Antennas in Microwave Breast Cancer Detection Systems”, DUJE, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 857–864, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.24012/dumf.1679840.