Research Article

Comparative Analysis of CNN-Based Deep Learning Architectures for Automatic Plant Disease Classification

Volume: 16 Number: 4 December 30, 2025
TR EN

Comparative Analysis of CNN-Based Deep Learning Architectures for Automatic Plant Disease Classification

Abstract

Early detection of plant diseases is crucial for ensuring crop health and reducing agricultural losses. Traditional visual inspection presents a key opportunity for enhancement, as its dependence on manual effort naturally limits both its speed and accuracy. To address this challenge, this study conducts a comparative analysis of five convolutional neural network based architectures—DenseNet201, EfficientNetB3, ResNet101, ResNet50, and VGG16—for automatic classification of apple leaf diseases, focusing on healthy, powdery mildew, and rust conditions. A publicly available Kaggle dataset consisting of 1,532 images was augmented to 9,284 samples using techniques such as flipping, brightness adjustment, and rotation. Each model was fine-tuned and evaluated based on accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. Among these, EfficientNetB3 and VGG16 demonstrated superior classification performance across all classes, achieving up to 95.00% accuracy with perfect precision and recall (100.00%). These results confirm the effectiveness of transfer learning and data augmentation in enhancing disease detection accuracy, offering a promising foundation for real-time plant health monitoring systems.

Keywords

Ethical Statement

The dataset used in this research is publicly available on Kaggle and was utilized in compliance with its terms of use. Therefore, ethical approval was not required.

References

  1. [1] K. P. Ferentinos, “Deep learning models for plant disease detection and diagnosis,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 145, pp. 311–318, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.01.009.
  2. [2] A. A. Al-Zubi, “CNN-Based Detection of Powdery Mildew and Rust in Apple Orchards for Optimizing Crop Management,” Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 381–389, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.36899/JAPS.2025.2.0032.
  3. [3] J. G. Arnal Barbedo, “Plant disease identification from individual lesions and spots using deep learning,” Biosystems Engineering, vol. 180, pp. 96–107, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.02.002.
  4. [4] S. Han Lee, H. Goëau, P. Bonnet, and A. Joly, “New perspectives on plant disease characterization based on deep learning,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 170, p. 105220, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105220.
  5. [5] L. Li, S. Zhang, and B. Wang, “Plant Disease Detection and Classification by Deep Learning - A Review,” 2021, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3069646.
  6. [6] S. ÖRENÇ, E. ACAR, and M. S. ÖZERDEM, “Utilizing the Ensemble of Deep Learning Approaches to Identify Monkeypox Disease,” DÜMF Mühendislik Dergisi, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.24012/dumf.1199679.
  7. [7] G. Wang, Y. Sun, and J. Wang, “Automatic Image-Based Plant Disease Severity Estimation Using Deep Learning,” Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, vol. 2017, 2017, doi: 10.1155/2017/2917536.
  8. [8] S. Pudumalar and S. Muthuramalingam, “Hydra: An ensemble deep learning recognition model for plant diseases,” Journal of Engineering Research (Kuwait), vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 781–792, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jer.2023.09.033.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Image Processing

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 30, 2025

Submission Date

September 3, 2025

Acceptance Date

November 21, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 16 Number: 4

APA
Örenç, S., Acar, E., & Özerdem, M. S. (2025). Comparative Analysis of CNN-Based Deep Learning Architectures for Automatic Plant Disease Classification. Dicle Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Mühendislik Dergisi, 16(4), 961-970. https://doi.org/10.24012/dumf.1777471
AMA
1.Örenç S, Acar E, Özerdem MS. Comparative Analysis of CNN-Based Deep Learning Architectures for Automatic Plant Disease Classification. DUJE. 2025;16(4):961-970. doi:10.24012/dumf.1777471
Chicago
Örenç, Sedat, Emrullah Acar, and Mehmet Siraç Özerdem. 2025. “Comparative Analysis of CNN-Based Deep Learning Architectures for Automatic Plant Disease Classification”. Dicle Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Mühendislik Dergisi 16 (4): 961-70. https://doi.org/10.24012/dumf.1777471.
EndNote
Örenç S, Acar E, Özerdem MS (December 1, 2025) Comparative Analysis of CNN-Based Deep Learning Architectures for Automatic Plant Disease Classification. Dicle Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Mühendislik Dergisi 16 4 961–970.
IEEE
[1]S. Örenç, E. Acar, and M. S. Özerdem, “Comparative Analysis of CNN-Based Deep Learning Architectures for Automatic Plant Disease Classification”, DUJE, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 961–970, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.24012/dumf.1777471.
ISNAD
Örenç, Sedat - Acar, Emrullah - Özerdem, Mehmet Siraç. “Comparative Analysis of CNN-Based Deep Learning Architectures for Automatic Plant Disease Classification”. Dicle Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Mühendislik Dergisi 16/4 (December 1, 2025): 961-970. https://doi.org/10.24012/dumf.1777471.
JAMA
1.Örenç S, Acar E, Özerdem MS. Comparative Analysis of CNN-Based Deep Learning Architectures for Automatic Plant Disease Classification. DUJE. 2025;16:961–970.
MLA
Örenç, Sedat, et al. “Comparative Analysis of CNN-Based Deep Learning Architectures for Automatic Plant Disease Classification”. Dicle Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Mühendislik Dergisi, vol. 16, no. 4, Dec. 2025, pp. 961-70, doi:10.24012/dumf.1777471.
Vancouver
1.Sedat Örenç, Emrullah Acar, Mehmet Siraç Özerdem. Comparative Analysis of CNN-Based Deep Learning Architectures for Automatic Plant Disease Classification. DUJE. 2025 Dec. 1;16(4):961-70. doi:10.24012/dumf.1777471