Research Article

Immunohistochemically Evaluation of PCNA and MMP-9 Expressions in Different Types of Canine Mammary Carcinomas

Volume: 13 Number: 2 December 31, 2020
TR EN

Immunohistochemically Evaluation of PCNA and MMP-9 Expressions in Different Types of Canine Mammary Carcinomas

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate reveal whether there is a significant relationship between cell proliferation and invasion-metastasis capacity in various mammary adenocarcinoma subtypes observed in dogs, by means of immunohistochemical markers such as PCNA and MMP-9. The material of this study was composed of tissue samples of mammary carcinomas taken from 6 Kangal and 4 Setter dogs with an average age of 8.4 years brought to our department between 2012-2020 years. Tissue samples from dogs were fixed in 10 % buffered formaldehyde solution. After routine tissue procedures, 5 μm thick sections were taken from paraffin blocks prepared for Hematoxylin and Eosin staining. Sections were examined under light microscope to determine the cancer patterns. Avidin-Biotin Peroxidase method was used as immunohistochemical method. 4 of 10 mammary carcinoma cases were classified as intraductal papillary carcinoma, 4 as carcinoma mixed, 1 as solid carcinoma and 1 as tubular carcinoma. We found the highest mean number of PCNA and MMP-9 positive cells in solid subtype. In conclusion, we thought that a positive relationship between cell proliferation and invasion and metastasis capacity under the solid subtype.

Keywords

References

  1. Referans1 Aydogan A, Ozmen O, Haligur M, Sipahi C, Ileri D, Haligur A. (2018). Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Bcl-2, ER-alpha, Caspase-3,-8,-9, PCNA and Ki-67 Expressions in Canine Mammary Carcinomas. Biotech Histochem. 93(4): 286-292.
  2. Referans2 Dong H, Diao H, Zhao Y, Xu H, Pei S, Gao J, Wang J, Hussain T, Zhao D, Zhou X, Lin D. (2019). Overexpression of Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 in Breast Cancer Cell Lines Remarkably Increases the Cell Malignancy Largely via Activation of Transforming Growth Factor Beta/SMAD Signalling. Cell Prolif. 52(5): e12633.
  3. Referans3 Kaszak I, Ruszczak A, Kanafa S, Kacprzak K, Król M, Jurka P. (2018). Current Biomarkers of Canine Mammary Tumors. Acta Vet Scand. 60(1): 60-66.
  4. Referans4 Valencakova-Agyagosova A, Frischova Z, Sevcikova Z, Hajurka J, Lepej J, Szakallova I, Kredatusova G, Nagy V, Ledecky V. (2014). Determination of Carcinoembryonic Antigen and Cancer Antigen (CA 15-3) in Bitches with Tumours on Mammary Gland: Preliminary Report. Vet Comp Oncol. 12(3): 205-214.
  5. Referans5 Vinothini G, Balachandran C, Nagini S. (2009). Evaluation of Molecular Markers in Canine Mammary Tumors: Correlation with Histological Grading. Oncol Res. 18(5-6): 193-201.
  6. Referans6 Dolka I, Król M, Sapierzyński R. (2016). Evaluation of Apoptosis-Associated Protein (Bcl-2, Bax, cleaved caspase-3 and p53) Expression in Canine Mammary Tumors: An Immunohistochemical and Prognostic Study. Res Vet Sci. 105: 124-133.
  7. Referans7 Kumaraguruparan R, Prathiba D, Nagini S. (2006). Of Humans and Canines: Immunohistochemical Analysis of PCNA, Bcl-2, p53, Cytokeratin and ER in Mammary Tumours. Res Vet Sci. 81(2): 218-224.
  8. Referans8 Muhammadnejad A, Keyhani E, Mortazavi P, Behjati F, Haghdoost IS. (2012). Overexpression of Her-2/Neu in Malignant Mammary Tumors; Translation of Clinicopathological Features from Dog to Human. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 13(12): 6415-6421.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Veterinary Surgery

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 31, 2020

Submission Date

September 14, 2020

Acceptance Date

November 9, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 13 Number: 2

APA
Karakurt, E., Kuru, M., Dağ, S., Beytut, E., Oral, H., Nuhoğlu, H., & Yıldız, A. (2020). Immunohistochemically Evaluation of PCNA and MMP-9 Expressions in Different Types of Canine Mammary Carcinomas. Dicle Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(2), 119-124. https://doi.org/10.47027/duvetfd.794571
AMA
1.Karakurt E, Kuru M, Dağ S, et al. Immunohistochemically Evaluation of PCNA and MMP-9 Expressions in Different Types of Canine Mammary Carcinomas. Dicle Üniv Vet Fak Derg. 2020;13(2):119-124. doi:10.47027/duvetfd.794571
Chicago
Karakurt, Emin, Mushap Kuru, Serpil Dağ, et al. 2020. “Immunohistochemically Evaluation of PCNA and MMP-9 Expressions in Different Types of Canine Mammary Carcinomas”. Dicle Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 13 (2): 119-24. https://doi.org/10.47027/duvetfd.794571.
EndNote
Karakurt E, Kuru M, Dağ S, Beytut E, Oral H, Nuhoğlu H, Yıldız A (December 1, 2020) Immunohistochemically Evaluation of PCNA and MMP-9 Expressions in Different Types of Canine Mammary Carcinomas. Dicle Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 13 2 119–124.
IEEE
[1]E. Karakurt et al., “Immunohistochemically Evaluation of PCNA and MMP-9 Expressions in Different Types of Canine Mammary Carcinomas”, Dicle Üniv Vet Fak Derg, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 119–124, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.47027/duvetfd.794571.
ISNAD
Karakurt, Emin - Kuru, Mushap - Dağ, Serpil - Beytut, Enver - Oral, Hasan - Nuhoğlu, Hilmi - Yıldız, Ayfer. “Immunohistochemically Evaluation of PCNA and MMP-9 Expressions in Different Types of Canine Mammary Carcinomas”. Dicle Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 13/2 (December 1, 2020): 119-124. https://doi.org/10.47027/duvetfd.794571.
JAMA
1.Karakurt E, Kuru M, Dağ S, Beytut E, Oral H, Nuhoğlu H, Yıldız A. Immunohistochemically Evaluation of PCNA and MMP-9 Expressions in Different Types of Canine Mammary Carcinomas. Dicle Üniv Vet Fak Derg. 2020;13:119–124.
MLA
Karakurt, Emin, et al. “Immunohistochemically Evaluation of PCNA and MMP-9 Expressions in Different Types of Canine Mammary Carcinomas”. Dicle Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 13, no. 2, Dec. 2020, pp. 119-24, doi:10.47027/duvetfd.794571.
Vancouver
1.Emin Karakurt, Mushap Kuru, Serpil Dağ, Enver Beytut, Hasan Oral, Hilmi Nuhoğlu, Ayfer Yıldız. Immunohistochemically Evaluation of PCNA and MMP-9 Expressions in Different Types of Canine Mammary Carcinomas. Dicle Üniv Vet Fak Derg. 2020 Dec. 1;13(2):119-24. doi:10.47027/duvetfd.794571

Cited By