Research Article

Screening for Metsulfuron Methyl Phytotoxicity in Seeds of Various Pine Species

Volume: 12 Number: 2 December 15, 2016
Ceren Dağlar , Derya Eşen , Bilal Çetin
EN TR

Screening for Metsulfuron Methyl Phytotoxicity in Seeds of Various Pine Species

Abstract

In forestry, herbicide screening of woody plant seeds has been successfully used for the selection of safe and effective herbicides for tree species. Consequently, research time and costs can be reduced when compared to the respective traditional field experiments. Metsulfuron methyl is a systemic sulfonylurea herbicide used to selectively control herbaceous and woody weeds in conifer plantations. In the present study, the cumulative germination rate and germination speed of Austrian pine (Pinus nigra J.F.Arnold), Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.), and maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Aiton) seed presoaked in sulfometuron methyl solutions of 15 different concentrations (0-5% v: v), including a control, were evaluated in a rapid seed-screening trial in order to predict early field phytotoxicity of the herbicide on these pine species. At the end of the 28-day germination trial in the laboratory, the cumulative rate and speed of germination of the three pine species seed varied across different concentrations of sulfometuron. Sulfometuron methyl was not significantly phytotoxic to pine seed germination at low and intermediate concentrations, while seed germination was depressed at high concentrations. The herbicide appeared to affect germination speed more than cumulative germination. The use of this herbicide at low to intermediate concentrations in nursery beds and forest areas could afford young seedlings a rapid establishment and growth without significant phytotoxicity to seed germination. These results could be used to predict early efficacy of sulfometuron on young pine seedlings in the field along with field confirmation of the results. Selecting a herbicide concentration that is both efficacious on weeds and safe for crop trees is vital for the successful establishment and growth of pine seedlings on nursery and plantation sites.

Keywords

Metsulfuron methyl,Phytotoxicity,Pine,Seed germination

References

  1. Baskin C. C and Baskin J. M 2014. Seeds: Ecology, Biogeography, and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination. Academic Press, San Diego, USA, pp. 1573.
  2. Blair M. P., Zedaker S. M., Seiler J. R, Hipkins P. L and Burch P. L 2006. Evaluation of Rapid Screening Techniques for Woody Plant Herbicide Development. Weed Technology 20: 971–979.
  3. Bowes G. G and Spun D. T 1996. Control of Aspen Poplar, Balsam Poplar, Prickly Rose and Western Snowberry with Metsulfuron-Methyl And 2,4-D. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 76:885-889.
  4. Boydak M and Çalışkan S,Ağaçlandırma (Afforestation),714,OGEM-VAK,2014
  5. Bunn B. H., Zedaker S. M and Seiler J. R,Presoaking Improves Forest Tree Seed Screening,129–130,1995,Proceedings of “The Southern Weed Science Society.”
  6. Cantürk, K,The Chief of Bolu Karacasu Forest Nursery of Bolu Regional Directorate of Forestry, Bolu, Turkey,2016
  7. Çetin, B,Mersin Yöresinde Kızılçam (Pinus brutia Ten.) Kozalak ve Tohumuna Ait Bazı Özelliklerin Yükseltiye Bağlı Değişimi,185,2010,Institute of Science and Technology, Istanbul University
  8. Dunlap J. R and Barnet J. P,Manipulation of Loblolly Pine (Pinus Taeda L.) Seed Germination with Simulated Moisture and Temperature Stress,61-74,Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk Publishers,Boston, MA, USA,Seedling Physiology and Reforestation Success,1984
  9. Eşen D and Yıldız O,Otsu Ve Odunsu Diri Örtü Mücadelesinin Meşcerelerin Gençleştirilmesi ve Büyümesine Etkileri,28-32,TBMMO,2000,37
  10. Eşen D., Yıldız O., Sargıncı M and Güneş N,Ormancılıkta Zararlı Ot İlaçlarının Kullanımı ve Riskleri,51-58,2005,1(2)
APA
Dağlar, C., Eşen, D., & Çetin, B. (2016). Çeşitli Çam Türlerinin Tohum Çimlenmesinde Metsulfuron Metil Fitotoksisitesi. Düzce Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Ormancılık Dergisi, 12(2), 34-43. https://izlik.org/JA32MR27FC
AMA
1.Dağlar C, Eşen D, Çetin B. Çeşitli Çam Türlerinin Tohum Çimlenmesinde Metsulfuron Metil Fitotoksisitesi. DUJOF. 2016;12(2):34-43. https://izlik.org/JA32MR27FC
Chicago
Dağlar, Ceren, Derya Eşen, and Bilal Çetin. 2016. “Çeşitli Çam Türlerinin Tohum Çimlenmesinde Metsulfuron Metil Fitotoksisitesi”. Düzce Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Ormancılık Dergisi 12 (2): 34-43. https://izlik.org/JA32MR27FC.
EndNote
Dağlar C, Eşen D, Çetin B (December 1, 2016) Çeşitli Çam Türlerinin Tohum Çimlenmesinde Metsulfuron Metil Fitotoksisitesi. Düzce Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Ormancılık Dergisi 12 2 34–43.
IEEE
[1]C. Dağlar, D. Eşen, and B. Çetin, “Çeşitli Çam Türlerinin Tohum Çimlenmesinde Metsulfuron Metil Fitotoksisitesi”, DUJOF, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 34–43, Dec. 2016, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA32MR27FC
ISNAD
Dağlar, Ceren - Eşen, Derya - Çetin, Bilal. “Çeşitli Çam Türlerinin Tohum Çimlenmesinde Metsulfuron Metil Fitotoksisitesi”. Düzce Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Ormancılık Dergisi 12/2 (December 1, 2016): 34-43. https://izlik.org/JA32MR27FC.
JAMA
1.Dağlar C, Eşen D, Çetin B. Çeşitli Çam Türlerinin Tohum Çimlenmesinde Metsulfuron Metil Fitotoksisitesi. DUJOF. 2016;12:34–43.
MLA
Dağlar, Ceren, et al. “Çeşitli Çam Türlerinin Tohum Çimlenmesinde Metsulfuron Metil Fitotoksisitesi”. Düzce Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Ormancılık Dergisi, vol. 12, no. 2, Dec. 2016, pp. 34-43, https://izlik.org/JA32MR27FC.
Vancouver
1.Ceren Dağlar, Derya Eşen, Bilal Çetin. Çeşitli Çam Türlerinin Tohum Çimlenmesinde Metsulfuron Metil Fitotoksisitesi. DUJOF [Internet]. 2016 Dec. 1;12(2):34-43. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA32MR27FC