Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Bakteriyel Selüloz Üretimi ve Karakterizasyonu

Year 2014, Volume: 10 Issue: 2, 1 - 10, 30.01.2017

Abstract

Bu çalışmada bakteriyel selüloz (BC) Gluconacetobacter hansenii (Gossele et al.) kullanılarak, saf selüloz elde edilmiş ve bazı özellikleri incelenerek literatür ile karşılaştırılmıştır. Hestrin ve Schramm (HS) ortamında iki tekrarlı olmak üzere 100 ml’lik deney örnekleri hazırlandı. 14 günlük süre sonunda BC tabakası elde edilerek morfolojik özellikleri SEM ile incelenmiş, selüloz zinciri çaplarının 20 nm – 75 nm arasında olduğu belirlenmiştir. Su tutma kapasitesi ise tam kuru ağırlıklarının 91 – 109 katı olarak hesaplanmıştır. Selüloz verimi ise sırasıyla 0,81 g/l ve 0,84 g/l olarak bulunmuştur. Diğer taraftan, XRD, FTIR ve TGA analizleri de yapılmış ve MCC ile karşılaştırılmış ve benzer yapıda olduğu görülmüştür. Bu sonuçlara göre, kullanılan suş’un bakteriyel selüloz üretimi için uygun olduğu söylenebilir ve bu özellikleri sayesinde; gıda, kozmetik, ilaç, kağıt ve kompozit yapımında hammadde ve dolgu maddesi olarak kullanılabilir.

References

  • Ateş E, Aztekin K. 2011. Parçacık ve fiber takviyeli polimer kompozitlerin yoğunluk ve basma dayanımı özellikleri, J. Fac. Eng. Arch. Gazi Univversity, Vol 26, No 2, 479-486,
  • Bungay HR, Serafica GC. 2000. Production of Microbial Cellulose. US Patent Number: 6,071,727,
  • Castro C, Zuluaga R, Álvarez C, Putaux JL, Gloria Caro G, Rojas OJ, Mondragon I, Ganán P. 2012. Bacterial cellulose produced by a new acid-resistant strain of Gluconacetobacter Genus, Carbohydrate Polymers, 89 (4): 1033-1037,
  • Castro C, Zuluaga R, Putaux JL, Caroa G, Mondragon I, Ganán P, 2011. Structural characterization of bacterial cellulose produced by Gluconacetobacter swingsii sp. from Colombian agroindustrial wastes, Carbohydrate Polymers, Volume 84, Issue 1, 11 February, Pages 96–102,
  • Cheng KC, Catchmark JM, Demirci A. 2009. Enhanced production of bacterial cellulose by using a biofilm reactor and its material property analysis, Journal of Biological Engineering, 3 (12), doi:10.1186/1754-1611-3-12,
  • Fabio P. Gomes, Nuno H.C.S. Silva, Eliane Trovatti, Luisa S. Serafim, Maria F. Duarte, Armando J.D. Silvestre, Carlos Pascoal Neto , Carmen S.R. Freire. 2013. Production of bacterial cellulose by Gluconacetobacter sacchari using dry olive mill residue, Biomass and Bioenergy, 55, 205-211,
  • Fu L, Zhang J, Yang G. 2013. Present status and applications of bacterial cellulose-based materials for skin tissue repair, Carbohydrate Polymers, 92: 1432– 1442,
  • Gama M, Gatenholm P, Klemm D. 2013. Bacterial NanoCellulose A Sophisticated Multifunctional Material, CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group 6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300 Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742, International Standard Book Number-13: 978-1-4398-6992-5 (eBook - PDF),
  • Goh WN, Rosma A, Kaur B, Fazilah A, Karim AA, Bhat R. 2012. Microstructure and physical properties of microbial cellulose produced during fermentation of black tea broth (Kombucha). II., International Food Research Journal 19(1): 153-158,
  • Grande CJ, Torres FG, Gomez CM, Troncoso OP, Ferrer JC, Pastor JM. 2009. Development of self-assembled bacterial cellulose–

The Production and Characterization of Bacterial Cellulose

Year 2014, Volume: 10 Issue: 2, 1 - 10, 30.01.2017

Abstract

Some properties of bacterial cellulose (BC) Gluconacetobacter hansenii (Gossele et al.) after production were determined and compared with microcrystalline cellulose (MCC). The BC test specimens were prepared with standard Hestrin and Schramm (HS) medium. The obtained pellicels were evaluated after 14 days incubation. According to SEM analysis the diameter of the cellulose fibrils were measured between 20 nm and 75 nm. The water holding capacity was calculated 91 to 109 times higher than dry weigth. The cellulose yield of BC was between 0,81 g/l and 0,84 g/l. XRD, FTIR and TGA analysis were done and compared with MCC. The obtained results and comparison between the strain and MCC showed similiraty. According to the results the obtained BC can be used for food, cosmetic, medicine, paper and composites as raw material or filler.

References

  • Ateş E, Aztekin K. 2011. Parçacık ve fiber takviyeli polimer kompozitlerin yoğunluk ve basma dayanımı özellikleri, J. Fac. Eng. Arch. Gazi Univversity, Vol 26, No 2, 479-486,
  • Bungay HR, Serafica GC. 2000. Production of Microbial Cellulose. US Patent Number: 6,071,727,
  • Castro C, Zuluaga R, Álvarez C, Putaux JL, Gloria Caro G, Rojas OJ, Mondragon I, Ganán P. 2012. Bacterial cellulose produced by a new acid-resistant strain of Gluconacetobacter Genus, Carbohydrate Polymers, 89 (4): 1033-1037,
  • Castro C, Zuluaga R, Putaux JL, Caroa G, Mondragon I, Ganán P, 2011. Structural characterization of bacterial cellulose produced by Gluconacetobacter swingsii sp. from Colombian agroindustrial wastes, Carbohydrate Polymers, Volume 84, Issue 1, 11 February, Pages 96–102,
  • Cheng KC, Catchmark JM, Demirci A. 2009. Enhanced production of bacterial cellulose by using a biofilm reactor and its material property analysis, Journal of Biological Engineering, 3 (12), doi:10.1186/1754-1611-3-12,
  • Fabio P. Gomes, Nuno H.C.S. Silva, Eliane Trovatti, Luisa S. Serafim, Maria F. Duarte, Armando J.D. Silvestre, Carlos Pascoal Neto , Carmen S.R. Freire. 2013. Production of bacterial cellulose by Gluconacetobacter sacchari using dry olive mill residue, Biomass and Bioenergy, 55, 205-211,
  • Fu L, Zhang J, Yang G. 2013. Present status and applications of bacterial cellulose-based materials for skin tissue repair, Carbohydrate Polymers, 92: 1432– 1442,
  • Gama M, Gatenholm P, Klemm D. 2013. Bacterial NanoCellulose A Sophisticated Multifunctional Material, CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group 6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300 Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742, International Standard Book Number-13: 978-1-4398-6992-5 (eBook - PDF),
  • Goh WN, Rosma A, Kaur B, Fazilah A, Karim AA, Bhat R. 2012. Microstructure and physical properties of microbial cellulose produced during fermentation of black tea broth (Kombucha). II., International Food Research Journal 19(1): 153-158,
  • Grande CJ, Torres FG, Gomez CM, Troncoso OP, Ferrer JC, Pastor JM. 2009. Development of self-assembled bacterial cellulose–
There are 10 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section İç Anadolu’da Ağaçlandırma Çalışmaları
Authors

Gökhan Gündüz This is me

Nejla Aşık This is me

Deniz Aydemir This is me

Ayşenur Kılıç This is me

Publication Date January 30, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2014 Volume: 10 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Gündüz, G., Aşık, N., Aydemir, D., Kılıç, A. (2017). Bakteriyel Selüloz Üretimi ve Karakterizasyonu. Düzce Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Ormancılık Dergisi, 10(2), 1-10.

........