Research Article

Accounting Conservatism and Intellectual Capital: Evidence From Turkey With Comparison Models and Sectors

Volume: 21 Number: 4 October 30, 2021
EN

Accounting Conservatism and Intellectual Capital: Evidence From Turkey With Comparison Models and Sectors

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the relevance between accounting conservatism and intellectual capital in the context of the contribution of accounting conservatism to intellectual capital. Four different measurement methods [the asymmetric timeliness of the earnings, market-to-book ratio, asymmetry of the accruals and cash flows and negative accruals] were employed in the study to measure both accounting conservatism and intellectual capital. In this study, research data based on listed companies in manufacturing industry and financial institutions of Borsa Istanbul (BIST) 100 Index in Turkey. The method of the study was the panel data analysis in which the effect of accounting conservatism on intellectual capital was examined based on the data of the predetermined this companies for 2006-2017 period. As a result of the findings, it was determined that the companies care about intellectual capital, and although there is a difference according to the measurement methods, accounting conservatism has an effect on intellectual capital, which is observed both positively that more prominent in financial institutions and negatively, and companies that have conservative accounting policies.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahmed, A. S. & Duellman, S. (2007). Accounting conservatism and board of director characteristics: An empirical analysis, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 43(2-3), 411-437.
  2. Akmeşe, H. (2006). Entellektüel sermayenin firma piyasa değeri üzerine etkisi ve IMKB’de işlem gören şirketler üzerinde bir araştırma, Master Thesis, Selçuk University–Institute of Social Sciences.
  3. Amir, E. & Lev, B. (1996). Value-relevance of nonfinancial information: The wireless communications industry, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 22(1-3), 3-30.
  4. Ball, R. & Shivakumar, L. (2006). The role of accruals in asymmetrically timely gain and loss recognition, Journal of Accounting Research, 44, 207-242.
  5. Basu, S. (1997). The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24(1), 3-37.
  6. Bayraktaroglu, A. E., Calisir, F., Baskak, M. (2014). Kimya, petrol, plastik sektöründeki firmalarda 1. ve 2. ulusal pazar açısından entelektüel sermaye kullanım etkinliği ve pazar performansı ilişkisi, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 9(3), 25-47.
  7. Bayraktaroglu, A. E., Calisir, F., Baskak, M. (2019). Intellectual capital and firm performance: an extended VAIC model, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 20 (3), 406-425.
  8. Beaver, W. H. & Ryan, S. G. (2000). Biases and lags in book value and their effects on the ability of the book-to-market ratio to predict book return on equity, Journal of Accounting Research, 38(1), 127-148.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Business Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

October 30, 2021

Submission Date

December 28, 2020

Acceptance Date

July 31, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 21 Number: 4

APA
Bellikli, U., & Daştan, A. (2021). Accounting Conservatism and Intellectual Capital: Evidence From Turkey With Comparison Models and Sectors. Ege Academic Review, 21(4), 333-355. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.1017873
AMA
1.Bellikli U, Daştan A. Accounting Conservatism and Intellectual Capital: Evidence From Turkey With Comparison Models and Sectors. ear. 2021;21(4):333-355. doi:10.21121/eab.1017873
Chicago
Bellikli, Uğur, and Abdülkerim Daştan. 2021. “Accounting Conservatism and Intellectual Capital: Evidence From Turkey With Comparison Models and Sectors”. Ege Academic Review 21 (4): 333-55. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.1017873.
EndNote
Bellikli U, Daştan A (October 1, 2021) Accounting Conservatism and Intellectual Capital: Evidence From Turkey With Comparison Models and Sectors. Ege Academic Review 21 4 333–355.
IEEE
[1]U. Bellikli and A. Daştan, “Accounting Conservatism and Intellectual Capital: Evidence From Turkey With Comparison Models and Sectors”, ear, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 333–355, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.21121/eab.1017873.
ISNAD
Bellikli, Uğur - Daştan, Abdülkerim. “Accounting Conservatism and Intellectual Capital: Evidence From Turkey With Comparison Models and Sectors”. Ege Academic Review 21/4 (October 1, 2021): 333-355. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.1017873.
JAMA
1.Bellikli U, Daştan A. Accounting Conservatism and Intellectual Capital: Evidence From Turkey With Comparison Models and Sectors. ear. 2021;21:333–355.
MLA
Bellikli, Uğur, and Abdülkerim Daştan. “Accounting Conservatism and Intellectual Capital: Evidence From Turkey With Comparison Models and Sectors”. Ege Academic Review, vol. 21, no. 4, Oct. 2021, pp. 333-55, doi:10.21121/eab.1017873.
Vancouver
1.Uğur Bellikli, Abdülkerim Daştan. Accounting Conservatism and Intellectual Capital: Evidence From Turkey With Comparison Models and Sectors. ear. 2021 Oct. 1;21(4):333-55. doi:10.21121/eab.1017873

Cited By