Research Article

Green Organizational Climate: Measurement Scale Development and Validation to Measure Green Climate Structure in Organizations

Volume: 23 Number: 1 January 23, 2023
EN

Green Organizational Climate: Measurement Scale Development and Validation to Measure Green Climate Structure in Organizations

Abstract

This paper aimed to develop a valid and reliable measurement scale for green organizational climate. Both qualitative and quantitative research methodologies were applied. In the research, the three-stage scale development process proposed by Schwab (1980) was be used. The conceptual framework were first clarified and a proposal pool were created by compiling the expressions in scale through a qualitative exploration study, which includes literature review, in-depth interviews and focus group studies using deductive and inductive methods. Expert opinions were sought for the examination of face validity and content validity. After the pilot application, draft scale was applied to 750 managers of businesses operating in different sectors in various provinces of Turkey. According to the results of the exploratory factor analysis, 21 items and 4 dimensions were extracted, namely green economic climate, green social climate, green digital climate, and green bureaucratic climate. The results of confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the measurement items developed were had an acceptable level of compatibility. The cronbach alpha coefficients had sufficient reliability in all dimensions. As a result, it was seen that the green organizational climate scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

Selcuk University Scientific Research Projects (BAP) Coordinatorship

Project Number

21401093

Thanks

This research was produced by using the data obtained within the scope of the project named “Green Organization Climate: A Project for Developing a Scale to Measure Green Climate Structure in Organizations” numbered 21401093 and supported by the Selcuk University Scientific Research Projects (BAP) Coordinatorship. The author would like to thank Selçuk University BAP Coordinator for their support.

References

  1. Brnova, Petra (2020). Strategic organizational sustainability climate: Scale development and validation. Doctoral Thesis, Nathan M. Bisk College of Business at Florida Institute of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Melbourne.
  2. Chou, Chia-Jung (2014). Hotels’ environmental policies and employee personal environmental beliefs: Interactions and outcomes. Tourism Management, 40 (2014), 436-446.
  3. Kuo, Szu-Yu and Pei-Chun Lin (2020). Determinants of green performance in container terminal operations: A lean management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275(2020), 123105.
  4. Norton, Thomas A., Hannes Zacher and Neal M. Ashkanasy (2012). On the importance of pro-environmental organizational climate for employee green behavior. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 497-500. doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2012.01487.x
  5. Norton, Thomas A., Hannes Zacher and Neal M. Ashkanasy (2014). Organisational sustainability policies and employee green behaviour: The mediating role of work climate perceptions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 49-54. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.12.008.
  6. Norton, Thomas A., Hannes Zacher and Neal M. Ashkanasy (2015). Pro-Environmental Organizational Culture and Climate. in: The Psychology of Green Organizations (ed. Jennifer L. Robertson, Julian Barling). Oxford University Press, 322-348.
  7. Norton, Thomas A., Hannes Zacher, Stacey L. Parker and Neal M. Ashkanasy (2017). Bridging the gap between green behavioral intentions and employee green behavior: The role of green psychological climate. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(7), 996-1015.
  8. Schwab, D. P. (1980). Construct Validity in Organizational Behavior. in: Research in Organizational Behavior. Cummings, L.L. and Staw, B.W. (Eds.). Greenwich CT.: JAI Press.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Business Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

January 23, 2023

Submission Date

March 11, 2022

Acceptance Date

August 23, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2023 Volume: 23 Number: 1

APA
Erbaşı, A. (2023). Green Organizational Climate: Measurement Scale Development and Validation to Measure Green Climate Structure in Organizations. Ege Academic Review, 23(1), 59-74. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.1086516
AMA
1.Erbaşı A. Green Organizational Climate: Measurement Scale Development and Validation to Measure Green Climate Structure in Organizations. ear. 2023;23(1):59-74. doi:10.21121/eab.1086516
Chicago
Erbaşı, Ali. 2023. “Green Organizational Climate: Measurement Scale Development and Validation to Measure Green Climate Structure in Organizations”. Ege Academic Review 23 (1): 59-74. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.1086516.
EndNote
Erbaşı A (January 1, 2023) Green Organizational Climate: Measurement Scale Development and Validation to Measure Green Climate Structure in Organizations. Ege Academic Review 23 1 59–74.
IEEE
[1]A. Erbaşı, “Green Organizational Climate: Measurement Scale Development and Validation to Measure Green Climate Structure in Organizations”, ear, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 59–74, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.21121/eab.1086516.
ISNAD
Erbaşı, Ali. “Green Organizational Climate: Measurement Scale Development and Validation to Measure Green Climate Structure in Organizations”. Ege Academic Review 23/1 (January 1, 2023): 59-74. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.1086516.
JAMA
1.Erbaşı A. Green Organizational Climate: Measurement Scale Development and Validation to Measure Green Climate Structure in Organizations. ear. 2023;23:59–74.
MLA
Erbaşı, Ali. “Green Organizational Climate: Measurement Scale Development and Validation to Measure Green Climate Structure in Organizations”. Ege Academic Review, vol. 23, no. 1, Jan. 2023, pp. 59-74, doi:10.21121/eab.1086516.
Vancouver
1.Ali Erbaşı. Green Organizational Climate: Measurement Scale Development and Validation to Measure Green Climate Structure in Organizations. ear. 2023 Jan. 1;23(1):59-74. doi:10.21121/eab.1086516

Cited By