Lider-Üye Etkileşimi İle İşten Ayrılma Niyeti Arasındaki İlişki Üzerinde Cinsiyetin Etkisi

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, lider-üye etkileşimi ile işten ayrılma niyeti arasındaki ilişki üzerinde cinsiyetin etkisini belirlemektir. Araştırma, Muğla ilinde turizm, gıda ve taşımacılık alanlarında faaliyette bulunan işletmelerde çalışan 203 kişiye bir anket yapılarak gerçekleşmiştir. Yapılan analizler sonucunda, liderüye etkileşimi ile işten ayrılma niyeti arasında anlamlı ve negatif yönde bir ilişki olduğu bulunmuştur. Bundan başka, cinsiyetin ve lider-üye etkileşiminin işten ayrılma niyetini önemli ölçüde etkilediği ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu araştırma sonucunda, işten ayrılma niyeti üzerinde lider-üye etkileşimi ile cinsiyetin birlikte etkisinin var olduğu ve bu ilişkinin kadın çalışanlar için erkeklerden daha kuvvetli olduğu bulunmuştur. Sonuç olarak, işten ayrılma niyetinin anlaşılması açısından hem cinsiyetin hem de lider-üye etkileşiminin dikkate alınması gereği vurgulanmaktadır

Keywords

• Lider-Üye Etkileşimi, İşten Ayrılma Niyeti, Cinsiyet

The Effect of Gender on The Relationship Between Leader-Member Exchange and Intention to Quit

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of gender on the relationship between leader-member exchange and intention to quit. This study included 203 employees, who were administered a structured instrument, across organizations in tourism, food and transportation sectors in Muğla. The analysis revealed a significant negative relationship between leader-member exchange and intention to quit. Moreover, gender and leader-member exchange explained a meaningful portion of intention to quit. The results of the present study indicated that gender moderated the relationship between leader-member exchange and intention to quit and this relationship was stronger for females than males. As a result, a need is emphasized to consider both gender and leader-member exchange to better understand intention to quit across organizations

Keywords

• Leader-Member Exchange, Intention to Quit, Gender

References

1. Aiken, L.S. ve West, S.G. (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions, Newbury Park, CA, Sage.
2. Alexander, J.A., Bloom, J.R. ve Nuchols, B.A. (1994) “Nursing Turnover and Hospital Efficiency: An Organization-Level Analysis” Industrial Relations, 33: 505–520.
3. Anderson, J.C. ve Gerbing, D.W. (1988) “Structural Equation Modeling In Practice: A Review and Recommended Two- Step Approach” Psychological Bulletin, 103: 411–423.
4. Bannister, B.D. ve Grifeth, R.W. (1986) ”Applying a Causal Analytic Framework to The Mobley, Horner, and Holling- sworth (1978) Turnover Model: A Useful Reexamination” Journal of Management, 12(3): 433–443.
5. Bauer, T.N. ve Green, S.G. (1996) “Development of Leader- Member Exchange: A Longitudinal Test” Academy of Mana- gement Journal, 39(6): 1538-1567.
6. Baysal, A.C. (1984): “İşletmelerde İşgücü Devri Sorunu” Erci- yes Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, Güz(6): 81-97.
7. Breukelen, W., Schyns, B. ve Blanc, P.L. (2006) “Leader-Mem- ber Exchange Theory and Research: Accomplishments and Future Challenges” Leadership, 2(3): 295-316.
8. Burns, J.Z. ve Otte, F.L. (1999) “Implications of Leader-Mem- ber Exchange Theory and Research for Human Resource Development Research” Human Resource Development Qu- arterly, 10(3): 225-248.

9. Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, D. ve Klesh, J. (1979) Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire, Uni- versity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
10. Cammann, C., Fichman, M.G., Jenkins, D. ve Klesh, J.R. (1983) “Assessing the Attitudes and Perceptions of Organi- zational Members” Seashore et al. (eds.), Assessing Organiza- tional Change: A Guide to Methods, Measures and Practices, New York, Wiley.
11. Campbell, D.J. ve Campbell, K.M. (2003) “Global Versus Fa- cet Predictors of Intention to Quit: Differences in a Samp- le of Male and Female Singaporean Managers and Non- Managers” International Journal of Human Resource Mana- gement, 14(7): 1152-1177.
12. Cascio, W. (1991) Costing Human Resources: The Financial Impact of Behavior in Organizations, 3rd edition, Boston, PWSKent.
13. Champoux, J.E. ve Peters, W.S. (1987) “Form, Effect Size, and Power in Moderated Regression Analysis” Journal Of Occu- pational Psychology, 60: 243–255.
14. Chaplin, W.F. (1991) “The Next Generation of Moderator Re- search in Personality Psychology” Journal of Personality, 59: 143–178.
15. Cevrioğlu, E. (2007) Lider-Üye Etkileşimi ile Bireysel ve Ör- gütsel Sonuçlar Arasındaki İlişki: Ampirik Bir İnceleme, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Afyon, Afyonkarahisar Koca- tepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü İşletme Anabilim Dalı.
16. Cotton, J.L. ve Tuttle, J.M. (1986) “Employee Turnover: A Meta-Analysis and Review with Implications for Research” The Academy of Management Review, 11(1): 55-70.
17. Çekmecelioğlu, H.G. (2005) “Örgüt İkliminin İş Tatmini ve İşten Ayrılma Niyeti Üzerindeki Etkisi: Bir Araştırma” C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 6(2): 23-39.
18. Dansereau, F., Graen, G.B. ve Haga, W. (1975) “A Vertical Dyad Linkage Approach to Leadership in Formal Organiza- tions” Organizatonal Behavior and Human Performance, 13: 46-78.
19. Demircan, Ç.N. ve Ceylan, A. (2005) “İş Motivasyonunun Çalışan Bağlılığı ve İşten Ayrılma Eğilimi Üzerine Etkileri” Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 6(1): 52-66.
20. Dienesch, R.M. ve Liden, R.C. (1986) “Leader-Member Exc- hange Model of Leadership: A Critique and Further Deve- lopment” Academy of Management Review, 11(3): 618-634.
21. Evans, M.G. (1985) “A Monte Carlo Study Of The Effects Of Correlated Method Variance in Moderated Multiple Regres- sion Analysis” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36(3): 305–323.
22. Ferris, G.R. (1985) “Role of Leadership in The Employee Withdrawal Process: A Constructive Replication” Journal of Applied Psychology, 70: 777–781.
23. Frazier, P.A., Tix, P.A. ve Barron, K.E. (2004) “Testing Mode- rator and Mediator Effects in Counseling Psychology Rese- arch” Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(1): 115-134.
24. Gerstner, C.R. ve Day, D.V. (1997) “Meta-Analytic Review of Leader-Member Exchange Theory: Correlates and Cons- truct Issues” Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6): 827-844.
25. Graen, G.B. ve Scandura, T.A. (1987) “Toward a Psychology of Dyadic Organizing” Research in Organizational Behavior, 9: 175-208.
26. Graen, G.B. ve Uhl-Bien, M. (1995) “Relationship-Based Approach to Leadership: Development of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory of Leadership Over 25 Years: App- lying A Multi-Level Multi-Domain Perspective” Leadership Quarterly, 6(2): 219-247.
27. Graen, G.B., Liden, R.C. ve Hoel, W. (1982) “Role of Lea- dership in The Employee Withdrawal Process” Journal of Applied Psychology, 67: 868–872.
28. Green, S.G., Anderson, S.E. ve Shivers, S.L. (1996) “Demog- raphic and Organizational Influences on Leader-Member Exchange and Related Work Attitudes” Organizational Be- havior and Human Decision Processes, 66: 203-214.
29. Griffeth, R.W., Hom, P.W. ve Gaertner, S. (2000) “A Meta- Analysis of Antecedents and Correlates of Employee Tur- nover: Update, Moderator Tests, and Research İmplicati- ons for The Next Millennium” Journal of Management, 26: 463–488.
30. Gül, H., Oktay, E. ve Gökçe, H. (2008) “İş Tatmini, Stres, Ör- gütsel Bağlılık, İşten Ayrılma Niyeti ve Performans Arasın- daki İlişkiler: Sağlık Sektöründe Bir Uygulama” Akademik Bakış, 15: 1-11.
31. Gürpınar, G. (2006) “Örgütsel Adalet, Örgütsel Bağlılık, Li- der-Üye Mübadele İlişkisi Ve Ayrılma Niyeti Arasındaki İliş- kiler Üzerine Ampirik Bir Çalışma”, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul, Yeditepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü İşletme Anabilim Dalı.
32. Harris, K.J., Kacmar, K.M. ve Wıtt, L.A. (2005) “An Exami- nation of The Curvilinear Relationship Between Leader– Member Exchange and Intent to Turnover” Journal of Orga- nizational Behavior, 26: 363-378.
33. Hom, P.W., Caranikas-Walker, F., Prussia, G.E. ve Griffeth, R.W. (1992) “A Meta-Analytical Structural Equations Analysis of a Model of Employee Turnover” Journal of App- lied Psychology, 77: 890-909.
34. House, J.H. ve Adiya, R.N. (1997) “The Social Scientific Study of Leadership: Quo Vadis?” Journal of Management, 23(3): 409-473.
35. Hu, L. ve Bentler, P.M. (1995) “Evaluating Model Fit”, Hoyle, R.H. (Ed.), Structural Equation Modelling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications.
36. Hu, L. and Bentler, P.M. (1998) “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Inde- xes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives” Structural Equation Modeling, 6: 1–55.
37. Jöreskog, K.G. ve Sörbom, D. (1993) LISREL 8: User’s Referen- ce Guide, Chicago, Scientific Software International.
38. Keçecioğlu, T. (2003) Lider ve Liderlik: Değişim Yolunda İyi Bir Öğrenci ve İyi Bir Öğretmen, Birinci Baskı, İstanbul, Oku- muş Adam Yayıncılık.
39. Koçel, T. (2003) İşletme Yöneticiliği, Genişletilmiş 9. Baskı, İs- tanbul, Beta Bas.Yay.Dağ.A.Ş.
40. Liden, R.C. ve Graen, G.(1980) “Generalizability of the Verti- cal Dyad Linkage Model of Leadership” Academy of Mana- gement Journal, 23(3): 451-465.
41. Liden, R.C. ve Maslyn, J.M. (1998) “Multidimensionality of Leader-Member Exchange: An Empirical Assessment Thro- ugh Scale Development” Journal of Management, 24(1): 43- 72.
42. Lyness, K.S. ve Judiesch, M.K. (2001) “Are Female Managers Quitters? The Relationships of Gender, Promotion, and Fa- mily Leaves of Absence to Voluntary Turnover” Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6): 1167-1178.
43. Maslyn, J.M. ve Uhl-Bien, M. (2001) “Leader-Member Exc- hange and Its Dimensions: Effects of Self-Effort and Other’s Effort on Relationship Quality” Journal of Applied Psycho- logy, 86(4): 697-708.
44. Milner, K., Katz, L.A., Fisher, J. ve Notrica, V. (2007) “Gen- der and the Quality of Leader-Member Exchange: Findings From South African Organization” South African Journal of Psychology, 37(2): 316-329.
45. Mobley, W.H. (1977) “Intermediate Linkages in the Relations- hip between Job Satisfaction and Employee Turnover” Jour- nal of Applied Psychology, 62(2): 237-240.
46. Mobley, W.H. (1982) Employee Turnover: Causes, Consequences, and Control, MA, Addison-Wesley.
47. Morrow, P.C., Suzuki, Y., Crum, M.R., Ruben, R. ve Pa- utsch, G. (2005) “The Role of Leader-Member Exchange in High Turnover Work Environments” Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20(8): 681-694.
48. Onay, M. (2009) “Algılanan Cinsiyet Ayrımcılığının Sonuçları ve Konuyla İlgili Ampirik Bir Araştırma” Ege Akademik Ba- kış, 9(4): 1101-1125.
49. Özutku, H., Ağca, V. ve Cevrioğlu, E. (2008) “Lider-Üye Et- kileşimi Teorisi Çerçevesinde, Yönetici-Ast Etkileşimi ile Örgütsel Bağlılık Boyutları ve İş Performansı Arasındaki İliş- ki: Ampirik Bir İnceleme” İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 22(2): 193-210.
50. Podsakoff, P.M., Mackenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y. and Podsakoff, N.P. (2003) “Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of The Literature and Recommended Reme- dies” Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 879–903.
51. Rai, H. (2008) ”Gender Differences: Ingratiation and Leader- Member Exchange” Singapore Management Review, 31(1): 63-72.
52. Sabuncuoğlu, E.T. (2007) “Eğitim, Örgütsel Bağlılık ve İşten Ayrılma Niyeti Arasındaki İlişkilerin İncelenmesi” Ege Aka- demik Bakış, 7(2): 621-636.
53. Schriesheim, C.A., Castro, S.L. ve Cogliser, C.C. (1999) “Lea- der-Member Exchange (LMX) Research: A Comprehensive Review of Theory, Measurement, and Data-Analytic Practi- ces” Leadership Quarterly, 10(1): 63-113.
54. Steel, R.P. ve Ovalle, N.K. (1984) “A Review and Meta-Analy- sis of Research on the Relationship Between Behavioral In- tentions and Employee Turnover” Journal of Applied Psycho- logy, 69(4): 673-686.
55. Stone, E.F. ve Hollenbeck, J.R. (1989) “Clarifying Some Cont- roversial Issues Surrounding Statistical Procedures for De- tecting Moderator Variables: Empirical Evidence and Rela- ted Evidence” Journal of Applied Psychology, 74: 3–10.
56. Şimşek, Ö.F. (2007) Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesine Giriş Temel İlkeler ve LISREL Uygulamaları, Ankara, Ekinoks Yayıncılık.
57. Tanoff G.F. ve Barlow, C.B. (2002) “Leadership and Followers- hip: Same Animal, Different Spots?” Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 54(3): 157-167.
58. Uyguç, N. ve Çimrin, D. (2004) “DEÜ Araştırma ve Uygu- lama Hastanesi Merkez Laboratuvarı Çalışanlarının Örgüte Bağlılıklarını ve İşten Ayrılma Niyetlerini Etkileyen Faktör- ler” DEÜ İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(1): 91-99.
59. Vecchio, R.P. ve Gobdel, B.C. (1984) “The Vertical Dyad Lin- kage Model of Leadership: Problems and Prospects” Organi- zational Behavior and Human Performance, 34: 5–20.
60. Vecchio, R.P., Grifeth, R.W. ve Hom, P.W. (1986) “The Pre- dictive Utility of the Vertical Dyad Linkage Approach” Jour- nal of Social Psychology, 126(5): 617-625.
61. Wayne, S.J., Liden, R.C. ve Sparrow, R.T. (1994) “Developing Leader-Member Exchanges: The Influence of Gender and Ingratiation” American Behavioral Scientist, 37(5): 697-714.
62. Wilhelm, C.C., Herd, A.M. ve Steiner, D.D. (1993) “Attri- butional Conflict Between Managers and Subordinates: An Investigation of Leader–Member Exchange Effects” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14: 531–544.
63. Williams, L.J. ve Hazer, J.T. (1986) “Antecedents and Cosequ- ences of Satisfaction and Commitment in Turnover Models: A Reanalysis Using Latent Variable Structural Equation Methods” Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(2): 219-231.
64. Zel, U. (2006) Kişilik ve Liderlik, 2nci Basım, Ankara, Nobel Yayınları.