Türkiye’nin Çevresel Enerji Etkinliği ve Toplam Faktör Verimliliği: Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analiz

Abstract

Türkiye’nin enerji verimliliği ve etkinliğinin, OECD ülkeleri örneklemi içinde karşılaştırmalı olarak ölçülmesi amaçlanan bu çalışmada, Veri Zarflama Analizi çerçevesinde Süper Etkinlik Modeli ve İstenmeyen Çıktı Modeli ile Türkiye’nin ekonomi düzeyinde teknik etkinliği ölçülmüş, Malmquist endeksi yardımıyla Türkiye’nin toplam faktör verimliliğindeki değişme analiz edilmiştir. Türkiye ithal ettiği enerjiyi de diğer üretim faktörleri ile birlikte etkin kullanamadığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Türkiye’nin kullandığı enerjide ağırlığın fosil yakıtlarda olması CO2 salınımının da fazla olmasına neden olmaktadır. Model sonuçları çerçevesinde Türkiye’nin ekonomisinin yapısı ile ilgili önemli bulgular ortaya çıkmaktadır. Bu çerçevede niteliksiz emek, nükleer eksikliği, enerji güvenliği, enerji güvenliği bağlamında da temiz enerji ön plana çıkmaktadır. Hızla artan enerji ihtiyacı göz önüne alındığında; yerli kaynakların değerlendirilmesini sağlayacak, Türkiye koşullarına uygun, dünyada enerji alanındaki gelişmeleri takip eden, uzun vadeli sosyal, ekonomik ve çevresel politikaları bir arada ele alan bir enerji politikasına ihtiyaç duyulduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır

Keywords

• Enerji etkinliği ve verimliliği, çevresel enerji etkinliği

Environmental Efficiency and Total Factor Productivity of Turkey: A Comparative Analysis

Abstract

In this paper I aim to measure Turkey’s energy efficiency and productivity in the OECD sample comperatively. I have used the Super Efficiency Model and the Bad Output Model to measure technical efficiency of Turkey generally and to see Turkey’s inefficiency in the energy inputs specificially under general return to scale assumption. Also I have used the Malmquist index to measure the changes in total factor productivity. I have come to the conclusion that Turkey hasn’t used energy inputs efficiently as non-energy inputs did. The fact that the share of fossil fuel is much in the energy consumption of Turkey has caused higher CO2 emissions in Turkey. According to the model results unskilled labour, lack of nuclear energy, energy security and clean energy have come to the forefront for Turkey. I have concluded that we need an energy policy which will follow developments in the energy field in the world, will be in accordance with our long term social, economic and environmental policies and will enable to use our domestic sources, by taking into consideration ever-growing energy needs in the world

Keywords

• Energy efficiency and productivity, environmental efficiency

References

1. Ang, B.W. (2006) “Monitoring Changes in Eco- nomy-wide Energy Efficiency: From Energy–GDP Ra- tio to Composite Efficiency Index” Energy Policy, 34(5): 574–582.
2. Azadeh, A., Amalnick, M. S., Ghaderi, S. F. ve Asadzadeh, S. M. (2007) “An Integrated DEA PCA Numerical Taxonomy Approach for Energy Efficiency Assessment and Consumption Optimization in Energy Intensive Manufacturing Sectors” EnergyPolicy, 35(7): 3792–3806.
3. Azadeh, A., Ghaderi, S. F. ve Asadzadeh, S. M. (2008) “Energy Efficiency Modeling and Estimation in Petroleum Refining Industry - A Comparison Using Physical Data” International Conference on Renewable Energies and Power Quality (ICREPQ’11), Santander, March 12-14.
4. Bagdadioglu, N., Price, C. M. W. ve Weyman-Jones, T. G. (1996) “Efficiency and Ownership in Electricity Distribution: a Non Parametric Model of the Turkish Experience” Energy Economics, 18(1): 1–23.
5. Banker, R. D., Charnes, R. F. ve Cooper, W. W. (1984) “Some Models for Estimating Technical and Sca- le Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis” Manage- ment Science, 30: 1078–1092.
6. Birol, F. ve Keppler, J. H. (2000) “Prices, Technology Development and the Rebound Effect” Energy Policy, 28(6-7): 457-469.
7. Boyd, G. A. and Pang, J. X. (2000) “Estimating the Linkage between Energy Efficiency and Productivity” Energy Policy, 28(5): 289–296.
8. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. ve Rhodes, E. (1978) “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units”, European Journal of Operational Research, 3(4): 392–444.

9. Chen, Y. ve Sherman H. D. (2004) “The Benefits of Non-Radial vs. Radial Super-Efficiency DEA: An App- lication to Burden-Sharing amongst NATO Member Nations” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 38: 307-320.
10. Chen, Y., Motiwalla, L. ve Khan, M. R. (2004) “Using Super-Efficiency DEA to Evaluate Financial Per- formance of E-Business Initiative in the Retail Industry” International Journal of Information Technology & Decisi- on Making, 3(2): 337-351.
11. Chien, T. ve Hu, J. L. (2007) “Renewable Energy and Macroeconomic Efficiency of OECD and Non- OECD Economies” Energy Policy, 35(7): 3606-3615.
12. Chung, Y.H., Färe, R. ve Grosskopf, S. (1997) “Pro- ductivity and Undesirable Outputs: A Directional Dis- tance Function Approach” Journal of Environmental Ma- nagement, 51(3): 229–240.
13. Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., ve Tone, K. (1999) Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software, Hingham, MA, USA, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
14. Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority (EECA) (2006) Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy in New Zealand, Year Four Report: March 2001 to 2005.
15. Färe, R. ve Grosskopf, S. (2004) “Modeling Undesi- rable Factors in Efficiency Evaluation: Comment” Euro- pean Journal of Operational Research, 157(1): 242–245.
16. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S. ve Tyteca, D. (1996) “An Ac- tivity Analysis Model of the Environmental Performance of Firms Application to Fossil-Fuel-Fired Electric Utiliti- es” Ecological Economics, 18(2): 161–175.
17. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lovell, C. A. K. ve Pasur- ka, C. (1989) “Multilateral Productivity Comparisons When Some Outputs are Undesirable: A Nonparametric Approach” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(1): 90–98.
18. Färe, R., ve Grosskopf, S. (2004) “Modeling Unde- sirable Factors in Efficiency Evaluation: Comment” Eu- ropean Journal of Operational Research, 157(1): 242–245.
19. Farrell, M. J. (1957) “The Measurement of Produc- tive Efficiency” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120(3): 253–290.
20. Fİrsund, F. R. ve Kittelsen, S. A. C. (1998) “Pro- ductivity Development of Norwegian Electricity Distri- bution Utilities” Resource and Energy Economics, 20(3): 207–224.
21. Geller, H., Harrington, P., Rosenfeld, A. H., Tanis- hima, S., ve Unander F. (2006) “Polices for Increasing Energy Efficiency: Thirty Years of Experience in OECD Countries” Energy Policy , 34(5): 556–573.
22. Grösche, P. (2008) “Measuring Residental Energy Efficiency Improvement with DEA” Ruhr Economic Pa- pers no. 60.
23. Hall, R. E., ve Jones, C. I. (1999) “Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output per Worker than Others?” NBER Working Papers no. 6564, Natio- nal Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
24. Hu, J. L. ve Kao, C. H. (2007) “Efficient Energy-Sa- vings Targets for APEC Economies” Energy Policy, 35(1): 373–382.
25. Hu, J. L. ve Wang. S. C. (2006) “Total-Factor Energy Efficiency of Regions in China” EnergyPolicy, 34(17): 3206–3217.
26. International Energy Agency (IEA) (2004) Oil Crisis & Climate Challenges—30 Years of Energy Use in IEA Co- untries, OECD, Paris.
27. International Energy Agency (IEA) (2007) Energy Use in the New Millennium—Trends in IEA Countries, OECD, Paris.
28. Jamasb, T., Nillesen, P. ve Pollitt, M. (2004) “Strate- gic Behaviour under Regulatory Benchmarking” Energy Economics, 26(5): 825–843
29. Kök, R. ve Deliktaş, E. (2003) Endüstri İktisadında Verimlilik Ölçme ve Strateji Geliştirme Teknikleri, DEÜ İİBF Yayınları, Yayın Karar No:25-8/1, İzmir.
30. Krüger, J. J. (2003) “The Global Trends of Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from the Nonparametric Malmquist Index Approach” Oxford Economic Papers, 55: 265-286.
31. Kulshreshtha, M. ve Parikh, J. K. (2002) “Study of Efficiency and Productivity Growth in Opencast and Underground Coal Mining in India: A DEA Analysis” Energy Economics, 24(5): 439–453.
32. Lee, W.S. (2008) “Benchmarking the Energy Effici- ency of Government Buildings with Data Envelopment Analysis” Energy and Buildings, 40(5): 891–895.
33. Lovell, C.A.K. ve Rouse A.P.B. (2003) “Equivalent Standard DEA Models to Provide Super-Efficiency Sco- res” Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54: 101- 108.
34. Mukherjee, K. (2008) “Energy Use Efficiency in U.S. Manufacturing: A Nonparametric Analysis”, Energy Economics, 30(1): 76–96.
35. Natural Resources Canada (NRC) (2006) Energy Efficiency Trends in Canada: 1990 to 2004, Office of Energy Efficiency, Ottawa.
36. ODYSSEE (2007) /http://www.odyssee-indicators. org/Overview/overview.php, (09.09.2010).
37. Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (OEERE) (2007) Indicators of Energy Intensities in the United States.
38. Onut, S. ve Soner, S. (2006) “Energy Efficiency Assessment for the Antalya Region Hotels in Turkey” Energy and Buildings, 38(8): 964–971.
39. Pacudan, R. ve de Guzman, E. (2002) “Impact of Energy Efficiency Policy to Productive Efficiency of Electricity Distribution Industry in the Philippines” Energy Economics, 24(1): 41–54.
40. Pombo, C. ve Taborda, R. (2006) “Performance and Efficiency in Colombia’s Power Distribution System: Effects of the 1994 Reform” Energy Economics, 28(3): 339–369.
41. Raczka, J. (2001) “Explaining the Performance of Heat Plants in Poland” Energy Economics, 23(4): 355– 370.
42. Ramanathan, R. (2000) “A Holistic Approach to Compare Energy Efficiencies of Different Transport Mo- des” Energy Policy, 28(11): 743–747.
43. SAITECH, (2004) Introduction to DEA-Solver- Pro (Professional Version 4.1), www.saitech-inc.com (29.09.2004).
44. Saygılı, Ş., Cihan, C. ve Yurtoğlu, H. (2005) Türki- ye Ekonomisinde Sermaye Birikimi, Verimlilik ve Büyüme: 1972-2003, Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı, Ekonomik Mo- deller ve Stratejik Araştırmalar Genel Müdürlüğü, Yayın No: 2286, Ankara.
45. Scheel, H., (2001) “Undesirable Outputs in Effici- ency Valuations” European Journal of Operational Rese- arch, 132: 400–410.
46. Stern, N. (2007) The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
47. Tone, K. (2001) “A Slacks-Based Measure of Effici- ency in Data Envelopment Analysis” European Journal of Operational Research, 130(3): 498-509.
48. Tone, K. (2002) “A Slacks-Based Measure of Super- Efficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis” European Jo- urnal of Operational Research, 143(1): 32-41.
49. Tyteca, D. (1996) “On the Measurement of the En- vironmental Performance of Firms - A Literature Review and a Productive Efficiency Perspective” Journal of Envi- ronmental Management, 46: 281-308.
50. Tyteca, D. (1997) “Linear Programming Models for the Measurement of Environmental Performance of Firms — Concepts and Empirical Results” Journal of Productivity Analysis, 8(2): 183–197.
51. Vaninsky, A. (2006) “Efficiency of Electric Power Generation in the United States: Analysis and Forecast Based on Data Envelopment Analysis” Energy Economics, 28(2): 326–338.
52. Wei, Y.M., Liao, H. ve Fan, Y. (2007) “An Empirical Analysis of Energy Efficiency in China’s Iron and Steel Sector” Energy, 32(12): 2262–2270.
53. Weyman-Jones, T.G. (1991) “Productive Efficiency in a Regulated Industry: The Area Electricity Boards of England and Wales” Energy Economics, 13(2): 116–122.
54. Xu, X. P. ve Liang, L. (2007) “Energy Efficiency and Productivity of China: Compared with Other Countri- es” Shi, Y., van Albada, G.D. ve Dongarra, J. (eds), Com- putational Science-ICCS 2007, 7th International Con- ference Part III, Beijing, China, May 27-30, 988-991.
55. Yang, H., Shi, D. ve Xiao. J. (2009) “Influence of Environmental Factors on Energy Efficiency— Analysis on Regional Theoretic Energy Saving Potential and Real Energy Saving Potential” China Industrial Economics, 4: 73–84.
56. Yu, M. (2004) “Measuring Physical Efficiency of Domestic Airports in Taiwan with Undesirable Outputs and Environmental Factors” Journal of Air Transport Ma- nagement, 10(5): 295–303.
57. Yunos, J. M. ve Hawdon, D. (1997) “The Efficiency of the National Electricity Board in Malaysia: An In- tercountry Comparison Using DEA” Energy Economics, 19(2): 255–269.
58. Zaim, O. (2004) “Measuring Environmental Per- formance of State Manufacturing Through Changes in Pollution Intensities: A DEA Framework” Ecological Eco- nomics, 48(1): 37–47.
59. Zhou, P., Ang, B. W. ve Poh, K. L. (2008a) “A Sur- vey of Data Envelopment Analysis in Energy and Envi- ronmental Studies” European Journal of Operational Rese- arch, 189(1): 1–18.
60. Zhou, P., Ang, B. W. ve Poh, K. L. (2008b) “Measu- ring Environmental Performance under Different Envi- ronmental DEA Technologies” Energy Economics, 30(1): 1–14.
61. Zhou, P., ve Ang, B. W. (2008) “Linear Program- ming Models for Measuring Economy-wide Energy Ef- ficiency Performance” Energy Policy, 36(8): 2911– 2916.
62. Zhu, J. (2001) “Super Efficiency and DEA Sensiti- vity Analysis” European Journal of Operational Research, 129: 443-455.
63. Zofio, J. L., ve Prieto, A. M. (2001) “Environmental Efficiency and Regulatory Standards: The Case of CO2 Emissions from OECD Industries” Resource and Energy Economics, 23(1): 63–83.