Stratejik İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi ve Firma Performansı Arasındaki İlişkide İçsel ve Dışsal Uyumun Moderatör Etkisi: Türk Otomotiv Sektöründe Bir Alan Araştırması

Abstract

Bu çalışmada Stratejik İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi ve firma performansı arasındaki ilişkide içsel ve dışsal uyumun moderatör etkisi Türk Otomotiv Sektöründe incelenmiştir. Verilerin analizinde tanımlayıcı istatistikler, kümeleme analizi, t testi, korelasyon analizi, hiyerarşik regresyon ve Manova analizi uygulanmıştır. Elde edilen bulgulara göre, stratejik insan kaynakları yönetimi politikaları ve uygulamaları olan firmaların, geleneksel insan kaynakları yönetimi politikaları ve uygulamaları olan firmalara göre daha yüksek performansa sahip oldukları saptanmıştır. Stratejik insan kaynakları yönetimi ve firma performansı arasındaki ilişkide dışsal uyum değişkeni olarak dikkate alınan işletme stratejilerinden yenilik stratejisinin firma performansı değişkenleri olan verimlilik, pazar payı ve ürün kalitesi üzerinde moderatör etkisinin olduğu, fiyat ve kalite stratejilerinin ise firma performansı üzerinde anlamlı bir etkisinin olmadığı anlaşılmıştır. Söz konusu ilişkide içsel uyumun firma performansı değişkenlerinden sadece pazar payı üzerinde moderatör etkiye sahip olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır

Keywords

• Stratejik insan kaynakları yönetimi, firma performansı, dışsal uyum, içsel uyum

The Moderating Effect of Internal and External Fit on Relationship between Strategic Human Resource Management and Firm Performance: A Study in Turkish Automotive Industry

Abstract

In this study, the moderating effect of internal and external fit on the relationship between Strategic Human Resource Management and firm performance has been analyzed in Turkish automotive industry. In the analysis of the data, descriptive statistics, cluster analysis, t tests, correlation analysis, hierarchical regression and Manova analysis have been applied. According to the findings obtained, it has been determined that the firms that have Strategic HRM policies and applications have higher performances than firms that have traditional HRM policies and applications. In the relationship between strategic HRM and firm performance, it has been understood that of the business strategies, innovation strategy that has been considered as external fit variable has a moderating effect on productivity, market share and product quality, which are firm performance variables; price and quality strategies on the other hand do not have a significant effect on firm performance. It has been revealed that of the firm performance variables, internal fit has a moderating effect only on market share

Keywords

• Strategic human resources management, firm performance, external fit, ınternal fit

References

1. Acquaah, M. (2004) “Human Factor Theory, Organizational Citizenship Behaviors and Human Organizational Performance in The Absence of Resources Management Practices: An Integration of Objective Measures: The Case of Privately Held Firms Theoretical Constructs and Suggestions for Measuring the Human Factor” Review of Human Factor Studies, 10(1): 118-151.
2. Alcázar, F.M., Fernández, P.M.R., Gardey, G.S. (2005) “Researching on SHRM: An Analysis of the Debate over the Role Played by Human Resources in Firm Success” Management Revue, 16(2): 213-241.
3. Baird, L ve Meshoulam, I. (1988) “Managing Two Fits of Strategic Human Resource Management” Academy of Management Review, 13(1):116-128.
4. Becker, B.E. ve Huselid, M.A. (2006) “Strategic Human Resources Management: Where Do We Go From Here?” Journal of Management, 32: 898-925.
5. Benligiray, S., Geylan, A. ve Duman, E. (2010) “İnsan Kaynakları Yönetiminin Stratejik Olarak Yönlendirilmesinin Finansal Performansı Etkileyip Etkilemediğinin Analizi” Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(1):61-84.
6. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002) Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance” Academy of Management Journal, 38(3): 635-672. Analizi Elkitabı, Ankara, Pegem Yayıncılık.
7. Chand, M. ve Katou, A.A. (2007) “The Impact of HRM Practices on Organisational Performance in the Indian Hotel Industry” Employee Relations, 29(6):576-594.
8. Chang, W.J.A. ve Huang, T.C. (2005) “Relationship Between Strategic Human Resource Management and Firm Performance: A Contingency Perspective” International Journal of Manpower, 26(5):434-449.

9. Costea, E.S. (2005) “The Challenges of Human Resource Management Towards Organizational Effectiveness A Comparative Study in Southern EU” Journal of European Industrial Training, 29(2):112-134.
10. Delenay, J.T. ve Huselid, M.A. (1996) “The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Perceptions of Organizational Performance” Academy of Management Journal, 39(4): 949-969.
11. Delery, J.E. (1998) “Issues of Fit in Strategic Human Resource Management: Implications for Research” Human Resource Management Review, 8(3):289-310.
12. Delery, J.E. ve Doty, H.D. (1996) “Modes of Theorizing in Strategic Human Resource Management: Test of Universalistic, Contingency and Configurational Performance Predictions” Academy of Management Organizations” California Management Review, 40 (2): Journal, 39(4): 802-835. 96-124.
13. Dess, G.G. ve Robinson, R.B. (1984) “Measuring and Conglomerate Business Units” Strategic Management Journal, 5:263-73.
14. Guest, D.E. (1997) “Human Resource Management and Performance: A review and Research Agenda”The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 8(3): 263-276.
15. Guest, D.E., Michie, J., Conway, N. ve Sheehan, M. ( 2003) “Human Resource Management and Corporate Performance in the UK” British Journal of Industrial Relations, 41(2):291-314.
16. Harel, H.G. ve Tzafrir, S.S. (1999) “The Effect of Human Resource Management Practices on The Perceptions of Organizational and Market Performance of the Firm” Human Resource Management, 38:185-200.
17. Jain, P. (2005) “A Comparative Analysis Of Strategic Human Resource Management İIssues in An Organisational Context” Library Review, 54(3):166-179.
18. Kalaycı, Ş, (2006) SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri, Ankara, Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
19. Marangoz, M. ve Biber, L. (2007) “İşletmelerin Pazar Performansı İle İnsan Kaynakları Uygulamaları Arasındaki İlişkinin Araştırılmasına Yönelik Bir Çalışma” Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 8(2): 202-217.
20. Miles, R. and Snow, C.C. (1984) “Designing Strategic Human Resource Systems” Organizational Dynamics, 13:36-52.
21. Ngo, H.Y., Lau, C.M. ve Foley, S. (2008) “Strategic Human Resource Management, Firm Performance, and Employee Relations Climate in China” Human Resource Management 47(1):73-90.
22. Özutku, H. (2010) Örgütsel Performans Boyutuyla İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi, Ankara, Gazi Yayınevi.
23. Pfeffer, J. (1994) Competitive Advantage through People, Boston, M.A. Harvard Business Scholl Press.
24. Pfeffer, J. (1998) “Seven Practices of Successful
25. Porter, M.E. (1985) “Technology and Competitive Advantage” Journal of Business Strategy, 5: 60-79.
26. Schuler, R.S. ve Jackson, S.E. (1987) “Linking Competitive Strategies With Human Resource Management Practices” Academy of Management Executive, 1: 207-219.
27. Singh, K. (2004) “Impact of HR Practices on Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(2): 109-130. Perceived Firm Performance in India” Asia Pacific Journal and Firm Performance at Different Points in Time” of Human Resources, 42 (3):301-317.
28. Truss, C. (2001) “Complexities and Controversies in Linking HRM with Organizational Outcomes” Journal of Management Studies, 38(8):1121-1149.
29. Tzafrir, S.S. (2006) “A Universalistic Perspective for
30. Wang, D.S. ve Shyu, C.L. (2008) “Will The Strategic Fit Between Business and HRM Strategy Influence HRM Effectiveness and Organizational Performance?” International Journal of Manpower, 29(2): 92-110.
31. Wright, P. M., ve McMahan, G. C. (1992). “Theoretical Perspectives for Strategic Human Resource Management” Journal of Management, 18: 295–320.