An Analysis of the World Society Conceptualization in the English School

Abstract

This study aims at analyzing the English School perspective on the non-state actors of international relations. In this regard, the study represents an overview of the world society conceptualization of the English School and highlights strengths and limitations of the existing accounts of the concept. The existing literature on the subject mainly concentrates on modern, value-based and global forms of non-state actors in international relations. This study offers an alternative view by emphasizing the importance of including non-global, interestbased and pre-modern non-state actors into the analysis in order to widen the scope of the English School theory. It is argued that the revised version of the world society conceptualization would also contribute to the understanding of modern non-state elements by achieving theoretical generalizations about the non-state dimension of the international relations

Keywords

• The English School, World Society, Nonstate Actors

İngiliz Okulunda Dünya Toplumu Kavramının Bir İncelemesi

Abstract

Bu çalışma İngiliz Okulunun devlet dışı aktörlere bakış açısını incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu bağlamda çalışma, İngiliz Okulunun dünya toplumu kavramının bir genel değerlendirmesini yapmakta ve kavrama bugüne kadar getirilmiş yaklaşımların güçlü ve zayıf yönlerinin altını çizmektedir. Kavram üzerine yazılmış literatür, temelde modern, değer temelli ve küresel devlet dışı uluslararası ilişkiler aktörlerine yoğunlaşmaktadır. Bu çalışma küresel olmayan, çıkar temelli ve tarihsel devlet dışı aktörlerin incelemelere dahil edilmesinin önemini vurgulayarak, İngiliz Okulu teorisinin kapsamını genişletmek adına bir alternatif bakış açısı önermektedir. Bu çalışmada uluslararası ilişkilerin devlet dışı boyutu hakkında teorik genellemelere vararak, gözden geçirilmiş dünya toplumu kavramının modern devlet dışı aktörleri anlamaya katkıda bulunacağı iddia edilmektedir

Keywords

• İngiliz Okulu, Dünya Toplumu Devlet Dışı Aktörler

References

1. Bull, H. (1971) “Order vs. Justice in International
2. Society”, Political Studies, 19(3): 269-283. Bull, H. (1979), “The State’s Positive Role in World
3. Affairs”, Daedalus, 108(4): 111-123. Bull, H. (1985) The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in International Politics, Hong Kong, Macmillan.
4. Bull, H. (2002) “Justice in International Relations: The Hagey Lectures”, Alderson et. al. (eds.), Hedley
5. Bull on International Society, London, Macmillan. Bull, H. and Watson A. (1984) The Expansion of
6. International Society, Oxford, Oxford University Press. Buzan, B. (1993) “From International System to
7. International Society: Structural Realism and the Regime Theory Meet the English School”, International Organization, 47(3): 327-352. Buzan, B. (2001) “The English School: An
8. Underexploited Resource in IR”, Review of International Studies, 27(3): 471-488. Buzan, B. (2004) From International to World Society?

9. English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Buzan, B. (2009) “The Middle East Through English
10. School Theory”, Buzan et. al. (eds.), International Society and the Middle East English School Theory at the Regional Level, Basingstoke, Palgrave. Buzan, B. and Little R. (2000) International Systems in World History: Remaking the Study of International
11. Relations, Oxford, Oxford University Press. Clark, I. (2007) Legitimacy and World Society, Oxford,
12. Oxford University Press. Hurrell, A. (2007) “One world? Many worlds? The Place of Regions in the Study of International Society”,
13. International Affairs, 83(1): 127-146. Jackson, R. (1995) “The Political Theory of International
14. Society”, Booth et. al. (eds.), International Relations Theory Today, New York, Polity Press. Jackson, R. (2000) The Global Covenant Human
15. Conduct in a World of States, Oxford, Oxford University Press. Linklater, A. (1981) “Men and Citizens in International
16. Relations”, Review of International Studies, 7(1): 23-38. Linklater, A. (2002) “The Problem of Harm in World
17. Politics: Implications for the Sociology of States- Systems”, International Affairs, 78(2): 319-338. Little, R. (1995) “Neorealism and the English School:
18. A Methodological, Ontological and Theoretical Reassessment”, European Journal of International Relations, 1(1): 9-34. Little, R. (2000) “The English School’s Contribution to the Study of International Relations”, European
19. Journal of International Relations, 6 (3): 395-422. Manning, C.A.W. (1962) The Nature of International
20. Society, London, Macmillan. Neumann, I. B. (2001) “The English School and the Practices of World Society”, Review of International Studies, 27: 503–507.
21. Pella, J. A. (2013) “Thinking Outside International
22. Society: A Discussion of the Possibilities for English School Conceptions of World Society”, Millennium- Journal of International Studies, 42(1): 65-77. Pella, J. A. (2015) Africa and the Expansion of
23. International Society Surrendering the Savannah, London, Routledge. Quayle, L. (2013) Southeast Asia and the English School of International Relations: A Region-Theory Dialogue,
24. Basingstoke, Palgrave. Ralph, J. (2007) Defending the Society of States Why
25. America Opposes the International Criminal Court and its Vision of World Society, Oxford, Oxford University Press. Schouenborg, L. (2013) The Scandinavian International
26. Society: Primary Institutions and Binding Forces, 1815- , London: Routledge.
27. Vincent, R. J. (1978) “Western Conceptions of a
28. Universal Moral Order”, British Journal of International Studies, 4(1): 20-46. Vincent, R. J. (1995) Human Rights and International
29. Relations, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Watson, A. (1990) “Systems of States”, Review of
30. International Studies, 16(2): 99-109. Watson, A. (2002) The Evolution of International
31. Society, London, Routledge. Wight, M. (1966) “Why is There no International
32. Theory?”, Butterfield et. al. (eds.) Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics, London, George Allen & Unwin Ltd. Wight, M. (1977) Systems of States, Leicester, Leicester University Press.
33. Wight, M. (1987) “An Anatomy of International
34. Thought”, Review of International Studies, 13(3): 221- Wight, M. (1991) International Theory: The Three
35. Traditions, Leicester, Leicester University Press. Williams, J. (2005) “Pluralism, Solidarism and the Emergence of World Society in the English School
36. Theory”, International Relations, 19(1): 19-38. Williams, J. (2014) “The International Society–World
37. Society Distinction”, Navari et. al. (eds.), Guide To The English School In International Studies, 127-142.