An Empirical Investigation on Growth and Institutional Structure Relations in Central Asian and Caucasian Countries

Abstract

Whether economic and political institutions have an impact on countries' economic growth performances is one of the important research topics discussed in the literature. Former socialist Central Asian and Caucasian countries trying to adapt into market economy have not yet completed their transition processes, but they have managed to grow their economies in comparison to previous periods. The aim of this study is to analyse the relationship between the growth performances and institutional structures of the Central Asian and Caucasian countries of Azerbaijan, Armenia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan between the years 2000-2018 by using the decision variables of civil rights, economic freedom, political stability, rule of law and GDP per capita. According to the analysis results obtained via Grey Relational Analysis method by assigning equal importance to all variables, Kazakhstan is found to be the highest-ranking country among all examined countries for all periods. The authoritarian tendencies that these countries have shown during their market economy transitions with regards to matters related to institutional structure have been found to be the reason why countries’ economic efforts have failed to yield results

Keywords

• Institutions,
• Growth,
• Transition Economics,
• Grey Relational Analysis,
• Central Asian and Caucasian Countries,

References

1. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2008). The role of institutions in growth and development (Vol. 10). Washington DC: World Bank.
2. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2015). The rise and decline of general laws of capitalism. Journal of economic perspectives, 29(1), 3-28.
3. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2019). Rents and economic development: the perspective of Why Nations Fail. Public Choice, 181(1), 13-28.
4. Agarwal, P. H., & Patel, K. R. (2019). Optimizing plasma arc cutting parameters for structural steel using grey relational analysis. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 8(1), 27-30.
5. Ahmadi, H. B., Petrudi, S. H. H., & Wang, X. (2017). Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with analytical hierarchy process and improved grey relational analysis: a case of telecom industry. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 90(9), 2413-2427.
6. Aron, J. (2000). Growth and institutions: a review of the evidence. The World Bank Research Observer, 15(1), 99-135. Arslan, H. M., & Uyanık, E. (2018). Gri ilişkisel analiz yöntemi ile yalıtım sektöründe en etkin taşeron firma seçimi. Ejovoc (Electronic Journal of Vocational Colleges), 8(2), 20-26.
7. Ayal, E. B., & Karras, G. (1998). Components of economic freedom and growth: An empirical study. The Journal of Developing Areas, 32(3), 327-338.
8. Batsaikhan, U., & Dabrowski, M. (2017). Central Asia—twenty-five years after the breakup of the USSR. Russian Journal of Economics, 3(3), 296-320.

9. Camelia, D., Emil, S., & Liviu-Adrian, C. (2013). Grey relational analysis of the financial sector in Europe. The Journal of Grey System, 25(4), 19-30.
10. Deng, Y., Feng, C., Jiaqiang, E., Wei, K., Zhang, B., Zhang, Z., Han, Z., Zhao, X. & Xu, W. (2019). Performance enhancement of the gasoline engine hydrocarbon catchers for reducing hydrocarbon emission during the cold-start period. Energy, 183, 869-879.
11. Eşiyok, Y., & Özge, E. (2018). Personel seçim probleminin gri ilişkisel analiz yöntemi ile çözülmesi: Medya sektöründe bir uygulama. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 6(4), 898-919.
12. Flachaire, E., García-Peñalosa, C., & Konte, M. (2014). Political versus economic institutions in the growth process. Journal of Comparative Economics, 42(1), 212-229.
13. World Bank Group. (2019). South Caucasus in Motion. World Bank.
14. Góes, C. (2016). Institutions and growth: A GMM/IV panel VAR approach. Economics Letters, 138, 85-91.
15. Guan, X., Sun, G., Yi, X., & Zhao, J. (2018). Grey relational analysis for hesitant fuzzy sets and its applications to multiattribute decision-making. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018.
16. Güleç, Ö. F., & Özkan, A. (2018). Gri ilişkisel analiz yöntemi ile finansal performansın değerlendirilmesi: BİST çimento şirketleri üzerine bir araştırma. Muhasebe ve Denetime Bakış, 54, 77-96.
17. Khan, M. H. (2018). Political settlements and the analysis of institutions. African Affairs, 117(469), 636-655.
18. Kunzel, M. P. J., De Imus, P., Gemayel, M. E. R., Herrala, R., Kireyev, M. A. P., & Talishli, F. (2018). Opening Up in the Caucasus and Central Asia: Policy Frameworks to Support Regional and Global Integration. International Monetary Fund.
19. Lee, W. S., & Lin, Y. C. (2011). Evaluating and ranking energy performance of office buildings using Grey relational analysis. Energy, 36(5), 2551-2556.
20. Meydan, C., Yıldırım, B. F., & Senger, Ö. (2016). BİST’te işlem gören gıda işletmelerinin finansal performanslarının gri ilişkisel analiz yöntemi kullanılarak değerlendirilmesi. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, (69), 147-171.
21. Nawaz, S. (2015). Growth effects of institutions: A disaggregated analysis. Economic Modelling, 45, 118-126. North, D. C. (1989). Final remarks-institutional change and economic history. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE)/Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 238-245.
22. Peng, M. W. (2003). Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of management review, 28(2), 275-296.
23. Piatkowski, M. (2002). The new economy and economic growth in transition economies: The relevance of institutional infrastructure (No. 2002/62). WIDER Discussion Paper.
24. Popov, V. (2007). Shock therapy versus gradualism reconsidered: Lessons from transition economies after 15 years of reforms. Comparative economic studies, 49(1), 1-31.
25. Pramanik, S., & Mukhopadhyaya, D. (2011). Grey relational analysis based intuitionistic fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making approach for teacher selection in higher education. International Journal of Computer Applications, 34(10), 21-29.
26. Rajesh, R., & Ravi, V. (2015). Supplier selection in resilient supply chains: a grey relational analysis approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 86, 343-359.
27. Ros, J. (2011). Institutions and growth: the times-series and cross-section evidenced. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(4), 567.
28. Senger, Ö., & Albayrak, Ö. K. (2016). Gri İlişki Analizi yöntemi ile personel değerlendirme. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, (17), 235-258.
29. Škrinjarić, T., & Šego, B. (2019). Using grey incidence analysis approach in portfolio selection. International Journal of Financial Studies, 7(1), 1-16.
30. Siddiqui, D. A., & Ahmed, Q. M. (2019). The causal relationship between institutions and economic growth: An empirical investigation for Pakistan economy. Siddiqui, DA and Ahmed, QM (2019). The Causal Relationship Between Institutions and Economic Growth: An Empirical Investigation for Pakistan Economy. International Economics and Business, 5(1), 1-19.
31. Süslü, B., & Elmirzeyev, Y. (2019). Azerbaycan Ekonomisinin Toplumsal Refahındaki Gelişimine Yeni Kurumcu Bir Bakış An New Institutional View of the Social Welfare of the Azerbaijan Economy.Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(4).
32. Tran, T. A. (2017). Optimization of the energy efficiency operational indicator for M/V NSU JUSTICE 250,000 DWT by grey relational analysis method in Vietnam. Journal of Environmental Science and Public Health, 1 (1), 1-23.
33. Tridico, P. (2007). Institutions, human development and economic growth in transition economies. The European Journal of Development Research, 19(4), 569-593.
34. Tridico, P. (2013). The stage of development among former communist economies: Social capital, the middle class and democracy. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 44, 47-58.
35. Tung, C. T., & Lee, Y. J. (2009). A novel approach to construct grey principal component analysis evaluation model. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), 5916-5920.
36. Vijayaraghavan, M., & Ward, W. A. (2001). Institutions and economic growth: empirical evidence for a cross-national analysis (No. 633-2016-41441).
37. Yan, J., Li, L., Zhao, F., Zhang, F., & Zhao, Q. (2016). A multi-level optimization approach for energy-efficient flexible flow shop scheduling. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 1543-1552.
38. Kaygin, C. Y., Bağci, H., & Tanir, D. (2019). BİST KOBİ sanayi şirketlerinin finansal performanslarının mw ve gri ilişkisel analiz yöntemleri ile ölçülmesi. Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(20), 944-965.
39. Yıldırım, B. F., & Önder, E. (2014). İşletmeciler, mühendisler ve yöneticiler için operasyonel, yönetsel ve stratejik problemlerin çözümünde çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri, Dora Yayınları: Bursa
40. Wang, T. K., Zhang, Q., Chong, H. Y., & Wang, X. (2017). Integrated supplier selection framework in a resilient construction supply chain: An approach via analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and grey relational analysis (GRA). Sustainability, 9(2), 289.
41. Way, L. (2008). The real causes of the color revolutions. Journal of Democracy, 19(3), 55-69.
42. Zhang, S. F., & Liu, S. Y. (2011). A GRA-based intuitionistic fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making method for personnel selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(9), 11401-11405.