BibTex RIS Cite

ENDÜSTRİYEL BÖLGELERDE SOSYAL SERMAYE VE GÜVEN: ÜÇÜNCÜ İTALYA ÖRNEĞİ

Year 2006, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 74 - 86, 01.05.2006

Murat Çetin

Abstract

1970’li yılların ortalarından itibaren endüstriyel bölgelerin gelişmesinde sosyo-kültürel yapının etkileri tartışılmaktadır. Bu bağlamda, sosyal sermaye ve güven arasındaki ilişkiler önem kazanmıştır. Güven ve sosyal sermaye arasındaki ilişkiler, oldukça etkili ve çok yönlüdür. Bu çalışma, bu ilişkilerin “Üçüncü İtalya” daki endüstriyel bölgelerin kalkınma sürecinde oynadığı rolleri üzerinde durur. Çalışmadan çıkan temel sonuç, Birinci ve Üçüncü İtalya’nın İkinci İtalya’ya göre daha yüksek sosyal sermaye ve güven düzeyine sahip olmasıdır. Buna bağlı olarak, ekonomik gelişmenin bu bölgelerde daha güçlü olduğu söylenebilir

References

  • ADAM, F. ve RONCEVIC, B. (2003): “Social Capital: Recent Debates, and Research Trensds”, Social Science Information, SAGE Publications, Cilt 42, Sayı 2, ss.155-183.
  • ALBERTI, F. (1996): The Concept of Industrial District: Main Contributions, ss.1-12.
  • ALBERTI, F. (2001): “The Governance of Industrial Districts: A Theoretical Footin Proposal”, Liuc Papers, Sayı 82, ss.1-31.
  • BECATTINI, G. (1990): The Marshallian Industrial District as a Socio-economic Notion., In F.Pyke, G.Becattini and W. Sengenberger (ed.s) Industrial Districts and Inter-firm Cooperation in Italy, ILO Geneva.
  • BELLANDI, M. (1989): The Industrial District in Marshall, In. Goodman, E. (eds), Small Firms and Industrial Districts in Italy, London, Routlegde.
  • BERGER, Suzanne ve LOCKE, Richard M. (2000): “II Caso Italiano and Globalization”, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Working Paper, Sayı 11, ss.1-28.
  • BRUSCO, S. (1990): The Idea of the Industrial District: Its Genesis. In F. Pyke, G. Becattini and W. Sengenberger (eds.) Industrial Districts and Inter-Firm Co-operation in Italy, ILO Geneva.
  • BOSCHMA, Ron A. (2005): Social Capital and Regional Development: An Empirical Analysis of the Third İtaly, In: Boschma, R.A., Kloosterman, R.C (eds.), Learning from Clusters. A Critical Assessment from An Economic-Geographical Perspective, Springer Verlag, Dordrecht.
  • BOURDIEU, P. (1986): The Forms of Capital, in John G. Richardson (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, New York, Greenwood Press, ss.241-258.
  • CAINELLI, G. MANCINELLI, S. ve MAZZANTI, M. (2005): “Social Capital, R&D and Industrial Districts”, Paper presented at the European Public Choice Society Annual Conference, Durham, England, (31/3-3/4 2005), ss.1-39.
  • COALE, H., MALAITH, G. ve POSTLEWAITE, A. (1992): “Social Norms, Savings Behavior, and Growth”, Journal of Political Economy, Cilt 100, Sayı 6, ss.1092-1125.
  • COHEN, S. S. ve FIELDS, G. (2000): Social Capital and Capital Gains: An Examination of Social Capital in Silicon Valley. In Understanding Silicon Valley, edited by Martin Kenney, ss.190- 217, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • COLEMAN, J. S. (1988): “Social Capital and the Creation of Human Capital”, American Journal of Sociology, Sayı 94, Supplement, ss.95-120.
  • DASGUPTA, Partha (2005): “The Economics of Social Capital”, January, ss.1-36.
  • EDWARDS, B. ve FOLEY, M. (1999): “Is it Time to Disinvest in Social Capital?”, Journal of Public Policy, Sayı 19, ss.141-173.
  • ENRICO, Callegati ve GRANDI, Silvia (2005): “Cluster Dynamics and Innovation in SMEs: The Role of Culture”, International Centre for Research on the Economics of Culture, Institutions, and Creativity (EBLA), Working Paper, No: 3, University of Torino, ss.1-12.
  • EVANS, P. (1996): “Government Action, Social Capital and Development: Reviewing the Evidence on Synergy”, World Development, Cilt 24, Sayı 6, ss.1119-1132.
  • FARELL, Henry ve KNIGHT, Jack (2002): “Trust, Institutions and Institutional Change: Industrial Districts and the Social Capital Hypothesis”, ss.1- 49.
  • FARR, J. (2003): “Social Capital: A Conceptual History”, Political Theory, Cilt 31 (X), ss.1-28.
  • FERRI, M. ve WHITE , T. J. (1999): “Regionalism, Cooperation and Economic Prosperity: Effective Autonomy in Emilia-Romagna”, Mediterrenean Quarterly, ss.89-106.
  • FERSHTMAN, C. ve WEISS, N. (1993): “Social Status, Culture and Economic Performance”, Economic Journal, Sayı 103, ss.946-959.
  • FIELD, J. (2003): Social Capital, NY: Routledge. FRANCOIS, P. (2003): Social Capital and Economic Development, London: Routledge.
  • FUKUYAMA, F. (1995): Trust: Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, NY: Free Press.
  • FUKUYAMA, F. (1999): “Social Capital and Civil Society”, IMF Conference on Second Generation Reforms, ss.1-12.
  • GANUGI, P., CROSATO, L. ve CIPOLLINI, F. (2004): Firm Size Distribution with Shrinkage in a Mature Italian Industrial District, ss.1-19.
  • GROOTAERT, C. ve BASTELAER, T. (2002): The Role of Social Capital in Development: An Empirical Assessment, Cambridge University Press.
  • HASSINK, R. (2004): “Learning Region: A Policy Concept to Unlock Regional Economies from Path Dependency?”, Paper prepared for the Conference Regionalization of Innovation Policy-Options and Experiences, June 4th-5th, 2004, Berlin, ss.1-21.
  • HAVERKORT, B. (2001): “Enhancing Endogenous Development: Experiences of Compas”, Clarion The Newsletter of Asian Compas Partners, (April-July), Cilt 1, Sayı 1-2, ss.1-2.
  • INGLEHART, R. (1995): “Changing Values, Economic Development, and Political Change”, International Social Science Journal, 145, ss.379- 404.
  • MISTRI, M. ve SOLARI, S. (2000): “Behavioural Rules in Industrial Districts: Loyalty, Trust and Reputation”, Department of Economic, University of Padua , İtaly, ss.1-28.
  • NARAYAN, D. ve PRITCHETT, L. (1999): “Cents and Sociability: Household Income and Social Capital in Rural Tanzania”, Economic Development and Cultural Change, Cilt 47, Sayı 4, ss.871-897.
  • PATTON, D. ve KENNEY, M. (2003): “Innovation and Social Capital in Silicon Valley”, BRIE Working Paper, No: 155, July, ss.1-28.
  • PIORE, M. ve SABEL, C. F. (1984): The Second Industrial Divide, New York: Basic Books.
  • PRETTY, Jules (2003): Social Capital and Connectedness: Issues and Implications for Agriculture, Rural Development and Natural Resource Management in ACP Countries, CTA Working Document, No: 8032, (December), ss.1- 49.
  • PUTNAM, R. (1993): Making Democracy Work: Civic Tradition in Modern Italy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • SABA, A. (2004): Globalization and Flexibility: The Experience of Italian Insutrial Districts, Roma, ss.1-24.
  • SAXENIAN, A. L. (1994): Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  • SELIGMAN, I. Amanda (2000): History of the American City, Wisconsin, USA.
  • STOCCHIERO, A. (2001): Migration Flows and Small and Medium Sized Enterprise Internationalisation Between Romania and the Italian Veneto Region, ss.1-11.
  • SZTOMPKA, P. (1999): Trust: A Sociological Theory, Cambridge University Press.
  • TAPPI, D. (2000): The Neo-Marshallian Industrial District: A Study on Italian Contributions to Theory and Evidence, Max-Planck-Institute for Research into Economic Systems Evolutionary Economic Unit, Jena, ss.1-21.
  • VERTOVA, G. (1998): “Industrial Districts in Italy: The Case of Sassuolo”, WEB CS4, University of Bergamo, ss.1-10.
  • WALL, E., FERRAZZI, G. ve SCHRYER, F. (1998): “Getting The Goods On Social Capital”, Rural Sociology, Cilt 63, Sayı 2, ss.300-322.
  • WHITTAKER Jay, BURNS Michelle ve BEVEREN, John Van (2003): “Understanding and Measuring the Effect of Social Capital on Knowledge Transfer within Clusters of SmallMedium Enterprises”, A Paper for the Small Enterprise Association of Australia and New Zealand 16th Annual Conference, Ballarat, (28 Sept-1 Oct), ss.1-11.
  • WOOLCOCK, M. (1998): “Social Capital and Economic Development: Towards A Theoretical Syntheses and Policy Framework”, Theory and Society, Sayı 27, ss.151-208.
  • WOOLCOCK, M. (2001): “The Place of Social Capital in Understanding Social and Economic Outcomes”, ın ISUMA, Canadian Journal of Policy Research, Cilt 2, Sayı 1, ss.11-17.
  • WOOLCOCK, M. ve NARAYAN, D. (2000): “Social Capital: Implications for Development Theory, Research and Policy”, The World Bank Research Observer, Cilt 15, Sayı 2, ss.225-249.

Year 2006, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 74 - 86, 01.05.2006

Murat Çetin

Abstract

The effects of socio-cultural structure on the development of industrial districts have been discussed since the middle of 1970s. In this context, the interactions between social capital and trust have become an important issue. The interactions between social capital and trust are very effective and multi-dimensional. This study dwells upon the roles of those interactions in the development process of industrial districts in “Third Italy”. It can be primarily deduced from this study that First and Third Italy are on higher levels than Second Italy from the perspective of social capital and trust. Thus, it can be well said that economic development is relatively stronger in those regions

References

  • ADAM, F. ve RONCEVIC, B. (2003): “Social Capital: Recent Debates, and Research Trensds”, Social Science Information, SAGE Publications, Cilt 42, Sayı 2, ss.155-183.
  • ALBERTI, F. (1996): The Concept of Industrial District: Main Contributions, ss.1-12.
  • ALBERTI, F. (2001): “The Governance of Industrial Districts: A Theoretical Footin Proposal”, Liuc Papers, Sayı 82, ss.1-31.
  • BECATTINI, G. (1990): The Marshallian Industrial District as a Socio-economic Notion., In F.Pyke, G.Becattini and W. Sengenberger (ed.s) Industrial Districts and Inter-firm Cooperation in Italy, ILO Geneva.
  • BELLANDI, M. (1989): The Industrial District in Marshall, In. Goodman, E. (eds), Small Firms and Industrial Districts in Italy, London, Routlegde.
  • BERGER, Suzanne ve LOCKE, Richard M. (2000): “II Caso Italiano and Globalization”, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Working Paper, Sayı 11, ss.1-28.
  • BRUSCO, S. (1990): The Idea of the Industrial District: Its Genesis. In F. Pyke, G. Becattini and W. Sengenberger (eds.) Industrial Districts and Inter-Firm Co-operation in Italy, ILO Geneva.
  • BOSCHMA, Ron A. (2005): Social Capital and Regional Development: An Empirical Analysis of the Third İtaly, In: Boschma, R.A., Kloosterman, R.C (eds.), Learning from Clusters. A Critical Assessment from An Economic-Geographical Perspective, Springer Verlag, Dordrecht.
  • BOURDIEU, P. (1986): The Forms of Capital, in John G. Richardson (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, New York, Greenwood Press, ss.241-258.
  • CAINELLI, G. MANCINELLI, S. ve MAZZANTI, M. (2005): “Social Capital, R&D and Industrial Districts”, Paper presented at the European Public Choice Society Annual Conference, Durham, England, (31/3-3/4 2005), ss.1-39.
  • COALE, H., MALAITH, G. ve POSTLEWAITE, A. (1992): “Social Norms, Savings Behavior, and Growth”, Journal of Political Economy, Cilt 100, Sayı 6, ss.1092-1125.
  • COHEN, S. S. ve FIELDS, G. (2000): Social Capital and Capital Gains: An Examination of Social Capital in Silicon Valley. In Understanding Silicon Valley, edited by Martin Kenney, ss.190- 217, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • COLEMAN, J. S. (1988): “Social Capital and the Creation of Human Capital”, American Journal of Sociology, Sayı 94, Supplement, ss.95-120.
  • DASGUPTA, Partha (2005): “The Economics of Social Capital”, January, ss.1-36.
  • EDWARDS, B. ve FOLEY, M. (1999): “Is it Time to Disinvest in Social Capital?”, Journal of Public Policy, Sayı 19, ss.141-173.
  • ENRICO, Callegati ve GRANDI, Silvia (2005): “Cluster Dynamics and Innovation in SMEs: The Role of Culture”, International Centre for Research on the Economics of Culture, Institutions, and Creativity (EBLA), Working Paper, No: 3, University of Torino, ss.1-12.
  • EVANS, P. (1996): “Government Action, Social Capital and Development: Reviewing the Evidence on Synergy”, World Development, Cilt 24, Sayı 6, ss.1119-1132.
  • FARELL, Henry ve KNIGHT, Jack (2002): “Trust, Institutions and Institutional Change: Industrial Districts and the Social Capital Hypothesis”, ss.1- 49.
  • FARR, J. (2003): “Social Capital: A Conceptual History”, Political Theory, Cilt 31 (X), ss.1-28.
  • FERRI, M. ve WHITE , T. J. (1999): “Regionalism, Cooperation and Economic Prosperity: Effective Autonomy in Emilia-Romagna”, Mediterrenean Quarterly, ss.89-106.
  • FERSHTMAN, C. ve WEISS, N. (1993): “Social Status, Culture and Economic Performance”, Economic Journal, Sayı 103, ss.946-959.
  • FIELD, J. (2003): Social Capital, NY: Routledge. FRANCOIS, P. (2003): Social Capital and Economic Development, London: Routledge.
  • FUKUYAMA, F. (1995): Trust: Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, NY: Free Press.
  • FUKUYAMA, F. (1999): “Social Capital and Civil Society”, IMF Conference on Second Generation Reforms, ss.1-12.
  • GANUGI, P., CROSATO, L. ve CIPOLLINI, F. (2004): Firm Size Distribution with Shrinkage in a Mature Italian Industrial District, ss.1-19.
  • GROOTAERT, C. ve BASTELAER, T. (2002): The Role of Social Capital in Development: An Empirical Assessment, Cambridge University Press.
  • HASSINK, R. (2004): “Learning Region: A Policy Concept to Unlock Regional Economies from Path Dependency?”, Paper prepared for the Conference Regionalization of Innovation Policy-Options and Experiences, June 4th-5th, 2004, Berlin, ss.1-21.
  • HAVERKORT, B. (2001): “Enhancing Endogenous Development: Experiences of Compas”, Clarion The Newsletter of Asian Compas Partners, (April-July), Cilt 1, Sayı 1-2, ss.1-2.
  • INGLEHART, R. (1995): “Changing Values, Economic Development, and Political Change”, International Social Science Journal, 145, ss.379- 404.
  • MISTRI, M. ve SOLARI, S. (2000): “Behavioural Rules in Industrial Districts: Loyalty, Trust and Reputation”, Department of Economic, University of Padua , İtaly, ss.1-28.
  • NARAYAN, D. ve PRITCHETT, L. (1999): “Cents and Sociability: Household Income and Social Capital in Rural Tanzania”, Economic Development and Cultural Change, Cilt 47, Sayı 4, ss.871-897.
  • PATTON, D. ve KENNEY, M. (2003): “Innovation and Social Capital in Silicon Valley”, BRIE Working Paper, No: 155, July, ss.1-28.
  • PIORE, M. ve SABEL, C. F. (1984): The Second Industrial Divide, New York: Basic Books.
  • PRETTY, Jules (2003): Social Capital and Connectedness: Issues and Implications for Agriculture, Rural Development and Natural Resource Management in ACP Countries, CTA Working Document, No: 8032, (December), ss.1- 49.
  • PUTNAM, R. (1993): Making Democracy Work: Civic Tradition in Modern Italy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • SABA, A. (2004): Globalization and Flexibility: The Experience of Italian Insutrial Districts, Roma, ss.1-24.
  • SAXENIAN, A. L. (1994): Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  • SELIGMAN, I. Amanda (2000): History of the American City, Wisconsin, USA.
  • STOCCHIERO, A. (2001): Migration Flows and Small and Medium Sized Enterprise Internationalisation Between Romania and the Italian Veneto Region, ss.1-11.
  • SZTOMPKA, P. (1999): Trust: A Sociological Theory, Cambridge University Press.
  • TAPPI, D. (2000): The Neo-Marshallian Industrial District: A Study on Italian Contributions to Theory and Evidence, Max-Planck-Institute for Research into Economic Systems Evolutionary Economic Unit, Jena, ss.1-21.
  • VERTOVA, G. (1998): “Industrial Districts in Italy: The Case of Sassuolo”, WEB CS4, University of Bergamo, ss.1-10.
  • WALL, E., FERRAZZI, G. ve SCHRYER, F. (1998): “Getting The Goods On Social Capital”, Rural Sociology, Cilt 63, Sayı 2, ss.300-322.
  • WHITTAKER Jay, BURNS Michelle ve BEVEREN, John Van (2003): “Understanding and Measuring the Effect of Social Capital on Knowledge Transfer within Clusters of SmallMedium Enterprises”, A Paper for the Small Enterprise Association of Australia and New Zealand 16th Annual Conference, Ballarat, (28 Sept-1 Oct), ss.1-11.
  • WOOLCOCK, M. (1998): “Social Capital and Economic Development: Towards A Theoretical Syntheses and Policy Framework”, Theory and Society, Sayı 27, ss.151-208.
  • WOOLCOCK, M. (2001): “The Place of Social Capital in Understanding Social and Economic Outcomes”, ın ISUMA, Canadian Journal of Policy Research, Cilt 2, Sayı 1, ss.11-17.
  • WOOLCOCK, M. ve NARAYAN, D. (2000): “Social Capital: Implications for Development Theory, Research and Policy”, The World Bank Research Observer, Cilt 15, Sayı 2, ss.225-249.
There are 47 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA32GS68JU
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Murat Çetin This is me

Publication Date May 1, 2006
Published in Issue Year 2006 Volume: 6 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Çetin, M. (2006). ENDÜSTRİYEL BÖLGELERDE SOSYAL SERMAYE VE GÜVEN: ÜÇÜNCÜ İTALYA ÖRNEĞİ. Ege Academic Review, 6(1), 74-86.
AMA Çetin M. ENDÜSTRİYEL BÖLGELERDE SOSYAL SERMAYE VE GÜVEN: ÜÇÜNCÜ İTALYA ÖRNEĞİ. ear. May 2006;6(1):74-86.
Chicago Çetin, Murat. “ENDÜSTRİYEL BÖLGELERDE SOSYAL SERMAYE VE GÜVEN: ÜÇÜNCÜ İTALYA ÖRNEĞİ”. Ege Academic Review 6, no. 1 (May 2006): 74-86.
EndNote Çetin M (May 1, 2006) ENDÜSTRİYEL BÖLGELERDE SOSYAL SERMAYE VE GÜVEN: ÜÇÜNCÜ İTALYA ÖRNEĞİ. Ege Academic Review 6 1 74–86.
IEEE M. Çetin, “ENDÜSTRİYEL BÖLGELERDE SOSYAL SERMAYE VE GÜVEN: ÜÇÜNCÜ İTALYA ÖRNEĞİ”, ear, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 74–86, 2006.
ISNAD Çetin, Murat. “ENDÜSTRİYEL BÖLGELERDE SOSYAL SERMAYE VE GÜVEN: ÜÇÜNCÜ İTALYA ÖRNEĞİ”. Ege Academic Review 6/1 (May 2006), 74-86.
JAMA Çetin M. ENDÜSTRİYEL BÖLGELERDE SOSYAL SERMAYE VE GÜVEN: ÜÇÜNCÜ İTALYA ÖRNEĞİ. ear. 2006;6:74–86.
MLA Çetin, Murat. “ENDÜSTRİYEL BÖLGELERDE SOSYAL SERMAYE VE GÜVEN: ÜÇÜNCÜ İTALYA ÖRNEĞİ”. Ege Academic Review, vol. 6, no. 1, 2006, pp. 74-86.
Vancouver Çetin M. ENDÜSTRİYEL BÖLGELERDE SOSYAL SERMAYE VE GÜVEN: ÜÇÜNCÜ İTALYA ÖRNEĞİ. ear. 2006;6(1):74-86.