BibTex RIS Cite

YÖNETİMİN İRRASYONEL YÜZÜ: ÖRGÜTSEL İŞLEV BOZUKLUKLARI VE ANALİZİ

Year 2008, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 451 - 468, 01.10.2008

Julide Kesken Derya İlic

Abstract

Geleneksel yönetim teorisinin temel varsayımlarından biri örgütlerde çalışan insanların yerine getirdikleri eylemlerin verimlilik ve etkinlik kriterlerine göre yapılması gerektiğidir. Bir diğer varsayım ise temellerini örgütteki insanların mantıksal neden-sonuç ilişkilerine dayalı olarak yönetilmesi prensibi olan rasyonel yaklaşıma dayandırmaktadır. Aynı zamanda modern yönetim teorisinin temelinde de genel kabul gören rasyonellik anlayışı, örgütlerin hedeflerine ulaşmak için gerekli olmayan çabalardan kaçınıp sadece gerekli olanları yapması gerektiği düşüncesini benimsemektedir. Kertsen ve Sidky (2005:472)’e göre, örgütsel öğrenciler örgütlerin rasyonel yönetim yaklaşımları etkisi ile planlama, denetleme ve hazırlanmış eğitim çabaları gibi faaliyetlerle sorunların üstesinden gelmeye çalıştığını belirtmişlerdir. Buna karşın gerçek yaşamda, örgütsel yaşamın pek çok öğrencisi verilen kararların nasıl olması gerektiği konusundaki beklentileriyle gerçekteki gözlemleri arasındaki fark karşısında hayal kırıklığına uğramaktadırlar (Kets de Vries, 1991:1). Bu çalışmanın amacı, örgütsel patolojinin yaşayan sistemler teorisi bağlamında tartışılması ve yöneticilerin örgüt yönetiminde önemle üzerinde durması gereken irrasyonel eğilimlerin klinik yaklaşım ile analiz edilmesidir

Keywords

Örgütsel işlev bozuklukları irrasyonel faktörler klinik ve psikoanalitik yaklaşım

References

  • Albrecht,K.(2002), The Power of Minds at Work:
  • Organizational Intelligence in Action, AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn. Cameron, K.S., Whetten, D.A. , Kim, M.U., (1987), Organizational Dysfunctions of Decline, Academy of Management Journal, 30 (1), ss.126-138.
  • Genç, N. (1995), Zirveye Götüren Yol: Yönetim, Timaş Yayınevi, İstanbul.
  • Fayol, H. (1949), General and Industrial Management, London: Pitman.
  • (Original work published 1916).
  • Fischer, T. F.(Internet), Five Types Of Organizational Dysfunction, Ministry Health, Support and Resources For Pastors and Christian Ministry Professionals, 25, http://www.ministryhealth.net/mh_articles/025_five_types_dysfunction.html/ erişim tarihi:07.02.2007.
  • Gould, L.J. (1991), Using Psychonalytic Frameworks for Organizational
  • Analysis, ss.25-44 içinde M. Kets de Vries (Ed.), Organizations on the Couch: Clinical Perspectives on Organizational Behavior and Change; San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Gulick, L., & Urwick, L. (1937), Papers On The Science Of Administration, New
  • York: Columbia University Press. Heiner, R.A., (1983), The Origin of Perdictible Behavior, The American Economic Review, 73,ss.560-595.
  • Hatchuel, A., (2001), Towards Design Theory and Expandable Rationality: The Unfinished Program of Herbert Simon, Journal of Management and Governance, 5 (3-4), ss.260-273.
  • Kersten, A.,Sidky M., (2005), Re-Aligning Rationality: Crisis Management And Prisoner Abuses In Iraq, Public Relations Review 31 (4), ss.471–478.
  • Kesken, Jülide, (2002), Kurumsal İmaj Ve Ekonomik Performans, İstanbul
  • Menkul Kıymetler Borsası İçin Bir Analiz, erc/METU International Conference in Economics VI, 11-14 Eylül, Ankara, Türkiye. Kets De Vries, M, Miller, D., (1984), Neurotic Style and Organizational
  • Pathology, Strategic Management Journal, 5, ss. 35-55. Kets de Vries, M. (1991), Exploding The Myth That Organizations And Executives Are Rational, ss. 1-24, içinde M. Kets de Vries (Ed.), Organizations on the Couch: Clinical Perspectives on Organizational Behavior and Change;
  • San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Kets de Vries, M., Miller, D., (1991), Leadership Styles and Organizational
  • Cultures: The Shaping of Neurotic Organizations, ss.243-263, içinde M. Kets de Vries (Ed.), Organizations on the Couch: Clinical Perspectives on Organizational Behavior and Change;, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Kilburg, R.R., (2004), “When Shadows Fall: Using Psychodynamic Approaches in Executive Coaching”, Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, (4), pp. 246–268.
  • Krantz, J., (1985), Group Processes Under Conditions of Organizational
  • Decline, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 21, ss.1-17. Levinson, H., (1991), Diagnosing Organizations Systematically, ss.45-93 içinde
  • M. Kets de Vries (Ed.), Organizations on the Couch: Clinical Perspectives on Organizational Behavior and Change;, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Miller, J. G., Miller, J. L., (1991), A Living Systems Analysis of Organizational
  • Pathology, Behavioral Science, 36 (4), ss.239-251. Mooney, J. D., and Reiley, A. C. (1931), Onward Industry, New York: Harper.
  • Simon , H.A., 1986. Rationality in Psycholoy and Economics. Journal of Business, 49(4), ss.209-224.
  • Sperry, L., (1995), Classification System Proposed for Workplace Behavior,
  • Academy of Organizational and Occupational Psychiatry, 4(1), http://www.aoop.org/archive-bulletin/1995springcategry.shtml, erişim tarihi:07.02.2007
  • Staw, B. M., Sandelands, L. E., & Dutton, J. E.,(1981), Threat-Rigidity Affects In
  • Organizational Behavior: A Multilevel Analysis, Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, ss. 501-524. Taylor, J. R., (2001), The “Rational” Organization Reconsidered: An Exploration of Some of the Organizational Implications of Self-Organizing, Communication Theory, 11 (2), ss.137–177
  • Taylor, F. W. (1911), Principles of Scientific Management, New York: Harper.
  • Veccihio, R.P., 1991. Organizational Behavior,The Dryden Press International Edition.
  • Whetten, D. A. (1981), Organizational Responses To Scarcity—Exploring The Obstacles To Innovative Approaches To Retrenchment In Education,
  • Educational Administration Quarterly, 17(3), ss.80-97.

THE IRRATIONAL SIDE OF MANAGEMENT: ORGANIZATONAL DYSFUNCTION AND ANALYSIS

Year 2008, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 451 - 468, 01.10.2008

Julide Kesken Derya İlic

Abstract

One of the main assumptions of traditional management theory is that employees in organizations should do their jobs based on productivity and effectiveness criteria. The other important assumption is rational approach that human beings can be managed solely around logical means-ends models. As

Keywords

Organizational dysfunction irrational issues clinical and psychoanalytic approach

References

  • Albrecht,K.(2002), The Power of Minds at Work:
  • Organizational Intelligence in Action, AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn. Cameron, K.S., Whetten, D.A. , Kim, M.U., (1987), Organizational Dysfunctions of Decline, Academy of Management Journal, 30 (1), ss.126-138.
  • Genç, N. (1995), Zirveye Götüren Yol: Yönetim, Timaş Yayınevi, İstanbul.
  • Fayol, H. (1949), General and Industrial Management, London: Pitman.
  • (Original work published 1916).
  • Fischer, T. F.(Internet), Five Types Of Organizational Dysfunction, Ministry Health, Support and Resources For Pastors and Christian Ministry Professionals, 25, http://www.ministryhealth.net/mh_articles/025_five_types_dysfunction.html/ erişim tarihi:07.02.2007.
  • Gould, L.J. (1991), Using Psychonalytic Frameworks for Organizational
  • Analysis, ss.25-44 içinde M. Kets de Vries (Ed.), Organizations on the Couch: Clinical Perspectives on Organizational Behavior and Change; San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Gulick, L., & Urwick, L. (1937), Papers On The Science Of Administration, New
  • York: Columbia University Press. Heiner, R.A., (1983), The Origin of Perdictible Behavior, The American Economic Review, 73,ss.560-595.
  • Hatchuel, A., (2001), Towards Design Theory and Expandable Rationality: The Unfinished Program of Herbert Simon, Journal of Management and Governance, 5 (3-4), ss.260-273.
  • Kersten, A.,Sidky M., (2005), Re-Aligning Rationality: Crisis Management And Prisoner Abuses In Iraq, Public Relations Review 31 (4), ss.471–478.
  • Kesken, Jülide, (2002), Kurumsal İmaj Ve Ekonomik Performans, İstanbul
  • Menkul Kıymetler Borsası İçin Bir Analiz, erc/METU International Conference in Economics VI, 11-14 Eylül, Ankara, Türkiye. Kets De Vries, M, Miller, D., (1984), Neurotic Style and Organizational
  • Pathology, Strategic Management Journal, 5, ss. 35-55. Kets de Vries, M. (1991), Exploding The Myth That Organizations And Executives Are Rational, ss. 1-24, içinde M. Kets de Vries (Ed.), Organizations on the Couch: Clinical Perspectives on Organizational Behavior and Change;
  • San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Kets de Vries, M., Miller, D., (1991), Leadership Styles and Organizational
  • Cultures: The Shaping of Neurotic Organizations, ss.243-263, içinde M. Kets de Vries (Ed.), Organizations on the Couch: Clinical Perspectives on Organizational Behavior and Change;, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Kilburg, R.R., (2004), “When Shadows Fall: Using Psychodynamic Approaches in Executive Coaching”, Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, (4), pp. 246–268.
  • Krantz, J., (1985), Group Processes Under Conditions of Organizational
  • Decline, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 21, ss.1-17. Levinson, H., (1991), Diagnosing Organizations Systematically, ss.45-93 içinde
  • M. Kets de Vries (Ed.), Organizations on the Couch: Clinical Perspectives on Organizational Behavior and Change;, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Miller, J. G., Miller, J. L., (1991), A Living Systems Analysis of Organizational
  • Pathology, Behavioral Science, 36 (4), ss.239-251. Mooney, J. D., and Reiley, A. C. (1931), Onward Industry, New York: Harper.
  • Simon , H.A., 1986. Rationality in Psycholoy and Economics. Journal of Business, 49(4), ss.209-224.
  • Sperry, L., (1995), Classification System Proposed for Workplace Behavior,
  • Academy of Organizational and Occupational Psychiatry, 4(1), http://www.aoop.org/archive-bulletin/1995springcategry.shtml, erişim tarihi:07.02.2007
  • Staw, B. M., Sandelands, L. E., & Dutton, J. E.,(1981), Threat-Rigidity Affects In
  • Organizational Behavior: A Multilevel Analysis, Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, ss. 501-524. Taylor, J. R., (2001), The “Rational” Organization Reconsidered: An Exploration of Some of the Organizational Implications of Self-Organizing, Communication Theory, 11 (2), ss.137–177
  • Taylor, F. W. (1911), Principles of Scientific Management, New York: Harper.
  • Veccihio, R.P., 1991. Organizational Behavior,The Dryden Press International Edition.
  • Whetten, D. A. (1981), Organizational Responses To Scarcity—Exploring The Obstacles To Innovative Approaches To Retrenchment In Education,
  • Educational Administration Quarterly, 17(3), ss.80-97.
There are 29 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA99ZA88TT
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Julide Kesken This is me

Derya İlic This is me

Publication Date October 1, 2008
Published in Issue Year 2008 Volume: 8 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Kesken, J., & İlic, D. (2008). THE IRRATIONAL SIDE OF MANAGEMENT: ORGANIZATONAL DYSFUNCTION AND ANALYSIS. Ege Academic Review, 8(2), 451-468.
AMA Kesken J, İlic D. THE IRRATIONAL SIDE OF MANAGEMENT: ORGANIZATONAL DYSFUNCTION AND ANALYSIS. ear. October 2008;8(2):451-468.
Chicago Kesken, Julide, and Derya İlic. “THE IRRATIONAL SIDE OF MANAGEMENT: ORGANIZATONAL DYSFUNCTION AND ANALYSIS”. Ege Academic Review 8, no. 2 (October 2008): 451-68.
EndNote Kesken J, İlic D (October 1, 2008) THE IRRATIONAL SIDE OF MANAGEMENT: ORGANIZATONAL DYSFUNCTION AND ANALYSIS. Ege Academic Review 8 2 451–468.
IEEE J. Kesken and D. İlic, “THE IRRATIONAL SIDE OF MANAGEMENT: ORGANIZATONAL DYSFUNCTION AND ANALYSIS”, ear, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 451–468, 2008.
ISNAD Kesken, Julide - İlic, Derya. “THE IRRATIONAL SIDE OF MANAGEMENT: ORGANIZATONAL DYSFUNCTION AND ANALYSIS”. Ege Academic Review 8/2 (October 2008), 451-468.
JAMA Kesken J, İlic D. THE IRRATIONAL SIDE OF MANAGEMENT: ORGANIZATONAL DYSFUNCTION AND ANALYSIS. ear. 2008;8:451–468.
MLA Kesken, Julide and Derya İlic. “THE IRRATIONAL SIDE OF MANAGEMENT: ORGANIZATONAL DYSFUNCTION AND ANALYSIS”. Ege Academic Review, vol. 8, no. 2, 2008, pp. 451-68.
Vancouver Kesken J, İlic D. THE IRRATIONAL SIDE OF MANAGEMENT: ORGANIZATONAL DYSFUNCTION AND ANALYSIS. ear. 2008;8(2):451-68.