HIGH COSTS FOR CO-OCCURRENCE OF NECK/SHOULDER AND LOW BACK DISORDERS IN SWEDEN

Year 2009, Volume: 9 Issue: 3, 1017 - 1033, 01.08.2009

Johan Liwing Christina Wiktorin - Wilhelmus Ja Grooten Teresia Nyman Magnus Svartengren

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the present study was to analyse if the localization of unspecific back disorders influenced the yearly direct and indirect costs during a five year period; 1996 to 2001. Methods: Based on the location and the recurrence of neck/shoulder disorders (NSD) and low back disorders (LBD) disorders, 2057 individuals were grouped into six different disorder groups and one control group without disorders. Direct costs were calculated using self-reported data on drug use, health care utilization and ergonomic interventions. Indirect costs were calculated using yearly collected individual register data on personal income and government compensation for sickness absence. The costs for each of the six groups with NSD and/or LBD were estimated by subtracting the costs in the control group from the costs in each disorder group with NSD/LBD. Adjustments were made for age, gender, and other diseases. Results: The indirect costs were ten times higher than the direct costs. The total average individual costs for the subjects with co-occurrence NSD and LBD was $6.000 for the year 2001. This was three to four times higher than for those with solely NSD or solely LBD. The largest increase in costs between 1996 and 2001 was seen in this group. Conclusion: Further studies are required to identify which characteristics in work environment or in life style that causes recurrent and concurrent NSD and LBD

Keywords

Back pain, Neck pain, Sick leave, Direct costs, Indirect costs

References

• [1] National Social Insurance B. Nybeviljade förtidspensioner/sjukbidrag 2002 [in swedish]. In: Statistical report is-i. Stockholm: National Social Insurance Board; 2003.
• [2] Hansson EK, Hansson TH. The costs for persons sick-listed more than one month because of low back or neck problems. A two-year prospective study of swedish patients. Eur Spine J 2005; 14:337-345.
• [3] Waddell G. The back pain revolution. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1998.
• [4] Nordin M, Hiebert R, Pietrek M, Alexander M, Crane M, Lewis S. Association of comorbidity and outcome in episodes of nonspecific low back pain in occupational populations. J Occup Environ Med 2002; 44:677-684.
• [5] van Tulder MW, Koes BW, Bouter LM. A cost-of-illness study of back pain in the netherlands. Pain 1995; 62:233 -240.
• [6] Borghouts JA, Koes BW, Vondeling H, Bouter LM. Cost-of-illness of neck pain in the netherlands in 1996. Pain 1999; 80:629-636.
• [7] Wigaeus Tornqvist E, Kilbom A, Vingard E, Alfredsson L, Hagberg M, Theorell T, et al. The influence on seeking care because of neck and shoulder disorders from work-related exposures. Epidemiology 2001; 12:537-545.
• [8] Vingard E, Alfredsson L, Hagberg M, Kilbom A, Theorell T, Waldenstrom M, et al. To what extent do current and past physical and psychosocial occupational factors explain care-seeking for low back pain in a working population? Results from the musculoskeletal intervention center-norrtalje study. Spine 2000; 25:493-500.
• [9] Grooten WJA, Wiktorin C, Norrman L, Josephson M, Wigaeus Tornqvist E, Alfredsson L. Seeking care for neck/shoulder pain: A prospective study of work-realated risk factors in a healthy population. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2004; 46:138-146.
• [10] Pernold G, Mortimer M, Wiktorin C, Tornqvist EW, Vingard E. Neck/shoulder disorders in a general population. Natural course and influence of physical exercise: A 5-year follow-up. Spine 2005; 30:E363- E368.
• [11] Von Korff M, Ormel J, Keefe FJ, Dworkin SF. Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain 1992; 50:133-149.
• [12] Waldenstrom M, Theorell T, Ahlberg G, Josephson M, Nise P, Waldenstrom K, et al. Assessment of psychological and social current working conditions in epidemiological studies: Experiences from the music-norrtalje study. Scand J Public Health 2002; 30:94-102.
• [13] Rice DP. Estimating the cost of illness. In: Health economics series. Washington: U.S. Departement of Health, Education and Wellfare; 1966.
• [14] Tolpin HG, Bentkover JD. Economic cost of illness: Decision-making applications and practical considerations. Adv. Health Econ. Health Serv. Res. 1983; 4:165-198.
• [15] Hodgson TA, Meiners MR. Cost-of-illness methodology: A guide to current practices and procedures. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc 1982; 60:429-462.
• [16] Scitovsky AA. Estimating the direct costs of illness. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc 1982; 60:463-491.
• [17] Rice DP. Cost-of-illness studies: Fact or fiction? Lancet 1994; 344:1519-1520.
• [18] Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FF, van Ineveld BM, van Roijen L. The friction cost method for measuring indirect costs of disease. J Health Econ 1995; 14:171-189.
• [19] Statistics Sweden. En longitudinell database kring utbildning, inkomst och sysselsättning (LOUISE) 1990-1999. In: Bakgrundsfakta till arbetsmarknads och utbildningsstatistiken. Örebro: Statistics Sweden; 2002.
• [20] Ekman M, Johnell O, Lidgren L. The economic cost of low back pain in sweden in 2001. Acta Orthop 2005; 76:275-284.
• [21] Mittendorf T, Merkesdal S, Huelsemann JL, von der Schulenburg JM, Zeidler H, Ruof J. Implementing standardized cost categories within economic evaluations in musculoskeletal diseases. Eur J Health Econ 2003; 4:43-49.