BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2009, Volume: 9 Issue: 4, 1375 - 1398, 01.11.2009

Abstract

References

  • Baltagi, B. H., Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Sussex, England, (1995).
  • Barro, R. J. and Sala-i-Martin, X., Economic Growth, McGraw Hill: New York USA, (1995).
  • Barro, R.J. and Lee, J-W., ―International Data on Educational Attainment: Updates and Implications‖, CID Working Paper No.42, Harvard University, (2000).
  • Bils, M. and Klenov, P.J., ―Does Schooling Cause Growth?‖, American Economic Review, 90(5), (2000).
  • Erlat, H., Panel Data: A Selective Survey, Unpublished Lecture Notes, (2008).
  • European Commission Staff, Eropean Competitiveness Report 2004, European Commission Staff Staff Working Document SEC(2004), 1397, (2004).
  • Greene, W. H., Econometric Analysis, Prentice Hall: New Jersey, USA, (2003).
  • Hausman, J. A., ―Specification Tests in Econometrics‖, Econometrica, 46, (1978), Pp: 1251-1271.
  • Hsiao, C., Analysis of Panel Data, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, (2003).
  • Johnston, J. and DiNardo, J., Econometric Methods, McGraw-Hill Book Co., (1997).
  • Kennedy, P., A Guide to Econometrics, Blackwell Publishing: Oxford: UK, (2003).
  • Swamy, P. A. V. B. and Arora, S.S., ―The Exact Finite Sample Properties of the Estimators of Coefficients in the Error Components Regression Models‖, Econometrics, 40, (1972), Pp: 261-275.
  • Szirmai, A., ―Explaining Success and Failure in Development‖, United Nations University Working Paper Series, No. 2008-13, (2008).
  • Temple, J. R. W., ―Generalizations That Aren’t? Evidence on Education and Growth‖, European Economic Review 45(4-6), (2001).
  • Ul Haque, I., Trade, Technology and International Competitiveness, World Bank, (1995).
  • UNIDO, ―Industrial Development Report 2002/2003: Competing through Innovation and Learning‖, http://www.unido.org, (2002).
  • UNIDO, ―Industrial Development Report 2005: Capacity Building for Catching Up; Historical, Empirical and Policy Dimesions‖, UNIDO Publication No. 454, http://www.unido.org, (2005).

COMPETITIVE INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE INDEX AND ITS DRIVERS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ON TURKEY AND SELECTED COUNTRIES

Year 2009, Volume: 9 Issue: 4, 1375 - 1398, 01.11.2009

Abstract

Competitiveness of manufacturing industry is regarded as one of the basic determinants of long run sustainable growth of a country. Therefore it is important to have an understanding of relative positions of countries in terms of competitiveness and determinants of competitive ability. This study aims to reveal the standing of Turkey in a group of countries and analyze determinants of competitive ability. The competitive industrial performance (CIP) index, taken to be an indicator of relative competitive ability, has been calculated for a sample of 33 countries for years 1985, 1990, 1998 and 2002. Panel data methods then have been employed to reveal sources of competitive ability. Conducted analysis reveals Turkish manufacturing industry to be lagging behind many of the sample countries and presents a grim picture for sustainable development in medium and long run

References

  • Baltagi, B. H., Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Sussex, England, (1995).
  • Barro, R. J. and Sala-i-Martin, X., Economic Growth, McGraw Hill: New York USA, (1995).
  • Barro, R.J. and Lee, J-W., ―International Data on Educational Attainment: Updates and Implications‖, CID Working Paper No.42, Harvard University, (2000).
  • Bils, M. and Klenov, P.J., ―Does Schooling Cause Growth?‖, American Economic Review, 90(5), (2000).
  • Erlat, H., Panel Data: A Selective Survey, Unpublished Lecture Notes, (2008).
  • European Commission Staff, Eropean Competitiveness Report 2004, European Commission Staff Staff Working Document SEC(2004), 1397, (2004).
  • Greene, W. H., Econometric Analysis, Prentice Hall: New Jersey, USA, (2003).
  • Hausman, J. A., ―Specification Tests in Econometrics‖, Econometrica, 46, (1978), Pp: 1251-1271.
  • Hsiao, C., Analysis of Panel Data, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, (2003).
  • Johnston, J. and DiNardo, J., Econometric Methods, McGraw-Hill Book Co., (1997).
  • Kennedy, P., A Guide to Econometrics, Blackwell Publishing: Oxford: UK, (2003).
  • Swamy, P. A. V. B. and Arora, S.S., ―The Exact Finite Sample Properties of the Estimators of Coefficients in the Error Components Regression Models‖, Econometrics, 40, (1972), Pp: 261-275.
  • Szirmai, A., ―Explaining Success and Failure in Development‖, United Nations University Working Paper Series, No. 2008-13, (2008).
  • Temple, J. R. W., ―Generalizations That Aren’t? Evidence on Education and Growth‖, European Economic Review 45(4-6), (2001).
  • Ul Haque, I., Trade, Technology and International Competitiveness, World Bank, (1995).
  • UNIDO, ―Industrial Development Report 2002/2003: Competing through Innovation and Learning‖, http://www.unido.org, (2002).
  • UNIDO, ―Industrial Development Report 2005: Capacity Building for Catching Up; Historical, Empirical and Policy Dimesions‖, UNIDO Publication No. 454, http://www.unido.org, (2005).
There are 17 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA42GD83AB
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Çağaçan Değer This is me

Burcu Türkcan This is me

Neşe Kumral This is me

Publication Date November 1, 2009
Published in Issue Year 2009 Volume: 9 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Değer, Ç., Türkcan, B., & Kumral, N. (2009). COMPETITIVE INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE INDEX AND ITS DRIVERS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ON TURKEY AND SELECTED COUNTRIES. Ege Academic Review, 9(4), 1375-1398.
AMA Değer Ç, Türkcan B, Kumral N. COMPETITIVE INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE INDEX AND ITS DRIVERS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ON TURKEY AND SELECTED COUNTRIES. ear. November 2009;9(4):1375-1398.
Chicago Değer, Çağaçan, Burcu Türkcan, and Neşe Kumral. “COMPETITIVE INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE INDEX AND ITS DRIVERS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ON TURKEY AND SELECTED COUNTRIES”. Ege Academic Review 9, no. 4 (November 2009): 1375-98.
EndNote Değer Ç, Türkcan B, Kumral N (November 1, 2009) COMPETITIVE INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE INDEX AND ITS DRIVERS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ON TURKEY AND SELECTED COUNTRIES. Ege Academic Review 9 4 1375–1398.
IEEE Ç. Değer, B. Türkcan, and N. Kumral, “COMPETITIVE INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE INDEX AND ITS DRIVERS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ON TURKEY AND SELECTED COUNTRIES”, ear, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1375–1398, 2009.
ISNAD Değer, Çağaçan et al. “COMPETITIVE INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE INDEX AND ITS DRIVERS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ON TURKEY AND SELECTED COUNTRIES”. Ege Academic Review 9/4 (November 2009), 1375-1398.
JAMA Değer Ç, Türkcan B, Kumral N. COMPETITIVE INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE INDEX AND ITS DRIVERS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ON TURKEY AND SELECTED COUNTRIES. ear. 2009;9:1375–1398.
MLA Değer, Çağaçan et al. “COMPETITIVE INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE INDEX AND ITS DRIVERS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ON TURKEY AND SELECTED COUNTRIES”. Ege Academic Review, vol. 9, no. 4, 2009, pp. 1375-98.
Vancouver Değer Ç, Türkcan B, Kumral N. COMPETITIVE INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE INDEX AND ITS DRIVERS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ON TURKEY AND SELECTED COUNTRIES. ear. 2009;9(4):1375-98.