BibTex RIS Cite

GLOBAL MACROECONOMIC THEORY IN MEANSTREAM ECONOMICS: CURRENT ACCOUNT DYNAMICS IN NEW OPEN MACRO ECONOMİCS (NOEM)

Year 2009, Volume: 9 Issue: 4, 1485 - 1510, 01.11.2009

Abstract

The New Open Macroeconomics (NOEM) literature in meanstream economics has developed for the last ten years. NOEM literature contends the optimal monetary policy argument and the coordination problems of optimal monetary policy in global economy. The NOEM Literature has an empirical and theoretical content that is explored the optimal monetary policy in the cross cauntries. The monetary transmission process in New Keynessian Economics disputes the small and open economy in which mark-up prices and wages are stickiness. Obstfeld and Rogoff (1995) contribution, which is based on the Mundell-Fleming and Keynesian tradition, to NOEM Literature draws attantion to the stickness of current producers’ export prices

References

  • Bergin, P.R. (2003). “Putting the New Open Economy Macroeconomics to a Test”, Journal of International Economics 60 (1):3-34.
  • Bernanke, B. S. ve Gertler, M. (1995). “Inside the Black Box: The Credit Channel of Monetary Policy Transmission”. Journal of Economic Perspectives, IX, 4, 27-48.
  • Borondo, C. (2000).”International transmission of monetary shocks with ıntrest rate rules”, Working Paper, University of Valladolid, Spain.
  • Bowman, D., Doyle, B. (2003). “New Keynesian, Open Economy Models and Their Implication for Monetary Policy”, Board of Governers of Federal Reserve System, International Finance Discussion Papers. No: 762, March.
  • Corsetti, G. (2007). “New Open Macro Economics” RSCAS Working Papers 2007/27, European University Institute, 07/27. Corsetti,
  • Interdependence”, Qarterly Journal of Economics, 116 (2), 421-45. P. (2001). “Welfare and
  • Macroeconomic Devereux, B, (2003). “Should The Exchange Rate be a Stock Absorber”, Journal of International Economics, 62, 359-377.
  • Devereux, M., Engel, C. (2001). “Monetary Policy in the Open Revised Exchenge Rate Flexibility and Price Setting and Exchange-Rate Flexibility”, Review of Economic Studies 70 (October 2003): 765-83.
  • ECB, 2004, European Central Bank. “The Monetary Policy of The ECB”.
  • Faust, J. Rogers, Swanson, E. Wright, j. (2003). “Identifying The Effects of Monetary Policy Shocks on Exchange Rates Using High Frequency Data”, NBER Working Paper, 9660, pp. 44.
  • Fisher, L.A., Huh, H.S. (2002). “Real Exchange Rates, Trade Balances and Nominal Shocks: Evidence for the G-7”, Journal of International Money and Finace, 21(2002), pp. 497-518.
  • Ghironi, F. (2003). “Understanding Macroeconomic Interdependence: Do We Really Need to Shut Off the Current Accaunt?, Boston College Working Papers in Economics
  • Kim, S. (1999). “Do Monetary Policy Shocks Matter in the G-7 Countries? Using Common Identifying assumptions about monetary policy acroos Countries”, Journal of International Economics, 48, pp.3 87-412.
  • Kim, S. (2001a). “International Transmission of US.Monetary Policy Shocks: Evidence From VAR’s”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 48, pp. 339-372.
  • Kim, S. (2001b). “Exchange rate Stabilization In The ERM: Identifying European Monetary Policy Reactions”. Journal of International Money And Finance,Economics, 48, pp. 339-372.
  • Koray, F., McMillanm, W.D. (1999).”Monetary Shocks, The Exchange Rate, and the Trade Balance”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 18, pp.925- 940.
  • Kutner, N. K. Mosser C. P. 2002. “Monetary Transmission Mechanism: Some Answers and Further Questions”, FRBNY Economic Policy Review.
  • Landry, A.E. (2005). “Expectation and Exchange Rate Dynamics A State- Dependent Pricing Approach”. Job Market Papper, Boston Universiy.
  • Lee, J, Chinn, M.D., (2006). “Current Account and Exchange Rate Dynamics in the G7 Countries”., Journal of International Money and Finance, 25(2006), pp.257-274.
  • Malik, H.; (2006), “Monetary-Exchange Rate Policy and Current Account Dynamics”, SBP-Research Bulletin, 2(1),
  • McCallum, B., Nelson, E. (2001). “Monetary Policy for an Open Economy: An Alternative Framework with Optimising Agents and Sticky Prices”, External MPC Unit Discussion. pp. Paper No: 5, November.
  • Mishkin, F. S. (1996). “Understanding Financial Crises: A Developing Country Perspective”, Working Paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper, No: 5600, May, pp.9.
  • Obsfeld D, M., Rogoff, K. (1995). “Exchange Rate Dynamics Redux”, The Journal of political Economy, 103(3).
  • Rajan, R. (2004). “GEM: A New International Macro Economic Model”, IMF, Research Department. January.
  • Rogoff, K. ( 2001). “The Failure of Emprical Exchange Rate Models; No Longer New, but Still True”, Economic Policy Web Essay No:1, October.
  • Rogoff, K. (2002). “Dornbusch’s Overshooting Model after Twenty-Five Years: International Monetry Fund’s Second Annual Research Conference Mundell- Fleming Lecture. IMF Staff Papers. Vol. 49, IMF annual research Conference, pp. 1-34.
  • Rose, A.K.; (2000), “ A Review of of Some of the Economic Countribution of Robert A. Mundell Winner of the 1999 Nobel Economic Prize in Economics”, January 27, Haas School of Business, Berkeley, CA, USA, 94720-1900.
  • Roubini, N. (1998a). “An Introduction to Open Economy Macroeconomics, Currency Crises and the Asian Crisis Part I: Basic Concepts, Currency, Capital Account and Foreign Debt Accumulation”, Stern School of Business, New York University, New York.
  • Roubini, N. (1998b). “An Introduction to Open Economy Macroeconomics, Currency Crises and the Asian Crisis Part II: International Indicators. Balance of Payments, Capital Account and Foreign Debt Accumulation, Sustainability of Current Account Deficits, Nominal and Real Exchange Rates and International Interest Parity Condition”, Paper. Stern School of Business, New York University, New York.

YERLEŞİK İKTİSATTA KÜRESEL MAKROEKONOMİK TEORİ: YENİ AÇIK MAKROEKONOMİDE (NOEM) CARİ İŞLEMLER DİNAMİKLERİ

Year 2009, Volume: 9 Issue: 4, 1485 - 1510, 01.11.2009

Abstract

Yerleşik iktisatta “Yeni Açık Makroekonomi” (New Open Macroeconomics) (NOEM) yazını son on yıldır küresel ekonomide optimal para politikaları ve bu politikaların kordinasyon sorunu üzerinde süregelen tartışmalar ışığında şekillenmektedir. NOEM yazını küresel ekonomide ülkelerarası optimal stabilizasyon politikaları ve uygulamalarının tartışıldığı kuramsal ve amprik bir içeriğe sahiptir. Yeni Keynezyen İktisat’ta parasal aktarım süreci küçük ve açık ekonomide, ücret ve fiyat (mark-up) yapışkanlığı altında tartışılmaktadır. Mundell-Fleming ve Keynesyen geleneğe dayanan NOEM modelleri Obstfeld ve Rogof (1995)’un katkılarıyla, üreticinin cari ihracat fiyat yapışkanlığına dikkat çekmektedir

References

  • Bergin, P.R. (2003). “Putting the New Open Economy Macroeconomics to a Test”, Journal of International Economics 60 (1):3-34.
  • Bernanke, B. S. ve Gertler, M. (1995). “Inside the Black Box: The Credit Channel of Monetary Policy Transmission”. Journal of Economic Perspectives, IX, 4, 27-48.
  • Borondo, C. (2000).”International transmission of monetary shocks with ıntrest rate rules”, Working Paper, University of Valladolid, Spain.
  • Bowman, D., Doyle, B. (2003). “New Keynesian, Open Economy Models and Their Implication for Monetary Policy”, Board of Governers of Federal Reserve System, International Finance Discussion Papers. No: 762, March.
  • Corsetti, G. (2007). “New Open Macro Economics” RSCAS Working Papers 2007/27, European University Institute, 07/27. Corsetti,
  • Interdependence”, Qarterly Journal of Economics, 116 (2), 421-45. P. (2001). “Welfare and
  • Macroeconomic Devereux, B, (2003). “Should The Exchange Rate be a Stock Absorber”, Journal of International Economics, 62, 359-377.
  • Devereux, M., Engel, C. (2001). “Monetary Policy in the Open Revised Exchenge Rate Flexibility and Price Setting and Exchange-Rate Flexibility”, Review of Economic Studies 70 (October 2003): 765-83.
  • ECB, 2004, European Central Bank. “The Monetary Policy of The ECB”.
  • Faust, J. Rogers, Swanson, E. Wright, j. (2003). “Identifying The Effects of Monetary Policy Shocks on Exchange Rates Using High Frequency Data”, NBER Working Paper, 9660, pp. 44.
  • Fisher, L.A., Huh, H.S. (2002). “Real Exchange Rates, Trade Balances and Nominal Shocks: Evidence for the G-7”, Journal of International Money and Finace, 21(2002), pp. 497-518.
  • Ghironi, F. (2003). “Understanding Macroeconomic Interdependence: Do We Really Need to Shut Off the Current Accaunt?, Boston College Working Papers in Economics
  • Kim, S. (1999). “Do Monetary Policy Shocks Matter in the G-7 Countries? Using Common Identifying assumptions about monetary policy acroos Countries”, Journal of International Economics, 48, pp.3 87-412.
  • Kim, S. (2001a). “International Transmission of US.Monetary Policy Shocks: Evidence From VAR’s”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 48, pp. 339-372.
  • Kim, S. (2001b). “Exchange rate Stabilization In The ERM: Identifying European Monetary Policy Reactions”. Journal of International Money And Finance,Economics, 48, pp. 339-372.
  • Koray, F., McMillanm, W.D. (1999).”Monetary Shocks, The Exchange Rate, and the Trade Balance”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 18, pp.925- 940.
  • Kutner, N. K. Mosser C. P. 2002. “Monetary Transmission Mechanism: Some Answers and Further Questions”, FRBNY Economic Policy Review.
  • Landry, A.E. (2005). “Expectation and Exchange Rate Dynamics A State- Dependent Pricing Approach”. Job Market Papper, Boston Universiy.
  • Lee, J, Chinn, M.D., (2006). “Current Account and Exchange Rate Dynamics in the G7 Countries”., Journal of International Money and Finance, 25(2006), pp.257-274.
  • Malik, H.; (2006), “Monetary-Exchange Rate Policy and Current Account Dynamics”, SBP-Research Bulletin, 2(1),
  • McCallum, B., Nelson, E. (2001). “Monetary Policy for an Open Economy: An Alternative Framework with Optimising Agents and Sticky Prices”, External MPC Unit Discussion. pp. Paper No: 5, November.
  • Mishkin, F. S. (1996). “Understanding Financial Crises: A Developing Country Perspective”, Working Paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper, No: 5600, May, pp.9.
  • Obsfeld D, M., Rogoff, K. (1995). “Exchange Rate Dynamics Redux”, The Journal of political Economy, 103(3).
  • Rajan, R. (2004). “GEM: A New International Macro Economic Model”, IMF, Research Department. January.
  • Rogoff, K. ( 2001). “The Failure of Emprical Exchange Rate Models; No Longer New, but Still True”, Economic Policy Web Essay No:1, October.
  • Rogoff, K. (2002). “Dornbusch’s Overshooting Model after Twenty-Five Years: International Monetry Fund’s Second Annual Research Conference Mundell- Fleming Lecture. IMF Staff Papers. Vol. 49, IMF annual research Conference, pp. 1-34.
  • Rose, A.K.; (2000), “ A Review of of Some of the Economic Countribution of Robert A. Mundell Winner of the 1999 Nobel Economic Prize in Economics”, January 27, Haas School of Business, Berkeley, CA, USA, 94720-1900.
  • Roubini, N. (1998a). “An Introduction to Open Economy Macroeconomics, Currency Crises and the Asian Crisis Part I: Basic Concepts, Currency, Capital Account and Foreign Debt Accumulation”, Stern School of Business, New York University, New York.
  • Roubini, N. (1998b). “An Introduction to Open Economy Macroeconomics, Currency Crises and the Asian Crisis Part II: International Indicators. Balance of Payments, Capital Account and Foreign Debt Accumulation, Sustainability of Current Account Deficits, Nominal and Real Exchange Rates and International Interest Parity Condition”, Paper. Stern School of Business, New York University, New York.
There are 29 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA33FD26CJ
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

S. Sevinç Orhan This is me

Publication Date November 1, 2009
Published in Issue Year 2009 Volume: 9 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Orhan, S. S. (2009). GLOBAL MACROECONOMIC THEORY IN MEANSTREAM ECONOMICS: CURRENT ACCOUNT DYNAMICS IN NEW OPEN MACRO ECONOMİCS (NOEM). Ege Academic Review, 9(4), 1485-1510.
AMA Orhan SS. GLOBAL MACROECONOMIC THEORY IN MEANSTREAM ECONOMICS: CURRENT ACCOUNT DYNAMICS IN NEW OPEN MACRO ECONOMİCS (NOEM). ear. November 2009;9(4):1485-1510.
Chicago Orhan, S. Sevinç. “GLOBAL MACROECONOMIC THEORY IN MEANSTREAM ECONOMICS: CURRENT ACCOUNT DYNAMICS IN NEW OPEN MACRO ECONOMİCS (NOEM)”. Ege Academic Review 9, no. 4 (November 2009): 1485-1510.
EndNote Orhan SS (November 1, 2009) GLOBAL MACROECONOMIC THEORY IN MEANSTREAM ECONOMICS: CURRENT ACCOUNT DYNAMICS IN NEW OPEN MACRO ECONOMİCS (NOEM). Ege Academic Review 9 4 1485–1510.
IEEE S. S. Orhan, “GLOBAL MACROECONOMIC THEORY IN MEANSTREAM ECONOMICS: CURRENT ACCOUNT DYNAMICS IN NEW OPEN MACRO ECONOMİCS (NOEM)”, ear, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1485–1510, 2009.
ISNAD Orhan, S. Sevinç. “GLOBAL MACROECONOMIC THEORY IN MEANSTREAM ECONOMICS: CURRENT ACCOUNT DYNAMICS IN NEW OPEN MACRO ECONOMİCS (NOEM)”. Ege Academic Review 9/4 (November 2009), 1485-1510.
JAMA Orhan SS. GLOBAL MACROECONOMIC THEORY IN MEANSTREAM ECONOMICS: CURRENT ACCOUNT DYNAMICS IN NEW OPEN MACRO ECONOMİCS (NOEM). ear. 2009;9:1485–1510.
MLA Orhan, S. Sevinç. “GLOBAL MACROECONOMIC THEORY IN MEANSTREAM ECONOMICS: CURRENT ACCOUNT DYNAMICS IN NEW OPEN MACRO ECONOMİCS (NOEM)”. Ege Academic Review, vol. 9, no. 4, 2009, pp. 1485-10.
Vancouver Orhan SS. GLOBAL MACROECONOMIC THEORY IN MEANSTREAM ECONOMICS: CURRENT ACCOUNT DYNAMICS IN NEW OPEN MACRO ECONOMİCS (NOEM). ear. 2009;9(4):1485-510.