An Analysis of the Airbus-Boeing Dispute From the Perspective of the WTO Process

Year 2010, Volume: 10 Issue: 4, 1129 - 1138, 01.11.2010

Özgür Çalışkan

Abstract

The longstanding trade dispute between Boeing (US) and Airbus (EU) over government subsidies has increased in intensity over the past few years, with both parties filing complaints at the World Trade Organization (WTO) in May 2005. The aim of this paper is to analyze this dispute and its implications by reviewing the general characteristics of the large civil aircraft (LCA) industry and the particular legal roots of this dispute. The paper focuses on recent developments in terms of the WTO process. The main argument of this paper is that the WTO process is unlikely to produce a feasible and effective solution to the dispute. This is due to the characteristics of the LCA industry, complicated relations between the main producers and their governments, the historical roots of the dispute and the legacy of international arrangements on subsidies for the industry, and most importantly, the current structure of the WTO system

Keywords

Trade policy, aircraft industry, subsidies, WTO

References

• Airbus (2009): “The Airbus Global Market Forecast for 2009-2025” and “2008 Annual Review”, <http://www.airbus.com/en/airbusfor/ analysts> (10.09.2009).
• Boeing (2009): History Reading Room and Orders and Deliveries, <http://www.boeing.com/commercial> (10.09.2009).
• Carbaugh, R.J. and Olienyk, J. (2004): “Boeing-Airbus Subsidy Dispute: A Sequel”, Global Economy Journal, 4(2): Article 6.
• Economist (2005): “Boeing v Airbus: Nose to nose” and “Air war”, June 23.
• European Commission (EC, 2009a): All WTO Documents on WT/DS317 and WT/DS353 by EC, <http://trade.ec.europa.eu/ wtodispute/show.cfm?id=354 &code=1> (15.09.2009).
• EC (2009b): Market Access Database- Trade Barriers Database, <http:// madb.europa.eu/madb_barriers/barriers_select.htm> (15.05.2009).
• Eurostat (2006): Statistics in Focus: Manufacture of Aerospace equipment in the EU.
• Garten, J.E. (2005): “The Big Blowout: Why the Airbus-Boeing case could wreck the WTO, and how to stop it”, Newsweek International, April 4.
• Herzstein, R. (2006): “Don’t Expect the WTO to Resolve the BoeingAirbus Dispute”, European Affairs, 7(1&2) (Spring/Summer).
• Heymann, E. (2007): “Boeing v Airbus: The WTO dispute that neither can win”, Deutsche Bank Research Paper, February. (Short and updated version: “Boeing vs. Airbus: The Unwinnable WTO Dispute”, the Globalist, June 26).
• Hufbauer, G.C. (2007): “Boeing vs. Airbus: Fighting the Last War”, Handelsblatt, June 19, (also in the <http://www.petersoninstitute. org/ publications/opeds/oped.cfm?ResearchID=773> (19.06.2007)). ICTSD (2009): Bridges Weekly Trade News Digest, 13(31), (September 16).
• Irwin, D. and Pavcnik, N. (2004): “Boeing vs. Airbus Revisited:
• International Competition in the Aircraft Market”, Journal of International Economics, 64: 223– 245.
• Krugman P. and Obstfeld, M. (2006): International Economics: Theory and Policy, Seventh Edition, Addison-Wesley.
• Mavroidis, P. (2007): Trade In Goods: The GATT and the Other Agreements Regulating Trade in Goods, Oxford, October.
• Pavcnik, N. (2002): “Trade disputes in the commercial aircraft industry”, The World Economy, 25 (5): 733-751.
• Pritchard, D. and Macpherson, A. (2004): “Industrial subsidies and the politics of world trade: The case of the Boeing 7e7”, The Industrial Geographer, 1 (2): 57-73.
• US Dept. Of Commerce International Trade Administration (USDOC, 2007): Apogee and Perigee: Status of the Domestic Aerospace Industry-2007, March.
• US-DOC (2009): <http://www.ita.doc.gov/aerospace/aerospace_ statistics.htm> (10.09.2009).
• USTR (2009a): National Trade Estimate Report on Foreign Trade Barriers.
• USTR (2009b): “Dispute Settlement Proceedings”, <http://www. ustr.gov/trade-topics/enforcement/dispute-settlement-proceedings> (10.01.2009).
• Weinstein, M.A. (2005): “Economic Brief: Airbus vs. Boeing’”, The Power and Interest News Report (PINR), June 5.
• WTO (2003): The Legal Texts - The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations, Cambridge University Press.
• WTO (2009a), WTO Analytical Index -Guide to WTO Law and Practice (Volume 1-2), 2nd edition (also available at <http://www. wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e /analytic_index_e.htm>).
• WTO (2009b): “Dispute Settlement: Index of disputes issues”, <http:// www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispu_subjects_index_e. htm> (15.09.2009).