An Empirical Perspective on the Relationship Between Innovation Performance and Sustainable Development

Year 2021, Volume: 21 Issue: 1, 47 - 57, 30.01.2021

Sema Yiğit

https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.874020

Cited By: 2

Abstract

In 2015, almost all member states of the United Nations adopted seventeen Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which provide specific objectives and timelines to promote inclusive prosperity. Innovation is crucial for achieving sustainable development. Innovation itself is one of the SDGs (Goal 9) and also a means for achieving the others. It is aimed to reveal the multidimensional relationship of innovation with the pillars of sustainable development in this study. The dataset of the study consists of 35 OECD member countries and statistics of these countries between 2007-2019 years. Global innovation scores of countries were used for innovation. Human Development Index was used for the social dimension, CO2 emission values were used for the environmental dimension and GDP per capita was used for the economic dimension. The balanced panel was resolved through Eviews and STATA software packages programs. According to the results of the analysis, innovation has a positive and significant relationship with the social and economic pillars of sustainable development. It also has a significant but negative relationship with CO2 emission, which negative relationship is a positive situation for the environment. Therefore, the main result of the study is innovation has a positive effect on sustainable development. According to the causality test results, it was determined that there are both short and long-run relationships between the three dimensions of innovation and sustainable development.

Keywords

Innovation performance, Sustainable development, Three pillars of sustainable development, OECD countries, Panel data analyses

References

• Acheampong, A. O. (2018). Economic Growth, CO2 Emissions and Energy Consumption: What Causes What and Where? Energy Economics, 74, 677-692.
• Avila-Lopez, L. A., Lyu, C., & Lopez-Leyva, S. (2019). Innovation and Growth: Evidence from Latin American Countries. Journal of Applied Economics, 22(1), 287-303.
• Batie, S. S., Sedjo, R. A., & Fedkiw, J. (2008). Sustainability: From Natural Resource Sufficiency to Ecosystem Functional Integrity. R. A. Sedjo inside, Perspectives on Sustainable Resources in America (s. 11-21). Washington: RFF Press Book.
• Breitung, J. (2000). The Local Power of Some Unit Root Tests for Panel Data. Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration and Dynamic Panels, 15,161-177.
• Constantinescu, A., & Frone, S. (2014). The Role of Technological Innovation in Sustainable Economic Development. Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology, 4(1.1),1-13.
• Costa, L., Rybski, D., & Kropp, J. P. (2011). A Human Development Framework for CO2 Reductions. PLoS ONE, 6(12), 1-9. Çınar, S. (2011). Income and CO2 Emissions: Panel Unit Root and Cointegration Tests. Uludağ Journal of Economy and Society, 30(2),71-83.
• Dauda, L., Long, X., Mensah, C. N., & Salman, M. (2019). The Effects of Economic Growth and Innovation on CO2 Emissions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(15),15028-15038.
• Dumitrescu, E.-I., & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger Non-causality in Heterogeneous Panels. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450-1460.
• Dutta, S., Reynoso, R. E., Garanasvili, A., Saxena, K., Lanvin, B., Wunsch-Vincent, S., . . . Guadagno, F. (2018). The Global Innovation Index 2018: Energizing the World with Innovation.
• S. Dutta, B. Lanvin, & S. Wunsch-Vincent inside, Global Innovation Indeks 2018 (s. 3-54). Retrieved from https:// www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2018.pdf.
• Ejemeyovwi, J. O., Osabuohien, E. S., Johnson, O. D., & Bowale, E. I. (2019). Internet Usage, Innovation and Human Development Nexus in Africa: The Case of ECOWAS. Journal of Economic Structures, 8(1),1-16.
• Fan, H., & Hossain, M. I. (2018). Technological Innovation, Trade Openness, CO2 Emission and Economic Growth: Comparative Analysis between China and India. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 8(6),240-257.
• Garren, S. J., & Brinkmann, R. (2018). Sustainability Definitions, Historical Context, and Frameworks. R. Brinkmann, & S. J. Garren inside, The Palgrave Handbook of Sustainability Case Studies and Practical Solutions (s. 1-18). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Giovannini, E., Niestroy, I., Nilsson, M., Roure, F., & Spanos, M. (2015). The Role of Science, Technology and Innovation Policies to Foster the Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals Report of the Expert Group “Follow-up to Rio+20, notably the SDGs”. Luxembourg: European Commission.
• Hadri, K. (2000). Testing for Stationarity in Heterogeneous Panel Data. The Econometrics Journal, 3(2),48-161.
• Hauff, M. v., & Jörg, A. (2010). Innovation and Sustainable Development: From Mainstream Innovation Theory to Sustainable Innovation Research. F. Teuteberg, & J. M. Gomez içinde, Corporate Environmental Management Information Systems: Advancements and Trends (s. 37-54). Hershey: IGI Global.
• Im, K. S., Pesaran, M., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1),53-74. Kaswana, V., Choudhary, M., Kumar, P., Kaswan, S., & Bajyad, P. (2009). Green Production Strategies. Encyclopedia of Food Security and Sustainability, 1, 492-500.
• Levin, A., Lin, C.-F., & Chu, C.-S. J. (2002). Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-sample Properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1),1-24.
• Long, X., Luo, Y., Wu, C., & Zhang, J. (2018). The Influencing Factors of CO2 Emission Intensity of Chinese Agriculture from 1997 to 2014. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25,13093–13101.
• Maradana, R. P., Pradhan, R. P., Dash, S., Gaurav, K., Jayakumar, M., & Chatterjee, D. (2017). Does Innovation Promote Economic Growth? Evidence from European Countries. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 6(1),1-23.
• Mensah, C. N., Long, X., Boamah, K. B., Bediako, I. A., Dauda, L., & Salman, M. (2018). The Effect of Innovation on CO2 Emissions of OECD Countries from 1990 to 2014. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(1), 29678–29698.
• Mulder, K. F. (2007). Innovation for Sustainable Development: From Environmental Design to Transition Management. Sustainability Science, 2(2),253–263.
• Munier, N. (2005). Introduction to Sustainability Road to a Better Future. Dordrecht: Springer.
• Ouedraogo, N. S. (2013). Energy Consumption and Human Development: Evidence from A Panel Cointegration and Error Correction Model. Energy, 63, 28-41.
• Pedroni, P. (1999). Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors. Oxford Bulletin Of Economics and Statistics, Special Issue, 61(S1), 653-670.
• Pesaran, H. M. (2004). General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics Working Paper, Discussion Paper No. 1240.
• Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of Cross‐section Dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265-312.
• Phillips, P. C., & Hansen, B. E. (1990). Statistical Inference in Instrumental Variables Regression with I(1) Processes. The Review of Economic Studies, 57(1),99-125.
• Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2002). National Innovative Capacity. M. E. Porter, J. D. Sachs, P. K. Cornelius, J. W. McArthur, & K. Schwab inside, The Global Competitiveness Report 2001–2002 (s. 102-119). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Praetorius, B., Bauknecht, D., Cames, M., Fischer, C., Pehnt, M., Schumacher, K., & Voß, J.-P. (2009). Innovation for Sustainable Electricity Systems. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
• Purvis, B., Mao, Y., & Robinson, D. (2019). Three Pillars of Sustainability: In Search of Conceptual Origins. Sustainability Science, 14(3),681–695.
• Saikkonen, P. (1991). Asymptotically Efficient Estimation of Cointegration Regressions. Econometric Theory, 7(1),1-21.
• Santana, N. B., Rebelatto, D. A., Périco, A. E., Moralles, H. F., & Filho, W. L. (2015). Technological Innovation for Sustainable Development: An Analysis of Different Types of Impacts for Countries in the BRICS and G7 Groups. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 22(5), 425-436.
• Silva, P., & Moreira, A. C. (2019). The Relationship Between Culture and Human Development: An Analysis Through the Lens of Innovation and Corruption. Z. Nedelko, & M. Brzozowski inside, Recent Advances in the Roles of Cultural and Personal Values in Organizational Behavior (s. 187-212). Hershey: IGI Global.
• Silvestre, B. S., & Ţîrcă, D. M. (2019). Innovations for Sustainable Development: Moving Toward a Sustainable Future. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 325-332.
• Smedt, P. D. (2006). Asking The Right Questions: New Approaches On Measuring Sustainable Development. Economic Commission for Europe Conference of European Statisticians (s. 1-12). Oslo: UNECE/OECD/Eurostat Working Group on Statistics for Sustainable Development.
• UNCTAD. (2017). New Innovation Approaches to Support the Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals. The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Retrieved from https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/ dtlstict2017d4_en.pdf.
• Ülkü, H. (2004). R&D, Innovation, and Economic Growth: An Empirical Analysis. IMF Working Paper, WP/04/185,1-36.
• Waas, T., Hugé, J., Verbruggen, A., & Wright, T. (2011). Sustainable Development: A Bird’s Eye View. Sustainability, 3(10),1637-1661.
• WCED. (1987). Our Common Future. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development, Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/ documents/5987our-common-future.pdf.