Migration and Economic Growth Relationship: An Analysis Based on Selected OECD Countries

Öz

Migration flows, which vary according to the level of development of the imigrating and emigrating country have direct or indirect effects on employment and economic growth in the municipial countries. In this study, 2000-2016 period annual data of selected 7 OECD membership countries were used to determine the relationship between economic growth and migration. As an immigration agent (IMG); the foreign-born population employment rate (%) as a percentage of the immigrant population that subsequently went to the target country born in the foreign country, the annual growth rate per capita gross domestic product per capita gdp growth rate,%) data have used for for the 7 countries panel data set in the analysis of the economic growth and migration relation through the panel causality test developed by Dumitrescu and Hurlin (2012). Both the two variables are included in the analysis as percent. As a result, to be from IMG to GDP, it has a one-direct panel Granger causality relationship between IMG and GDP

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Migration, Economic Growth, Panel Unit Root, Panel Causality

Göç ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: Seçilmiş OECD Ülkeleri Üzerine Ekonometrik Bir Analiz

Öz

Göç veren ve göç alan ülkenin gelişmişlik düzeyine göre çeşitlilik gösteren göç akımları göçe taraf ülkelerde istihdam ve ekonomik büyüme üzerinde doğrudan ya da dolaylı etkiler yaratmaktadır. Bu çalışmada ekonomik büyüme ve göç olgusu arasındaki ilişkiyi tespit etmede seçilmiş 7 OECD üyesi ülkenin 2000-2016 dönemi yıllık verileri kullanılmıştır. Ekonomik büyüme ve göç ilişkisine yönelik Dumitrescu ve Hurlin (2012) tarafından geliştirilen panel nedensellik testi üzerinden yapılan analizde 7 ülkeden oluşan panel veri seti için göç değişkeni olarak(IMG); yabancı ülkede doğmuş hedef ülkeye sonradan giden göçmen populasyonun %’si olarak yabancı ülke doğumluların istihdam oranı (%), ekonomik büyüme değişkeni olarak(GDP) da, kişi başı gayri safi yurtiçi hasıladaki yıllık büyüme oranı dataları kullanılmıştır. Sonuç olarak, IMG’den GDP’ye olmak üzere IMG ve GDP arasında tek yönlü bir panel Granger nedensellik ilişkisinin olduğu sonucu elde edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Göç, Ekonomik Büyüme, Panel Birim Kök, Panel Nedensellik

Kaynakça

1. Borjas, J.George (1994), “TheEconomics of Immigration”, Journal of EconomicLiterature, Vol. XXXII (December 1994), pp. 1667–1717.
2. Boubtane, Ekrame, Dramane Coulibaly ve Cristophe Rault (2013), ”Immigration, Growth, and Unemployment: Panel VAR Evidence from OECD Countries”, Review of Labour Economics and Industrial Relations, Vol. 27, pp. 399-420.
3. Boubtane, Ekrame, Jean-Christopheve Dumont ve Cristophe Rault (2014), “Immigration and Economic Growth in the OECD Countries: 1986-2006”, IZA DiscussionPaper Series, (WorkingPaper No:8681), Germany.
4. Boucher, Anna ve Justin Gest (2015),“Göç Çalışmaları Dönüm Noktasında: Göç Rejimi Tipolojilerine İlişkin Bir Eleştiri”, Göç Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 1(2), ss. 152-187. (http://gam.gov.tr/files/d6.pdf)
5. Brezis, Elise S. ve Paul Krugman (1993),”Immigration, Investmentand Real Wages”, NBER Working Papers 4563, Journal of Population Economics,Vol. 9, No.1, pp. 83-93. National Bureau of Economic Research,Inc. (http://www.nber.org/papers/w4563)
6. Bretschger, Lucas (2001), “Labor Supply, Migration, and Long-term Development”, Open Economies Review, Vol:12, pp. 5-27.
7. Brücker, Herbert ve Philipp J. H. Schröder (2006), “International Migration with Heterogeneous Agents: Theory and Evidence”, IZA Discussion Papers, No. 2049, Copenhagen. (https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/33442/1/518549992.pdf)
8. Chen, Hung-Ju (2006), “International Migration and Economic Growth: A Source Country Perspective”, (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00148-005-0023-1). Population Economics, Vol. 19, pp. 725–748.

9. Coniglio,Nicola ve Kenji Kondoh (2015), “International Integration with Heterogeneous Immigration Policies”, International Economics,Vol. 142, No.2, pp. 15-31.
10. (https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cii:cepiie:2015-q2-142-2)
11. Dolado, Juan , Alessandra Goria ve Andrea Ichino (1994), “Immigration, Human Capital and Growth in the Host Country: Evidence from Pooled Country Data”, Journal of Population Economics, Vol.7, pp. 193-215.
12. (https://econpapers.repec.org/article/sprjopoec/v_3a7_3ay_3a1994_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a193- 215.htm).
13. Dumitrescu , Elena-Ivona ve Christophe Hurlin (2012), “Testing for Granger Non-causality in Heterogeneous Panels”, EconomicModelling, Vol. 29, pp. 1450–1460.
14. Felbermayr, Gabriel, Sanne Hiller ve Davide Sala (2010),“Does Immigration Boost Per CapitaI income?”, (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176510000182) Letters, Vol. 107, No. 2, pp. 177-179.
15. Gupta, Manash Ranjan ve Bidisha Chakraborty (2006), “Human Capital Accumulation and Endogenous Growth in a Dual Economy, Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 169-195. (https://www.isid.ac.in/~planning/bc.pdf)
16. Granger, Clive W.J. (1969), “Investıiating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross- Spectral Methods”, The Econometric Society, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 424-438.
17. Granger, Clive W.J. ve Gawon Yoon (2002), “Hidden Cointegration”, Department of Economics Working Paper University of California, No:2002-02.
18. Holtz-Eakin, Douglas, Whitney Newey ve Harvey Rosen (1988), “Estimating Vector Autoregressions with Panel Data”, Econometrica, Vol. 56, No. 6, pp. 1371–1396.
19. İçduygu, Ahmet, İbrahim Sirkeci ve Gülnur Muradoğlu (2001), “Socio-economic Development and International Migration: A Turkish Study”, International Migration,Vol. 39,No.4, pp. 39-60.
20. Im, Kyung So, M.Hashem Pesaran ve Yongcheol Shin (2003), “Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels”, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 115, No. 1, pp. 53-74.
21. Kang, Youngho ve Byung Yeon Kim (2012),”Immigration and Economic Growth: Do Originand Destination Matter?”, Samsung Economic Research Institute, Seoul National University, MPRA Paper No. 39695. (https://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/39695)
22. Kim, Keuntae ve Joel E. Cohen (2010), “Determinants of International Migration Flows to and from Industrialized Countries: A Panel Data Approach Beyond Gravity” , International Migration Review, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 899-932. (https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/33442/1/518549992.pdf)
23. Lucas, Robert E. (1988),“On The Mechanics of Economic Development”, Journal of Monetary Economics, July 1988,22:1, 3-42 (https://doi.org/10.1016/0304- 3932(88)90168-7)
24. Maddala, G.S. ve Shaowen Wu (1999), “A comparative Study of Unit Root Tests With Panel Data and a New Simple Test”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol.61, No.S1, pp.631-652.
25. Morley, Bruce (2006), “Causality Between Economic Growth and Immigration: An ARDL Bounds Testing Approach”, Economics Letters, Vol. 90, pp. 72–76. (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176505002594).
26. Mountford, Andrew (1997), “Can a Brain Drain be Good for Grow thin the Source Economy?” Journal (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304387897000217) Economics, Vol.53, No. 2, pp. 287–303.
27. OECD, (2016), “Recent Trends in International Migration”, International Migration Outlook, Paris.
28. OECD/European Union (2015), “Indicators of Immigrant Integration 2015: Settling In”, OECD Publishing, Paris. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264234024-en.) OECD(18.09.2017) (Çevrimiçi.): https://data.oecd.org
29. Ortega Francesc ve Giovanni Peri (2009), “The Causes and Effects of International Migration: Evidence from OECD Countries 1980-2005”, NBER Working Papers 14833. (http://www.nber.org/papers/w14833)
30. Ortega Francesc ve Giovanni Peri (2014), Migration, Trade and Income, Journal of International Economics, Vol. 92, pp. 231-51.
31. Robertson, Peter E. (2002), “Demographic Shocks and Human Capital Accumulation in the Uzawa-Lucas (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016517650100547X) Economics Letters, Vol. 74, pp. 151-160.
32. Romer, P.M. (1994), “The Origin of Endogenous Growth, Journal of Economic Perspectives”, Journal (https://econpapers.repec.org/article/aeajecper/v_3a8_3ay_3a1994_3ai_3a1_3ap_ 3a3-22.htm) Perspectives, Vol.8, No. 1, pp. 3-22.
33. Romer, Paul M. (1989), “Human Capital and Growth: Theory and Evidence”,NBER Working Paper No. 3173.
34. Sevinç, Haktan ve Demet Sevinç Eroğlu (2016), “Ekonomik Büyüme ve Göç İlişkisi: Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelere Dayalı Bir Analiz”, International Conference on Eurasian Economies Session 2C: Kalkınma II, August 29-31, Hungary.
35. The World Bank (18.09.2017) (Çevrimiçi): http://data.worldbank.org/indicator
36. Taylor, J.Edward (2006), “International Migration and Economic Development”, International Symposium on International Migration and Development, Population Division Department of Economic and Social Affairs”, United Nations SecretariatTurin, 28-30 June, Italy.
37. Walz, Ume (1993), “On the Growth (rate) Effects of Migration”, Tübinge Diskussionsbeiträge, No. 24.
38. Zlotnik, Hania (1998), “International Migration 1965-96: An Overview”, Population and Development Review, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 429-468.