A Study on The Determinants of Income in Turkey

Öz

The objective of this study is to analyze the effects of social, economic, and individual factors on individual earnings. This research study is motivated by Becker’s Human Capital Model and Mincer’s studies on wage models. Turkish Statistical Institute’s (TURKSTAT) micro data set that is revealed for the year 2011 and titled Household Budget Survey and Income Distribution is used for the analyses. The data set covers an effective sample size of 9,918 households and 37,121 individuals who are interviewed by TURKSTAT periodically. The studied models are then enriched with adding a gender effect. The findings indicate that the males earn more than women who posses similar characteristics with men. This reflects a gender wage gap among economically active Turkish population. Moreover, vocational high schools graduates perform better than other high school graduates economically. The results also reveal some other important relationships between the earnings of economically active population and the primary income components that are included in the models

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Income,Determinants,Earnings

A Study on The Determinants of Income in Turkey

Öz

Kaynakça

1. Akhmedjonov, A. & Balci Izgi, B. (2012). Does it Pay to Work in the Public Sector in Turkey?, Applied Economics Letters, 19(10), 909-913.
2. Alkış, M. T. (1998). Kalkınmada İnsan Sermayesi: İç Getiri Oranı Yaklaşımı ve Türkiye Uygulaması, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 13, Sayi: 1, 83-106.
3. Altay, A. & Pazarlıoğlu, M. V. (2007). Uluslararası Rekabet Gücünde Beşeri Sermaye: Ekonometrik Yaklaşım, Selçuk Üniversitesi Karaman İİBF Dergisi, S. 12, Yıl 9, s. 96- 108.
4. Björklund, A. & Kjellström, C.(2002). Estimating the return to investments in education: how useful is the standard Mincer equation? Economics of Education Review, Volume 21, Issue 3, 195-210.
5. Blackburn, M. L.( July 2008). Are Union Wage Differentials in the United States Falling? Affiliation not provided to SSRN Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Vol. 47, Issue 3, 390-418.
6. Cankal, E. & Gokce, A. (2015). “The Determinants of Earnings in Turkey”, International Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 9, Issue. 1, 73-79.
7. Çelik, O. & Selim, S. (2014). Türkiye'de Kamu ve Özel Sektör Ücret Farklılıklarının Kantil Regresyon Yaklaşımı ile Analizi, Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 1, 205-232.
8. Çelik, O. & Selim, S. (2013). Basic Human Capital Theory: The Case of Turkey. EY International Congress on Economics, Ankara.

9. Jovanovic,B. & Lokshin, M. M. (2004). Wage Differentials between the State and Private Sectors in Moscow, Journal Article Review of Income and Wealth, Series 50, Number 1, 107-123.
10. Lucifora, C & Meurs, D. (2004). The Public Sector Pay Gap in France, Great Britain and Italy, IZA Discussion paper series, No. 1041.
11. Magda, I. & Rycx, F. & Tojerow, I. & Valsamis, D. (October 2011). Wage differentials across sectors in Europe: an east-west comparison, Economics of Transition, Volume 19, Issue 4, 749-769.
12. Mincer, J. (1997). The Production of Human Capital and the Life Cycle of Earnings: Variations on a Theme, Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 15, No. 1, Part 2: University of Chicago Press, 26-47.
13. Toutkoushian, R. K. (1998). Racial and marital status differences in faculty pay. The Journal of Higher Education, 69, 513-541.
14. Trond, P. & Penner, A. M. & Hİgsnes, G. (2011). “The male marital wage premium: Sorting versus differential pay.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 54, 283-304.
15. Turac, S. (2014). “A Study on the Determinants of Income: Example of Turkey”, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ph.D. Dissertation.
16. Ünal, L. I. (1991). İşgücü Piyasalarinda Eğitimsel Niteliklerin Rolü, Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 2.