Abandoning Microfinance in Turkey: An Explanatory Study

Öz

Microfinance has brought a change in the economic life of the participants of the society by providing an opportunity to the financially disadvantaged individuals to be employed and be financially independent. Microfinance is a financial instrument that can be utilized to combat poverty and other challenges hindering the progress of countries. It has managed to impact the lives of thousands of families within Turkey and on a global level too. Recently, it has been observed that the number of clients of microfinance has decreased. Therefore, the objective of the research is to identify the reasons of dissatisfaction among microfinance borrowers which leads to their separation from the microfinance institution. A total of 150 drop-out clients from Turkish Grameen Microfinance Program have been considered through the random sampling method for the research via the survey method of face-to-face interviews. Change in income level of the drop-out clients was an important reference in the method of microfinance as an instrument against poverty. The recommendations of this research like repayment period and microcredit limit can be considered and these suggestions may contribute to better managerial strategies and organizational plans for the development of microfinance institutions

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Microfinance, Poverty, Microfinance Clients.

Abandoning Microfinance in Turkey: An Explanatory Study

Öz

Kaynakça

1. Ateş, G., & Öğütoğulları, E. (2012).Türkiye'de Yoksullukla Mücadelede Mikrokredi Uygulamaları [Micro Credit Practices in the Fight against Poverty in Turkey].Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 14.2: 33-54. (1 January, 2016).
2. Artukoğlu, M. M. (2009). Micro Credit Applications for Decreasing of Poverty in the World and Turkey‖. [Electronic Version] Ege Ünv. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. 46.3: 225-230.(14 February, 2016).
3. Barnes, C., & Sebstad, J. (2000). Guidelines for microfinance impact assessments. Assessing the Impact of Microenterprise Services (AIMS)–USAID.Washington, DC.
4. Burritt, K. (2003). Microfinance in Turkey. Draft paper for the United Nations Development Programme: United Nations Capital Development Fund.
5. Chakravartı, P. (2015). Micro-finance : A study on BRIC countries. [Electronic Version] International Journal of Research in Business Management.3.7: 75-82 (12 November 2015).
6. Dincer, C. (2014). The Role of Microfinance in Women's Empowerment in Turkey.
7. Günel, G., & Aytulun, Ö. (2006). Assistance or Subjugation: The Impact of Microcredit on the Poor. (2006). International Conference on Human and Economic Resources.154-169.
8. Korkmaz, D., & Bayramoğlu, M. (2007). Yoksullukla Mücadelede Mikrofinans Modelive Mikrofinans Kuruluşlarının Finansal İşlevleri [The Financial Functions of Microfinance Institutions and the microfinance model against poverty].MUFAD Journal.98-110.

9. Lafourcade, A., Isern, J., Mwangi, P., & Brown, M. (2005).Overview of the outreach and financial performance of microfinance institutions in Africa. Microfinance Information Exchange (MIX). Micro Banking Bulletin. 3-14
10. Leikem, K. (2012). Microfinance: A Tool for Poverty Reduction?.University of Rhode Island,HonorsProgram.http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1 308&context=srhonorsprog (15 November, 2015).
11. Obaidullah, M. (2008). Role of Microfinance in Poverty Alleviation: lessons from experiences in selected IDB member countries. Islamic Development Bank.2.21:1-71. (10 October, 2015).
12. Rehman, H., Moazzam, A., & Ansari, N. (2015). Role of Microfinance Institutions in Women Empowerment: A Case Study of Akhuwat, Pakistan. [Electronic Version] A Research Journal of South Asian Studies.30.1: 107-125. (10 November, 2015).
13. Van Rooyen, C., Stewart, R., & De Wet, T. (2012). The impact of microfinance in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of the evidence. [Electronic Version] World Development.40.11: 2249-2262. (16 April, 2016).
14. Saatçi, E., &Özçam, Ö. (2013). Early application of social business in Turkey: The case of the Diyarbakir/Sur microcredit program. Social Business. [Electronic Version] Social Business. 3.3: 251-258. (15 March, 2016).
15. Simanowitz, A. (2000). Client exit surveys: A tool for understanding client drop-out. Journal of Microfinance/ESR Review, 2.1:112-137.
16. Siddiqi, K. (2008). Potential of Islamic microfinance in Pakistan Discussion Paper Series, United Kingdom: Loughborough University School of Social Sciences.
17. Turkiye Grameen Mikrofinans Programı. http://www.tgmp.net/tr/ (24 April 2016).
18. Yayla, R. (2012). Effects of Microcredit Programs on Income Levels of Participant Members :Evidence From Eskişehir, Turkey, Unpublished Master’s dissertation. Istanbul: Mıddle East Technical University.
19. Yunus, M., & Weber, K. (2007).Creating a world without poverty: Social business and the future of capitalism. New York: Public Affairs.
20. Turkstat http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/Start.do;jsessionid=ZzlHXcJKGnVJ8Y9MhhF91Kf3M sl8T2WBqgJ47hQfzvwwgQvk79R (24 April 2016).