Efficacy of Polishing Materials in same size applied by Air-Flow and Rubber Cup on Surface Roughness

Abstract

The present in vitro study aimed to evaluatethe efficacy of two polishing materials in reducingtooth roughness caused by sonic scaling. Buccaltooth surface areas of extracted, distile water stored24 mandibular incisor teeth were scaled in a buccolingual direction by a sonic scaler. The resultingroughness was measured by a profilometer. Thespecimens were then splint into two groups. One ofthese groups was polished by an air-powder instruments and the other was polished by rubber cup andprophylaxis paste. Tooth roughness Ra wasrecorded for each step in the procedures. In bothgroups Ra values were not significantly reduced ateach step of the polishing procedures and the terminal results was similar for the groups.Prophylaxis paste and air-powder polishing gave asimilar reduction of the sonic scaling roughness

Aynı gren büyüklüğüne sahip politür materyallerinin air-flow ve döner lastik ile uygulanmasının yüzey pürüzlülüğüne etkisi: in-vivo çalışma

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı; sonik enstrümanlarlayapılmış olan diş taşı temizliği sonrasında kullanılan iki politür materyalinin diş yüzeyindekipürüzlülüğü azaltmadaki etkisini incelemektir.Çekilerek distile su içerisinde muhafaza edilmiş 24adet diş sonik bir cihaz yardımı ile bukko-lingualyönde hareketler ile temizlenmiştir. Ortaya çıkanpürüzlülük profilometre yardımı ile ölçülmüştür.Daha sonra örnekler iki gruba ayrılmıştır. Bugruplardan birindeki dişler air-powder enstrümanyardımı ile diğer gruptakiler ise lastik ve politür patı

References

1. WHO Expert Committee. Prevention met- hods and programmes for oral diseases. Technical Report, series 713. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1984.
2. Waldman HB. Dentistry in the USA: A les- son in survival. J Dent 1989; 17: 124-31.
3. Lövdal A, Arnö A, Schei O, Waerhaug J. Combined effect of subgingival scaling and cont- rolled oral hygiene on the incidence of gingivitis. Acta Odontol Scand 1961; 19: 537-53.
4. Axelsson P, Lindhe J. The sigificance of maintenance care in the treatment of periodontal di- sease. J Clin Periodontol 1981; 8: 281-94.
5. Meyer K, Lie T. Root surface roughness in response to periodontal instrumentation studied by combined use of microroghness measurements and scanning electron microscopy. J Clin Periodontol 1977; 4: 77-91.
6. Jotikasthira NE, Lie T, Leknes KN. Comparative in vivo studies of sonic, ultrasonic and reciprocating scaling instruments. J Clin Periodontol 1992; 19: 560-9.
7. Leitão J, Hegdahl T. On teh measuring of roughness. Acta Odontol Scand 1981; 39: 379-84.
8. Leknes LN, Lie T. Erythrosin staining in clinical disclosure of plaque. Quintessence Int 1988; 19: 199-204.

9. Lutz F, Sener B, Imfeld T, Barbakow F, Schüpbach P. Self-adjusting abrasiveness: A new technology for prophylaxis pastes. Quintessences Int 1993; 24: 53-63.
10. Barbakow F, Lutz F, Imfeld T. Relative dentin abrasionby dentifrices and prophylaxis pastes: Implications for clinicians, manufacturers, and patients. Quintessences Int 1987; 18: 29-34.
11. Christensen RP. Brand names and charac- teristics of polishing products used by dental hygi- enists in the US- results of a survey. Dental Hyg 1984; 58: 222-8.
12. Johnson G, Brännstörm M. The sensitivity of dentin. Changes in relation to conditions at exposed tubule apertures. Acta Odontol Scand 1974; 32: 29-38.
13. Rosenberg RM, Ash MM Jr. The effect of root roguhness on plaque accumulation and gingival inflamation. J Periodontol 1974: 45: 146-50.
14. Green E, Ramfjord SP. Tooth roughness after subgingival root planing. J Periodontol 1966; 37: 396-9.
15. Pameijer CH, Stallar RE, Hiep N. Surface characteristics of teeth following periodontal instru- mentation: a scanning electron microscopic study. J Periodontol 1971; 43: 628-31.
16. Wilkinson RF, Maybury JE. Scanning elect- ron microcopy of the root surface following instru- mentation. J Periodontol 1973; 44: 559-62.
17. Kerry GJ. Roughness of root surface after use of ultrasonic instruments and hand currets. J Periodontol 1967; 38(4): 340-6.
18. Green E. Root planning with dull and sharp currets. J Peirodontol 1968; 39: 348-50.
19. Clark SM, Grupe HE, Mahler DB. The effect of ultrasonic instrumentation on root surface. J Periodontol 1968; 39: 135-7.
20. Weaks LM, Lescher NB, Barnes CM, Holroyd SV. Clinical evaluationof the Prophy-Jet as an instrument for routine removal of tooth stain and plaque. J Periodontol 1984; 55: 486-8.
21. Barnes CM, Russel CM, Gerbo LR, Wells BR, Barnes DW. Effects of an air-powder polishing system on orthodontically bracketed and banded teeth. Am J of Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990; 97: 74-81.
22. Willmann DE, Norling BK, Johnson WN. A new prophylaxis instrument: effect on enamel alte- rations. JADA 1980; 101(6): 923-5.
23. Stookey GK, Schemehorn BR. A method for assessing relative abrasion of prophylaxis materi- als. J Dent Res 1979; 58: 588-92.
24. Rateitschak K. Failure of periodontal treat- ment. Quintessence Int 1994; 25: 449-57.
25. Boyde A. Airpolishing effects on enamel, dentine, sement and bone. Br Dent J 1984; 134:49- 53.
26. Zu BJ, Burstein GT, Huchings IM. A com- parative study in slurry erosion and free fall particle erosion on aluminum. Wear 1991; 149: 73-84.
27. Ramfjord S. Maintenance car efor treated periodontitis patients. J Clin Periodontol 1987; 14: 433-7.
28. Kaldahl W, Kalkworf K, Patil K et al. Longterm evaluation of periodontal therapy. II: Incidence of sites breaking down. J Peirodontol 1996; 67: 103-8.