Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Year 2022, Volume: 8 Issue: 2 , 31 - 36 , 15.12.2022
https://izlik.org/JA53TX87ML

Abstract

References

  • AYTAÇ, A. and TURACI, T. (2015). Strong Weak Domination in Complementary Prisms, Dynamics of Continuous, Discrete and Impulsive Systems Series B: Applications and Algorithms, 22(2), 85-96.
  • BERMUDO, S.,FERNAU, H.,SIGARRETTA, J. (2014). The Differential and the Roman Domination Number of a Graph, Appl. Anal. Discret. Math., 8, 155-171.
  • BLIDIA, M., BOUCHOU, A., CHELLALI, M. (2020). Extremal Graphs for a Bound on the Roman Domination Number, Discuss. Math. Graph Theory, 40, 771-785.
  • CHANG, G.J., HUANG, L., ZHU, X. (1999). Circular Chromatic Numbers of Mycielski’s Graphs, Descrete Math, 205, 23-37.
  • CHAMBERS, E.W., KINNERSLEY, B., PRINCE, N., WEST, D.B. (2009). Extermal Problems for Roman Domination, SIAM j. Discret Mathematics, 23(3) 1575-1586.
  • COCKAYNE, E.J., DREYER Jr, P.A., HEDETNIEMI, S.A. (2004). Roman Domination in Graphs, Discrete Mathematics, 11-22. HARARY, F. (1969). Graph Teory, In: Addition- Wesley Publishing Co. Reading, MA/Menlo Park, CA/London.
  • HARTSFIELD, N. and RINGEL, G. (1990). Pearls in Graph Theory, In: Academic Press, INC.
  • HAYNES, T.W., HEDETNIEMI, P.J., SLATER, P.J. (1998). Fundamentals of Domination in Graphs, Marcel Dekker, New York.
  • KARTAL, Z. and AYTAÇ, A. (2010). Semitotal Domination of Harary Graphs, Tbilisi Mathematical Journal, 3, 11-17.
  • LIU, C.H. and CHANG, G.J.(2012). Upper Bounds on Roman Domination numbers of Graphs, Discret. Math., 312, 1386-1391.
  • LIEDLOFF, M., KLOKS, T., LIU, J., PENG, S.L. (2008). Efficient Algorithms for Roman Domination on Some Classes of Graphs, Discret. Appl. Math., 156, 3400-3415.
  • MOJDEH, D.A., PARSIAN, A., MASOUMI, I. (2019). Strong Roman Domination Number of Complementary Prism Graphs, Turk. J. Math. Comput. Sci, 40-47.
  • RAMAKRISHNAN,(1988).MPhil-Thesis, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, India.
  • SAMPATHKUMAR, E. & WALİKAR, H.B. (1980). On the Splitting Graph of a Graph, The Karnataka University Journal Science, 25&26, 13-16.
  • STEWART, I. (1999). Defend the Roman Empire!, Sci. Ame., 281,136-139.
  • WEST, D.B. (2001). Introduction to Graph Theory, In: Pearson Education (Second Edition)
  • XING, H.M., CHEN, X., CHEN X.G. (2006). A Note on Roman Domination in Graphs, Discret. Math., 306, 3338-3340.

On Roman Domination in Middle and Splitting Graphs

Year 2022, Volume: 8 Issue: 2 , 31 - 36 , 15.12.2022
https://izlik.org/JA53TX87ML

Abstract

For a graph G=(V,E), a Roman dominating function(RDF) is a function f:V→{0,1,2} having the property that every vertex u for which f(u)=0 is adjacent to at least one vertex v for which f(v)=2. The weight of an RDF ((w(f)) is the sum of assignments for all vertices. The minimum weight of an Roman dominating function on graph G is the Roman domination number, denoted by γ_R (G). In this paper, we study on this variant of the domination number for middle, splitting and Mycielski graphs of some special graphs.

References

  • AYTAÇ, A. and TURACI, T. (2015). Strong Weak Domination in Complementary Prisms, Dynamics of Continuous, Discrete and Impulsive Systems Series B: Applications and Algorithms, 22(2), 85-96.
  • BERMUDO, S.,FERNAU, H.,SIGARRETTA, J. (2014). The Differential and the Roman Domination Number of a Graph, Appl. Anal. Discret. Math., 8, 155-171.
  • BLIDIA, M., BOUCHOU, A., CHELLALI, M. (2020). Extremal Graphs for a Bound on the Roman Domination Number, Discuss. Math. Graph Theory, 40, 771-785.
  • CHANG, G.J., HUANG, L., ZHU, X. (1999). Circular Chromatic Numbers of Mycielski’s Graphs, Descrete Math, 205, 23-37.
  • CHAMBERS, E.W., KINNERSLEY, B., PRINCE, N., WEST, D.B. (2009). Extermal Problems for Roman Domination, SIAM j. Discret Mathematics, 23(3) 1575-1586.
  • COCKAYNE, E.J., DREYER Jr, P.A., HEDETNIEMI, S.A. (2004). Roman Domination in Graphs, Discrete Mathematics, 11-22. HARARY, F. (1969). Graph Teory, In: Addition- Wesley Publishing Co. Reading, MA/Menlo Park, CA/London.
  • HARTSFIELD, N. and RINGEL, G. (1990). Pearls in Graph Theory, In: Academic Press, INC.
  • HAYNES, T.W., HEDETNIEMI, P.J., SLATER, P.J. (1998). Fundamentals of Domination in Graphs, Marcel Dekker, New York.
  • KARTAL, Z. and AYTAÇ, A. (2010). Semitotal Domination of Harary Graphs, Tbilisi Mathematical Journal, 3, 11-17.
  • LIU, C.H. and CHANG, G.J.(2012). Upper Bounds on Roman Domination numbers of Graphs, Discret. Math., 312, 1386-1391.
  • LIEDLOFF, M., KLOKS, T., LIU, J., PENG, S.L. (2008). Efficient Algorithms for Roman Domination on Some Classes of Graphs, Discret. Appl. Math., 156, 3400-3415.
  • MOJDEH, D.A., PARSIAN, A., MASOUMI, I. (2019). Strong Roman Domination Number of Complementary Prism Graphs, Turk. J. Math. Comput. Sci, 40-47.
  • RAMAKRISHNAN,(1988).MPhil-Thesis, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, India.
  • SAMPATHKUMAR, E. & WALİKAR, H.B. (1980). On the Splitting Graph of a Graph, The Karnataka University Journal Science, 25&26, 13-16.
  • STEWART, I. (1999). Defend the Roman Empire!, Sci. Ame., 281,136-139.
  • WEST, D.B. (2001). Introduction to Graph Theory, In: Pearson Education (Second Edition)
  • XING, H.M., CHEN, X., CHEN X.G. (2006). A Note on Roman Domination in Graphs, Discret. Math., 306, 3338-3340.
There are 17 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Betül Atay Atakul 0000-0003-1964-3287

Publication Date December 15, 2022
IZ https://izlik.org/JA53TX87ML
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 8 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Atay Atakul, B. (2022). On Roman Domination in Middle and Splitting Graphs. Eastern Anatolian Journal of Science, 8(2), 31-36. https://izlik.org/JA53TX87ML
AMA 1.Atay Atakul B. On Roman Domination in Middle and Splitting Graphs. Eastern Anatolian Journal of Science. 2022;8(2):31-36. https://izlik.org/JA53TX87ML
Chicago Atay Atakul, Betül. 2022. “On Roman Domination in Middle and Splitting Graphs”. Eastern Anatolian Journal of Science 8 (2): 31-36. https://izlik.org/JA53TX87ML.
EndNote Atay Atakul B (December 1, 2022) On Roman Domination in Middle and Splitting Graphs. Eastern Anatolian Journal of Science 8 2 31–36.
IEEE [1]B. Atay Atakul, “On Roman Domination in Middle and Splitting Graphs”, Eastern Anatolian Journal of Science, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 31–36, Dec. 2022, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA53TX87ML
ISNAD Atay Atakul, Betül. “On Roman Domination in Middle and Splitting Graphs”. Eastern Anatolian Journal of Science 8/2 (December 1, 2022): 31-36. https://izlik.org/JA53TX87ML.
JAMA 1.Atay Atakul B. On Roman Domination in Middle and Splitting Graphs. Eastern Anatolian Journal of Science. 2022;8:31–36.
MLA Atay Atakul, Betül. “On Roman Domination in Middle and Splitting Graphs”. Eastern Anatolian Journal of Science, vol. 8, no. 2, Dec. 2022, pp. 31-36, https://izlik.org/JA53TX87ML.
Vancouver 1.Betül Atay Atakul. On Roman Domination in Middle and Splitting Graphs. Eastern Anatolian Journal of Science [Internet]. 2022 Dec. 1;8(2):31-6. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA53TX87ML