Ergenlerde Topluluk Hissi Ölçeği Türkçe Formunun Geçerlik Ve Güvenirliği

Year 2014, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 16 - 25, 11.07.2016

Ahmet Akın Fatih Usta Nihal Çelebi Eroğlu

Abstract

Bu araştırmanın amacı Chiessi, Cicognani, ve Sonn (2010) tarafından geliştirilen Ergenlerde Topluluk Hissi ölçeğinin Türkçe formunun geliştirilmesidir. Araştırmanın örneklem grubunu yaşları 15 ile 18 arasında değişen 169’si kız, 222’si erkek toplam 391 lise öğrencisi oluşmaktadır. Ölçeğin yapı geçerliği için uygulanan doğrulayıcı faktör analizinde tek boyutlu topluluk hissi modelinin iyi uyum verdiği görülmüştür. Ölçeğin faktör yükleri .40 ile .69 arasında değişmektedir. Topluluk Hissi Ölçeği’nin Cronbach alfa iç tutarlılık güvenirlik katsayısı .87, üç hafta arayla elde edilen test-tekrar güvenirlik katsayısı .84 olarak bulunmuştur. Ölçeğin düzeltilmiş madde toplam korelasyonlarının .35 ile .62 arasında sıralandığı görülmektedir. Analizler sonucunda, Topluluk Hissi Ölçeği Türkçe formunun, ilgili yaş grubu öğrencileri üzerinde, geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olarak kullanılabileceğini göstermektedir

Keywords

Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi, Ergenlik, Geçerlik, Güvenirlik, Topluluk Hissi

The Reliability and Validity of Turkish Version of Sense of Community Scale in Adolescents

Abstract

The aim of this study is to improve the Turkish version of the Sense of Community Scale developed by Chiessi, Cicognani, & Sonn (2010). The research was conducted on 391 high school students. Results of confirmatory factor analyses demonstrated that the one-dimensional sense of community model fitted well. Cronbach alpha internal consistency coefficient of the scale was found as .87 and three-week interval test re-test reliability coefficient was found as .84. The corrected item-total correlations ranged from .35 to .62. Overall results demonstrated that Sense of Community Scale can be used as a valid and reliable instrument in education and psychology

Keywords

Adolescence, Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Reliability, Sense of community, Validity

References

• Bailey, M., & McLaren, S. (2005). Physical activity alone and with others as predictors of sense of belonging and mental health in retirees. Aging and Mental Health, 9, 82–90.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2004). Veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
• Chiessi, M., & Cicognani, E. (2010). Assessing sense of community on adolescents: Validating the brief scale of Sense Of Community in adolescents (SOC-A). Journal Of Community Psychology, 38, 276–292.
• Evans, S. D. (2007). Youth sense of community: Voice and power in community contexts. Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 693–709.
• Finlayson, T. J. (2007). Self effects of stigma, sense of community, and self-esteem on the hiv sexual risk behaviors of african american and latino men who have sex with men. Georgia State University, Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi.
• Goodenow, C. (1993). Classroom belonging among early adolescents: Relationships to motivation and achievement. Journal of Early Adolescence, 13, 21-43.
• Ilgaz, H. (2008). Uzaktan Eğitimde Teknoloji Kabulünün ve Topluluk Hissinin Öğrenen Memnuniyetine Katkısı, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
• Mannarini, T., & Fedi, A. (2009). Multiple senses of community: The experience and meaning of community. Journal of Community Psychology, 37(2), 211–227.
• McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6– 23.
• Parker, E. A., Lichtenstein, R. L., Schulz, A. J., Israel, B. A., Steinman, K. J., & James, S. A. (2001).Disentangling measures of individual perceptions of community social dynamics: Results of a community survey. Health Education & Behavior, 28, 462–486.
• Peterson, N. A., & Reid, R. J. (2003). Paths to empowerment in an urban community: Neighborhood connectedness and community participation in substance abuse prevention activities. Journal of Community Psychology, 31(1), 25–38.
• Pretty, G. M. H. (2002). Young people’s development of the community-minded self: Considering community identity, community attachment and sense of community. In A. T. Fisher, C. C. Sonn and B. J. Bishop (Eds.), Psychological sense of community: Research, Applications, and implications (s. 183-203). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
• Pretty, G., Bishop, B., Fisher, A., & Sonn, C. (2006). Psychological sense of community and its relevance to well-being and everyday life in Australia. Australian Psychological Society Ltd.
• Prezza, M., & Costantini, S. (1998). Sense of community and life satisfaction: Investigation in three diferent territorial contexts. journal of community & applied social psychology, 8, 181-194.
• Rovai, A. P. (2001). Building a sense of community at a distance: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(4), 33–48.
• Sarason, S. B. (1974). The psychological sense of community: Prospects for a community psychology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Shaffer, C. R., & Anundsen, K. (1993). Creating community anywhere: Finding support and connection in a fragmented world. New York: Putnam.
• Speer, P. W. (2000). Intrapersonal and interactional empowerment: Implications for theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 51–61.
• Speer, P. W., & Peterson, N. A. (2000). Psychometric properties of an empowerment scale: Testing cognitive, emotional, and behavioral domains. Social Work Research, 24, 109–118.
• Taylor, B., & Taylor, A. (1996). A wayfinding perspective in mental health: Generating a sense of community among people with multiple handicapping conditions. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 20, 77–81.
• Tezbaşaran, A. A. (1996). Likert tipi ölçek geliştirme kılavuzu. Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları.
• Wang, S. K. (2008). The effects of a synchronous communication tool (yahoo messenger) online learners’ sense of community and their multimedia authoring skills. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 7(1), 59-74.