Site Observations on Buildings’ Performance in Hatay Province after Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes

Abstract

Two major earthquakes of 7.7 and 7.6 magnitudes hit a large region of east south of Türkiye on the same day. The first 7.7 MW earthquake occurred in Pazarcık, Kahramanmaraş on the 6th of Feb 2023 followed by an earthquake of 7.6 MW in Elbistan, Kahramanmaraş after 9 hours. Thousands of buildings collapsed in ten provinces in Türkiye and caused thousands of life losses and injuries. More than 14 million people were affected, and a lot of people lost their homes which makes the two major events the worst natural disaster of the century. This paper presents site observations on the seismic performance of the buildings in Hatay province that is the most affected city by these earthquakes. Site observations indicate that most of the collapsed buildings are old building stocks constructed before 1999 and collapsed in a pancake failure mode which increases life losses. In general, newly constructed buildings that were designed according to the new Turkish earthquake design code show good seismic performance. Reasons for failures and failure modes of old and new buildings were investigated.

Keywords

• Kahramanmaraş earthquakes
• disaster
• seismic
• buildings
• concrete

References

1. [1]. “Natural Disaster Databook 2021 An Analytical Overview” Asian Disaster Reduction Center (ADRC) Higasjhikan 5F., 1-5-2 Wakinohamakaigan-dori Chuo-ku, Kobe 651-0073, Japan.
2. [2]. A. Barka, “The August 1999 Izmit Earthquake” Science, 285(5435), 1858-1859. DOI:10.1126/science.285.5435.1858, 1999.
3. [3]. OCHA (15 September 1999), “Turkey – Earthquake OCHA Situation Report No. 21”. ReliefWeb. Retrieved 12 May 2023. https://reliefweb.int/report/turkey/turkey-earthquake-ocha-situation-report-no-21.
4. [4]. S. Nazara and B. P. Resosudarmo, “Aceh-Nias Reconstruction and Rehabilitation: Progress and Challenges at the End of 2006,” ADB Institute Discussion Paper No. 70, Asian Development Bank Institute, Kasumigaseki Building 8F, 3-2-5 Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-6008, Japan
5. [5]. T. Miyazaki, “Impact of Socioeconomic Status and Demographic Composition on Disaster Mortality: Community-Level Analysis for the 2011 Tohoku Tsunami,” Int J Disaster Risk Sci vol. 13, pp. 913-924, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-022-00454-x
6. [6]. D. Kalafat, A. C. Zülfikar, and S. O. Akcan, “Seismicity of Turkey and real-time seismology applications in determining earthquake hazard,” Academic Platform Journal of Natural Hazards and Disaster Management, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 96-111, 2021. doi:10.52114/apjhad.1039670
7. [7]. K. Ansari, O. Corumluoglu, and S. K. Sharma, “Numerical simulation of crustal strain in Turkey from continuous GNSS measurements in the interval 2009-2017,” Journal of Geodetic Science, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 113-129, 2017.
8. [8]. “Kahramanmaraş Depremi”, https://www.trthaber.com/haber/gundem/asrin-felaketinde-can-kaybi-40-bin-689a-yukseldi-747421.html (Accessed Feb. 19, 2023)

9. [9]. “Last Earthquakes”, https://deprem.afad.gov.tr/last-earthquakes (Accessed Feb. 19, 2023)
10. [10]. H. Korkmaz, “The relationship between ground conditions and earthquake effect in Antakya,” Turkish Journal of Geographical Sciences, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 49-66, 2006 (in Turkish).
11. [11]. TBSC, “Türkiye Building Seismic Code”, AFAD, Official Gazetta, (in Turkish). Ankara: 416 pages, 2018.