Energy Efficiency Optimization in Biogas Production from Cattle Rumen Digesta Through Process Simulation Using Aspen Plus

Abstract

This study optimizes energy efficiency in biogas production from cattle rumen digesta (CRD) using Aspen Plus process simulation. CRD, an underutilized abattoir byproduct, showed favorable characteristics with 72.6% volatile solids and a C/N ratio of 22.48. The simulation integrated NRTL thermodynamic techniques with RCSTR/RStoic reactor modules to model the four anaerobic digestion phases: hydrolysis, acidogenesis, acetogenesis, and methanogenesis. The validated model predicted methane yields of 0.0382 kg/hr compared to experimental yields of 0.0335 kg/hr (12.3% difference), representing acceptable agreement under optimal conditions; deviations ranged from 12.3% to 25.4% across all HRT conditions. Energy analysis revealed an electrical potential of 4.46 kWh/day, equivalent to ₦9,366/month, with payback period less than one year. Heat integration reduced external heating requirements by 30%, lowering net energy demand and improving overall system efficiency. Sensitivity analysis identified optimal conditions at 25 days hydraulic retention time and 1.5 kg VS/m³/day organic loading rate, yielding stable pH (6.8–7.2) and VFA concentrations below 1,500 mg/L. Simulated methane yields (0.0341–0.0382 kg/hr) compare favourably with published values for similar feedstocks (0.035–0.045 kg/hr). Model validation across seven case studies showed deviations ranging from 0.3% to 12.4%, confirming robustness and scalability. This study provides a validated, CRD-specific framework for waste-to-energy system design and demonstrates the effectiveness of process simulation in optimizing renewable energy production from abattoir waste.

Keywords

• Anaerobic digestion
• Aspen plus
• Biogas simulation
• Cattle rumen digesta
• Energy efficiency
• Energy optimization.

References

1. [1] Hassan, Q., et al., Adapting German energy transition rules for Iraq through industry, flexibility, and demand management. Futures, 2024. 161: p. 103411.
2. [2] Obada, D.O., et al., A review of renewable energy resources in Nigeria for climate change mitigation. Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering, 2024. 9: p. 100669.
3. [3] Omotoye, G., et al., Navigating global energy markets: A review of economic and policy impacts. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 2024. 11: p. 195-203.
4. [4] Hüner, B. and E. Telli, Design and performance analysis of a green house based on hybrid and passive energy systems: A case study. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 2023. 45(4): p. 12859-12879.
5. [5] Yang, Y., et al., Energy transition: Connotations, mechanisms and effects. Energy Strategy Reviews, 2024. 52: p. 101320.
6. [6] Amoo, A.O., S. Ahmed, and A. Haruna, The Impact of Process Variables on the Quantity and Quality of Biogas Generated from Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste and Rumen Contents. Industrial and Domestic Waste Management, 2023. 3(1): p. 27-37.
7. [7] Akanji, S., E. Adeyeni, and I. Olawoore, Biogas Production from Agricultural Wastes and Kigelia Africana Leaves: A Sustainable Approach for Renewable Energy Generation 1 AKANJI, SB; * 2 ADEYENI, EG; 3 OLAWOORE, IT; 4 OYELEYE, SA. 2024.
8. [8] Pilarski, K., A.A. Pilarska, and J. Dach, Biogas as renewable energy source: A brief overview. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 2025. 26(7): p. 408-416.

9. [9] Nevzorova, T. and V. Kutcherov, Barriers to the wider implementation of biogas as a source of energy: A state-of-the-art review. Energy Strategy Reviews, 2019. 26: p. 100414.
10. [10] Olanrewaju, O., M.J.B. Kabeyi, and J. Akpan, Biogas Production and Process Control Improvements, in From Biomass to Biobased Products, E. Jacob-Lopes, L. Queiroz Zepka, and R.R. Dias, Editors. 2024, IntechOpen: Rijeka.
11. [11] Erdirençelebi, D., Primer ve Sekonder Arıtma Çamur Fraksiyonlarının Meyve Atığı ile Anaerobik Çoklu Besiyeri Çürütmesi Ön Çalışması. Konya Journal of Engineering Sciences, 2021. 9(1): p. 1-7.
12. [12] Ihoeghian, N.A., et al., Anaerobic co-digestion of cattle rumen content and food waste for biogas production: Establishment of co-digestion ratios and kinetic studies. Bioresource Technology Reports, 2022. 18: p. 101033.
13. [13] Neuner, T., et al., Impact of Design and Mixing Strategies on Biogas Production in Anaerobic Digesters. Water, 2024. 16(15): p. 2205.
14. [14] Inayat, A., et al., Process Simulation and Optimization of Anaerobic Co-Digestion. Frontiers in Energy Research, 2021. Volume 9 - 2021.
15. [15] Palomar, J., et al., Process Simulation and Optimization on Ionic Liquids. Chemical Reviews, 2024. 124(4): p. 1649-1737.
16. [16] Harun, N., et al., Anaerobic Digestion Process of Food Waste for Biogas Production: A Simulation Approach. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2019. 42(9): p. 1834-1839.
17. [17] Sheikhi, A. and M. Rasouli, Model Development and Simulation of Anaerobic Digestion Process Using Aspen Plus. International Journal of Energy Research, 2025. 2025(1): p. 4018548.
18. [18] Akyüz, A.Ö. and K. Kumaş, Biogas Potential of Afyonkarahisar, Turkey-based on Animal Manure: Energy Equivalents and its Contribution to Economy and Carbon Emissions. El-Cezeri, 2023. 10(2): p. 356-370.
19. [19] Mihi, M., et al., Modeling and forecasting biogas production from anaerobic digestion process for sustainable resource energy recovery. Heliyon, 2024. 10(19).
20. [20] Amoo, A.O., et al., Microbiological Analysis of Hawked-Cooked Food: Evidence from Ready-to-Eat Food Vendors in Dutse Ultra-Modern Market, Northwestern, Nigeria. Tropical Environment, Biology, and Technology, 2024. 2(1): p. 23-33.
21. [21] Eaton, A.D., et al., Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 2005: American Public Health Association.
22. [22] Pham, C.H., et al., Validation and recommendation of methods to measure biogas production potential of animal manure. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci, 2013. 26(6): p. 864-73.
23. [23] Bravo, D., et al., Aspen Plus process-simulation model: Producing biogas from VOC emissions in an anaerobic bioscrubber. Journal of Environmental Management, 2018. 213: p. 530-540.
24. [24] Kelif Ibro, M., V. Ramayya Ancha, and D. Beyene Lemma, Biogas Production Optimization in the Anaerobic Codigestion Process: A Critical Review on Process Parameters Modeling and Simulation Tools. Journal of Chemistry, 2024. 2024(1): p. 4599371.
25. [25] Ramasamy, G., et al., Process simulation of anaerobic digestion for methane production using aspen plus. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2022. 1257(1): p. 012002.
26. [26] Mao, C., et al., Review on research achievements of biogas from anaerobic digestion. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015. 45: p. 540-555.
27. [27] Rajendran, K., et al., A novel process simulation model (PSM) for anaerobic digestion using Aspen Plus. Bioresour Technol, 2014. 168: p. 7-13.
28. [28] Nayeri, D., et al., A comprehensive review on the recent development of anaerobic sludge digestions: Performance, mechanism, operational factors, and future challenges. Results in Engineering, 2024. 22: p. 102292.
29. [29] Onojo, J., et al., Estimation Of The Electric Power Potential Of Human Waste Using Students Hostel Soak-Away Pits. 2013: p. 198-203.
30. [30] Gadaleta, G., S. De Gisi, and M. Notarnicola, Feasibility Analysis on the Adoption of Decentralized Anaerobic Co-Digestion for the Treatment of Municipal Organic Waste with Energy Recovery in Urban Districts of Metropolitan Areas. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021. 18(4): p. 1820.
31. [31] Hurtado, A.D.P., et al., Assessment of energy efficiency and performance in a two-phase anaerobic process for organic matter removal. Water Science and Technology, 2021. 84(3): p. 667-682.
32. [32] Slopiecka, K., et al., Chemical and physical characterization of food waste to improve its use in anaerobic digestion plants. Energy Nexus, 2022. 5: p. 100049.
33. [33] Amoo, A.O., S. Ahmed, and A. Haruna, Combinatorial Effect of Process Parameters on the Rate of Biogas Production and Rate of Substrate Degradation Following Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste and Rumen Content. Journal of Applied Science and Environmental Management, 2023. 27(3): p. 449-455.
34. [34] Jameel, M.K., et al., Biogas: Production, properties, applications, economic and challenges: A review. Results in Chemistry, 2024. 7: p. 101549.
35. [35] Wukovits, W., et al., Integration of Biohydrogen Production with Heat and Power Generation from Biomass Residues. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING TRANSACTIONS, 2013. 35: p. 1003-1008.
36. [36] Santaweesuk, A., A. Artnaseaw, and C. Benjapiyaporn, Optimization of methane production through co-digestion of pig manure with napier grass. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 2025. 26: p. 100931.
37. [37] Ajala, O.O. and O.J. Odejobi, Modelling, simulation and optimization of domestic and agricultural wastes-based anaerobic digestion using Aspen Plus. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 2025. 15(2): p. 2817-2833.
38. [38] Hüner, B., et al., Pt Thin Film-Coated 3D-Printed Polymer Anode Gas Diffusion Electrodes for PEM Water Electrolyzers. Energy & Fuels, 2024. 38(14): p. 13228-13244.