Examining the Methodological Anatomies of Studies on Teaching English as a Foreign Language from a Techno Pedagogical Perspective

Year 2024, Issue: 53, 80 - 104, 30.06.2024

Veysel Karslı Sinem Çilligöl Karabey Meva Bayrak Selçuk Karaman

https://doi.org/10.33418/education.1421201

Abstract

Changes in technology and the increase in its potential for language teaching have made it possible to restructure Teaching English as a Foreign Language (TEFL) models today. In this context, the aim of this study is to examine the methodological anatomy of theses on technology integration in TEFL from a techno-pedagogical perspective. In this direction, the descriptive features, methodological features, examined variables, used technological environments/tools/materials and the roles of instructors and students were examined. Within the scope of this study, content analysis was used for 110 graduate theses conducted in Turkey on technology integration in TEFL. According to the results of the study, it has been determined that the effects of different technologies on various skills have been examined with different research methods from past to present in the TEFL processes, and again in this process, studies tried to focus on skills that are almost directly related to the potential of each technology. However, in most of these research processes, it was observed that the potential offered by the relevant technology was utilized at a very basic level and in relation to this, especially students were given passive roles. As a result of the study, research and application suggestions were made that can better reveal the real potentials of related technologies in technology-assisted TEFL processes.

Keywords

TEFL, Technology-based foreign language teaching, Foreign language teaching, Techno-pedagogical teaching practices

Yabancı Dil Olarak İngilizce Öğretimine Yönelik Çalışmaların Metodolojik Anatomilerinin Teknopedagojik Bakış Açısıyla İncelenmesi

Abstract

Teknolojide meydana gelen değişimler ve dil öğretimine yönelik potansiyelindeki artış, günümüzde Teaching English as an Foreign Language (TEFL) modellerini yeniden yapılandırmasına uygun bir bağlam oluşturmuştur. Bu kapsamda çalışmanın amacı İngilizce’nin yabancı dil olarak öğretiminde teknoloji entegrasyonuna yönelik araştırmaların yöntemsel anatomilerinin teknopedagojik bakış açısıyla ortaya koyulmasıdır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda ele alınan araştırmaların tanımlayıcı özellikleri, yöntemsel özellikleri, incelenen değişkenler, kullanılan teknolojik ortamlar/araçlar/materyaller ile eğitimci ve öğrencilerin üstlendikleri roller incelenmiştir. Bu amaçla Türkiye’de İngilizce’nin yabancı dil olarak öğretiminde teknoloji entegrasyonuna yönelik olarak yapılan 110 lisansüstü tez içerik analizine tabi tutulmuştur. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre TEFL süreçlerinde geçmişten günümüze farklı araştırma yöntemleri eşliğinde farklı teknolojilerin çeşitli beceriler üzerindeki etkisinin incelendiği, bu süreçte her bir teknolojinin potansiyeli ile hemen hemen doğrudan ilişkili beceriler üzerine odaklanılmaya çalışıldığı tespit edilmiştir. Ancak bu araştırma süreçlerinin büyük bir kısmında ilgili teknolojinin sunmuş olduğu potansiyelden oldukça temel seviyede faydalanıldığı ve bununla ilişkili olarak özellikle öğrencilere pasif olarak nitelendirilebilecek roller verildiği göze çarpmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda teknoloji destekli TEFL süreçlerinde ilgili teknolojilerin asıl potansiyellerini daha iyi bir şekilde ortaya çıkarabilecek araştırma ve uygulama önerilerinde bulunulmuştur.

Keywords

Teknoloji destekli yabancı dil öğretimi, Yabancı dil öğretimi, Teknopedagojik öğretim uygulamaları

References

• Agudo, J. E., Sánchez, H., & Rico, M. (2010, July). Playing games on the screen: Adapting mouse interaction at early ages. In 2010 10th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 493-497). IEEE.
• Ahmadi, D., & Reza, M. (2018). The use of technology in English language learning: A literature review. International Journal of Research in English Education, 3(2), 115-125.
• Al-Wasy, B. Q. (2020). The effectiveness of integrating technology in EFL/ESL writing: a meta-analysis. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 17 (4), 435-454. http://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-03-2020-0033
• Akkoyunlu, B., Kurbanoğlu S. (2003). Öğretmen adaylarının bilgi okuryazarlığı ve bilgisayar öz-yeterlilik algıları üzerine bir çalışma. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24, 1-10.
• Albaladejo, S. A., Coyle, Y., & de Larios, J. R. (2018). Songs, stories, and vocabulary acquisition in preschool learners of English as a foreign language. System, 76, 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.05.002
• Alemi, M., Meghdari, A., & Ghazisaedy, M. (2015). The impact of social robotics on L2 learners’ anxiety and attitude in English vocabulary acquisition. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7(4), 523-535. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-015-0286-y
• Alsied, S. M., & Pathan, M. M. (2013). The use of computer technology in EFL classroom: Advantages and implications. International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies (IJ-ELTS), 1(1), 61-71.
• Ammade, S., Mahmud, M., Jabu, B., & Tahmir, S. (2018). Integrating technology in English language teaching: global experiences and lessons for Indonesia. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(6), 107-114. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v8n6p107
• Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives: Complete edition. New York, NY: Longman.
• Arifah, A. (2014). Study on the use of technology in ELT classroom: Teachers’ perspective. M.A. Thesis, Department of English and Humanities, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
• Arslan, R. Ş., & Şahin-Kızıl, A. (2010). How can the use of blog software facilitate the writing process of English language learners?. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(3), 183-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2010.486575
• Barrot, J. (2016). Using Facebook-based e-portfolio in ESL writing classrooms: impact and challenges. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 29(3), 286–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2016.1143481
• Basturkmen, H. (2009). Commenting on results in published research articles and masters dissertations in Language Teaching. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8(4), 241-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2009.07.001
• Baz, F. Ç. (2010). Bilgisayar destekli yabancı dil eğitim yazılımı olan Dyned Programının öğretmen ve öğrenci görüşleri açısından değerlendirilmesi. (Publication No. 292843) [Master thesis, Cukurova University]. YÖK Tez Merkezi. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
• Baytak, A., Tarman, B., & Ayas, C. (2011). Experiencing technology integration in education: children's perceptions. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 3(2), 139-151.
• Beatty, K. (2003). Teaching and Researching Computer-Assisted Language Learning (Applied Linguistics in Action). New York: Pearson ESL.
• Bordbar, F. (2010). English teachers' attitudes toward computer-assisted language learning. International Journal of Language Studies, 4(3).
• Cakici, D. (2016). The use of ICT in teaching English as a foreign language. Participatory Educational Research (PER), 4(2), 73-77.
• Cakir, I. (2006). The use of video as an audio-visual material in foreign language teaching classroom. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 5(4), 67-72.
• Celik, S. (2013). Internet-assisted technologies for English language teaching in Turkish universities. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(5), 468-483. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.692385
• Cetinkaya, L., & Sutcu, S. S. (2019). Students’ success in English vocabulary acquisition through multimedia annotations sent via Whatsapp. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 20(4), 85-98. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.640517
• Cetto, M. (2010). Technology and second language teaching. Brujula, 8, 119-121.
• Chang, M. M., & Hung, H. T. (2019). Effects of Technology-Enhanced Language Learning on Second Language Acquisition. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 22(4), 1-17.
• Cojocariu, V. M., & Boghian, I. (2014). Teaching the relevance of game-based learning to preschool and primary teachers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 142, 640-646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.679
• Chu, H. C., Wang, C. C., & Wang, L. (2019). Impacts of concept map-based collaborative mobile gaming on English grammar learning performance and behaviors. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 22(2), 86-100.
• Chun, D., Kern, R., & Smith, B. (2016). Technology in language use, language teaching, and language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 64-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12302
• Cutrim Schmid, E. (2008). Potential pedagogical benefits and drawbacks of multimedia use in the English language classroom equipped with interactive whiteboard technology. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1553-1568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.02.005
• Dai, W., & Fan, L. (2012). Discussion about the pros and cons and recommendations for multimedia teaching in local vocational schools. Physics Procedia, 33, 1144-1148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2012.05.188
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 13(3), 318-340.
• DeHaan, J. Reed, W., & Kuwada, K. (2010). The effect of interactivity with music video games on second language vocabulary recall. Language Learning & Technology,14(2),74-94.
• Dewaele, J. M., & Li, C. (2020). Emotions in second language acquisition: A critical review and research agenda. Foreign Language World, 196(1), 34-49.
• Drayton, B., Falk, J. K., Stroud, R., Hobbs, K., & Hammerman, J. (2010). After installation: Ubiquitous computing and high school science in three experienced, high-technology schools. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(3), 1-57.
• Ernest, P., Guitert Catasús, M., Hampel, R., Heiser, S., Hopkins, J., Murphy, L., & Stickler, U. (2013). Online teacher development: Collaborating in a virtual learning environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(4), 311-333.
• Faizi, R. (2018). Teachers’ perceptions towards using Web 2.0 in language learning and teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 23(3), 1219-1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9661-7
• Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education.
• Ghanizadeh, A., Razavi, A., & Jahedizadeh, S. (2015). Technology-Enhanced Language Learning (TELL): A Review of Resourses and Upshots. International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy, 54, 73. https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILCPA.54.73
• Gilakjani, A. P. (2012). The significant role of multimedia in motivating EFL learners' interest in English language learning. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 4(4), 57.
• Gilakjani, A. P. (2017). A review of the literature on the integration of technology into the learning and teaching of English language skills. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(5), 95-106. http://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v7n5p95
• Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: a review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer assisted language learning, 27(1), 70-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.700315
• Gong, Y. F., Gao, X. A., & Lyu, B. (2020). Teaching Chinese as a second or foreign language to non-Chinese learners in mainland China (2014–2018). Language Teaching, 53(1), 44-62.
• Grabe, W., & Stoller, F.L. (2002). Teaching and researching reading. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education.
• Grant, S. (2016). Peer review process completion rates and subsequent student perceptions within completely online versus blended modes of study. System, 62(1), 93-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.06.010
• Güngör, B. (2018). The effect of the integration of talking toys on preschoolers’ vocabulary learning in English. Erken Çocukluk Çalışmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 180-193. https://doi.org/10.24130/eccd-jecs.196720182255
• Hamilton, M. 2013. Autonomy and Foreign Language Learning in a Virtual Learning Environment. London: Bloomsbury.
• Hauck, M., & Guichon, N. (2011). Editorial: Teacher education research in CALL and CMC: More in demand than ever. ReCALL, 23(3), 187-199. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344011000139
• Herlina, A. (2014). The Utilization of Technology to Improve English Speaking Skills. Journal for the Study of English Linguistics, 2(2), 19-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/jsel.v2i2.6665
• Lin, M. H. (2015). Learner-centered blogging: A preliminary investigation of EFL student writers' experience. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(4), 446-458.
• Liu, H., Lin, C. H., & Zhang, D. (2017). Pedagogical beliefs and attitudes toward information and communication technology: a survey of teachers of English as a foreign language in China. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(8), 745-765. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1347572
• Hamad, M. M. (2017). Using WhatsApp to Enhance Students' Learning of English Language "Experience to Share". Higher Education Studies, 7(4), 74-87. http://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v7n4p74
• Hooker, M. (2009). How can I encourage multi-stakeholder narrative and reflection on the use of ICT in teacher professional development programmes in Rwanda? Educational Journal of Living Theories, 2(3), 324-364.
• Houcine, S. (2011, ). The effects of ICT on learning/teaching in a foreign language.International Conference “ICT for Language Learning”. https://www.academia.edu/download/34070270/The_effects_of_ICT_on_learning.pdf
• Hubbard, P., & Levy, M. (2006). Teacher education in CALL. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
• Hubbard, P. (2017). Technologies for teaching and learning L2 listening. In Carol A. Chapelle, Shannon Sauro (Eds.) The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp 93-106). http://doi.org/10.1002/9781118914069
• İlter, B. G. (2015). How does technology affect language learning process at an early age?. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 311-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.552
• Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2015). NMC horizon report: 2015 higher education edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium
• Kalanzadeh, G. A., Soleimani, H., & Bakhtiarvand, M. (2014). Exploring the influence of using technology on Iranian EFL students’ motivation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 814-823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.486
• Kalasi, R. (2014). The impact of social networking on new age teaching and learning: An overview. Journal of Education & Social Policy, 1(1), 23-28.
• Kapsargina, S., & Olentsova, J. (2019). Reasonability of using LMS Moodle tests as a form of control in teaching a foreign language for students of secondary vocational education. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 131, 811-815.
• Kennedy, C., & Miceli, T. (2013). In piazza online: Exploring the use of wikis with beginner foreign language learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(5), 389-411. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2013.770035
• Kozikoğlu, A. G. İ. (2013). Yabancı dil öğretiminde bilgisayar kullanımına ilişkin öğretim elemanlarının görüşleri. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(1), 373-394.
• Kuru Gönen, S. İ. (2019). A qualitative study on a situated experience of technology integration: reflections from pre-service teachers and students. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(3), 163-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1552974
• Lawless, K.A., & Pellegrino, J.W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575-614. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307309921
• Lee, K. (2000). English teachers’ barriers to the use of computer-assisted language learning. The Internet TESL Journal, 6(12).
• Lee, L. (2004). Learners’ perspectives on networked collaborative interaction with native speakers of Spanish in the US. Language Learning and Technology, 8(1), 83-100.
• Lee, C., Jor, G., & Lai, E. (2005). Web-based Teaching and English Language Teaching: A Hong Kong Experience. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
• Lin, H. (2015). Computer-mediated communication (CMC) in L2 oral proficiency development: A metaanalysis. ReCALL, 27(3), 261–287.
• Little, D., & Thorne, S. L. (2017). From learner autonomy to rewilding: A discussion. Learner Autonomy and Web, 2, 12-35.
• Liu, M., Moore, Z., Graham, L., & Lee, S. (2002). A look at the research on computer-based technology use in second language learning: A review of the literature from 1990-2000. Journal of research on technology in education, 34(3), 250-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2002.10782348
• Mahmud, M., & Nur, S. (2018). Exploring Students' Learning Strategies and Gender Differences in English Language Teaching. International Journal of Language Education, 2(1), 51-64. https://doi.org/0.26858/ijole.v2i1.4346
• Margerum-Leys, J., & Marx, R. W. (2002). Teacher knowledge of educational technology: A case study of student/mentor teacher pairs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26(4), 427-462. https://doi.org/10.2190/JXBR-2G0G-1E4T-7T4M
• McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. (2010). Personalised and self regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 418-431. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1100
• McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in Education: Evidence-Based Inquiry, MyEducationLab Series. Pearson.
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
• Mollaei, F., & Riasati, M. J. (2013). Teachers’ perceptions of using technology in teaching EFL. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 2(1), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.7575/ijalel.v.2n.1p.13
• Nami, F., Marandi, S.S., & Sotoudehnama, E. (2016). CALL teacher professional growth through lesson study practice: An investigation into EFL teachers’ perceptions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29, 658–682. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1016439
• Natalia, K., & Julia, O. (2018). New use of MOODLE tools for distance English language learning (experience of Krasnoyarsk State Agrarian University). International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference: SGEM, 18(5.4), 225-232. https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2018/5.4/S22.029
• Nguyen, V. M. (2021). Positive Effects of Video-based Projects on the Communicative English Grammar Lessons. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 3(3), 54-68. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v2i3.666
• Özel, A. (2013). The Use of the Internet and Web 2.0 Tools Among EFL Instructors. Akdeniz University, The Instıtute of Educational Sciences Foreign Language Teaching Department. Master Thesis, Antalya.
• Paily, M. U. (2013). Creating constructivist learning environment: Role of “Web 2.0” technology. In International Forum of Teaching and Studies 9(1), 39-50.
• Panagiotidis, P. (2018). Technology as a Motivational Factor in Foreign Language Learning. European Journal of Education, 1(3), 43-52.
• Parvin, R. H., & Salam, S. F. (2015). The Effectiveness of Using Technology in English Language Classrooms in Government Primary Schools in Bangladesh. FIRE: Forum for International Research in Education, 2(1), 47-59.
• Peregoy, S., & Boyle, O. (2012). Reading, writing and learning in ESL: A resource book for teachers. New York: Allyn & Bacon
• Pierson, M. E. (2001). Technology integration practice as a function of pedagogical expertise. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(4), 413-430. https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.2001.10782325
• Poonpon, K. (2017). Enhancing English skills through project-based learning. The English Teacher, XL, 1-10.
• Quansah, R., & Essiam, C. (2021). The use of learning management system (LMS) moodle in the midst of covid-19 pandemic: Students’ perspective. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 4(3), 418-431. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.934730
• Rodinadze, S., & Zarbazoia, K. (2012). The advantages of information technology in teaching English language. Frontiers of Language and Teaching, 3(5), 271-275. Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Sert, O., & Li, L. (2017). A qualitative study on CALL knowledge and materials design: Insights from pre-service EFL teachers. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 7(3), 73-87. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.2017070105
• Shadiev, R., Hwang, W. Y., & Huang, Y. M. (2017). Review of research on mobile language learning in authentic environments. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(3-4), 284-303.
• Shadiev, R., Hwang, W. Y., & Liu, T. Y. (2018). A study of the use of wearable devices for healthy and enjoyable English as a foreign language learning in authentic contexts. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(4), 217-231.
• Shadiev, R., & Yang, M. (2020). Review of studies on technology-enhanced language learning and teaching. Sustainability, 12(2), 524. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020524
• Shalatska, H.M., Zotova-Sadylo, O.Y., Muzyka, I.O. (2020, December 20). Moodle course in teaching English language for specific purposes for masters in mechanical engineering [Conference presentation]. 7th Workshop on Cloud Technologies in Education (CTE 2019), Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine. https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125937918.pdf
• Sharma, P. (2009). Controversies in using technology in language teaching. BBC Teaching English.
• Shih, C. L., & Chuang, H. H. (2013). The development and validation of an instrument for assessing college students’ perceptions of faculty knowledge in technology-supported class environments. Computers & Education, 63, 109-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.021
• Sitthirak, Ch. (2013). Social media for language teaching and learning. Thammasat University Journal, 31(1), 611-619.
• Shyamlee, S. D., & Phil, M. (2012, March). Use of technology in English language teaching and learning: An analysis [Conference presentation]. International Conference on Language, Medias and Culture. IACSIT Press, Singapore. https://www.academia.edu/download/52965297/1._Use_of_Technology_in_English_Language_Teaching_and_Learning.pdf
• Sozbilir, M., Kutu, H., & Yasar, M. D. (2012). Science education research in Turkey: A content analysis of selected features of papers published. In J. Dillon& D. Jorde (Eds). The World of Science Education: Handbook of Research in Europe (pp.341-374). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
• Stickler, U., & Hampel, R. (2015). Qualitative research in CALL. CALCO Journal, 32(3), 380-395.
• Sun, Z., Lin, C. H., You, J., Shen, H. J., Qi, S., & Luo, L. (2017). Improving the English-speaking skills of young learners through mobile social networking. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(3–4), 304–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1308384
• Szendeffy, J. (2005). A practical guide to using computers in language teaching. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press/ESL.
• Towndrow, P. A. (2007). Task Design, Implementation and Assessment: Integrating Information and Communication Technology in English Language Teaching and Learning. Hong Kong: McGraw-Hill Education.
• Toy, B. Y., & Tosunoğlu, N. G. (2007). Sosyal bilimler alanındaki araştırmalarda bilimsel araştırma süreci, istatistiksel teknikler ve yapılan hatalar. Gazi Üniversitesi Ticaret ve Turizm Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (1), 1-20.
• Uşun, S. (2013). Bilgisayar Destekli Öğretimin Temelleri. Ankara: Nobel yayıncılık.
• Ürün, M. F. (2015). Integration of technology into language teaching: A comparative review study. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(1), 76-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0701.09
• Veglis, A. (2013). Education of journalists on ICTs: Issues and opportunities. Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies, 2(2), 265-279. https://doi.org/10.1386/ajms.2.2.265_1
• Williams, J., & Chinn, S. J. (2009). Using Web 2.0 to support the active learning experience. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 165-174.
• Woodrow, L. (2017). Motivation in language learning. In Essential competencies for English-medium university teaching. Springer, Cham.
• Yaverbaum, G.J., Kulkarni, M. & Wood, C. (1997). Multimedia Projection: An Exploratory Study of Student Perceptions Regarding Interest, Organization, and Clarity. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 6(2), 139-153.
• Zeng, G., & Takatsuka, S. (2009). Text-based peer–peer collaborative dialogue in a computer-mediated learning environment in the EFL context. System, 37(3), 434-446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.01.003
• Zengin, Ö., & Aksu, M. (2017). A Review Study on the Integration of Technology into Foreign Language Education in Turkey. Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 50(2), 79-104. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000001398
• Zhao, Y., & Tella, S. (2002). Technology and teacher education. Language Learning & Technology, 6(3), 25.
• Zhao, H. (2008). Using the Internet to improve EFL through reading and writing for communicative purposes. Polyglossia, 14, 17-24.
• Zhou, W. (2020). Mobile Assisted Chinese Learning as a Foreign Language: An Overview of Publications between 2007 and 2019. Frontiers of Education in China, 15(1), 164-181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-020-0007-7