Kendimize Sadık mıyız? Öz Sadakat Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi

Abstract

Kişinin kendisine sadık olması ruh sağlığını daha iyi bir hale getirir İhanet ve kendine ihanet ruh sağlığına zarar verebilir. Bu çalışma Türk yetişkinler için geçerli ve güvenilir bir Öz-Sadakat Ölçeği geliştirmek ve varsayımsal bir model önermek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Mevcut araştırma üç çalışma halinde yürütülmüştür. Madde tepki analizi, Çalışma I'de (N = 258) ölçek maddelerinin yüksek düzeyde ayırt edici olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Çeşitli güvenilirlik analizleri (McDonald's ω, Cronbach's α, Guttman's λ6) Öz Sadakat Ölçeği'nin güvenilirliğini göstermiştir. Çalışma II'de (N = 419), korelasyon ve ağ analizi depresyon, anksiyete, stres ve yaşam doyumu ile önemli ilişkiler ortaya koymuştur. Ayrıca Beş Büyük kişilik özelliğinin tamamı öz-sadakat ile ilişkilendirilmiştir. Çalışma III (N = 457), bilinçli farkındalık ve sağlamlığın öz sadakat ile mental iyi oluş arasında seri olarak aracılık ettiğini ortaya koymuştur. Dolayısıyla öz-sadakat, bilinçli farkındalık ve sağlamlık aracılığıyla doğrudan ve dolaylı olarak mental iyi oluşu yordamaktadır. Bu duruma göre kendine sadık bireyler çevrelerine karşı daha bilinçli olup sorunlarla daha kolay başa çıkabilmekte ve bu da iyi olma halinin gelişmesine yardımcı olmaktadır. Öz-sadakat üzerine yapılan bu öncü ve kapsamlı çalışma kavramın ruh salığı açısından önemini vurgulamaktadır.

Keywords

• Öz-Sadakat
• Bilinçli Farkındalık
• Dayanıklılık
• Mental İyi Oluş
• Ölçek Geliştirme

Are We Loyal to Ourselves? Development of the Self-Loyalty Scale

Abstract

Being loyal to oneself improves mental health. Betrayal and self-betrayal can harm mental health. This study aims to develop a valid and reliable Self-Loyalty Scale for Turkish adults and proposes a hypothetical model. The current research has been conducted in three studies. Item response analysis revealed that the scale items were highly discriminative in Study I (N = 258). Various reliability analyses (McDonald's ω, Cronbach's α, Guttman's λ6) showed the Self-Loyalty Scale's reliability. In Study II (N = 419), correlation and network analysis revealed substantial associations with depression, anxiety, stress, and life satisfaction. Additionally, all of the Big Five personality traits were linked to self-loyalty. Study III (N = 457) found that mindfulness and resilience serially mediated self-loyalty and mental well-being. So, self-loyalty predicts mental health directly and indirectly through mindfulness and resilience. According to this view, self-loyal people are more conscious of their environment and can handle problems more readily, leading to increased well-being. This pioneering and comprehensive study on self-loyalty highlights the concept's importance in terms of mental health.

Keywords

• Self-Loyalty
• Mindfulness
• Resilience
• Mental Well-Being
• Scale Development

References

1. Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52(3), 317-332.
2. Aksoy, L., Keiningham, T. L., Buoye, A., Lariviere, B., Williams, L., & Wilson, I. (2015). Does loyalty span domains? Examining the relationship between consumer loyalty, other loyalties and happiness. Journal of Business Research, 68(12), 2464-2476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.033
3. Akyıl, Y. (2025). Examining the connections between boredom proneness, resilience, mental well-being, and rumination. Personality and Individual Differences, 233, 112931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2024.112931
4. Akyıl, Y., & İme, Y. (2024). The Mediating Role of Mental Well-Being Between Psychological Resilience, Life Satisfaction and Emotional Intelligence. e-Kafkas Journal of Educational Research, 11(4), 742-752. https://doi.org/10.30900/kafkasegt.1433531
5. Allen, R. T. (1989). When loyalty no harm meant. The Review of Metaphysics, 281-294.
6. Arvidson, M., & Axelsson, J. (2019). Exploring self-loyalty in the context of social acceleration: theorising loyalties as emotions and resistance. In Resistance and Emotions (pp. 7-22). Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2017.1335835
7. Ay, İ. (2023). Exploring the relationship between cognitive flexibility and mindfulness with self-regulation in university students. Afr Educational Res J, 11(3), 460-7. https://doi.org/10.30918/AERJ.113.23.073
8. Bagozzi, R. P. (2010). Structural equation models are modelling tools with many ambiguities: Comments acknowledging the need for caution and humility in their use. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(2), 208-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2010.03.001

9. Bajaj, B., & Pande, N. (2016). Mediating role of resilience in the impact of mindfulness on life satisfaction and affect as indices of subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 93, 63-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.09.005
10. Bajaj, B., Gupta, R., & Pande, N. (2016). Self-esteem mediates the relationship between mindfulness and well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 96-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.020
11. Baker, F. B. (2001). The basics of item response theory. In ERIC clearing-house on assessment and evaluation (2nd ed.). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED458219.pdf. Accessed 21 March 2024.
12. Baker, F. B., & Kim, S. H. (2017). The basics of item response theory using R (Vol. 969). New York: Springer.
13. Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 248-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L
14. Baxter, L. A., Mazanec, M., Nicholson, J., Pittman, G., Smith, K., & West, L. (1997). Everyday loyalties and betrayals in personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14(5), 655-678. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407597145005
15. Beer, A., & Watson, D. (2009). The individual and group loyalty scales (IGLS): Construction and preliminary validation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(3), 277-287. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890902794341
16. Bobâlcă, C., Gătej, C., & Ciobanu, O. (2012). Developing a scale to measure customer loyalty. Procedia Economics and Finance, 3, 623-628. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00205-5
17. Bossi, F., Zaninotto, F., D’Arcangelo, S., Lattanzi, N., Malizia, A. P., & Ricciardi, E. (2022). Mindfulness-based online intervention increases well-being and decreases stress after Covid-19 lockdown. Scientific reports, 12(1), 6483. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10361-2
18. Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822-848. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822
19. Brown, T. A., Chorpita, B. F., Korotitsch, W., & Barlow, D. H. (1997). Psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) in clinical samples. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35(1), 79-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(96)00068-X
20. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage Focus Editions, 154, 136-136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005
21. Chalmers, R. P. (2012). Mirt: a multidimensional item response theory package for the Renvironment. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–29. http://hdl.handle.net/10.18637/jss.v048.i06
22. Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
23. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233– 255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
24. Colledani, D., Anselmi, P., & Robusto, E. (2019). Using multidimensional item response theory to develop an abbreviated form of the Italian version of Eysenck’s IVE questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 142, 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.01.032
25. Coşkun, A. N. (2014). The reflections of brand loyalty on consumer attitudes and behaviors: a study on brand loyalty development in fast moving consumer goods [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. İstanbul University.
26. Dağlı, A., & Baysal, N. (2016). Adaptation of the satisfaction with life scale into Turkish: The study of validity and reliability. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 15(59), 1250-1262. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.75955
27. Demirtaş, A. S., & Baytemir, K. (2019). Warwick-Edinburgh mental iyi oluş ölçeği kısa formu’nun Türkçe’ye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 18(70), 689-701. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.432708
28. Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
29. Dinh, H. P., Van Nguyen, P., Trinh, T. V. A., & Nguyen, M. H. (2022). Roles of religiosity in enhancing life satisfaction, ethical judgements and consumer loyalty. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 2010482. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.2010482
30. Doğan, T. (2015). Adaptation of the Brief Resilience Scale into Turkish: A validity and reliability study. The Journal of Happiness & Well‐Being, 3(1), 93-102.
31. Ertürk, H. (2020). Factors affecting customer loyalty and the effect of customer complaint management on customer loyalty: Research on the customers of a private bank [Unpublished masters dissertation]. Beykent University.
32. Filosofova, A., Mironova, O., & Kozyreva, V. (2017). Psychological and philosophical approaches to studying the" self-betrayal" experience. Economic and Social Development: Book of Proceedings, 1121-1128.
33. Finney, S. J., & DiStefano, C. (2006). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Second Course, 269-314.
34. Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G., & Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 350. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.350
35. Freyd, J., & Birrell, P. (2013). Blind to betrayal: Why we fool ourselves we aren't being fooled. Turner Publishing Company.
36. Ghorbani, N., Watson, P. J., Farhadi, M., & Chen, Z. (2014). A multi‐process model of self‐regulation: Influences of mindfulness, integrative self‐knowledge and self‐control in Iran. International journal of psychology, 49(2), 115-122. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12033
37. Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
38. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2009). Multivariate data analysis: Global edition. 7th Edition: Pearson Education.
39. Han, J., Jun, M., & Kim, M. (2019). Impact of online community engagement on community loyalty and social well-being. Social Behavior and Personality: an International Journal, 47(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.7545
40. Heere, B., & Dickson, G. (2008). Measuring attitudinal loyalty: Separating the terms of affective commitment and attitudinal loyalty. Journal of Sport Management, 22(2), 227-239. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.22.2.227
41. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
42. James, K., & Cropanzano, R. (1994). Dispositional group loyalty and individual action for the benefit of an ingroup: Experimental and correlational evidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60(2), 179-205. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1080
43. Johnson, R. E., Lin, S. H., & Lee, H. W. (2018). Self-control as the fuel for effective self-regulation at work: Antecedents, consequences, and boundary conditions of employee self-control. In Advances in Motivation Science, 5, 87-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2018.01.004
44. Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 144–156. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.bpg016
45. Kandemir, M. (2014). Reasons of academic procrastination: Self-regulation, academic self-efficacy, life satisfaction and demographics variables. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 188-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.179
46. Karadeniz, Y. (2020). Customer loyalty ın e-commerce 'a critical review of the e-loyalty literature and conceptual framework ofthe antecedents of e-loyalty in B2C online markets' [Unpublished masters dissertation]. Queen Mary University of London.
47. Keye, M. D., & Pidgeon, A. M. (2013). Investigation of the relationship between resilience, mindfulness, and academic self-efficacy. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 1(6), 1-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jss.2013.16001
48. Khoa, B. T., & Nguyen, M. H. (2020). Electronic loyalty in social commerce: scale development and validation. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 22(3), 276-300. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.783274230941744
49. Kleinig, J. (2022). Loyalty. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
50. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
51. Klussman, K., Curtin, N., Langer, J., & Nichols, A. L. (2020). Examining the effect of mindfulness on well-being: Self-connection as a mediator. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 14, e5. https://doi.org/10.1017/prp.2019.29
52. Klussman, K., Nichols, A. L., Curtin, N., Langer, J., & Orehek, E. (2022). Self‐connection and well‐being: Development and validation of a self‐connection scale. European Journal of Social Psychology, 52(1), 18-45. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2812
53. Labrague, L. J. (2021). Resilience as a mediator in the relationship between stress-associated with the Covid-19 pandemic, life satisfaction, and psychological well-being in student nurses: A cross-sectional study. Nurse Education in Practice, 56, 103182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103182
54. Lombardo, P., Jones, W., Wang, L., Shen, X., & Goldner, E. M. (2018). The fundamental association between mental health and life satisfaction: results from successive waves of a Canadian national survey. BMC Public Health, 18, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5235-x
55. Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 320-341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
56. Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56(3), 227. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.227
57. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52(5), 509–516. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.5.509
58. Morishima, M., (1982). Why has Japan ‘succeeded’?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59. Nasser-Abu Alhija, F., & Wisenbaker, J. (2006). A Monte Carlo study investigating the impact of item parceling strategies on parameter estimates and their standard errors in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling, 13(2), 204-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705500802222972
60. Nghiêm-Phú, B. (2016). Country image, country attachment, country loyalty, and life satisfaction of foreign residents in Vietnam. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 16(4), 329-344. https://doi.org/10.1177/1467358415600218
61. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
62. Özyeşil, Z., Arslan, C., Kesici, Ş., & Deniz, M. E. (2011). Bilinçli farkındalık ölçeği’ni Türkçeye uyarlama çalışması. Eğitim ve Bilim, 36(160).
63. Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification (Vol. 1). Oxford university press.
64. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
65. Prince, M., Patel, V., Saxena, S., Maj, M., Maselko, J., Phillips, M. R., & Rahman, A. (2007). No health without mental health. The Lancet, 370(9590), 859-877. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61238-0
66. Quang, N. N., & Thuy, D. C. (2024). Mindfulness affecting loyalty with mediating role of customer experience in the context of adventure tourism in Vietnam. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2312651. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2312651
67. Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of research in Personality, 41(1), 203-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001
68. Saad, N. A., Elgazzar, S., & Mlaker Kac, S. (2022). Investigating the impact of resilience, responsiveness, and quality on customer loyalty of MSMEs: Empirical evidence. Sustainability, 14(9), 5011. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095011
69. Saraei, F. H., Hatami, H., & Bagheri, F. (2016). Effectiveness of stress management on glycemic control and change of some of mental health indicators (depression, anxiety, stress, and quality of life) among patients with type 2 diabetes. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2016.v7n4p
70. Sarı, N., Çetiner, O., Çelik, R., Erdinç, B., Akyıl, Y., & Akçıl, S. (2025). Adolescents' relative deprivation and well-being in relation to parents' mindfulness and psychological resilience: a dyadic approach. International Journal of Modern Education Studies, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.51383/ijonmes.2025.406
71. Smith, B. W., Dalen, J., Wiggins, K., Tooley, E., Christopher, P., & Jennifer Bernard, J. (2008). The brief resilience scale: Assessing the ability to bounce back. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15, 194–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705500802222972
72. Sousa, E. C., & Freire, L. (2023). The effect of brief mindfulness‐based intervention on patient satisfaction and loyalty after waiting. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 57(2), 906-942. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12488
73. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4^th. ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
74. Tennant, R., Hiller, L., Fishwick, R., Platt, S., Joseph, S., Weich, S., Parkinson, J., Secker, J., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2007). The Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS): Development and UK validation. Health and Quality of life Outcomes, 5, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-5-63
75. Timmerman, M. E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 209. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023353
76. Türküm, A. S., Satici, S. A., Yilmaz, M. F., & Kayis, A. R. (2016). Turkish version of 10-Item Big Five Inventory’s psychometric properties. Paper presented at the X. European Conference on Social and Behavioral Sciences. Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
77. Valikhani, A., Abbasi, Z., Radman, E., Goodarzi, M. A., & Moustafa, A. A. (2018): Insecure attachment and subclinical depression, anxiety, and stress: A three-dimensional model of personality self-regulation as a mediator. The Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2018.1468727
78. Yıldırım, M., & Arslan, G. (2022). Exploring the associations between resilience, dispositional hope, preventive behaviours, subjective well-being, and psychological health among adults during early stage of COVID-19. Current Psychology, 41(8), 5712-5722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01177-2
79. Yılmaz, Ö., Boz, H., & Arslan, A. (2017). Depresyon anksiyete stres ölçeğinin (dass 21) Türkçe kısa formunun geçerlilik-güvenilirlik çalışması. Finans Ekonomi ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2(2), 78-91.
80. Zoubi, R. A. F., Jubran, A. M., & Al‐Karasneh, S. M. (2024). The availability degree of mindfulness among Arab public school principals and its relationship with teachers’ organizational loyalty within the green line. Jordanian Educational Journal, 9(2), 49-73. https://doi.org/10.46515/jaes.v9i2.505
81. Zubair, A., Kamal, A., & Artemeva, V. (2018). Mindfulness and resilience as predictors of subjective well-being among university students: A cross cultural perspective. Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 28(2), 1.