Adrese Dayalı Nüfus Kayıt Sistemi’nin Öğrenci Kayıtlarında Esas Alınmasına İlişkin Okul Yöneticilerinin Görüşleri

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, ilköğretim okullarına öğrenci kayıtları yapılırken Adrese Dayalı Nüfus Kayıt Sistemi’nin (ADNKS) esas alınmasının ortaya çıkardığı sonuçları ilköğretim okulu yöneticilerinin görüşlerine belirlemektir. Araştırma nitel bir durum çalışması olup katılımcıların belirlenmesinde amaçlı örnekleme yöntemlerinden maksimum çeşitlilik örneklemesi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada elde edilen verilerin analizinde tematik analiz yaklaşımı kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu Adıyaman il merkezinde yer alan 8 ve Gaziantep il merkezinde yer alan 4 okul olmak üzere toplam 12 ilköğretim okulunun müdürleri oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmadan elde edilen bulgular, ilköğretim okullarına öğrenci kayıtları yapılırken bir yönetim bilgi sistemi olan Adrese Dayalı Nüfus Kayıt Sistemi’nin (ADNKS) esas alınmasının okula ulaşım, akademik yapı, okul gelirleri, bürokrasi ve fırsat eşitliği temaları altında çeşitli olumlu ve olumsuz sonuçları ortaya koyduğunu göstermektedir

Keywords

• Adrese Dayalı Nüfus Kayıt Sistemi, yönetim bilgi sistemleri

School administrators’ Opinions on the Enrollment of Students Through the Address-Based Population Register System

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate elementary school administrators’ opinions on the effects and outcome of enrolling students in elementary schools through the Address-Based Population Register System. In this qualitative study, the maximum variation sampling method, a purposeful sampling approach, was utilized to select the participants. In order to analyze the data, the thematic analysis approach was used. The participants were 12 elementary school principals, 8 from Adıyaman and 4 from Gaziantep cities. The findings indicate that the school principals perceived that the Address-Based Population Register System contains both positive and negative aspects which were investigated under five different themes: transportation to the school, academic structure, school revenues, bureaucracy and equal opportunities

Keywords

• address-based population register system, management information systems

References

1. Adamson, I. (2005). Knowledge management - The next generation of TQM?, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 16:8, 987-1000.
2. Alavi, M. & Leidner, D.E. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues. Mis Quarterly, 25 (1), 107-136.
3. Alavi, M. & Leidner, D.E. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. Mis Quarterly, 25 (1), 107-136.
4. Alazmi, M. & Zairi, M. (2003). Knowledge management critical success factors, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 14:2, 199-204. Bhatt, G.D. (2002). Management strategies for individual knowledge and organizational knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6, 1, 31-39.
5. Blair, C.D. (2002). Knowledge management: Hype, hope, or help? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53:12, pg. 1019-1028.
6. Boder, A. (2006). Collective intelligence: a keystone in knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2006, 10:1, pg. 81-93.
7. Bourdreau, A. & Couillard, G. (1999). Systems integration and knowledge management. Information Systems Management,16(4),1-9. Boyatsiz, R.E. (1998). Thematic Analysis and Code Development: Transforming Qualitative Information. Thousands Oaks, London: Sage Publications.
8. Brewer, D.P & Brewer, K.L. (2010). Knowledge Management, Human ResourceManagement, and Higher Education: A Theoretical Model. Journal of Education for Business, 85, 330-335.

9. Carayannis, E.G. (1999). Fostering synergies between information technology and managerial and organizational cognition: the role of knowledge management. Technovation, 19, 219-231.
10. Davenport, T.H. & Völpel, S.C. (2001). The rise of knowledge towards attention management. Journal of Knowledge Management; 5: 3, 212-221.
11. Dey, I. (1993). Qualitative Data Analysis: A user friendly guide for social sciences. London: Taylor and Francis Group.
12. Evans, M. M. & Allyne, J. (2009). The concept of knowledge in KM: A knowledge domain process model applied to inter-professional care. Knowledge and Process Management, 16 (4), 147-161.
13. Fernandez, I.B. (2000). The role of arti®cial intelligence technologies in the implementation of People-Finder knowledge management systems. Knowledge-Based Systems 13, 315-320.
14. Jackson, P. & Clobas, J. (2008).Building knowledge in projects: A practical application of social constructivism to information systems development. International Journal of Project Management 26, 329–337.
15. Lee, C.C. & Yang, J. (2000). Knowledge value chain. The Journal of Management Development; 19, 783-793.
16. O’Connor, N.G. & Martinsons, M.G. (2006). Management of information systems: Insights from accounting research. Information & Management 43, 1014-1024.
17. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Variety in qualitative inquiry: theoretical orientations. In C.D. Laughton, V. Novak, D. E. Axelsen, K. Journey, & K. Peterson (Eds.), Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousands Oaks, London: Sage Publications.
18. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
19. Zack, M.H. (1999). Developing a knowledge strategy. California Management Review, 41(3), 125-145