Competitive Team-Based Learning versus Group Investigation with Reference to the Language Proficiency of Iranian EFL Intermediate Students

Abstract

This paper is a report on an experimental study which intended to look into the possible effects of Competitive Team-Based Learning (CTBL) vis-à-vis Group Investigation (GI) method of Cooperative Learning (CL) on the language proficiency of Iranian EFL intermediate students. Seventy homogeneous Iranian intermediate students were selected out of a total population of 110 to serve the present study. The results of the study indicated the advantage of CTBL over GI in terms of its effect on improving the target group’s language proficiency. The results of the study were in contrast to the reports of researchers like Ab-Raza (2007), an Israeli language specialist, who have argued that students in Islamic countries “do not value diversity of ideas, beliefs, and perspectives” (p. 5) and so cannot be taught through modern methods like those of CL

Keywords

• Competitive Team-Based Learning, Group Investigation, Language

Competitive Team-Based Learning versus Group Investigation with Reference to the Language Proficiency of Iranian EFL Intermediate Students

Öz

-

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

References

1. Ab-Raza, R. (2007). Cross-cultural study of the relationship between language learning strategies and socio-educational and cultural factors. Journal of English Language Teaching, 45(1): 3–12.
2. DeVries, D., & Edwards, K. (1974). Student teams and learning games: Their effects on cross-race and cross-sex interaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66: 741–749.
3. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
4. Hosseini, S. M. H. (2000). The effects of competitive team-based learning on the reading comprehension of high school students. Unpublished MA Dissertation.
5. Garmsar Azad University, Iran. Hosseini, S. M. H. (2007). ELT in higher education in Iran and India: A critical review. Language http://www.languageinindia.com/dec2007/eltinindiaandiran.html. in India, 7(12).
6. Hosseini, S. M. H. (2009). Infusion of emerging online technologies into ELT: The need of the hour, Perspectives in Education, 25, 119–127. Also, [Online] Available at: http://eltweekly.com/more/2009/06/eltweekly-issue22-research-paper-by-mohammad- hassan- hosseini/
7. Hosseini, S. M. H. (2009). Effectiveness of cooperative learning methods: A study with
8. Iranian and Indian undergraduate learners. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Mysore University, India. Hosseini, S. M. H. (2010). Theoretical foundations of competitive team-based learning.

9. Canadian Journal of English Language Teaching, 3(3): 229 - 243. Also, [Online] Available at: http: //www.ccsenet.org/journal/index/php/elt/article/viewFile/7236/5588
10. Hosseini, S. M. H. (2012). A study of the effects of Competitive Team-Based Learning and Structured Academic Controversy on the language proficiency of Iranian EFL college seniors. the International Journal of Adult Vocational Education and Technology, 3(4): 230-151.
11. Hosseini, S. M. H. (2012). Beyond the present methods and approaches to
12. ELT/Education: The crucial need for a radical reform. Tehran: Jungle Publication. Hosseini, S. M. H. (2013). Team-Based Learning in Secondary Education. – MA
13. Dissertation. Germany: Lambert Academic. Hosseini, S. M. H. (2013). Cooperative Learning Methods + 1: Research and Innovation. PhD Thesis. Germany: Scholars’ Press.
14. Hosseini, S. M. H. (2013). Teach Language: A Practical Crash Course. Germany: Scholars’ Press.
15. Sharan, S., & Sharan, Y. (1992). Group investigation: Expanding cooperative learning.
16. New York: Teacher’s College Press. Slavin, R. E. (1991). Group rewards make groupwork. Educational Leadership, 5: 89–
17. Stevens, R. J., Madden, N. A., Slavin, R. E. & Farnish, A. M., (1987). Cooperative integrated reading and composition: Two field experiments. Reading Research Quarterly, 22:433-454.
18. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Turkish Abstract