EFL Teachers’ Perceptions, Evaluations and Expectations about English Language Courses as EFL in Saudi Universities

Abstract

The focus of this study is to explore EFL teachers’ perceptions, evaluations and expectations about English language courses as EFL in Saudi tertiary level. In other words, this article aims at creating a new avenue for effective EFL teaching- learning curriculum techniques and syllabus in the Saudi tertiary context. Saudi universities offer credit and non-credit Foundation English courses as a part of their program, which are not being very effective. These courses do not promote the students in dealing with their disciplines or programs oriented courses. Even after completion of the Foundation English courses in consecutive two or three semesters, students fail to grasp comprehensive control over the reading materials of their discipline-oriented courses. This is a common scenario in almost all the universities in KSA. The author of this paper ventured to study the predicament of EFL courses in some universities through survey questionnaires, observation as well as primary and secondary sources. The data were collected through questionnaires from a total of 25 EFL teachers at renowned Saudi universities. The research results revealed that the existing Foundation English Course syllabus is not tailored appropriately to the needs of the students so far as the higher studies concerned, and EFL classroom is not conducive to task-based language teaching (TBLT) practice due to large class size . It, therefore, suggests that university Foundation English Courses should be redesigned in assimilating the learners’ standard and previous learning, and course contents should cover the socio-cultural factors of the learners. The study also concludes with some effective implications and recommendations based on the findings of the present research

Keywords

• Perception, Attitude, Socio-cultural milieu, EFL courses, Motivation

EFL Teachers’ Perceptions, Evaluations and Expectations about English Language Courses as EFL in Saudi Universities

Abstract

-

Keywords

• -

References

1. Al- Nofaile, H. (2010). The Attitude of Teachers and Students towards using Arabic in
2. EFL Classrooms in Saudi Public Schools. Novitas-ROYAL Research on Youth and Language , 4 (1), 64-95. Al-Ahaydib, M. E. (1986). Teaching English as a foreign language in the intermediate and secondary schools of Saudi Arabia: diagnostic study. PhD thesis. Kansas: University of Kansas.
3. Al-Mekhlafi, A. M., & Nagaratnam, R. P. (2011). Difficulties in Teaching and Learning
4. Grammar in an EFL Context. Journal of International Instruction , 04 (02), 69-92. Atari, O. (A.H. 1418/1998). EFL Teachers’ Perceptions of Writing Quality and Holistic
5. Evaluations. Journal of King Saud University , 10 (Lang. & Transl.), 49-59. Bacon, S., & Finneman, M. (1990). A study of attitudes, motives, and strategies of university foreign language students and their disposition to authentic oral and written input. The Modern Language Journal , 74 (4), 459-473.
6. Berardo, S. (2006). The use of authentic materials in the teaching of reading. The Reading Matrix , 6 (2), 60-69.
7. Brown, J., & Eskenazi, M. (2004). Retrieval of authentic documents for reader-specific lexical practice. In Proceedings of InSTIL/ICALL Symposium. Venice, Italy.
8. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed

9. Approaches (Second Revised ed.). London: Sage Publications Ltd. Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing Your Coursebook. Heinemann.
10. Dwaik, R., & Shehadeh, A. (2010). Motivation Types among EFL College Students: Insights from the Palestinian context. An-Najah University Journal of Research (Humanities) , 24 (1), 333-360.
11. Hajailan, T. A. (2003). Teaching English in Saudi Arabia (1424-2003 ed.). Riyadh: Aldar Alsawlatia.
12. Jarf, R. A. (2008). The Impact of English as an Internattional Language (EIL) upon
13. Arabic in Saudi Arabia.Asian EFL Journal. Retrieved December 27, 2009, from http://www.asian-esl-journal.com/December_08home.php.
14. Lee, W. (1995). Authenticity revisited: text authenticity and learner authenticity. ELT Journal , 49 (4), 323-328.
15. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2006). Designing Qualitative Research. London: Sage
16. Publications Ltd. (Inc 1st pub. 1989).
17. Mishan, F. (2005). Designing authenticity into language learning materials. Bristol: Intelect Ltd.
18. Moskovsky, C., & Alrabai, F. (2009). Intrinsic Motivation in Saudi Learners of English as a Foreign Language. The Open Applied Linguistic Journal , 2, 1-10.
19. Ng, C., & Tang, E. (n.d.). Teachers’ Needs in the Process of EFL reform in China- A Report from Shanghai. Retrieved November 8, 2011, from http://www.mendeley.com/research/teachers-needs-process-efl-reform-china-reportshanghai/
20. Noon-ura, S. (2008). Teaching Listening Speaking Skills to Thai Students with Low
21. English Proficiency. Retrieved October 26, 2011, from Asian EFL Journal: http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/December 08 home.php
22. Team, C. E. (1999). College English Teaching Syllabus (For regular college students).
23. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press & Higher Education Press. Weirsma, W. (1995). Research Methods in Education: An Introduction (6th ed.).
24. Needham Heigths, MA: Simon & Schuster.