Teaching Teachers to Teach Together Between High Schools

Abstract

The proliferation of Internet-based networks linking small schools in rural communities in some countries challenges the appropriateness of teaching exclusively in the closed environments of traditional classrooms. The development of Internet-based school networks, facilitating the creation of virtual classes, has implications for the professional education of teachers who will, it is argued in this article, increasingly teach both face-to-face and on-line, or virtually and actually. Internet-based networks of schools provide opportunities for teachers to collaborate with their colleagues in the open learning spaces between sites that are academically and administratively linked. This paper outlines four ways in which pre-service Canadian teachers are encouraged to collaborate in preparation for teaching together across dispersed sites

Keywords

• Cybercells, Rural, Triads, Virtual, Teaching Teachers, High Schools

Teaching Teachers to Teach Together Between High Schools

Abstract

-

Keywords

• -

References

1. Anderson, R.S. & Speck, B.W. (1998). Oh What A Difference A Team Makes: Why Team Teaching
2. Makes A Difference. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14 (7), 671-686. Barbour, M. & Mulcahy, D. (2005). The Role of Mediating Teachers in Newfoundland’s New Model of Distance Education. The Morning Watch, 32 (1-2) Fall. http://www.mun.ca/educ/faculty/mwatch/fall4/barbourmulcahy.htm
3. Bullough, R. V., Jr., Young, J., Erickson, L., Birrell, J. R., Clark, D. C., Egan, M. W., et al. (2002).
4. Rethinking field experience: Partnership teaching versus single-placement teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 68-80. Bullough, R. V., Young, J., Birrell, J.D., Clark, C.D., Egan, M.W., Erickson, L., Frankovich, M., Brunetti, J., & Welling, M. (2003). Teaching with a peer: A comparison of two models of student teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(1), 57-73.
5. Cavanaugh, C, (2001). The effectiveness of interactive distance education technologies in K-12 learning: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7 (1), 73-88.
6. Cochran-Smith, M. & Lytle, S.L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. In A. Iran-Hejad & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of Research in Education Vol. 24, (pp. 249-306). Washington DC, AERA.
7. Coffin, G. (2002). Mediating E-learning: M-teacher or M-team? Centre for Distance Learning and Innovation, Department of Education of Newfoundland and Labrador, St John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
8. Craig, B. & Stevens, K.J. (2011). The promise of high-speed learning networks for rural and inner-city communities. The International Journal of Learning 18 (1), 537-550.

9. Dunne, F., Nave, B. & Lewis, A. (2000). Critical friends groups: Teachers helping teachers to improve student learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 28, 9-12.
10. Eick, C. J., Ware, F. N., & Williams, P. G. (2003). Coteaching in a science methods course: A situated learning model of becoming a teacher. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(1), 74-85.
11. Ertl, H. and Plante, J. (2004). Connectivity and Learning in Canada’s Schools, Ottawa, Statistics
12. Canada, Government of Canada. Goodnough, K., Glassman, M., Pamela Osmond, P., Dibbon, D. & Stevens, K. (2009). Exploring a triad model of student teaching: Pre-service teacher and cooperating teacher perceptions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25 (2), 285 – 296.
13. Government of Newfoundland and Labrador. (2000). Supporting learning: Report on the ministerial panel on educational delivery in the classroom, St John’s, NL, Department of Education.
14. Griffin, D. and Sherrod, B. (2005). Technology use in rural high schools improves opportunity for student achievement. Southern Regional Education Board, Atlanta, GA. http://www.sreb.org/programs/EdTech/pubs/PDF/05T01-TechnologyUseinRuralHS/pdf
15. Hasbrouck, J. E. (1997). Mediated peer coaching for training preservice teachers. Journal of Special Education, 31(2), 251-271.
16. Hu, R., Caron, T., Deters, F., Moret, L. & Swaggerty, E.A. (2011). Teacher educators teaching and learning together: A collaborative self-study of support within an online literacy learning community.
17. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7 (1), 57-67. Kynaslahti, H. & Wager P. (1999). Changing roles of the teacher in inter-institutional networks of schools. European Journal of Open and Distance Learning, August, 1-8. http://kurs.nks.no/eurodl/eurodlen/index.html
18. Leavitt, M.C. (2006). Team teaching: Benefits and challenges. Newsletter - The Center for Learning and Teaching, Stanford University, 16(1), 1-4.
19. Morgan, R. L., Menlove, R., Salzberg, C. L., & Hudson, P. (1994). Effects of peer coaching on the acquisition of direct instruction skills by low-performing preservice teachers. Journal of Special Education, 28(1), 59-76.
20. Neubert, G. A., & McAllister, E. (1993). Peer coaching in preservice education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 20(4), 77-84.
21. Pierce, T., & Miller, S. P. (1994). Using peer coaching in preservice practica. Teacher Education and Special Education, 17(4), 215-223.
22. Roberts, R. (2009). Video conferencing in distance learning: A New Zealand schools’ perspective.
23. Journal of Distance Learning, 13(1), 91-107. Roth, W., & Tobin, K. (Eds). (2005). Teaching Together, Learning Together. New York: Peter Lang.
24. Sandalov, A., Sukhareva, N., Barry, M., Piper, T. & Stevens, K. (1999). The development of open models for teaching physics to schools in dispersed locations in Russia and Canada. In Valerio
25. Grementieri, Andras Szucs & Vladimir I. Trukhin (Eds.), Information and Communication Technologies and Human Resources Development: New Opportunities for European Co-operation (pp.148-154) European Distance Education Network, Budapest. Stefansdottir, L. (1993). The Icelandic educational network – Ismennt. In Davies, G. & Samways, B.
26. (Eds.), Teleteaching – Proceedings of the IFIP TC3 Third Teleteaching Conference (pp. 829-835. Amsterdam, Elsevier Science Publishers. Stevens, K.J. (2003). E-Learning and the development of open classes for rural students in Atlantic
27. Canada. In Jo Bradley (Ed) The Open Classroom – Distance Learning In and Out of Schools (pp. 149157). London & Sterling, VA: Kogan Page.
28. Stevens, K.J., Kynaslahti H. & Salminen J., (1996). Alustavia tuloksia koulujen verkottumisesta suomessa ja Uudessa Seelannissa (Some preliminary outcomes from networked casses in Finland and New Zealand). Julkaistavaksi suomen kasvatustieteelliessa aikakauskirjassa 'Kasvatuksessa.' Kasvatus The Finnish Journal of Education, 27 (2), 196 – 205.
29. Stevens, K.J. (2012). Two quadrants for the development of virtual environments to support collaboration between teachers. In Sagini Keengwe & Lydia Kyei-Blankson (Eds.), Virtual Mentoring for Teachers: Online Professional Development Practices (pp. 85-96). Hershey, PA & New York: IGIGlobal.
30. Stevens, K.J. (2011). A four-stage process to reposition small schools as sites within teaching and learning networks. In Siran Mukerji and Purnendu Tripathi (Eds.)., Cases on Innovation in Educational
31. Marketing – Transnational and Technological Strategies (pp. 149-159) Hershey, PA & New York: IGI-Global. Stevens, K.J. (2010). Three stages in the social construction of virtual learning environments. In
32. Bernhard Ertl (Ed). E-Collaborative Knowledge Construction: Learning from Computer-Supported and Virtual Networks (pp. 232-243). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. Stevens, K.J. & Moffatt, C. (2003). From distance education to teleLearning - The organization of open classes at local, regional and national levels. In Jo Bradley (Ed), The Open Classroom - Distance
33. Learning In and Out of Schools (pp. 171-180). London & Sterling, VA, Kogan Page. Stevens, K.J. & Stewart, D. (2005). Cybercells – Learning in Actual and Virtual Groups. Melbourne, Thomson-Dunmore Press.
34. Tobin, K., & Roth, W. M. (2005). Implementing coteaching and cogenerative dialoguing in urban science education. School Science & Mathematics, 105(6), 313-322.
35. Wentworth, J. & Davis, J.R. (2002). Enhancing interdisciplinarity through team teaching. In Carolyn
36. Hayes (Ed.), Innovations in Interdisciplinary Teaching (pp. 16-37). Westport, CT. The Oryx Press. Wynn, M., & Kromrey, J. (2000). Paired peer placement with peer coaching to enhance prospective teachers' professional growth in early field experience. Action in Teacher Education, 22(2A), 73-83.