Research Article

Investigating the contribution of the European Union Erasmus+ youth exchange project to foreign language learning

Volume: 7 Number: 1 April 8, 2021
  • Koray Cantez
  • Cihat Atar
EN

Investigating the contribution of the European Union Erasmus+ youth exchange project to foreign language learning

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the views of the participants of European Union Erasmus+ Youth Exchange project regarding its effect on foreign language motivation and speaking fluency development. Foreign language motivation and speaking are two significant aspects of learning English as a foreign language. There are some studies on the effects of Erasmus+ projects; however, there are very few studies on the effect of Erasmus+ Youth Exchange projects in the literature. Having a qualitative design, this study utilizes purposive sampling method, and participants are those who attended the Erasmus+ Youth Exchange projects implemented between 2014 and 2020. The data were collected via a standardized open-ended interview. The interviews were transcribed and qualitatively analyzed by Content Analysis method via MAXQDA 2018 Qualitative Data Analysis Software. The findings of the research revealed that according to the views of the participants, EU Erasmus+ Youth Exchange Project provided several benefits to participants in terms of improving foreign language level, and the project contributed to their English-speaking fluency and foreign language learning motivation. More specifically, points such as opportunities to do practice, negative comments on Turkish Education System, educational equality provided by Erasmus+ projects and follow-up activities carried out after projects were mentioned by the participants. These findings have implications for learning and teaching English as a foreign language.

Keywords

References

  1. Boyatzis, R. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic Analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  2. Brain, R., Fuhrman, N., & De Lay, A. (2009). Characterizing "Good" Teaching in Non-formal Settings. NACTA Journal, 53(3), 50-55.
  3. Coombs, P. & Ahmed, M (1974). Attacking rural poverty: How non-formal education can help. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  4. Cooper, J. L., & Robinson, P. (2000). The argument for making large classes seem small. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 81, 5-16.
  5. Coşkun, A. (2016). Causes of the "I Can Understand English but I Can't Speak" syndrome in Turkey. Journal on English Language Teaching, 6(3) 1-12.
  6. Csikzentmihalyi, M. (1997). Intrinsic motivation and effective teaching: A flow analysis. In J. L. Bess (Ed.). Teaching Well and Liking It: Motivating Faculty to Teach Effectively, (72-89). London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  7. Csizér, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (2005). Language learners’ motivational profiles and their motivated learning behaviour. Language Learning, 55(4), 613-659.
  8. Demirel, Ö. (1999). Öğretme sanatı. Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Linguistics

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Publication Date

April 8, 2021

Submission Date

October 13, 2020

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 7 Number: 1

APA
Cantez, K., & Atar, C. (2021). Investigating the contribution of the European Union Erasmus+ youth exchange project to foreign language learning. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 259-276. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.911281

Cited By