Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Year 2021, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 137 - 145, 22.12.2021

Abstract

References

  • Ulukardeşler A.H. & Ulusoy Y. 2012. 3. Nesil Biyoyakıt Teknolojisi olan Alglerin Türkiye de Üretilebilirlik Potansiyeli, Onuncu Ulusal Kimya Mühendisliği Kongresi, 3-6 Eylül 2012, Koç Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
  • Göçer S. & Zaimoğlu Z. 2018. Üçüncü ve dördüncü nesil biyoyakıtların araştırılması. Uluslararası GAP Yenilenebilir Enerji Ve Enerji Verimliliği Kongresi, 10-12 Mayıs 2018, pp: 71-75, Şanlıurfa, Türkiye. (Conference paper), GAP Yenilenebilir Enerji ve Enerji Verimliliği Merkezi (GAPYENEV-2018).
  • Avcıoğlu A.O., Türker U., Atasoy Z.D.& Koçtürk D. 2011. Tarımsal Kökenli Yenilenebilir Enerjiler-Biyoyakıtlar, Nobel Yayıncılık, Ankara.
  • Naik S.N., Goud V.V., Rout P.K. & Dalai A.K. 2010. Production of first and second generation biofuels: A comprehensive review, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14, 578-597.
  • IEA, 2010. Sustainable Production of second-generation Biofuels: Potential and perspectives in major economies and developing countries. https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/second_generation_biofuels.pdf / (accessed 20 September 2021)
  • Navigant Research (2014) Biofuels demand for road transportation will surpass 51 billion gallons annually by 2022. https://www.navigantresearch.com/newsroom/ biofuels-demand-for-road-transportation-will-surpass-51-billion-gallons-annually-by-2022/ (accessed 15 September 2021)
  • UNCTAD, 2015. Second generation biofuel markets: State of play, trade and developing country perspectives. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). UNCTAD/DITC/TED/2015/8, United Nations Publication.
  • Mofijur M., Siddiki Y.A., Shuvho B.A., Djavanroodi F., Rizwanul Fattah I.M., Ong H.C., Chowdhury M.A. & Mahlia, T.M.I. 2021. Effect of nanocatalysts on the transesterification reaction of first, second and third generation biodiesel sources- A mini-review, Chemosphere 270, 128642.
  • Gardy J., Rehan M., Hassanpour A., Lai X. & Nizami, A.S. 2019. Advances in nanocatalysts based biodiesel production from non-food feedstocks, J. Environ. Manag. 249, 109316.
  • USDA 2020. Statistical data of USDA. Retrieved from: https://usda.library. cornell.edu/concern/publications/ tx31qh68h? locale=en./ (accessed 2 October 2021)
  • TÜİK 2019. Statistical data of TUIK. Retrieved from: https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/ medas/?kn=104&locale=tr./ (accessed 2 October 2021)
  • TÜİK 2020. Statistical data of FAO. Retrieved from:https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/ medas/?kn=92&locale=tr./ (accessed 2 October 2021)
  • Irabien A. & Darton R.C. 2016. Energy–water–food nexus in the spanish greenhouse tomato production, Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 18 (5), 1307–1316.
  • Hasan A.H. & Avami A. 2018. Water and emissions nexus for biodiesel in Iran. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 93 (5), 354–363.
  • Yılmaz A., Yılmaz H., Arslan Y., Çiftçi V. & Baloch F.S. 2021. Ülkemizde Alternatif Yağ Bitkilerinin Durumu, Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, Özel Sayı 22, 93-100.
  • Gizlenci Ş., Acar M. & Şahin M. 2012. Türkiye’de yenilenebilir enerji kaynaklarının (Biyodizel, biyoetanol ve biyokütle) projeksiyonu, Tarım Makinaları Bilimi Dergisi, 8(3), 337-344.
  • Bayramin S. 2006. Aspir (Carthamus tinctoriusL.) / Kolza (Brassica napusspp. oleifera L.) Tarımı ve Islahı, Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi,15(1-2), 74-85.
  • Yıldırım M. 2005. Seçilmiş alternatif keten (Linum usitatissimumL.) hatlarının verimve verim öğeleri bakımından karşılaştırılması. Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara. FAO 2014b. Crop Yield. FAOSTAT, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data./ (accessed 25 September 2021).
  • Chong C.T., Loe T.Y., Wong K.Y., Ashokkumar V., Lam S.S, Chong W.T., Borrion A., Tian B. & Han N.G.J. 2021. Biodiesel sustainability: The global impact of potential biodiesel production on the energy–water–food (EWF) nexus, Environmental Technology & Innovation, 22, 101408.
  • USDA 2017. Foreign Agricultural Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Gain Report. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/report/ (accessed 22 September 2021)
  • Johnston M. & Holloway T. 2007. Policy analysis a global comparison of national biodiesel production potentials, Environ. Sci. Technol, 41 (23), 7967–7973.
  • Agarwal A.K. 2007. Biofuels (alcohols and biodiesel) applications as fuels for internal combustion engines, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci, 33(3), 233–271.
  • Altın R., Cetinkaya S. & Yücesu H. 2001. Potential of using vegetable oil fuels as fuel for diesel engines, Energy Convers. Manage, 42, 529–538.
  • Karmakar A., Karmakar S. & Mukherjee S. 2010. Properties of various plants and animals feedstocks for biodiesel productio, Bioresour. Technol, 101(19), 7201-7210.

Determination of the Amount of Land Area Required for Alternative Second-generation Feedstock to Replace First-generation Feedstock in Biodiesel Production in Turkey

Year 2021, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 137 - 145, 22.12.2021

Abstract

In this study, the amount of land area required for the replacement of sunflower and cottonseed plants, which are used as the first-generation feedstock source in the biodiesel production sector, which has the highest growing area as an oil plant in our country, with the second-generation vegetable oil feedstock was calculated. Safflower and rapeseed plants were selected as the second-generation vegetable oil feedstocks source. In this way, the required amount of land area and the amount of land saved to provide the same total potential biodiesel volume using second-generation feedstocks in the production sector has been determined. With the increase in the use of second-generation feedstock in biodiesel production, it is expected that land area use will be saved, our oil imports will decrease, and the pressure on the food sector will alleviation.

References

  • Ulukardeşler A.H. & Ulusoy Y. 2012. 3. Nesil Biyoyakıt Teknolojisi olan Alglerin Türkiye de Üretilebilirlik Potansiyeli, Onuncu Ulusal Kimya Mühendisliği Kongresi, 3-6 Eylül 2012, Koç Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
  • Göçer S. & Zaimoğlu Z. 2018. Üçüncü ve dördüncü nesil biyoyakıtların araştırılması. Uluslararası GAP Yenilenebilir Enerji Ve Enerji Verimliliği Kongresi, 10-12 Mayıs 2018, pp: 71-75, Şanlıurfa, Türkiye. (Conference paper), GAP Yenilenebilir Enerji ve Enerji Verimliliği Merkezi (GAPYENEV-2018).
  • Avcıoğlu A.O., Türker U., Atasoy Z.D.& Koçtürk D. 2011. Tarımsal Kökenli Yenilenebilir Enerjiler-Biyoyakıtlar, Nobel Yayıncılık, Ankara.
  • Naik S.N., Goud V.V., Rout P.K. & Dalai A.K. 2010. Production of first and second generation biofuels: A comprehensive review, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14, 578-597.
  • IEA, 2010. Sustainable Production of second-generation Biofuels: Potential and perspectives in major economies and developing countries. https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/second_generation_biofuels.pdf / (accessed 20 September 2021)
  • Navigant Research (2014) Biofuels demand for road transportation will surpass 51 billion gallons annually by 2022. https://www.navigantresearch.com/newsroom/ biofuels-demand-for-road-transportation-will-surpass-51-billion-gallons-annually-by-2022/ (accessed 15 September 2021)
  • UNCTAD, 2015. Second generation biofuel markets: State of play, trade and developing country perspectives. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). UNCTAD/DITC/TED/2015/8, United Nations Publication.
  • Mofijur M., Siddiki Y.A., Shuvho B.A., Djavanroodi F., Rizwanul Fattah I.M., Ong H.C., Chowdhury M.A. & Mahlia, T.M.I. 2021. Effect of nanocatalysts on the transesterification reaction of first, second and third generation biodiesel sources- A mini-review, Chemosphere 270, 128642.
  • Gardy J., Rehan M., Hassanpour A., Lai X. & Nizami, A.S. 2019. Advances in nanocatalysts based biodiesel production from non-food feedstocks, J. Environ. Manag. 249, 109316.
  • USDA 2020. Statistical data of USDA. Retrieved from: https://usda.library. cornell.edu/concern/publications/ tx31qh68h? locale=en./ (accessed 2 October 2021)
  • TÜİK 2019. Statistical data of TUIK. Retrieved from: https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/ medas/?kn=104&locale=tr./ (accessed 2 October 2021)
  • TÜİK 2020. Statistical data of FAO. Retrieved from:https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/ medas/?kn=92&locale=tr./ (accessed 2 October 2021)
  • Irabien A. & Darton R.C. 2016. Energy–water–food nexus in the spanish greenhouse tomato production, Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 18 (5), 1307–1316.
  • Hasan A.H. & Avami A. 2018. Water and emissions nexus for biodiesel in Iran. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 93 (5), 354–363.
  • Yılmaz A., Yılmaz H., Arslan Y., Çiftçi V. & Baloch F.S. 2021. Ülkemizde Alternatif Yağ Bitkilerinin Durumu, Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, Özel Sayı 22, 93-100.
  • Gizlenci Ş., Acar M. & Şahin M. 2012. Türkiye’de yenilenebilir enerji kaynaklarının (Biyodizel, biyoetanol ve biyokütle) projeksiyonu, Tarım Makinaları Bilimi Dergisi, 8(3), 337-344.
  • Bayramin S. 2006. Aspir (Carthamus tinctoriusL.) / Kolza (Brassica napusspp. oleifera L.) Tarımı ve Islahı, Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi,15(1-2), 74-85.
  • Yıldırım M. 2005. Seçilmiş alternatif keten (Linum usitatissimumL.) hatlarının verimve verim öğeleri bakımından karşılaştırılması. Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara. FAO 2014b. Crop Yield. FAOSTAT, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data./ (accessed 25 September 2021).
  • Chong C.T., Loe T.Y., Wong K.Y., Ashokkumar V., Lam S.S, Chong W.T., Borrion A., Tian B. & Han N.G.J. 2021. Biodiesel sustainability: The global impact of potential biodiesel production on the energy–water–food (EWF) nexus, Environmental Technology & Innovation, 22, 101408.
  • USDA 2017. Foreign Agricultural Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Gain Report. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/report/ (accessed 22 September 2021)
  • Johnston M. & Holloway T. 2007. Policy analysis a global comparison of national biodiesel production potentials, Environ. Sci. Technol, 41 (23), 7967–7973.
  • Agarwal A.K. 2007. Biofuels (alcohols and biodiesel) applications as fuels for internal combustion engines, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci, 33(3), 233–271.
  • Altın R., Cetinkaya S. & Yücesu H. 2001. Potential of using vegetable oil fuels as fuel for diesel engines, Energy Convers. Manage, 42, 529–538.
  • Karmakar A., Karmakar S. & Mukherjee S. 2010. Properties of various plants and animals feedstocks for biodiesel productio, Bioresour. Technol, 101(19), 7201-7210.
There are 24 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Agricultural Engineering
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Hülya Karabaş

Publication Date December 22, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2021 Volume: 5 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Karabaş, H. (2021). Determination of the Amount of Land Area Required for Alternative Second-generation Feedstock to Replace First-generation Feedstock in Biodiesel Production in Turkey. Eurasian Journal of Agricultural Research, 5(2), 137-145.
AMA Karabaş H. Determination of the Amount of Land Area Required for Alternative Second-generation Feedstock to Replace First-generation Feedstock in Biodiesel Production in Turkey. EJAR. December 2021;5(2):137-145.
Chicago Karabaş, Hülya. “Determination of the Amount of Land Area Required for Alternative Second-Generation Feedstock to Replace First-Generation Feedstock in Biodiesel Production in Turkey”. Eurasian Journal of Agricultural Research 5, no. 2 (December 2021): 137-45.
EndNote Karabaş H (December 1, 2021) Determination of the Amount of Land Area Required for Alternative Second-generation Feedstock to Replace First-generation Feedstock in Biodiesel Production in Turkey. Eurasian Journal of Agricultural Research 5 2 137–145.
IEEE H. Karabaş, “Determination of the Amount of Land Area Required for Alternative Second-generation Feedstock to Replace First-generation Feedstock in Biodiesel Production in Turkey”, EJAR, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 137–145, 2021.
ISNAD Karabaş, Hülya. “Determination of the Amount of Land Area Required for Alternative Second-Generation Feedstock to Replace First-Generation Feedstock in Biodiesel Production in Turkey”. Eurasian Journal of Agricultural Research 5/2 (December2021), 137-145.
JAMA Karabaş H. Determination of the Amount of Land Area Required for Alternative Second-generation Feedstock to Replace First-generation Feedstock in Biodiesel Production in Turkey. EJAR. 2021;5:137–145.
MLA Karabaş, Hülya. “Determination of the Amount of Land Area Required for Alternative Second-Generation Feedstock to Replace First-Generation Feedstock in Biodiesel Production in Turkey”. Eurasian Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 5, no. 2, 2021, pp. 137-45.
Vancouver Karabaş H. Determination of the Amount of Land Area Required for Alternative Second-generation Feedstock to Replace First-generation Feedstock in Biodiesel Production in Turkey. EJAR. 2021;5(2):137-45.
Eurasian Journal of Agricultural Research (EJAR)   ISSN: 2636-8226   Web: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ejar   e-mail: agriculturalresearchjournal@gmail.com