Effects of Dimensions of Tire Waste Cushion on Seismic Performance of Retaining Wall

Abstract

Geotechnical structures such as retaining walls are key elements of ports and harbors, transportation system lifelines, and other infrastructural facilities. These structures suffer excessive deformations or damages resulting from the increased earth pressure during the earthquakes. Inclusion of vertical compressible layers called as cushion layer can be a solution to increase the stability of the retaining structures in seismic regions. In the literature, two different compressible materials as geofoam and tire wastes-sand mixtures are studied to mitigate earthquake-induced dynamic earth pressures against rigid walls. This study proposes a seismic cushion material as tire crumb-sand mixture in decreasing structural hazard of retaining wall during earthquake loadings. Previous researches showed that the cushion thickness plays an important role on the seismic performance of retaining structures. The aim of this study is to determine the optimum seismic cushion thickness/height ratio (t/H) to increase the seismic performance of the wall. Both wall height and cushion thicknesses vary to achieve the desired cushion dimensions. A typical retaining wall with a tire waste-sand cushion is modelled by a finite element program called PLAXIS. This paper presents a series of numerical simulations to investigate the effects of dimensions of compressible tire waste-sand cushion to attenuate dynamic loads against rigid retaining walls. In addition, this research is an attempt towards developing an environmentally friendly earthquake resistant technique that has a reasonably good balance of cost and performance for improving the seismic performance of retaining structures. 

Keywords

• Retaining wall,seismic performance,tire crumb-sand mixtures,cushion,earthquake

References

1. Bathurst, R.J., Zarnani, S. & Gaskin A. 2007. Shaking table testing of geofoam seismic buffers. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 27(4), 324–332. Cagatay, A. 2008. Investigation of the effect of tire waste inclusions on the shear strength parameters of sand, MSc Thesis, Boğaziçi University (in English).
2. Edinçliler, A. & Toksoy Y.S. 2014. Investigation on Effects of Tire Crumb Cushion on Seismic Performance of Retaining Wall. TC207 Soil Structure Interaction and Retaining Walls, 16-18 June, St. Petersburg, Russia.
3. Edinçliler, A. & Toksoy Y.S. 2017. Effects of Ground Motion Characteristics on the Seismic Performance of Retaining Walls with Tire Waste Cushion. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 16WCEE 2017 Santiago Chile.
4. Edincliler, A. 2008. Using waste tire–soil mixtures for embankment construction. In: International Workshop on Scrap Tire Derived Geomaterials ‘‘Opportunities and Challenges”. Kanto Branch of Japanese Geotechnical Society, 319–328.
5. Edinçliler, A., Baykal, G., & Saygılı A. 2010. Influence of different processing techniques on the mechanical properties of used tires in embankment construction. Waste Management, 30, 1073–1080.
6. Hazarika, H., Kohama, E., & Sugano T. 2008. Shaking Table Tests on Waterfront Structures Protected with Tire Chips Cushion, Journal of Geotechnical and Environmental Engineering, ASCE, 134-11.
7. Hazarika, H., Okuzono, S., & Matsuo Y. 2003. Seismic stability enhancement of rigid nonyielding structures. In: Proceedings of the 13th (2003) International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Honolulu, HI, USA, 25–30 May 2003, 1244–1249.
8. Horvath, J.S. 1997. Compressible inclusion function of EPS geofoam. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 15(1-3), 77–120.

9. Karpurapu, R. & Bathurst R.J. 1992. Numerical investigation of controlled yielding of soil-retaining wall structures. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 11, 115–31.
10. Partos, A.M. & Kazaniwsky P.M. 1987. Geoboard reduces lateral earth pressures. In: Proceedings of Geosynthetics’87, Industrial Fabrics Association International. New Orleans, LA, USA, 628–39.
11. Pierce, C.E. & Blackwell M.C. 2003. Potential of scrap tire rubber as lightweight aggregate in flowable fill. Waste Management, 23, 197–208.
12. Ravichandran, N. & Huggins L. 2014. Applicability of Shredded Tire Chips as a Light Weight Retaining Wall Backfill in Seismic Regions. Geo-Congress 2014, 3336-3505.
13. Yildiz, O. 2012. Investigation on the mitigation of earthquake hazards with inclusion of tire wastes into the sand. M.Sc. Dissertation, Boğaziçi University, Istanbul, Turkey.
14. Zarnani, S., & Bathurst R.J. 2008. Numerical Modelling of EPS Seismic Buffer Shaking Table Tests. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 26, 371– 383.
15. Zarnani, S., & Bathurst R.J. 2007. Experimental investigation of EPS geofoam seismic buffers using shaking table tests. Geosynthetics International, 14(3), 165–177.
16. Zarnani, S., Bathurst, R.J. & Gaskin A. 2005. Experimental investigation of geofoam seismic buffers using a shaking table. In: Proceedings of the North American Geosynthetics Society (NAGS)/GRI19 Conference, Las Vegas, NV, USA.