Developing Professional Competence through Assessment: Constructivist and Reflective Practice in Teacher-Training

Year 2014, , 45 - 66, 29.07.2015

John Lalor Francesca Lorenzı Justin Ramı

https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2015.58.6

Abstract

Problem Statement: Traditional forms of assessment such as essays and end of term examinations are still widely used in higher education in Ireland as the sole assessment method. These forms of assessment, while they may be valid and reliable approaches for collecting evidence of the acquisition of theoretical knowledge, rarely afford students the opportunity to apply knowledge to key professional scenarios. In the context of teacher education, if the aim is to develop teacher competence beyond the mere possession of technical skills then appropriate pedagogic and curriculum interventions need to be developed, implemented and evaluated.

Purpose of Study: This paper argues that reflection and experiential learning should be infused through effective assessment strategies and embedded in the training and formation of trainee-teacher attributes. The authors draw on their experience as lecturers and module/course designers for an ‘Assessment’ module within a teacher-training degree programme in a School of Education in the Republic of Ireland.

Keywords

Teacher Training; Assessment; Reflection; Experientiallearning; Competences

References

• Arter J. A. & Spandell, V. (1992). Using portfolios of student work in instruction and assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 11 (1) 3-44.
• Ball, D. L. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. The Elementary School Journal 93, 373-397.
• Biggs, J. (1999). What the student does: Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: Open University Press.
• Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (1998). Assessment by portfolio: Constructing learning and designing teaching. In P. Stimpson, & P. Morris (Eds.), Curriculum and Assessment for Hong Kong: Two components, one system (pp. 443-462). Hong Kong: Open University of Hong Kong Press.
• Bouchard, T. J., Jr. (1976). Unobtrusive measures: An Inventory of uses. Sociological Methods and Research, (4), 267-300.
• Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable Assessment: rethinking assessment for the learning society. Professional Education, 22 (2), 151-167.
• Cannella, G. S., & Reiff, J. C. (1994). Individual constructivist teacher education: Teachers as empowered learners. Teacher Education Quarterly, 21(3), 498-429.
• Creswell, J. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
• Darlington, Y. & Scott, D. (2002). Qualitative Research in Practice: Stories from the field. Australia: Allen and Unwin.
• Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Denzin, N. K. (1989). Interpretive interactionism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education. An introduction to the philosophy of education (1966 edn.). New York: Free Press.
• Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. New York: Collier Books.
• Freire, P. (1970). Cultural action for freedom. The Harvard educational review. Monograph series, no. 1. Massachusetts: Cambridge.
• Gardner, F. (2009). Affirming values: using critical reflection to explore meaning and professional practice. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 10 (2) 179-190
• Glaser, B.G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
• Hickson, H. (2011). Critical reflection: reflecting on learning to be reflective. Reflective Practice, 12 (6), 829-839.
• Janssen-Noordman, A., Merrienboer, J., Van Der Vleuten, C. & Scherpbier, A. (2006). Design of integrated practice for learning professional competences. Medical Teacher, 28 (5), 447-452.
• Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 602–611.
• Lane, R., McMaster., Adnum, J, & Cavanagh, M. (2014). Quality reflective practice in teacher education: a journey towards shared understanding. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 15:4, 481-494.
• Larrivee, B. (2000). Transforming teaching practice: becoming the critically reflective teacher. Reflective Practice, 1 (3), 293-307.
• Lemaitre, D., Le Prat, R. De Graaf, E. & Bot L. (2006). Editorial: Focusing on competence. European Journal Education 31 (1), 45 -53.
• Lyotard, J. (1992). The Post-modern Condition: A Report on knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
• Mason, J. (2006). Mixing Methods in a Qualitatively-Driven Way. Qualitative Research, Vol. 6, No. 1, 9-26.
• Noddings, N. (2004). “Is teaching a practice?” In Education and Practice. Upholding the Integrity of Teaching and Learning (pp. 159-170). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing
• Pennel, W.R., Fishman, B. J. Yamaguchi, R. & Gallagher, L. P. (2007). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44 (4), 921-958.
• Piaget, J. (1972). Psychology and Epistemology: Towards a Theory of Knowledge. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
• Regehr, G. & Norman, G. R. (1996). Issues in cognitive psychology: implications for professional education. Academic Medicine 71 (9), 988-1001.
• Ritchie, J. & Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In A. Bryman, & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Analyzing qualitative data (pp.173- 194). London: Routledge.
• Schön, D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: how professionals think in action. London: Temple Smith.
• Srivastava, A. & Thomson, S. B. (2009). Framework Analysis: A Qualitative Methodology for Applied Policy Research. JOAAG, Vol. 4. No. 2.
• Tashakorri, A. & Teddlie, C. (2003c). Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (Eds). (1998). Mixed methodology: combining the qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage PublicationsThrelfall, S.J., (2014). E-journals: towards critical and independent reflective practice for students in higher education. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 15:3 pp.317-332.
• Threlfall, S. J., (2014). E-journals: towards critical and independent reflective practice for students in higher education. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 15:3, 317-332.
• Tisani, N. (2008). Challenges in producing a portfolio for assessment: in search of underpinning educational theories. Teaching in Higher Education, 13 (5), 549-557.
• Van Huizen, P., Van Oers B. & Wubbels T. (2005). A Vygotskian perspective on teacher education. Curriculum Studies, 37 (3), 267-290.